» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 94 | | 27 members and 67 guests | | Augusta, Backwoods Presbyterian, Brad, christianyouth, etexas, gene_mingo, glorifyinggodinwv, Grymir, matthew11v25, PuritanCovenanter, py3ak, Reformingstudent, rjlynam, rmdmphilosopher, RTaron, skellam, Sonoftheday, TimV, uberkermit, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-29-2007, 01:10 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | | Hebrews 1:3 Hebrews 1:3 "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;"
How do you understand the above text? Quote: |
The fathers and some modern divines have held that these words express the eternal relation between the Father and the Son. But Calvin, with others, such as Beza, Dr. Owen, Scott and Stuart, have regarded the words as referring to Christ as the Messiah, as the Son of God in human nature, or as Mediator, consistently with such passages as these, He that hath seen me hath seen the Father. John 14:9; He that hath seen me hath seen him that sent me. (John 12:45). By this view we avoid altogether the difficulty that arises from the expressions, the impress of his substance, or essence, he being so, not as to his eternal divinity, but as a Mediator. Ed. (http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom44.vii.ii.html)
|
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
08-29-2007, 08:14 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 4,271
Thanks: 489
Thanked 1,656 Times in 665 Posts
| | | The apostle is speaking of the person of Christ. Owen saw that everything stated of Christ here was applicable to Him in the union of the divine and human natures. So far so good. But one must explain how a *man* can be the express image of God's person. Here Owen acknowledges that everything that is said of Christ is owing to His divinity. It is because He is the God-man that He expresses God's exact character, specifically, because He is God who assumed human nature. To see Christ is to see God because He is God. This leaves us where the great majority of orthodox interpreters have brought us in the understanding of this passage -- that the divine person of Christ is the exact representation of God the Father.
__________________
Yours sincerely,
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
| 
08-29-2007, 08:39 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,834
Thanks: 843
Thanked 754 Times in 464 Posts
| | | Thanks to both of you gentlemen for your thoughts on this matter and teh others related to the Person of Christ.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
| 
08-30-2007, 03:09 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 2,469
Thanks: 0
Thanked 158 Times in 110 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer To see Christ is to see God because He is God. This leaves us where the great majority of orthodox interpreters have brought us in the understanding of this passage -- that the divine person of Christ is the exact representation of God the Father. | Exactly - the Son of God incarnate is the exact representation of God the Father, without being God the Father, Himself, as I'm sure some heretic or other has probably thought during church history. The Father is the Father and the Son is the Son, and both (with the Holy Spirit, of course) are the one God. Different persons, same essence.
__________________
Richard T. Zuelch, M.Div
Ruling Elder, OPC (not currently serving)
Westminster Presbyterian Church, CA (OPC) www.reiterations.wordpress.com www.foft.wordpress.com
Talking to oneself is, I believe, considered a sign of lunacy. Thinking to oneself is most certainly a sign of it. - G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936), in January, 1906
| 
08-30-2007, 05:12 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer The apostle is speaking of the person of Christ. Owen saw that everything stated of Christ here was applicable to Him in the union of the divine and human natures. So far so good. But one must explain how a *man* can be the express image of God's person. Here Owen acknowledges that everything that is said of Christ is owing to His divinity. It is because He is the God-man that He expresses God's exact character, specifically, because He is God who assumed human nature. To see Christ is to see God because He is God. This leaves us where the great majority of orthodox interpreters have brought us in the understanding of this passage -- that the divine person of Christ is the exact representation of God the Father. |
Thanks  |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |