» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 116 | | 33 members and 83 guests | | amishrockstar, austinww, Backwoods Presbyterian, bisonrancher, calvinich, Chippy, christabella_warren, ColdSilverMoon, earl40, fralo4truth, JM, johnbugay, Michael Turner, Neopatriarch, P. F. Pugh, Reformed Thomist, RTaron, satz, SemperEruditio, SRoper, T.A.G., Timothy William, TimV, tlharvey7, turmeric, uberkermit, WAWICRUZ | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
11-11-2008, 10:38 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | | Dual Authorship of Job
From a lot of Biblical studies guys, I've been hearing that Job must have been written by two authors. They say that the poetic dialogs which makes up the bulk of the book are written in an ancient form of Hebrew, while the Introduction and the conclusion part of the book is a later form of Hebrew that has Persian loan words.
The argument posed by some liberal scholars, most notably Erhman, is that the book of Job presents to us with two different answers to the question of why people suffer. The poetic dialogs give us the answer that we don't know why good people suffer, they just do, and God's ways are inscrutable. While the Intro + epilogue give a more classical answer to the question of suffering; Righteous people can suffer for a TIME, but in the end they will eventually be vindicated and blessed even more for their faithfulness.
What do you all think of this? Is there any evidence for the dual authorship of Job? Is there any evidence that the book of Job answers the problem of suffering in two different ways?
Thanks all.
-In Christ,
Andy.
__________________
Andrew C.
IFB
LBCF 1689
| 
11-11-2008, 10:45 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,425
Thanks: 2,918
Thanked 6,140 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | |
IMHO, the book of Job's intent is not to answer the "problem" of suffering. Rather, it is a testimony to the Sovereignty of God over blessings and suffering. It is a testimony that he owes no one explanation for anything and yet He sheweth forth mercy to His children.
As for the dual authorship of Job, I dunno. And it really doesn't bother me, since I believe the Holy Spirit is the one Whom speaks through the author(s).
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post: | | 
11-11-2008, 10:55 AM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,593
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | |
Generally speaking, when scholars pursue this sort of thing they are distracting from WHAT the Bible says and casting doubt on its credibility. From what I've read, there is absolutely zero external testimony to support this idea. This sort of thing comes from academia. It's based merely on the testimony of linguistic "experts." Experts tend to like to make a name for themselves. Ultimately, there is one Author.
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| 
11-11-2008, 11:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
| | |
Stick that in the same category as those liberal scholars who think there are two authors of Isaiah, or even three authors...
| 
11-12-2008, 09:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,646
Thanks: 609
Thanked 925 Times in 709 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua IMHO, the book of Job's intent is not to answer the "problem" of suffering. Rather, it is a testimony to the Sovereignty of God over blessings and suffering. It is a testimony that he owes no one explanation for anything and yet He sheweth forth mercy to His children.
As for the dual authorship of Job, I dunno. And it really doesn't bother me, since I believe the Holy Spirit is the one Whom speaks through the author(s). |
Josh--
Your comment reminds me something I read from Dr. Thomas:
"...the lesson of the Book of Job, as well as the key to Christian piety in general, is submission to a sovereign and incomprehensible God..." -- Derek Thomas, Calvin's Teaching on Job (page 17).
As to authorship of JOB, I like what Jamieson, Fausset and Brown state:
"All that can be said with certainty is that the author was a loyal Hebrew who was not strictly bound by the popular creed that assumed suffering was always the direct result of sin."
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |