 » Site Navigation | | | | » Online Users: 108 | | 21 members and 87 guests | | blhowes, bravebee, caddy, calgal, ColdSilverMoon, cornopean, CubsIn07, Guido's Brother, JDWiseman, LadyFlynt, MrMerlin777, Pilgrim72, py3ak, raekwon, Simply_Nikki, staythecourse, Timothy William, toddpedlar, Zenas | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
10-18-2007, 03:39 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | | Preterist Commentary on Daniel
Does anyone know of any preterist commentaries of Daniel? If so, are they online anywhere? 
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
|
10-18-2007, 07:47 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: NYC
Posts: 3,457
Thanks: 593
Thanked 113 Times in 87 Posts
| | James Jordan is supposed to be coming out with one. check americavision.org for updates. Gary Demar was touting it on his show.
__________________
~Keon Garraway~ Brooklyn, NY
Love for God demonstrated by the love for our children in giving them a God centered education is the only hope for our country. by David Morrow
Pslam 71:20 [Thou], which hast shewed me great and sore troubles, shalt quicken me again, and shalt bring me up again from the depths of the earth.
|
10-18-2007, 08:15 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Slippery  James Jordan is supposed to be coming out with one. check americavision.org for updates. Gary Demar was touting it on his show. |  Though I would be reluctant to read anything by James Jordan nowadays. I am giving a talk on Daniel 3 - Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego being thrown into the fiery furnace - on Tuesday night (D.V.) and will probably use R.J. Rushdoony's Thy Kingdom Come to help me bring out the social and political implications of the chapter. |
10-18-2007, 10:24 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Stuarts Draft, VA 24477
Posts: 242
Thanks: 4
Thanked 33 Times in 19 Posts
| | You can get a pdf copy of Daniel's Last Vision and Prophecy (James Farquharson) from American Vision in this set, but it deals only with the last few chapters.
Another online friend recommended one to me by his pastor.  Visions of Daniel Fulfilled: An Interpretation of...
I'm working on a brief one on my blog. Chapter 7 is coming shortly. |
10-18-2007, 11:29 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| |
Thanks, I will have to look into it further. |
10-18-2007, 12:23 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 752 Times in 462 Posts
| | Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it  ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College
|
10-18-2007, 01:27 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).  |
10-18-2007, 02:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 10
Thanked 91 Times in 61 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).:2cents: | “Interpretive maximalism”
__________________
Tom Albrecht
Member, Covenant URCNA, New Holland, PA.
"I'm not a famous man. I'm just a simple country doctor with horse sense."
|
10-18-2007, 03:52 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: LA
Posts: 9,818
Thanks: 827
Thanked 752 Times in 462 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).:2cents: | “Interpretive maximalism” | Right. Let's not knock Perspectivalism (if we are thinking of people like Frame and Bahnsen). It's a valid presuppositional move. |
10-19-2007, 01:59 PM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).:2cents: | “Interpretive maximalism” |
Yes, that is what you call it.  | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
|
