The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > The Gospels & Acts

The Gospels & Acts Discussion of texts from Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and Acts
These are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. (John 20:31)

» Online Users: 42
4 members and 38 guests
Kilted_Rob, tabrooks, Theoretical
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:09 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wick, Caithness, Scotland
Posts: 385
Thanks: 20
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
Mark6:20 "perplexed"

I was struck by this word in the NASV when I read it as a description of Herods reaction to John the Baptist. Despite enjoying listening to him he was "perplexed".

I looked the word up in the KJV+
Mar 6:20 ForG1063 HerodG2264 fearedG5399 John,G2491 knowingG1492 that heG846 was a justG1342 manG435 andG2532 an holy,G40 andG2532 observedG4933 him;G846 andG2532 when he heardG191 him,G846 he didG4160 many things,G4183 andG2532 heardG191 himG846 gladly.G2234

Here the word/phrase is given as "polus polos"

Yet elsewhere the NETBible gives the word as "aporeo"

Which is it and what does it mean did Herod do many things or was it the paralysis of analysis?
__________________
Eoghan
member,Thurso Baptist Church
Scotland

specialist subject: Creationist Genetics (Bottleneck effect of the Ark)
interests: holiness (practical theology)
member of Biblical Creation Society (available as a guest speaker in the far north of Scotland)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:18 AM
Nathan Riese's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
Mark 6.20.
Text Instead of ēporei ‘he was puzzled’ of all modern editions of the Greek text, Textus Receptus has epoiei ‘he was doing.’
Exegesis ephobeito (cf. 4.40) ‘he held (John) in awe,’ ‘he feared,’ ‘he respected.’
eidōs auton andra dikaion kai hagion ‘knowing him (to be) a righteous and holy man’: the participle eidōs ‘knowing’ is causal: ‘because he knew.’
dikaios (cf. 2.17) ‘righteous,’ ‘just,’ ‘upright.’
hagios (only place in Mark used of a man) ‘holy.’
sunetērei (only here in Mark) ‘he kept safe,’ ‘he protected’: i.e. from Herodias.
kai akousas autou polla ēporei ‘and when he heard him he was much perplexed’: the majority of translations take polla ‘much,’ ‘often’ with the principal verb ēporei ‘he was puzzled’: BFBS, however, takes it with the participle akousas ‘he often heard him’ (cf. Kilpatrick, The Bible Translator 7.8, 1956).
aporeō (only here in Mark) ‘be undecided,’ ‘be puzzled’ (from a privative ‘not’ and poros ‘passage’: literally, ‘without a way’). The verb may mean ‘raise questions’ (cf. Liddell & Scott I.2), which is suggested for this passage by Field (Notes, 29f.); cf. Arndt & Gingrich.
kai hēdeōs autou ēkouen ‘yet he heard him gladly,’ ‘yet he liked to hear him.’
hēdeōs (only here in Mark) ‘gladly,’ ‘with pleasure.’
Translation Feared in this context means ‘had a great deal of respect for,’ ‘had honor for him,’ or ‘saw him big’ (as in some languages).
For righteous see 2.17. In this context some languages have rather interesting expressions: ‘did what he should’ (Eastern Otomi), ‘walked straight’ (Popoluca), ‘was a man with a good heart’ (Huichol), ‘his life was straight’ (Black Bobo), and ‘was completely good’ (Huave). (This last expression does not imply sinless perfection.)
Holy has been discussed (see 1.7) in connection with the word Spirit. When applied to persons there may need to be certain adaptations, e.g. ‘good’ (Black Bobo), ‘without sin’ (Huichol), and ‘uncontaminated’ (Vai).
Kept him safe may be translated as ‘kept him from being harmed.’
Perplexed is equivalent to ‘worried,’ e.g. ‘his heart was gone’ (Tzeltal), ‘hard chased’ (Piro), ‘his mind was killing him’ (Navajo), ‘his stomach rose up’ (Gurunse), ‘he was very irresolute’ (lit., ‘it was all wrong with him’) (Indonesian), and ‘his heart was very divided’ (Javanese).

Robert G. Bratcher and Eugene Albert Nida, A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark, Originally Published: A Translator's Handbook on the Gospel of Mark, 1961., UBS handbook series; Helps for translators (New York: United Bible Societies, 1993], c1961), 195.


Ver. 20.—The words in the Authorized Version are, When he heard him, he did many things (πολλὰ ἐποίει), and heard him gladly. But according to the best authorities the reading should be (πολλὰ ἠπόρει), he was much perplexed. In St. Luke, as stated above, we have (διηπόρει), “he was much perplexed.” Nor is there any inconsistency in the next clause in St. Mark, if we accept this reading.

The Pulpit Commentary: St. Mark Vol. I, ed. H. D. M. Spence-Jones (Bellingham, WA: Logos Research Systems, Inc., 2004), 246.


He did many things. This translation is based upon an erroneous reading. The Greek text is not polla epoiei (πολλα ἐποιει) which would be “did many things,” but polla ēporei (πολλα ἠπορει). The verb is aporeō (ἀπορεω) from poros (πορος) “way” and Alpha privative, which makes the word mean “without a way.” The verb thus means “to be without resources, to be in straits, to be embarrassed, not to know which way to turn, to be perplexed.” This was Herod’s state of mind when he heard John.

Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest's Word Studies from the Greek New Testament : For the English Reader (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997, c1984), Mk 6:20.
__________________
Nathan Riese
Under Care, PCA
Trinity Presbyterian Church, Aledo, Illinois
Current student at MBBC
Future student of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
www.gpts.edu
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2009, 09:22 AM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 817 Times in 447 Posts
The difference appears to be a difference between the TR and the critical text at this point. The KJV and NKJV follow the TR and the NASB and NETbible follow the critical text. The NKJV may have a note to this effect, but I don't have mine handy.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69