The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > The Gospels & Acts

The Gospels & Acts Discussion of texts from Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and Acts
These are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. (John 20:31)

View Poll Results: Gospel Study!
St. Matthew 1 5.88%
St. Mark 3 17.65%
St. Luke 3 17.65%
St. John 10 58.82%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:43 AM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Question Your one year study of a Gospel?

Suppose an offer was presented to you, a deep line by line examination of one of the Gospels, under the care of the best Reformed NT Teacher alive. As stated you will be going line by line looking at the Greek, (and if your Greek is like mine, not so hot LOTS of parsing codes ) This will be around a one year study. Catch, you must select one Gospel! And yes, I am putting you on the "spot" again Brethren, so! Choose wisely and carefully! If you would state why you selected your Gospel.
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:44 AM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
Gospel of St. Mark
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:46 AM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Hard choice, but with one year I would select St. Luke. I have always like it's scope and it is a Literary Masterpiece!
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:52 AM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AV1611 View Post
Gospel of St. Mark
Hi Richard! What draws you to Mark?
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:12 PM
Blue Tick's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 295
Thanked 284 Times in 194 Posts
I would choose Matthew for a couple of reasons. One I like the Jewish context in which its written, there are numerous references to the OT. It causes someone to research the Old Testament when studying through the text, which provides a thorough understaning of what Christ is refering to in the Gospel. In addition, I like how Christ expands on the Law of God in Chapter 5.
__________________
John J.
Member Christ Prebyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.christpres.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:19 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Tick View Post
I would choose Matthew for a couple of reasons. One I like the Jewish context in which its written, there are numerous references to the OT. It causes someone to research the Old Testament when studying through the text, which provides a thorough understaning of what Christ is refering to in the Gospel. In addition, I like how Christ expands on the Law of God in Chapter 5.
Good choice!
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:21 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
As a trained historian I would go for Luke, of course.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church, Sewickley, PA
Student of Theology Pittsburgh Theological Seminary & Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary

“If the Church could be aroused to a deeper sense of the glory that awaits her, she would enter with a warmer spirit into the struggles that are before her.”-- J.H. Thornwell
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:30 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian View Post
As a trained historian I would go for Luke, of course.
All RIGHT! I am a HUGE History buff, to me St. Luke has many great elements, the Theology, History, Elegant Literature and a connection to Acts, which many consider one of the more important pieces of NT Canon.
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:33 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
Speaking of Acts, can I treat the Gospel as a "Two-Part" book and add Acts in with my study????
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church, Sewickley, PA
Student of Theology Pittsburgh Theological Seminary & Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary

“If the Church could be aroused to a deeper sense of the glory that awaits her, she would enter with a warmer spirit into the struggles that are before her.”-- J.H. Thornwell
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:48 PM
shackleton's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 771
Thanks: 55
Thanked 62 Times in 47 Posts
Ditto to above if it was two part I would say Luke then Acts together.

But I chose John since it is the most mystical of the four. Spend a lot of time on John 1 and its implications.

Then again Matthew would be good because of the Olivet Discourse.

I assume the professor somehow survived the crash and is on the same desert island with our favorite bible. Maybe it was one of those R.C. Sproul cruises and the ship sank.
__________________
Erick Bohndorf, Covenant Baptist Church, KS
http://qayaqtraveler.blogspot.com/
The question for us today is, will we be like the majority of Israel and continue to look in fear at the giants in the land and urge our fellow Christians to be "realistic," or will we be like Joshua and Caleb and faithfully follow our king, trusting to fulfill every one of his promises completely?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:58 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 3,221
Thanks: 880
Thanked 371 Times in 288 Posts
I voted John, because of the personal nature of his writing and I think it has a well rounded presentation of the gospel and the Savior.

Do we also get to choose "the best Reformed NT Teacher alive"?
__________________
~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 02:02 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,205
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
If we do I'll take Steven M. Baugh of WSCAL so that I really understand Greek.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church, Sewickley, PA
Student of Theology Pittsburgh Theological Seminary & Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary

“If the Church could be aroused to a deeper sense of the glory that awaits her, she would enter with a warmer spirit into the struggles that are before her.”-- J.H. Thornwell
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 03:27 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
I voted John, because of the personal nature of his writing and I think it has a well rounded presentation of the gospel and the Savior.

Do we also get to choose "the best Reformed NT Teacher alive"?
YES! You get to select the ANY NT Scholar you wish, one on one! Some asked if this was like my desert island scenario. No, not at all, you will be have all 66 books of the Holy-Writ, you ONLY have to decide which Gospel you want your NT Scholar of choice to study, any other Bible books would be for you to study on your own time. Hey! This is a pretty good deal here! Better than the desert island!
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 03:31 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 3,221
Thanks: 880
Thanked 371 Times in 288 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
I voted John, because of the personal nature of his writing and I think it has a well rounded presentation of the gospel and the Savior.

Do we also get to choose "the best Reformed NT Teacher alive"?
YES! You get to select the ANY NT Scholar you wish, one on one! Some asked if this was like my desert island scenario. No, not at all, you will be have all 66 books of the Holy-Writ, you ONLY have to decide which Gospel you want your NT Scholar of choice to study, any other Bible books would be for you to study on your own time. Hey! This is a pretty good deal here! Better than the desert island!
Cool! I'll have to give this some thought. Unless your supplying a list of of scholars as well.
__________________
~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 03:33 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by etexas View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Southern Presbyterian View Post
I voted John, because of the personal nature of his writing and I think it has a well rounded presentation of the gospel and the Savior.

Do we also get to choose "the best Reformed NT Teacher alive"?
YES! You get to select the ANY NT Scholar you wish, one on one! Some asked if this was like my desert island scenario. No, not at all, you will be have all 66 books of the Holy-Writ, you ONLY have to decide which Gospel you want your NT Scholar of choice to study, any other Bible books would be for you to study on your own time. Hey! This is a pretty good deal here! Better than the desert island!
Cool! I'll have to give this some thought. Unless your supplying a list of of scholars as well.
Nope! The selection of a Scholar is totally up to you!
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 03:46 PM
tellville's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Surrey (Vancouver), BC
Posts: 643
Thanks: 44
Thanked 40 Times in 26 Posts
Naturally I would want to study the best named Gospel. The obvious choice then being the Gospel of Mark.
__________________
Mark Maney
Kwanglim Korean Methodist Church - 1689'er Baptist Pastor (read profile for more info)
Master of Theological Studies emphasis Biblical Studies
Trinity Western University, ACTS Seminaries
Surrey, BC. (Vancouver), Canada
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 07:28 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tellville View Post
Naturally I would want to study the best named Gospel. The obvious choice then being the Gospel of Mark.
Chuckle! Are you being "name biased " I like what Luther called the Gospel of Mark:"That robust little Gospel." Very apt, I always have liked that.
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 07:39 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 2,825
Thanks: 488
Thanked 698 Times in 527 Posts
I chose John's Gospel

I would especially enjoy the exposition of chapter 6 of John.

Not sure yet who I would pick as a NT scholar to have instruct me. I am open to suggestions.
__________________
Sterling Harmon
Coventry, CT
PCA
Deacon

________________

"Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
-- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

"Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
-- Martin Luther, Table Talk
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 07:46 PM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Presbyterian Deacon View Post
I would especially enjoy the exposition of chapter 6 of John.

Not sure yet who I would pick as a NT scholar to have instruct me. I am open to suggestions.
Actually, I will open options of who to study with a bit more (feeling generous) it can be a NT Scholar from anywhere you wish or if you wish, it can be a more "general" Theologian, or it can be a Pastor, think of this as an ultimate wish. You get your scholar, Theologian, or Pastor 5 days a week for one hour, for a year, the ULTIMATE Bible study.
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 02:59 AM
Grymir's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,675
Thanks: 314
Thanked 244 Times in 200 Posts
I voted John, and I would want R.C. Sproul to teach me. I pick it because it's loaded with theology, and well, do I need to explain my choice of R. C.?

Etexas, I noticed you put the saint in front of the gospel writers names, are you going Roman Catholic on us?
__________________
Timothy Johnson
First United Presbyterian of Moline
PCUSA (Yea, I know)
Theology/Philosophy Sunday School Teacher
Davenport, IA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 05:15 AM
christianyouth's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 930
Thanks: 745
Thanked 34 Times in 22 Posts
Timothy!

I would go with John since there are a lot of phrases in John that are really hard to understand, more then reading through the Synoptics, IMO.

The bad thing is John doesn't have many parables. Luke has many and I would love to figure out the meaning to all the parables.

Good thread idea.
__________________
Andrew Clerebout
Joy Baptist Church, IFB (Westland, MI)

www.animalfarmblog.com
^Nick Altman's blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 08:34 AM
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 5,101
Thanks: 814
Thanked 200 Times in 168 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grymir View Post
I voted John, and I would want R.C. Sproul to teach me. I pick it because it's loaded with theology, and well, do I need to explain my choice of R. C.?

Etexas, I noticed you put the saint in front of the gospel writers names, are you going Roman Catholic on us?
Not at all. The St. as preface to the name of the 4 Gospel writers continued into the Reformation, to this day some KJV Cambridge Editions use this tradition, I have no issue with it, the Bible itself refers to true believers as Saints.
__________________
~etexas~
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!