» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 65 | | 12 members and 53 guests | | AltogetherLovely, Chippy, christabella_warren, David, Pergamum, RTaron, satz, Timothy William, TSL316, WAWICRUZ | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-01-2009, 05:53 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | | Is Christian Zionism kosha from a reformed perspective?
We had missionaries at our church today speaking about there mission work with Israel.
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
Their work is primarily focused on helping them return.
They were selling books which revealed they were coming from a Zionism perspective. (They were selling David Pawsons book).
Is Zionism biblically sound?
I find it difficult to suss out where some Israel focused groups are coming from in their soteriology at times. Hence the question.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." John Calvin
John from Scotland
Denomination: Attending Baptist church
Confessional Subscription:London Baptist Confession
Blog: [url]www.three-streams.co.uk[/url]
| 
03-01-2009, 06:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 179
Thanked 617 Times in 358 Posts
| | |
I would say that if their work is centered on converting Jews to be members of the Catholic Church (not the Roman one) then fine, if not (be it to a distinct Jewish church or to remain practicing Jews) then it is not acceptable.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England
"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post: | | 
03-01-2009, 06:06 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo I would say that if their work is centered on converting Jews to be members of the Catholic Church (not the Roman one) then fine, if not (be it to a distinct Jewish church or to remain practicing Jews) then it is not acceptable. | I'm not sure their work is focused on evangelism at all. (I find very few missionary organisations are these days).
Their work seems to be focused on helping the Jews return to Israel because the believe God is calling the Jews back to Israel for His end time purposes.
That is all I really heard them say today.
| 
03-01-2009, 06:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,249
Thanks: 179
Thanked 617 Times in 358 Posts
| | |
The Church is tasked with proclaiming the Gospel, not with ticking boxes to encourage the second coming which I am sure God can handle all by himself.
This all smacks of dispensationalism and I can only imagine how Stephan (Acts 7) would have reacted to this kind of thing.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post: | | 
03-01-2009, 06:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,476
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 2,416 Times in 1,142 Posts
| | |
Let us call it what it is. Childish and stupid.
I remember as a teenager a group of Australians who were arrested for trying to blow up the Dome of the Rock so a Jewish Temple could be built in it's place to hasten the End of Days.
In principle, how is what these people are doing different? 120,000 Palestinian Christians reduced to second class citizens in the land where they've lived for centuries, just to bring about what some fevered minds have decided is necessary for Christ to come again?
I was thinking about starting a "what sermon did you hear today" thread, since ours was on that exact topic. Pastor Martin quoted Luther. When asked if he knew the end of the world was tomorrow, what would he do. He said he'd plant an apple tree. Apple trees take a couple year to bear. The idea is that you live your life and fulfil your duties at all times. Since you don't know when the Lord will come again, you fight the fight without letting up, presuming that you could die at any minute.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
03-01-2009, 08:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 5,477
Thanks: 2,033
Thanked 450 Times in 276 Posts
| | |
Christian Zionism is heresy.
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY Member of Franklin Square OPC
Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Anton Bruckner For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 04:48 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton Bruckner Christian Zionism is heresy. | Hmmm, would you like to unfold that a bit? -----Added 3/2/2009 at 04:48:06 EST-----
Here is a link to the missionary organisations website FAQ section. Operation Exodus - Country Selector
Let me know what you think once you read it.
also, here is a quote from it Quote: Does Ebenezer evangelise the Jewish people?
Ebenezer’s calling is to call out the Jewish people by prayer and proclamation, and to help them return to their God - given homeland. Were we to evangelise those we help we would not be able to work with the Jewish authorities, and so would not be able to fulfil our calling. We are certain that it is God’s will that His people return and are “planted in the Land”, and that this is their destiny. The prophet Ezekiel foresaw the day when God would pour out his spirit on the nation regathered to the land (Ezekiel 39:25-29).
| | 
03-02-2009, 05:17 AM
|  | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Lisbon, NY
Posts: 5,887
Thanks: 421
Thanked 635 Times in 294 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton Bruckner Christian Zionism is heresy. | Hmmm, would you like to unfold that a bit? -----Added 3/2/2009 at 04:48:06 EST-----
Here is a link to the missionary organisations website FAQ section. Operation Exodus - Country Selector
Let me know what you think once you read it.
also, here is a quote from it Quote: Does Ebenezer evangelise the Jewish people?
Ebenezer’s calling is to call out the Jewish people by prayer and proclamation, and to help them return to their God - given homeland. Were we to evangelise those we help we would not be able to work with the Jewish authorities, and so would not be able to fulfil our calling. We are certain that it is God’s will that His people return and are “planted in the Land”, and that this is their destiny. The prophet Ezekiel foresaw the day when God would pour out his spirit on the nation regathered to the land (Ezekiel 39:25-29).
| | Ezekiel is also very clear (ch. 37) that when Israel returns to the land, they will have a king over a unified people. Obviously, modern Israel doesn't fit the fulfillment, even if we were to take the prophecy literally. And the apostles were crystal clear as to who the true Israel was, those who believe in Christ, both Jew and Gentile.
__________________
Patrick
MDiv, RTS Jackson
Pastor, Grace Presbyterian Church (OPC), Lisbon, NY "He does well, that discourses of Christ; but he does infinitely better, that by experimental knowledge, feeds and lives on Christ." Thomas Brooks. "Let us not please ourselves that we have deep understandings, but let us shew our understandings by our practice." Richard Sibbes | 
03-02-2009, 05:32 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Puritan Sailor Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 Quote:
Originally Posted by Anton Bruckner Christian Zionism is heresy. | Hmmm, would you like to unfold that a bit? -----Added 3/2/2009 at 04:48:06 EST-----
Here is a link to the missionary organisations website FAQ section. Operation Exodus - Country Selector
Let me know what you think once you read it.
also, here is a quote from it Quote: Does Ebenezer evangelise the Jewish people?
Ebenezer’s calling is to call out the Jewish people by prayer and proclamation, and to help them return to their God - given homeland. Were we to evangelise those we help we would not be able to work with the Jewish authorities, and so would not be able to fulfil our calling. We are certain that it is God’s will that His people return and are “planted in the Land”, and that this is their destiny. The prophet Ezekiel foresaw the day when God would pour out his spirit on the nation regathered to the land (Ezekiel 39:25-29).
| | Ezekiel is also very clear (ch. 37) that when Israel returns to the land, they will have a king over a unified people. Obviously, modern Israel doesn't fit the fulfillment, even if we were to take the prophecy literally. And the apostles were crystal clear as to who the true Israel was, those who believe in Christ, both Jew and Gentile.  | The sentence I changed to bold type, is the view I have always held.
Is this what Zionists regard as 'replacement theology'?
Regarding the return of Israel and the king ruling over a unified people. Could it not be the case that the people will return and then the king will emmerge?
Another thing, the fact that Jews are returning to Israel in flocks can surely be no small thing, especially when there are prophesies which speak of the return of Jews to Israel. By the way, this does not mean I am arguing for this particuarly ministry or Zionism for that matter. Just thrashing it out.
| 
03-02-2009, 05:48 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,476
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 2,416 Times in 1,142 Posts
| | Quote: |
Is this what Zionists regard as 'replacement theology'?
| Yes Quote: |
Regarding the return of Israel and the king ruling over a unified people. Could it not be the case that the people will return and then the king will emmerge?
| Yes, and someone could anonymously put ten million dollars into your bank account tomorrow ;-) but it wouldn't be responsible to spend a great deal of time wondering if it will occur. Quote: |
Another thing, the fact that Jews are returning to Israel in flocks can surely be no small thing, especially when there are prophesies which speak of the return of Jews to Israel. By the way, this does not mean I am arguing for this particuarly ministry or Zionism for that matter. Just thrashing it out.
| Jews have been flocking to Israel from Eastern Europe so they could more easily get to America for decades. That's why the number of Jews are increasing in the US and even Western Europe faster than the number of Jews in Israel.
If you count that as somehow "no small thing" there's a guy named Harold Camping I'll introduce you to some day | | The Following User Says Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 06:09 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| |
How would reformed believers interpret the following? Quote:
Rom 11:7What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
8(According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear unto this day.
9And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them:
10Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway.
11I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.
12Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?
13For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
14If by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of them.
15For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?
16For if the firstfruit be holy, the lump is also holy: and if the root be holy, so are the branches.
17And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert grafted in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree;
18Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.
19Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.
20Well; because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not highminded, but fear:
21For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be grafted in: for God is able to graft them in again. 24For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?
25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.
29For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
| | 
03-02-2009, 06:18 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,476
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 2,416 Times in 1,142 Posts
| |
Well, we agree with it. Contrary to nature Quote:
Mat 15:22 And behold, a Canaanite woman from that region came out and was crying, "Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David; my daughter is severely oppressed by a demon."
Mat 15:23 But he did not answer her a word. And his disciples came and begged him, saying, "Send her away, for she is crying out after us."
Mat 15:24 He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Mat 15:25 But she came and knelt before him, saying, "Lord, help me."
Mat 15:26 And he answered, "It is not right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs."
| room was made for Gentiles, as most of the Jews were cut off from the church. And when those Jews who remained in the Church by converting to Christianity were augmented by elect Gentiles, then all Israel, i.e. all the elect from both peoples, what we call the Church, will be saved.
If someone is tempted to believe that the verses you quoted mean that every single member of the Jewish race is going to be converted at some future date, they would make a good Christian Zionist.
| 
03-02-2009, 06:42 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote: |
If someone is tempted to believe that the verses you quoted mean that every single member of the Jewish race is going to be converted at some future date, they would make a good Christian Zionist.
| I'm not sure Zionist believe all Jews will be saved (do they?). But that a) the Jews will return to Israel B) A large number of Jews will turn to Christ c) Jesus will return.
Or are we saying that God has no further purpose for the Jewish nation? Are we saying that all O.T prophesies regarding the Jews are now to be understood in terms of the church?
What do people make of the following claim? Quote: |
Christian Zionism is not new. " A Nation Called by God " (see and Britain) reviews the writings of great evangelical churchmen who cared about Israel in God's plan and in His word. These men included ... William Cowper, John Owen, John Wesley, Robert Murray McCheyn, William Wilberforce, Charles Haddon Spurgeon and Bishop J C Ryle.
| Against Christian Zionism | 
03-02-2009, 06:56 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,476
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 2,416 Times in 1,142 Posts
| | Quote: |
I'm not sure Zionist believe all Jews will be saved (do they?). But that a) the Jews will return to Israel B) A large number of Jews will turn to Christ c) Jesus will return.
| I guess I just don't see whether you are asking questions, playing the Devil's advocate, wondering out loud or trying to teach. What did you mean by bolding Quote:
25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.
29For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
| What do you think verse 26 means? And when you say Quote: |
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
| It makes it even more confusing. It seems that you are asking questions that you already know the answers to. You take it as a given that there are Bible verses that speak of Jews returning to Israel and that the significance of them doing so is no small thing.
Sorry again, and it's probably just me, but it's really hard to understand where you are coming from.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 07:03 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV Quote: |
I'm not sure Zionist believe all Jews will be saved (do they?). But that a) the Jews will return to Israel B) A large number of Jews will turn to Christ c) Jesus will return.
| I guess I just don't see whether you are asking questions, playing the Devil's advocate, wondering out loud or trying to teach. What did you mean by bolding Quote:
25For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the father's sakes.
29For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
| What do you think verse 26 means? And when you say Quote: |
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
| It makes it even more confusing. It seems that you are asking questions that you already know the answers to. You take it as a given that there are Bible verses that speak of Jews returning to Israel and that the significance of them doing so is no small thing.
Sorry again, and it's probably just me, but it's really hard to understand where you are coming from. | If you feel you need some context for the discussion you should check the first post.
| 
03-02-2009, 07:11 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,476
Thanks: 1,890
Thanked 2,416 Times in 1,142 Posts
| |
I did, and I quoted you. Quote: |
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
| | 
03-02-2009, 08:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Taytay, Rizal Province, The Philippines
Posts: 1,586
Thanks: 752
Thanked 457 Times in 305 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 Another thing, the fact that Jews are returning to Israel in flocks can surely be no small thing, especially when there are prophesies which speak of the return of Jews to Israel. By the way, this does not mean I am arguing for this particuarly ministry or Zionism for that matter. Just thrashing it out. | John, a Reformed answer to your question is provided by Robert L. Reymond in his essay Who Really Owns the "Holy Land"? Quote: Five Propositions
....
1. The modern Jewish state is not a part of the Messianic kingdom of Jesus Christ. Even though this particular political state came into being on May 14, 1948, it would be a denial of Jesus' affirmation that his kingdom is "not of this world order " (John 18:36) to assert that modern Israel is a part of his Messianic kingdom. To put it bluntly, modern Israel is not true Israel at all, but is rather "the spiritual son of Hagar " (Romans 9:6-8; Galatians 4:24-25) and thus is "Ishmaelitish " to the core, due to its lack of Abrahamic belief in Jesus Christ. 21. [21. Modern Israel must face the fact that to be the physical descendants of Abraham and to have Abrahamic blood flowing in their veins means nothing as far as acquiring God’s approbation is concerned. As John the Baptist warned: ?Do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our Father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham? (Matthew 3:9). To the Jews who said, "Abraham is our Father," but who were seeking to kill him, Jesus, said,: "If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing what Abraham did [that is, you would rejoice to see my day].... You are of your father the devil" (John 8:39-44, 56). Ethnic Jews must recall that Abraham had two sons, which means that "not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring"; rather, "it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise who are counted as offspring" (Romans 9:7-8).] It has accordingly forsaken any legitimate Biblical claim to Palestine.
2. The land promise of the Old Testament served as a type of the consummate realization of the purposes of God for his redeemed people that encompasses "all the nations " (Genesis 12:3) and the entire cosmos (Romans 4:13). Christians as members of the Messianic kingdom of God are the real heirs, along with Abraham, of the land promise in its antitypical, consummated character.
3. Because of the inherently limited scope of the land promised in the Old Testament, it cannot be regarded as having continuing significance in the realm of redemption other than in its function as a model to teach that obedience and divine blessing go hand in hand while disobedience and divine retribution also go hand in hand.
4. The Old Testament predictions about the "return" of "Israel" to the "land" in terms of a geo-political re-establishment of the state of Israel are more properly interpreted as having fulfillment at the "restoration of all things" that will accompany the resurrection of believers at the return of Christ (Acts 3:21; Romans 8:22-23). To interpret these predictions literally would be a retrograde elevation of type over antitype.
5. The future Messianic kingdom will embrace the whole of the recreated cosmos and will not experience a special manifestation that could be regarded in any sense as "Jewish" in the so-called "holy land" or anywhere else.
Peter, the apostle to the circumcision (who surely would have had his ear tuned to any and every future privilege Jews might enjoy), when he wrote of future things in 2 Peter 3, said nothing about a Jewish millennium or about a restoration of a Jewish kingdom in Palestine but rather divided the whole of Earth history into three periods: the first period — "the world of that time" — extending from the beginning of creation to the Genesis flood (2 Peter 3:5-6); the second period — "the heavens and Earth that now exist " (2 Peter 3:7) — extending from the flood to the final Day of the Lord, at which time the Earth will be destroyed by fire (2 Peter 3:7) and the present heavens "will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved " (2 Peter 3:10); and the third period — "new heavens and a new Earth in which righteousness dwells " (2 Peter 3:13) ó extending throughout eternity future. If he had believed in a Jewish millennium following this present age 2 Peter 3 would have been the appropriate place to mention it, but he makes no mention of a millennium, much less a Jewish millennium, placing the entirety of Earth history within the three time frames.
.... Appendix
Biblical prophecy says nothing about modern Israel. In fact, far from the formation of modern Israel being a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, it is, if anything, a major instrumentality in the hand of God to sustain Israel in its divinely imposed hardening.
Christian Zionists claim that the establishment of Israel as a nation on May 14, 1948, fulfilled Biblical prophecies. The following Old Testament prophecies are samples from a larger group of passages that these Biblical interpreters say were fulfilled in 1948:
1. Jeremiah 29:14, it is said, predicted the founding of the modern state of Israel. But the context of Jeremiah 29 makes it clear that the predicted "restoration" after the completion of the seventy years of Babylonian exile (29:10), refers to the return from exile under Zerubbabel in 536 B.C.
2. Isaiah 11:11, it is said, speaks of a "second time" that God would restore the remnant to the land, the first being the return from Babylon in 536 B.C., the second being the establishment of modern Israel in 1948. But the context of Isaiah 11 makes it clear that Israel’s first deliverance was from Egypt under Moses (11:16) with its second restoration being from the nations into which the Jews of the Assyrian/Babylonian captivity had dispersed.
3. Zechariah 8:7, it is said, predicted that God "will save [his] people from the east country and the west country, and?bring them to dwell in the midst of Jerusalem." It is, however, a reach to see this prediction as referring to the modern state of Israel. In fact, the passage speaks of the faithfulness and righteousness of the inhabitants of Jerusalem in that day (8:8), something that is definitely not true of present Jerusalem. Much more likely is it that Zechariah was predicting the return of exiles during the days of Ezra, Nehemiah, and after (see Ezra 7:1-10; Nehemiah 11:1-2) that, again, pointed typically forward to the antitypical new Paradise of God.
4. Ezekiel 36:24-26, it is said, predicted that Israel would be restored to the land "in unbelief" which agrees with the situation in Israel today. But the passage does not speak of a restoration "in unbelief." God does not reward disobedience. Verse 33 states: "On the day that I cleanse you from all your iniquities, I will cause the cities to be inhabited," clearly implying that those who are "restored" have first been spiritually cleansed, thereby meeting the requirement of Leviticus 26:40-42: "...if they confess their iniquity...; if their uncircumcised heart is humbled..., then I will remember my covenant...and I will remember the land."
5. Amos 9:14-15, it is said, declares that this condition of permanent national establishment that would someday prevail simply was not true of any Old Testament restoration. But given the fact that James in Acts 15:16-17 applied the prophecy immediately preceding these two verses to the church of this age, the restoration envisioned here most likely describes in pastoral terms the rejuvenated cosmos.
|
__________________
Albert, The Republic of the Philippines
Pasig United Covenant Reformed Church (a Reformed church plant)
United Covenant Reformed Churches in the Philippines (UCRCP)
Three Forms of Unity and Westminster Confession of Faith
Psalm 27:1a (AV) The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? “Perseverance is the badge of true saints. The Christian life is not a beginning only in the ways of God, but also a continuance in the same as long as life lasts.” - | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to A.J. For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 We had missionaries at our church today speaking about there mission work with Israel.
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
Their work is primarily focused on helping them return.
They were selling books which revealed they were coming from a Zionism perspective. (They were selling David Pawsons book).
Is Zionism biblically sound?
I find it difficult to suss out where some Israel focused groups are coming from in their soteriology at times. Hence the question. | Maybe it would be better to ask them what they believe rather than coming on here and asking us about persons unnamed with whom probably none here have any familiarity.  I know you are looking for information on this issue and apparently don't know much about it, but if you ask a rather vague question as with the OP, the responses are going to tend to be all over the map or perhaps will not address what it is you are really looking for.
From a strictly confessional Reformed standpoint, any form of Christian Zionism is probably not kosher since the confessions don't teach it. Most if not all confessional Reformed churches (including confessional Reformed Baptist churches) are not going to allow any form of Christian Zionism to be taught. This was one of the issues that led to a split in the Orthodox Presbyterian church in 1937, with the Bible Presbyterian church being formed that enshrined premillenialism in their version of the Westminster Standards.
Christian Zionism is also somewhat of a nebulous term. Given the various understandings and usages of it, it could be applied to men and entities as diverse as John Hagee, Hal Lindsay, the Rapture Ready website, Charles Ryrie, John MacArthur, C.H. Spurgeon and J.C. Ryle. It can include anything from historic premillenialists (i.e. nondispensationalists) who believe that the Bible teaches that the Jews will be restored to the land (Ryle, Spurgeon, Bonar, M'Cheyne) to more mainstream dispensationalists--whether classic or Progressive (MacArthur, Ryrie) to heretics who teach that the Jews do not need to acknowledge that Jesus is the Messiah.
Last edited by Pilgrim; 03-02-2009 at 01:47 PM.
| 
03-02-2009, 02:00 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 We had missionaries at our church today speaking about there mission work with Israel.
They support the bible texts which speak about the return of the Jews to Israel.
Their work is primarily focused on helping them return.
They were selling books which revealed they were coming from a Zionism perspective. (They were selling David Pawsons book).
Is Zionism biblically sound?
I find it difficult to suss out where some Israel focused groups are coming from in their soteriology at times. Hence the question. | Maybe it would be better to ask them what they believe rather than coming on here and asking us about persons unnamed with whom probably none here have any familiarity.  I know you are looking for information on this issue and apparently don't know much about it, but if you ask a rather vague question as with the OP, the responses are going to tend to be all over the map or perhaps will not address what it is you are really looking for.
From a strictly confessional Reformed standpoint, any form of Christian Zionism is probably not kosher since the confessions don't teach it. Most if not all confessional Reformed churches (including confessional Reformed Baptist churches) are not going to allow any form of Christian Zionism to be taught. This was one of the issues that led to a split in the Orthodox Presbyterian church in 1937, with the Bible Presbyterian church being formed that enshrined premillenialism in their version of the Westminster Standards.
Christian Zionism is also somewhat of a nebulous term. Given the various understandings and usages of it, it could be applied to men and entities as diverse as John Hagee, Hal Lindsay, the Rapture Ready website, Charles Ryrie, John MacArthur, C.H. Spurgeon and J.C. Ryle. It can include anything from historic premillenialists (i.e. nondispensationalists) who believe that the Bible teaches that the Jews will be restored to the land (Ryle, Spurgeon, Bonar, M'Cheyne) to more mainstream dispensationalists--whether classic or Progressive (MacArthur, Ryrie) to heretics who teach that the Jews do not need to acknowledge that Jesus is the Messiah. | Firstly, I am not sure what is vague about the question Quote: |
Is Zionism biblically sound?
| Secondly, you obviously did not find it vague either, since your answer proved insightful and helpful. This only leaves me to wonder; why the expression of frustration in your first paragraph? It seems needless. Like I said, I dont think there is anything vague in the question Quote: |
Is Zionism biblically sound?
| If you feel that the context I included has only served to 'foggy the issue' I apologise. perhaps the question could have stood alone without the context.
In regards to the group, I did include a link to their website which explains what they are about.
| 
03-02-2009, 02:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 1,963
Thanks: 441
Thanked 415 Times in 212 Posts
| |
Don't forget that many of those in Israel today (especially in government) who claim to be ethnic Jews are, in fact, not.
It's not just American politicians and PAC's that use and mock the modern American evangelicals. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CDM For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 02:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316
Firstly, I am not sure what is vague about the question | As I noted in my previous post, "Christian Zionism" can mean anything from Spurgeon's views to the heretical dual covenant theology. (Everyone here would say the latter is heretical, but many would not consider Spurgeon's prophetical views to rise to the level of heresy, even though the majority on the board would disagree with them.)
You didn't seem to be getting the kinds of answers you were looking for, and only posted the link to the particular group you were interested in some time later. That's why I stated it was vague, because it didn't get at what this group believes, but simply assumed that everyone knew what they taught based on the label of "Christian Zionism." Quote: |
Secondly, you obviously did not find it vague either, since your answer proved insightful and helpful. This only leaves me to wonder; why the expression of frustration in your first paragraph? It seems needless. Like I said, I dont think there is anything vague in the question
| See above. However, perhaps my first paragraph was too harsh and a little over the top. | 
03-02-2009, 04:52 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote: |
Christian Zionism is also somewhat of a nebulous term. Given the various understandings and usages of it, it could be applied to men and entities as diverse as John Hagee, Hal Lindsay, the Rapture Ready website, Charles Ryrie, John MacArthur, C.H. Spurgeon and J.C. Ryle. It can include anything from historic premillenialists (i.e. nondispensationalists) who believe that the Bible teaches that the Jews will be restored to the land (Ryle, Spurgeon, Bonar, M'Cheyne) to more mainstream dispensationalists--whether classic or Progressive (MacArthur, Ryrie) to heretics who teach that the Jews do not need to acknowledge that Jesus is the Messiah.
| So, the reformed guys mentioned here, is their Zionism simply the conviction that the Jews would return to Israel?
| 
03-02-2009, 05:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | |
Zionism and the Reformed faith are not compatable.
Zionist wish to "restore" national Israel and ignore the "Israel of God" to the tune of numbers of oppressed Palestinian Christians.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Roanoke VA.
Covenant Reformed Episcopal Church. Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum. | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MrMerlin777 For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 05:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 970 Times in 581 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 Zionism and the Reformed faith are not compatable.
Zionist wish to "restore" national Israel and ignore the "Israel of God" to the tune of numbers of oppressed Palestinian Christians. | Lebanese Christians also. | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knoxienne For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 05:23 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
So, is God completely finished with Israel as a nation then?
| 
03-02-2009, 05:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 So, is God completely finished with Israel as a nation then? | This is only my opinion but I believe it can be supported with Scripture as well. I tend to believe that God was through with national Israel and it's "shadows" when He brought the temple down in 70AD. Just as Christ had prophesied in Matthew 24.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to MrMerlin777 For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 05:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 3,666
Thanks: 2,140
Thanked 970 Times in 581 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 So, is God completely finished with Israel as a nation then? | This is only my opinion but I believe it can be supported with Scripture as well. I tend to believe that God was through with national Israel and it's "shadows" when He brought the temple down in 70AD. Just as Christ had prophesied in Matthew 24. | I agree. I believe the modern nation of Israel to have been created out of political expediency more than anything else. | | The Following User Says Thank You to Knoxienne For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 05:34 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| |
[quote=MrMerlin777;560451] Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 So, is God completely finished with Israel as a nation then? | Quote: |
This is only my opinion but I believe it can be supported with Scripture as well. I tend to believe that God was through with national Israel and it's "shadows" when He brought the temple down in 70AD. Just as Christ had prophesied in Matthew 24.
| What do you make of the following text though? Quote:
Rom 11:25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. 26And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
"The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27And this is[f] my covenant with them
when I take away their sins."[g]
28As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God's mercy to you. 32For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
| | 
03-02-2009, 05:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | |
I believe Paul is speaking here of the "Israel of God", His church. All of which will be saved.
| 
03-02-2009, 06:13 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 195
Thanks: 60
Thanked 62 Times in 47 Posts
| |
Brother Jon,
These may be of help to you:
Respecting "Messianic Judaism" which is related to Christian Zionism:
And for a Reformed amillenial take on Romans 11 - see this book beginning on p.141: | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CovenantalBaptist For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 06:32 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by CovenantalBaptist | Thanks for the book tips (I have so many books I need to add to my list). I checked out the reviews to get a feel of what they are about. What is the authors take on Zionism?
| 
03-02-2009, 09:00 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,425
Thanks: 1,963
Thanked 1,062 Times in 600 Posts
| |
I've owned the Maoz book "Judaism is Not Jewish" virtually since its publication. It's a worthwhile reference addition to any Reformed believer's library, and it's worth multiple "reads." Just my  worth.
Margaret
__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan "The LORD thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing." Zephaniah 3:17 | 
03-02-2009, 09:08 PM
|  | Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,190
Thanks: 74
Thanked 3,365 Times in 1,190 Posts
| | |
I just preached the latter half of Exodus 12, the Exodus itself. Doctrinally, the focus for the message was God's effectual call.
Long ago, I recognized that Israel-the-nation has always been a composite of Abraham's natural seed and converts/incorporated. But in my preparation for this week's sermon, this passage strongly reinforced my view.
Once you've gone through the plagues, and the original Passover preparation and keeping, you see how God is speaking to the world in words that call to salvation on one hand, and harden in judgment in another. Upwards of 2.5 million people answered the call of God to leave Egypt. Even with a miraculous "baby boom," there is a simple chronological roadblock to the creation of this numerous a people, simply relying on the biological heirs of Jacob.
Exodus 12:38 explains that this was a "mixed multitude," on the one hand you had Judahites, Ephraimites, Benjamites, etc.; on the other hand there were such like Egyptians, Ethiopians, and Edomites, to name a few.
Now, we should note Moses' style here, in chs. 12 & 13, as he interweaves instruction on the creation of Passover, and its future memorial celebration around the events of the Passover-and-Exodus event.
Note then v.41, "At the end of 430 years, on that very day, all the hosts of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt;" and following verses that define those who may join in the sacramental meal of unity, note vv.49-50, "'There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you.' All the people of Israel did just as the LORD commanded Moses and Aaron."
Moses point seems to be this: If you were a part of the Passover-and Exodus event, if you responded to God's effectual call, there was ONE LAW that applied, whether you could claim a "pedigree" to Abraham or not--if you came out, then the appellation "people of Israel" belonged to you. If this were so in ages to come "in the land," how much more so when all these people, including aliens, answered God's call to leave the accursed land?
See, God was already answering his promise to Abraham to make him the father of many nations, calling into one people those from many kindreds, tongues, tribes, and nations. Here in the "nativity" of the nation (to use Calvin's felicitous expression) was an inaugural fulfillment of even that eschatological promise.
**********
"Israel" has from its humblest beginnings been a conversion people, around a genetic core. It was stupidity and blindness of massive proportions that made many Jews take unreasonable pride in their stock, or in their circumcision, or in any outward identity.
Once the Christ was come, any reason to confine "Israel" to one stock also disappeared forever. When Jewish stock come to faith in Christ, they have returned to Israel (which is Christ), and to that ancient, eternal kingdom promised to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David.
*************
A final thought: (this had nothing to do with my sermon, BTW)
Since ethnic Jews from that region historically are indistinguishable from Palestinians, and many other nationalities from there, it is worth pondering that many Palestinians, whether Christian or Moslem, have to be the descendants of Jewish converts to Christianity in the days of the Apostles and afterward. They fled Judea under persecution from the religious Jews, or in advance of the Romans in AD67 (as Jesus told them to do).
Naturally, many of them would have moved back home into those regions after the Romans finished their depredations and deportations. So these people cared not one bit to call themselves "Jews" anymore, both for political, as well as for theological reasons.
So, now we have this tragic situation of having Jewish-sponsored ethnic cleansing and subjugation literally of their own kin, who centuries ago stopped considering themselves as "Jewish", but who have as much claim genetically to Abraham, and even more than many religious Jews of today would have.
Sure, many of those families left the Christian faith during the centuries, and some were converted to Moslem faith, and migration has always impacted those lands. But it is a gross injustice for the so-called "children of Israel" in a modern political sense of the term, to apply one law to themselves, and another law to many families who simply left Judaism centuries ago when the gospel was first preached "in Jerusalem, in Samaria, and unto the uttermost parts of the earth." Why? Merely on the basis of a "permanent" claim to real estate that others have as much or more right to own.
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Last edited by Contra_Mundum; 03-02-2009 at 09:29 PM.
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post: | | 
03-02-2009, 10:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 7,361
Thanks: 1,495
Thanked 932 Times in 643 Posts
| |
[quote=Jon 316;560462] Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon 316 So, is God completely finished with Israel as a nation then? |
What do you make of the following text though? Quote:
Rom 11:25I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. 26And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:
"The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27And this is[f] my covenant with them
when I take away their sins."[g]
28As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now[h] receive mercy as a result of God's mercy to you. 32For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
| | See here for one perspective.
| 
03-03-2009, 12:24 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 195
Thanks: 60
Thanked 62 Times in 47 Posts
| |
This open letter by many Presbyterian, Reformed and Reformed Baptist pastors and Seminary professors also speaks to the issue of Zionism from some within our community.
| 
03-03-2009, 06:18 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 662
Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 26 Posts
| | |
I believe (even) the PC (USA) has a position against Christian Zionism of the dispensational sort.
| 
03-03-2009, 05:02 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
Thanks for all the input folks. Since Sunday I have come to realise something significant.
I have been holding two opposing views on Eschatology simutaniously without fully realising it.
Having been saved in the brethren movement I have been influenced by dispensationalism.
However I have mainly, somehow, (probably through the reading of scripture), adopted a more covenantal position (The new covenant and the church are at the heart of God's purposes).
I've also began to identify some exegetical/appocalyptic/prophetic assumptions about the end times.
Again, cheers for the comments, links and book recommendations.
I have just purchased Stephen Sizers Zions Christian Soldiers? which is a recent book which strongly argues against Zionism.
| 
03-06-2009, 06:06 PM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 640
Thanks: 208
Thanked 240 Times in 107 Posts
| | |
Ok, when I first posted this thread, I had very little understanding of the exact nature of Christian Zionism.
I've now almost finished Sizer's book and I have scanned through some of John Hagee, and some other Zionist whos name evades me just now.
My conclusion? Those guys are scary! Really scary. Talk about scripture twisting, context ignoring, eschatological speculation, not to mention imaginative sensasionalism that would put the top 10 tabloids to shame!
I'm careful with my use of the word herasy. But I'm not sure what else you can call it? It seems to be nothing other than the reviving of the old covenant which Jesus has fulfilled!
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |