» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 146 | | 53 members and 93 guests | | austinww, Backwoods Presbyterian, bisonrancher, CalvinandHodges, Casey, cecat90, christabella_warren, Christusregnat, CredoFidoSpero, Curt, Damaged Goods, Daniel Haley, David, Dr. Bob Gonzales, duncan001, Dwimble, EricP, gene_mingo, glorifyinggodinwv, Grillsy, Hippo, JOwen, Karnes, Kevin, Knight, KSon, Micah Everett, Mindaboo, MMasztal, msortwell, NateLanning, Puritan Sailor, Re4mdant, ReadBavinck, Reformed Thomist, Richard Tallach, Ruby, sastark, smhbbag, Southern Presbyterian, TimV, uberkermit, VictorBravo, Wayne, William Price, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
01-10-2009, 04:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Hankamer, TX
Posts: 771
Thanks: 94
Thanked 151 Times in 100 Posts
| | | James Stuart Russell the heretic
I listened to a sermon by Barry Horner last night and he called James Stuart Russell a heretic.
I never finished Parousia, but I am curious if you think the same of Russell?
If Russell is a heretic, are all hyper preterists heretical?
If so, why?
__________________
Boliver
Future Chaplain
EPC
Hankamer, TX
| 
01-10-2009, 04:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 179
Thanked 618 Times in 358 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaplainintraining I listened to a sermon by Barry Horner last night and he called James Stuart Russell a heretic.
I never finished Parousia, but I am curious if you think the same of Russell?
If Russell is a heretic, are all hyper preterists heretical?
If so, why? | The key problem is a denial of a future physical resurrection.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England
"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
| 
01-10-2009, 04:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,478
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 450 Times in 276 Posts
| | |
Yoda would say it this way, "Heretic he is"
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY Member of Franklin Square OPC
Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
| 
01-10-2009, 05:11 PM
|  | Megerator | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,725
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 954 Times in 795 Posts
| | |
I thought you meant Charles Taze Russell for a minute. He was a heretic.
| 
01-10-2009, 05:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
| | | One potential take on the issue...
John Noe's book, "The Apocalypse Conspiracy: Why the World May Not End As Soon As You Think and What You Should Be Doing in the Meantime" points out that the Greek text in the NT passage that mentions Jesus going back up into the sky, and the angels saying that Jesus will return in like manner, CAN be literally interpreted from the Greek, as meaning..(to paraphrase), that "Jesus comes and goes in the manner you have just seen". That concept coupled with the idea throughout Scripture that coming on "clouds" means coming with "Judgement", (an idea shared by most Partial Preterists), could shed a much different light on the Biblical "evidence" for a physical 2nd Coming of Jesus.
I am NOT saying I agree with Noe's book or premise, but just saying it is a literal Greek reading possibility.
So in dealing with this issue, one must carefully examine the literal Greek meanings of the key passages that appear to point to a physical 2nd Coming of Jesus.
__________________
Roy
PCA
Orlando, Florida
| 
01-10-2009, 06:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 1,405
Thanks: 204
Thanked 205 Times in 135 Posts
| | |
I read his book, or at least most of it, last year when I was studying the book of Revelation mostly because I noticed that anyone who knows much about end times has read the book. It is a good synopsis of preterism and an early dating of the book of Revelation. But he does go to far in certain areas being a full preterist and believing that all of what was spoken of by Jesus was fulfilled by 70 A.D. including the resurrection and Second Coming. But if you can read it knowing this and are not going to be taken in by it it is worth the read.
| 
01-10-2009, 07:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by shackleton I read his book, or at least most of it, last year when I was studying the book of Revelation mostly because I noticed that anyone who knows much about end times has read the book. It is a good synopsis of preterism and an early dating of the book of Revelation. But he does go to far in certain areas being a full preterist and believing that all of what was spoken of by Jesus was fulfilled by 70 A.D. including the resurrection and Second Coming. But if you can read it knowing this and are not going to be taken in by it it is worth the read. | Very true...
I got my copy of Noe's book believe it or not, at the RTS (Reformed Theological Seminary) Orlando, back when it was at its old location in Maitland, Florida. It was at their book store there. I talked to the at the time book store manager about the book, and he said he ordered it to have something "controversial" to stir up some debate about the issues. It is indeed that....
| 
01-10-2009, 08:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 179
Thanked 618 Times in 358 Posts
| | |
A future bodily resurection is also universally proclaimed by the major Catholic creeds, any denial of this tenant is almost by definition heretical. I Corinthians 15 is fairly clear on the matter and even if someone can come up with some clever argument the Creeds leave no doubt that such arguments are heretical. The Apostles Creed
I believe in the Holy Spirit, the holy *catholic church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body,
and life everlasting. The Nicene Creed
And I believe one holy catholic and apostolic Church. I acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen. The Athanasian Creed
He ascended into heaven, He sitteth on the right hand of the Father, God Almighty; From thence He shall come to judge the living and the dead. At whose coming all men shall rise again with their bodies; And shall give account of their own works.
Of course our own confessions are also clear on this subject as well (WCF Chapter XXXII).
II. At the last day, such as are found alive shall not die, but be changed: and all the dead shall be raised up with the self-same bodies, and none other, although with different qualities, which shall be united again to their souls forever.
Hyper preterism is really just another form of Gnostisism and should be treated as such,
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |