» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 85 | | 19 members and 66 guests | | Blueridge Believer, Casey, Christoffer, ColdSilverMoon, Dearly Bought, FenderPriest, jambo, Jimmy the Greek, Michael Doyle, Michael Turner, Pergamum, Puritan Sailor, Puritan Scot, Rogerant, Romans922, tabrooks, TaylorOtwell | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-31-2009, 03:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | | Job, a self-mutilator?
This was discussed some on this thread, but I have a question to add. The point of the thread is to better understand if Job scraped his wounds because they itched or to self-medicate, or if he was self-mutilating in the form of cutting because of depression.
My question is this: what does Job 18:4 mean? "You who tear yourself in your anger"... could that refer to Job tearing his skin with the potsherd because of his emotions? Earlier than Job 18, Job lamented about how God was "tearing at his soul," but I don't think this is being referenced here by Bildad, the speaker. I doubt this reference because Bildad, Eliphaz, and Zophar having been telling Job that God was the cause of his disposition because of Job's alleged moral pitfalls. Thus, the tearing here in 18:4 seems to be a ramification of God's actions, while earlier in Job "God's tearing" would be the causal actions. Perhaps then, in Job's "anger" he tore himself physically with the potsherd?
| 
03-31-2009, 03:29 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,427
Thanks: 2,919
Thanked 6,140 Times in 2,590 Posts
| |
Matthew Henry: Quote:
III. With a haughty contempt and disdain of his friends and of that which they offered (v. 3): Wherefore are we counted as beasts? This was invidious. Job had indeed called them mockers, had represented them both as unwise and as unkind, wanting both in the reason and tenderness of men, but he did not count them beasts; yet Bildad so represents the matter, 1. Because his high spirit resented what Job had said as if it had been the greatest affront imaginable. Proud men are apt to think themselves slighted more than really they are. 2. Because his hot spirit was willing to find a pretence to be hard upon Job. Those that incline to be severe upon others will have it thought that others have first been so upon them.
IV. With outrageous passion: He teareth himself in his anger, v. 4. Herein he seems to reflect upon what Job had said (ch. xiii. 14): Wherefore did I take my flesh in my teeth? "It is thy own fault," says Bildad. Or he reflected upon what he said ch. xvi. 9, where he seemed to charge it upon God, or, as some think, upon Eliphaz: He teareth me in his wrath. "No," says Bildad; "thou alone shalt bear it." He teareth himself in his anger. Note, Anger is a sin that is its own punishment. Fretful passionate people tear and torment themselves. He teareth his soul (so the word is); every sin wounds the soul, tears that, wrongs that (Prov. viii. 36), unbridled passion particularly.
|
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | | The Following User Says Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
03-31-2009, 03:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| |
That seems a little too allegorical for me, Joshua. Any other commentaries?  Actually, I read MH's, Gill's, and the Jamieson, Fausset, Brown commentary; none of them seemed to help answer the question, despite interacting with the text in some way. I know this isn't an issue to worry about, but it would be mightily interesting if the ever-so-patient Job was a cutter in order to relieve some emotional pain. Thanks Josh
Last edited by AThornquist; 03-31-2009 at 04:03 PM.
| 
03-31-2009, 03:43 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,427
Thanks: 2,919
Thanked 6,140 Times in 2,590 Posts
| |
Uh, I'm sorry. Exactly what is allegorical in that quoted portion?
It could be Job scratching his boils for relief, thus tearing skin in the process. I seriously doubt Job was a "cutter." That would take a high amount of eisogesis, me thinks, to make such a case.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
03-31-2009, 04:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,996
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,109 Times in 696 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Uh, I'm sorry. Exactly what is allegorical in that quoted portion?  | I wasn't serious. I was poking fun at the idea that MH is too allegorical; I was hoping the '  ' would signify that, assuming one has a knowledge of the MH-allegory threads. Oh well. Quote: |
It could be Job scratching his boils for relief, thus tearing skin in the process. I seriously doubt Job was a "cutter." That would take a high amount of eisogesis, me thinks, to make such a case.
| There isn't much refuting it or supporting a mere tearing of the skin (in anger?) because of the boils, either. To push hard for either would take at least a sprinkle of eisogesis, as far as I know. That is why I wanted to consider Job 18:4, to see if it relates to Job 2:8 at all.
I guess something good to know would be if, in the phrase "you who tear yourself in anger," "in anger" means while angry or because of anger.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to AThornquist For This Useful Post: | | 
03-31-2009, 04:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | |
Job's boils could have been caused by a number of malladies, anything from normal carbuncle type boils (bacterial) to parasitic worms. Most likely Job cut his boils open for relief. If bacterial the boils would have been quite painful, anyone who has had to have a boil lanced will tell you that. If parasitic about the only treatment (barring divine healing) at that time would have been to cut open the "boil" and remove the parasite.
So IMO Job "scraped his flesh" in treatment of the disease that was afflicting him.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Roanoke VA.
Covenant Reformed Episcopal Church. Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum. | | The Following User Says Thank You to MrMerlin777 For This Useful Post: | | 
03-31-2009, 04:34 PM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| | |
When I read the title to this thread, I thought you meant "a job- a self-mutilator."
Lols my friend, lols.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| 
03-31-2009, 05:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas When I read the title to this thread, I thought you meant "a job- a self-mutilator."
Lols my friend, lols. | I thought the same thing myself at first.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |