Closed Thread
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Hebrews 6:4-6

  1. #1
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts

    Hebrews 6:4-6

    Not that it makes a real difference -- impossible is impossible --, but I'm curious about the nature of the impossibility in view. Is it a legal impossibility or a psychological impossibility; an objective one or a subjective one? On the one hand it's said that it is impossible to renew them again to repentance. On the other it says they are crucifying again the Son of God. I guess I'm asking whether they are in some state of irreparable breach of contract or something like that, or whether it's a statement about our own nature, that it cannot be enlightened twice.

    So, which is it . . . or is there a third option I'm not seeing?
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    Matthew1034's Avatar
    Matthew1034 is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Spring Hill, FL
    Posts
    482
    Thanks
    304
    Thanked 79 Times in 52 Posts
    It is impossible to be born-again again.
    Matthew Philip Miller | Reformed Baptist, SBC
    Student of Theology at Trinity College of Florida

    Iniquities prevail against me; As for our transgressions, You will provide atonement for them. Blessed is the man You choose, And cause to approach You, That he may dwell in Your courts. We shall be satisfied with the goodness of Your house, Of Your holy temple.
    Psalms 65:3-4 (NKJV)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Wouldn't that imply that one can lose their salvation. That is, if the text is talking about someone who is regenerate, or in the words of the WSC, effectually called, then they must be elect, and they must, in the words of Rom. 8, be "glorified."

    I don't think I can understand Heb. 6 that way. I think I have to understand Heb. 6 in light of 1 John 2:19.

    In other words, if they are born again, then they have not been brought back to the garden, but beyond it, to the eschatological destiny of the imagebearer.

    Your two cents is worth every bit as much as mine. I don't have a better answer. I just don't think I can buy an understanding with the particular two pennies you gave me.
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to chbrooking For This Useful Post:

    Iconoclast (05-11-2009)

  5. #4
    Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
    Presbyterian Deacon is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rockville, CT
    Posts
    3,680
    Thanks
    596
    Thanked 956 Times in 727 Posts
    An excellent exegesis of this verse is found here
    Sterling Harmon
    Presbyterian Church of Coventry (PCA)
    Coventry, CT
    Deacon
    ________________

    "Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
    -- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

    "Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
    -- Martin Luther, Table Talk

    Interim Pulpit Supply of New England

    My Facebook

    Owner/Administrator @ Reformed Theology Institute
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Presbyterian Deacon For This Useful Post:

    chbrooking (04-21-2009), Michael Doyle (04-21-2009)

  7. #5
    DonP's Avatar
    DonP is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,553
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    326
    Thanked 410 Times in 280 Posts
    For me, to taste Christ is not to eat Him.

    John 6:53 Then Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. NKJV

    One who has been in the visible covenant or external covenant membership and has not been converted can be said to be cut off or leave, the visible membership. We can be warned not to be content to be only in the visible membership but to be sure of our election, work out our salvation that we can be assured of being in a state of grace.

    Covenant breakers were put to death. So that may be a type of covenant breaker today.

    It does seem to go against some of our experience in seeing some leave the church and come back later. But we do not know the spiritual realities.

    I see it as a strong warning to covenant members, as this verse:

    Rom 11:21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, He may not spare you either. 22 Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God: on those who fell, severity; but toward you, goodness, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise you also will be cut off
    NKJV
    Last edited by DonP; 04-21-2009 at 05:16 PM.
    DonP
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  8. #6
    Richard Tallach's Avatar
    Richard Tallach is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth, Scotland UK
    Posts
    1,882
    Thanks
    384
    Thanked 614 Times in 413 Posts
    It is impossible because the Spirit has stopped striving with one who was not truly regenerate. Ultimately only God knows infallibly who have fallen away to this extent. This passage must have reference to the unforgiveable sin mentioned by Jesus, since he said there was only one such sin.

    We must be careful not to make judgements in regard to who has done this, especially verbally to someone who has fallen away.

    Would that be correct? We shouldn't make judgements regarding whether someone has sinned unforgiveably? Where there's physical life there's hope of salvation?
    Richard
    communicant member, FCoS
    Perth, Scotland UK

    His Name forever shall endure;
    last like the sun it shall:
    Men shall be blessed in Him,
    and blessed all nations shall Him call (Ps. 72:17)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. #7
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Thanks Sterling,
    He does an excellent job working with the text. In fact, he's persuaded me. But he doesn't really answer the question I asked. And he only worked through one of the verses (as far as I could tell -- did he follow up with another post? I couldn't find it.)

    Whether we take a hypothetical, but really saved, or a apparently, but not really saved view, I'm still wondering what is the nature of the impossibility. WHY is it impossible?

    Thanks for link.

    -----Added 4/21/2009 at 08:03:59 EST-----

    Quote Originally Posted by PeaceMaker View Post
    Covenant breakers were put to death. So that may be a type of covenant breaker today.

    It does seem to go against some of our experience in seeing some leave the church and come back later. But we do not know the spiritual realities.
    That's an interesting take, Don. But the PCA BCO has a very nice treatment on restoration of one previously excommunicated. I know, because we just went through the process with a PCA church when a previous excommunicant among us sought restoration. The OP BCO doesn't even treat it!!!

    So are you suggesting that we not restore a repentant excommunicant?

    -----Added 4/21/2009 at 08:11:37 EST-----

    Thanks Richard, for understanding my question.
    That's a reasonable suggestion, if we take the "appeared to be saved" view. I wonder if, however, we ought to speak as though the Spirit might unsuccessfully strive with someone. Does the Spirit strive with us, or convict us/enlighten us/give us new birth?

    Good thought. Any others?
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  10. #8
    Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
    Presbyterian Deacon is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rockville, CT
    Posts
    3,680
    Thanks
    596
    Thanked 956 Times in 727 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    Thanks Sterling,
    He does an excellent job working with the text. In fact, he's persuaded me. But he doesn't really answer the question I asked. And he only worked through one of the verses (as far as I could tell -- did he follow up with another post? I couldn't find it.)

    Whether we take a hypothetical, but really saved, or a apparently, but not really saved view, I'm still wondering what is the nature of the impossibility. WHY is it impossible?

    Thanks for link.
    Clark:

    That post is one in a thread of several posts in which he exegetes Hebrews 5:7-6:6.

    His first substantial post in the thread is on page 2 HERE

    The whole thread is 5 pages long. His exegesis of Heb 6:5 is HERE

    Exegesis of Heb 6:6 is Here

    He does answer the question in the final post on HEB 6:6

    Also He gives a summary of possible conclusions in this post
    Sterling Harmon
    Presbyterian Church of Coventry (PCA)
    Coventry, CT
    Deacon
    ________________

    "Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
    -- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

    "Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
    -- Martin Luther, Table Talk

    Interim Pulpit Supply of New England

    My Facebook

    Owner/Administrator @ Reformed Theology Institute
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Presbyterian Deacon For This Useful Post:

    chbrooking (04-21-2009), Michael Doyle (04-21-2009), Quickened (05-11-2009)

  12. #9
    armourbearer's Avatar
    armourbearer is offline. Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    7,901
    Thanks
    979
    Thanked 6,097 Times in 2,229 Posts
    I've found the "experiences" of the passage best understood in terms of what the Confession calls "common operations of the Spirit" and "outward calling," while "repentance" is more properly linked to the kind of transformation associated with "effectual calling." Hence the falling away is real with respect to the outward calling, but only an hypothetical possibility for those who are effectually called. It is impossible to renew effectual calling, but it is also impossible for the effectually called to fall away in the first place.
    Yours sincerely,


    "Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:

    chbrooking (04-21-2009), Michael Doyle (04-21-2009), Prufrock (04-21-2009), PuritanCovenanter (04-22-2009), rescuedbyLove (04-22-2009)

  14. #10
    Prufrock's Avatar
    Prufrock is offline. Arbitrary Moderation
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Flint, MI
    Posts
    3,086
    Thanks
    853
    Thanked 1,929 Times in 836 Posts
    I think Dickson expresses the context of the opening parts of Rev. Winzer's comments well in loc.

    Thirdlie, from this comparison, it is clear, 1. That there are some converts, externall, from the worlde, to the Church, who yet sticke in the naturallys; and are not, in the sense of sinne, fledde unto Christ, for Refuges, nor converted, from nature, to Saving Grace; to whom the Apostle will not denye rowme in the Church, if they will studie to make progess. And, 2. That illumination, and tasting of Spirituall thinges, may bee given as well to such, who are not renewed in their heart, as unto sound convertes.
    This last part he explains:

    Hee may bee made part-taker of the holie Ghost, and haue his share of Church giftes, distrubted by the holie Ghost; so as hee can, from the light which the holie Ghost giveth him, answere other mens doubtes, comfort the feeble mynded, and edifie others in their fayth, by his speaches; yea, have the gift of expressing his brayne lgith, both in conference to men, and in formall prayer to GOD, if hee bee a private man onlie; and if hee bee in publicke office, may have the gift of formall preaching, and praying in publicke; yea, in those dayes of the Apostle, might have had the extraordinary gifts of Tongues, Prophesying, and Miracles working. &c.
    Paul Korte
    OPC
    Flint, MI

    They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post:

    armourbearer (04-21-2009), chbrooking (04-21-2009), Michael Doyle (04-21-2009)

  16. #11
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    So the impossible only applies to the hypothetical falling away. I get that. However, and I suppose it doesn't really matter, since it's only a hypothetical, but I was really wondering WHY this would be the case. The author goes on to say that he is re-crucifying the Lord to his shame. And he goes on to talk about the land richly drinking the rain but producing no crop being burned. Is there something in these words that would explain the nature of the impossibility. Is it just that God has decided he WON'T renew them to repentance, or is there some other reason why he CAN'T--however uncomfortable even using such a word with reference to God makes us? Is this just a secret thing that I should drop?
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  17. #12
    moral necessity is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Mountain Lake Park, MD
    Posts
    1,092
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked 284 Times in 197 Posts
    IMO, the verse is saying that they should not run from Christ back to Judaism for their righteousness, and, if they do, that there is no hope for them to be saved in that manner. They were in very much danger of doing so, and hence the letter. If one has tasted of what Judaism pointed to, namely Christ, and then has returned back to the former for justification, it is very much impossible for them to be saved by that method. For, when the leave Christ, they return to works for righteousness. And so, by doing so, they crucify again Christ in the manner that the unregenerate Jews did, namely as a criminal. They disregard him as their substitute, and are content to stand on their own. Therefore, verse 2 is very applicable to them, "let us not lay again a foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith towards God."
    Charles Plauger
    Member/Grace Reformed Church
    Oakland, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  18. #13
    armourbearer's Avatar
    armourbearer is offline. Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    7,901
    Thanks
    979
    Thanked 6,097 Times in 2,229 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    So the impossible only applies to the hypothetical falling away. I get that. However, and I suppose it doesn't really matter, since it's only a hypothetical, but I was really wondering WHY this would be the case. The author goes on to say that he is re-crucifying the Lord to his shame. And he goes on to talk about the land richly drinking the rain but producing no crop being burned. Is there something in these words that would explain the nature of the impossibility. Is it just that God has decided he WON'T renew them to repentance, or is there some other reason why he CAN'T--however uncomfortable even using such a word with reference to God makes us? Is this just a secret thing that I should drop?
    The author of Hebrews is dealing with a live situation where "calling" is something the readers must "make sure," but which is being cast in doubt by their preference for the old testament ritual; and so the reality of the warning can't be presented in the hypothetical terms we would expect if he were dealing with it in the abstract. These professing believers must be confronted with the dire consequences of turning back from their previous commitments, and so from a "temporal" persepective both the benefits received and the warning issued are presented as "real" conditions. Speaking conditionally, given their participation in the blessings of Christ, apostasy would involve them in such a rejection of Christ as leaves them without any possibility of salvation. Hence the impossibility is conditioned on three facts: (1.) Christ is the only way of salvation; (2.) they have once been partakers of Christ; and (3.) they have fallen away from Christ, which would mean they have tried and rejected the only way by which they could possibly be saved. In the abstract we qualify point 2, so that those who actually fall away are regarded as only outwardly participating in Christ, while those who truly and inwardly participate in Christ give heed to the warning and persevere to the end. Hebrews 6 itself reflects this distinction when it goes on to encourage the Hebrews by saying in verse 9, "we are persuaded better things of you;" but so far as the concrete situation is concerned all the covenant community is confronted with the warnings as real possibilities for the very reason that their behaviour did not make clear that they were in point of fact inwardly and effectually partakers of the blessings of Christ.
    Yours sincerely,


    "Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  19. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:

    a mere housewife (04-22-2009), chbrooking (04-22-2009), Iconoclast (05-11-2009), J. David Kear (04-22-2009), Prufrock (04-21-2009), Quickened (04-22-2009)

  20. #14
    cih1355 is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vallejo, CA
    Posts
    964
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 146 Times in 107 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    So the impossible only applies to the hypothetical falling away. I get that. However, and I suppose it doesn't really matter, since it's only a hypothetical, but I was really wondering WHY this would be the case. The author goes on to say that he is re-crucifying the Lord to his shame. And he goes on to talk about the land richly drinking the rain but producing no crop being burned. Is there something in these words that would explain the nature of the impossibility. Is it just that God has decided he WON'T renew them to repentance, or is there some other reason why he CAN'T--however uncomfortable even using such a word with reference to God makes us? Is this just a secret thing that I should drop?
    Wouldn't the nature of the impossibility be due to the fact that God does not guarantee that they will come to Christ? Men, by nature, reject God and if God does not effectually call them, they cannot come to Christ.
    Last edited by cih1355; 04-22-2009 at 12:41 AM. Reason: Correction
    Curt Hayashida
    member, Community Bible Church (Non-denominational)
    Vallejo, CA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  21. #15
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Thanks everyone for your excellent input. Perhaps you'd permit me to ask one followup question that might clarify things a bit for me. Who is the subject of the ACTIVE infinitive ἀνακαινίζειν in v. 6?
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  22. #16
    DTK's Avatar
    DTK
    DTK is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Elkton, MD
    Posts
    1,252
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 598 Times in 205 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    Who is the subject of the ACTIVE infinitive ἀνακαινίζειν in v. 6?
    Clark,

    I'll beat you over the head and straighten you out the next time I see you at Presbytery.

    Until then, you can lose sleep over something else.

    DTK
    Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
    D. T. King, pastor
    Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Elkton, Maryland
    Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, §1.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  23. #17
    reformedminister's Avatar
    reformedminister is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Springfield MO
    Posts
    370
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 203 Times in 107 Posts
    I believe the idea here is related to Christ's finished work and the doctrine of Definite Redemption. Christ's atoning sacrifice on the cross was not merely to make salvation possible for everyone but to secure the redemption of His elect. The whole idea of being born again twice would put Christ to an open shame in the sense that His atonement did not accomplish it's purpose. The idea is similar to the absurdity and shame the Catholic Mass brings to the cross of Christ, as if the sacrifice had to be repeated. "But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins, for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified." (Hebrews 10:12-14)
    Rev. Andy Eppard
    Associate Minister
    First Cumberland Presbyterian Church
    Springfield, MO
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  24. #18
    Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
    Presbyterian Deacon is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Rockville, CT
    Posts
    3,680
    Thanks
    596
    Thanked 956 Times in 727 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    Thanks everyone for your excellent input. Perhaps you'd permit me to ask one followup question that might clarify things a bit for me. Who is the subject of the ACTIVE infinitive ἀνακαινίζειν in v. 6?
    It is unexpressed but hypothetically the Holy Spirit.
    Sterling Harmon
    Presbyterian Church of Coventry (PCA)
    Coventry, CT
    Deacon
    ________________

    "Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
    -- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

    "Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
    -- Martin Luther, Table Talk

    Interim Pulpit Supply of New England

    My Facebook

    Owner/Administrator @ Reformed Theology Institute
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  25. #19
    akennethjr's Avatar
    akennethjr is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nampa
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Brooking let's remember that in Hebrews six that "Seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God and to put Him to an open shame." this is in the present tense. It is impossible to come to Christ if you presently "crucify to themselves" present tense. The passage warns of apostasy. Apostasy can be remedial, final apostasy is irremediable.
    Do you think it is talking about apostasy or final apostasy?
    Paul
    Member OPC
    Idaho

    Be the master of many books, but let the Bible master you.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  26. #20
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by akennethjr View Post
    Brooking let's remember that in Hebrews six that "Seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God and to put Him to an open shame." this is in the present tense. It is impossible to come to Christ if you presently "crucify to themselves" present tense. The passage warns of apostasy. Apostasy can be remedial, final apostasy is irremediable.
    Do you think it is talking about apostasy or final apostasy?
    In light of the other warning passages, and v. 7, I have always taken this as final apostasy. I take it that you are saying the re-crucifying and openly shaming, inasmuch as they are given as the grounds for the impossibility, also limit the impossibility. So that, were they to no longer re-crucify and openly shame Christ, then the impossibility would disappear. Am I misunderstanding you?

    If that is so, a) wouldn't that be tautologous? and b) wouldn't that dramatically reduce the rhetorical effect -- the sting -- of the warning?

    ----

    By the way DTK, I'm not overly concerned here. I'm just trying to understand the passage as far as I'm able. I'm just curious -- a godly curiosity, I hope -- about the nature of the impossibility. Some of the responses given so far have been very helpful. Some of them missed the nature of my question -- assuming I was asking the standard questions about the passage. I'm just interested in what makes it impossible for (presumably) the Spirit (-- since calling and repentance are his work) to renew their repentance. Feel free to beat me over the head at presbytery though -- although you'll have to be there to do it ... just kidding ... truly.
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  27. #21
    Whitefield's Avatar
    Whitefield is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Georgetown, IN
    Posts
    1,554
    Thanks
    160
    Thanked 652 Times in 384 Posts
    Owen discusses Hebrews 6:4-6 in chapter one of The Nature of Apostasy found on my website.
    Lance G. Marshall
    Pastor
    Georgetown, Indiana
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  28. #22
    chbrooking's Avatar
    chbrooking is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ellicott City, MD
    Posts
    779
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 400 Times in 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
    Owen discusses Hebrews 6:4-6 in chapter one of The Nature of Apostasy found on my website.
    It seems, then, that Owen would agree with Paul:

    VAdu,naton ga,r. "Impossibile enim," that is, "est;" — "It is impossible." Syr., !yxik.v.m, al' aL'a,, — "But they cannot." This respects the power of the persons themselves, and not the event of things; it may be not improperly as to the sense. Beza and Erasmus, "Fieri non potest," — "It cannot be;" the same with "impossible." But the use of the word avdu,naton in in the New Testament, which signifies sometimes only what is very difficult, not what is absolutely denied, makes it useful to retain the same word, as in our translation, "For it is impossible."
    I haven't read this thoroughly (who can read Owen thoroughly on anything with less than 3 or 4 readings???), from this, it seems that Owen might make people the subject of the active infinitive: "this respects the power of persons themselves".

    Am I misreading him?
    Clark Brooking
    Pastor
    Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
    Clarksville, MD
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  29. #23
    Iconoclast's Avatar
    Iconoclast is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    St.James ,NY
    Posts
    1,527
    Thanks
    719
    Thanked 260 Times in 183 Posts
    2. The Third Warning: Do not Degenerate...! (5:11–6:20).
    The author interrupts his doctrinal argument concerning the priesthood of Melchizedek because his readers have degenerated in their spiritual progress to the point that, when they should be able to teach others, they have need of being taught all over again! The author then states that this teaching concerning the priesthood of Melchizedek is “the strong meat of the Word”.
    This very stern warning reveals the utter hopelessness that necessarily attends spiritual apostasy from the truth of the Gospel. Cf. 6:4–6, “For it is impossible....If they shall fall away, to renew them again to repentance...” (VAdu,naton ga..r…kai. parapeso,ntaj(pa,lin avnakaini,zein eivj meta,noian, 2. aor. ptc.), “having fallen away.”
    He states, however, that he is persuaded that his readers are truly saved, although he further exhorts them to diligence and then gives them some consolation in the faithfulness of God (6:7–20).

    I could not cut and paste the quote accurately;
    Anthony D'Arienzo
    Sunday School Teacher
    Hope Reformed Baptist Church:
    Medford, N.Y.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  30. #24
    Quickened's Avatar
    Quickened is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Posts
    2,049
    Thanks
    947
    Thanked 225 Times in 188 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by chbrooking View Post
    Thanks Sterling,
    He does an excellent job working with the text. In fact, he's persuaded me. But he doesn't really answer the question I asked. And he only worked through one of the verses (as far as I could tell -- did he follow up with another post? I couldn't find it.)

    Whether we take a hypothetical, but really saved, or a apparently, but not really saved view, I'm still wondering what is the nature of the impossibility. WHY is it impossible?

    Thanks for link.
    Clark:

    That post is one in a thread of several posts in which he exegetes Hebrews 5:7-6:6.

    His first substantial post in the thread is on page 2 HERE

    The whole thread is 5 pages long. His exegesis of Heb 6:5 is HERE

    Exegesis of Heb 6:6 is Here

    He does answer the question in the final post on HEB 6:6

    Also He gives a summary of possible conclusions in this post
    Thank you for linking to this discussion. Sadly hebrews is a book that I have neglected for whatever reason even though i have been perplexed by these verses in the past with no real solid understanding of the text.

    I feel motivated to really dive into the book and i appreciate the insight offered in these posts both here and in that other discussion thread that you linked.
    Brian E
    Attending Falls OPC
    Menomonee Falls, WI

    Quote Originally Posted by Psalm 28:7
    The Lord is my Strength and my shield; in Him my heart trusts, and I am helped; my heart exults, and with my song i give thanks to Him.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  31. #25
    akennethjr's Avatar
    akennethjr is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Nampa
    Posts
    25
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Yes, there are places in the Bible where it does seem to teach final apostasy and Hebrews six is possibly one of these. Sounds like damnable heresy.
    Paul
    Member OPC
    Idaho

    Be the master of many books, but let the Bible master you.
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69