The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > NT Epistles

NT Epistles Discussion of texts from Romans - Jude
Grace be with all those who love our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerety. (Eph. 6:23)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:07 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
Ephesians 4:12

NASB Ephesians 4:12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of service, to the building up of the body of Christ;

ESV Ephesians 4:12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ,

GNV Ephesians 4:12 For the repairing of the Saintes, for the woorke of the ministerie, and for the edification of the bodie of Christ,

KJV Ephesians 4:12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:

NIV Ephesians 4:12 to prepare God's people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up

NKJ Ephesians 4:12 for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ,
What is the purpose of the apostles, prophets, evangelists, and pastors/teachers of v. 11? What is the purpose of preaching?

Is it "For the equpping of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ..."

OR "For the equipping of the saints for the works of service, for the edifying of the body of Christ..."


Is there a comma there or not? Are we to equip the saints for ministry/service? OR Are we to equip the saints and do the work of ministry/service?


How do we interpret, how do we exegete this passage, what is the meaning?
__________________
Rev. Andrew J. Barnes
Husband of Dena
Father of Oliver
Master of Bruce
Pastor of Tchula Presbyterian Church

What can I say, I like blogs!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:09 PM
LawrenceU's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Deep in the heart of Dixie - Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 6,152
Thanks: 767
Thanked 2,925 Times in 1,455 Posts
Either way the pastor's job is to equip the Saints. That really is the bottom line.
__________________
We shall not adjust our Bible to the age; but before we have done with it, by God's grace, we shall adjust the age to the Bible. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon

Lawrence Underwood, Jr.
Pastor - Providence Family Fellowship / Mobile, Alabama
1644/46 LBC
My Blog - Imprimis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 03:14 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 136
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LawrenceU View Post
Either way the pastor's job is to equip the Saints. That really is the bottom line.
That is correct, but there's bigger fish to fry, like I am going to preach on this and I need to teach the text!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 05:03 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 453
Thanked 871 Times in 398 Posts
There have been a couple of essays written on this. I know that T. David Gordon, Dennis Johnson, and Steve Baugh have all weighed in (as it was part of an exchange read for senior seminar), but do not know if those essays have become widely available.

Gordon came down favoring the punctuation into three distinct phrases all related to the pastoral role, while Johnson favored the ESV's understanding. Steve Baugh was asked to evaluate their arguments in his essay, and while seeing strong points in Dr. Johnson's position ultimately sided with David Gordon.

A lot of it boils down to grammatical details that those who are not Greek students would find too obtuse and confusing for discussion (I don't remember them myself at the moment). I think my sr. seminar materials are packed away, but if I can find them I will give you the titles of those essays, and their publication info if any.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon

Soli Deo Gloria
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 05:14 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 1,002 Times in 572 Posts
Could this be a Hebraism in which Paul refers to the same thing twice?

In other words, saints = body of Christ,

and

equipping = building up

If that is the case, then it is not two activities, but one, to be doubly emphasized.

Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA

"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 05:38 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,063
Thanks: 453
Thanked 871 Times in 398 Posts
Andrew,

T. David Gordon's essay "'Equipping Ministry in Ephesians 4?" is located in JETS37 (1994): 69-78. I am sorry to say that both Dr. Johnson's and Dr. Baugh's respective essays are unpublished.

If you have some time, which doesn't seem to be the case, you could always contact them through WSC to see if they might send you something via email. I only have the essays in paper. The title of Dr. Johnson's essay is "Pastors and Teachers Do Equip the Saints for Ministry: A Brief Response to T. David Gordon's Interpretation of Eph. 4:11-12". The title of Dr. Baugh's is "On Eph. 4:11-12: Dialogue with Drs. Johnson and Gordon".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 09:43 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,402
Thanks: 2,682
Thanked 2,838 Times in 1,471 Posts
The letters to Philemon, the ... - Google Books

http://civitatedei.wordpress.com/200...esians-411-12/
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 11:04 PM
Ask Mr. Religion's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 619
Thanks: 142
Thanked 260 Times in 151 Posts
I prefer the NLT 2007 rendering:

Their responsibility is to equip God’s people to do his work and build up the church, the body of Christ.

AMR
__________________
Patrick
Member, PCA
Chandler, AZ
ReformedTheologyInstitute.com


I fear explanations explanatory of things explained.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 11:25 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Andrew,

I've studied this in some depth (Gordon's paper is an excellent place to begin). It seems to me that there is not as much difference between the views about ministry in totality as may be implied, although there is a great deal of difference in the passage at hand.

Basically, Gordon sees the "work of ministry" ( ἔργον διακονίας) as being Word and Sacrament, and hence the prerogative of the minister. But that does not mean that Gordon (and others) would see works of service as not being part of the laity's responsibility. On the other hand, those who see ἔργον διακονίας as "works of service" (almost diaconal) see the text speaking of the purview of the laity.

It would appear to me that both concepts are correct - the ministry of Word and Sacrament (narrowly defined, as by Gordon) is the responsibility of the minister, and at the same time, the people are to be involved in serving one another and their King.

I hope that helps some in your sermon prep.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Romans922 (08-29-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-18-2009, 11:27 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,520
Thanks: 334
Thanked 3,502 Times in 1,412 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I prefer the NLT 2007 rendering:

Their responsibility is to equip God’s people to do his work and build up the church, the body of Christ.

AMR
I disagree. The NLT butchers the text, importing words that are nowhere in the text ("church" "responsibility") and leaving out concepts as well ("saints" "ministry/service") that are key to the text. It is not just a translation, but a bad interpolation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Rev. Todd Ruddell (08-19-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2009, 06:10 AM
Ask Mr. Religion's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 619
Thanks: 142
Thanked 260 Times in 151 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ask Mr. Religion View Post
I prefer the NLT 2007 rendering:

Their responsibility is to equip God’s people to do his work and build up the church, the body of Christ.

AMR
I disagree. The NLT butchers the text, importing words that are nowhere in the text ("church" "responsibility") and leaving out concepts as well ("saints" "ministry/service") that are key to the text. It is not just a translation, but a bad interpolation.
"God's people" are not "saints"? The "body of Christ" is not "the church"?

Verse 11 describes individuals given gifts for the church. They are so appointed these gifts for two reasons: equip God's people, the saints to do his work (service!) and to build up the church, the body of Christ.

To what end? verse 13 - "This will continue until we all come to such unity in our faith and knowledge of God’s Son that we will be mature in the Lord, measuring up to the full and complete standard of Christ."

You may not like the translation, but we both end up at the same place. And without fretting over comma placement.

AMR
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69