Closed Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Meaning of "least in the Kingdom of Heaven" in Matthew 5:19

  1. #1
    ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
    ColdSilverMoon is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    2,240
    Thanks
    770
    Thanked 989 Times in 443 Posts

    Meaning of "least in the Kingdom of Heaven" in Matthew 5:19

    Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches [them], he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
    What does it mean to be called "least in the kingdom of heaven?" Calvin says it means those ministers who don't teach the full law or teach it inaccurately are "sent to the back of the line" to get into heaven, while MacArthur says it means the "least" are unsaved members of the visible church. Any other insight on this?
    Mason
    Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
    New York, NY

    "Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. #2
    PresbyDane's Avatar
    PresbyDane is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Breum, Denmark
    Posts
    6,459
    Thanks
    2,674
    Thanked 1,105 Times in 778 Posts
    Martin - Reformed
    Husband to the most godly, honorable and loyal wife Line
    Searching for a Church
    Webpage www.5solas.dk
    Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
    Soli Deo Gloria
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. #3
    Skyler's Avatar
    Skyler is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    2,318
    Thanks
    354
    Thanked 555 Times in 386 Posts
    It would seem to suggest to me that there are levels of greatness even among the saints. I am reminded of George Whitefield's comment that he didn't expect to see John Wesley in heaven--because he anticipated Mr. Wesley to be so much closer to Christ than he was.
    Jonathan, A.A.S.
    Audio Engineer
    Reformed Baptist
    Ohio
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Skyler For This Useful Post:

    ColdSilverMoon (04-09-2009)

  5. #4
    DonP's Avatar
    DonP is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,553
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    326
    Thanked 410 Times in 280 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    It would seem to suggest to me that there are levels of greatness even among the saints. I am reminded of George Whitefield's comment that he didn't expect to see John Wesley in heaven--because he anticipated Mr. Wesley to be so much closer to Christ than he was.
    That must have been before he said, he would not be able to consider him a brother if he didn't stop lying and falsely translating works like Predestination by Zanchius and teaching against the doctrines of scripture like Predestination

    As for least in the kingdom I am not dogmatic at this point but I do believe it is speaking of the whole kingdom. These would be false prophets who would be stoned in the OT and so now would be in the least part of the real spiritual kingdom which would be hell.
    John 14:16"If you love Me, keep My commandments. NKJV

    John 15:10 If you keep My commandments, you will abide in My love, NKJV

    1 John 2:3 Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. 4 He who says, "I know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. 5 But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this we know that we are in Him. 6 He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked. NKJV

    How could we teach people not to keep the 4th commandment or that these laws have been abrogated for the believer and be converted?
    It plainly says By this we know we are in Him.
    And if we do not keep them we do not have the truth

    It could be referring to those who were misguided and did not see we need to keep all 10 commandments and yet He will have mercy on them and save them as least in the new heaven and earth.

    Point is, don't teach people not to keep a command, who wants to be least in the kingdom anyway.
    DonP
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  6. #5
    E Nomine's Avatar
    E Nomine is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    165
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 87 Times in 32 Posts
    McArthur's interpretation doesn't make sense to me because the unsaved will not have any place in the Kingdom of Heaven.
    SW
    Church of the Highlands, San Francisco, CA
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to E Nomine For This Useful Post:

    ColdSilverMoon (04-09-2009)

  8. #6
    Joshua's Avatar
    Joshua is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    23,947
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    3,366
    Thanked 1,801 Times in 1,023 Posts
    Mason, I think these two sermons by my pastor will prove helpful:

    SermonAudio.com - Introduction - The Greatest and the Least
    SermonAudio.com - Are you Least or Greatest in the Kingdom?

    Of course, I'd encourage you to listen to the whole series, as they are very helpful in understanding God's Law as understood in what is perpetual, what has been "fulfilled" what are the distinctions in the law, etc. But the two sermons above deal explicitly with the greatest and least.
    Josh
    CCRPC, RPCGA
    Board Rules -Signature Rules

    How absurd a tenet is this, which holdeth that there is some particular worship of God allowed, and not commanded? What new light is this which maketh all our divines to have been in the mist, who have acknowledged no worship of God, but that which God hath commanded? Who ever heard of commanded and allowed worship?
    - George Gillespie
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69