The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > OT Historical Books

OT Historical Books Discussion of texts from Genesis - Esther
Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is One! (Deut. 6:4)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

» Online Users: 91
18 members and 73 guests
annmarie, Backwoods Presbyterian, ChristianTrader, FrielWatcher, Grace Alone, Ivan, jakomus, jambo, JM, Josh G, lightandheat, PactumServa72, rmb, Seb, Southern Presbyterian
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 02:10 AM
sotzo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 570
Thanks: 37
Thanked 40 Times in 28 Posts
Significance of God's provision in Gen 1 and Gen 7

In Genesis 1, we read:

28 God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground."

29 Then God said, "I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air and all the creatures that move on the ground—everything that has the breath of life in it—I give every green plant for food." And it was so.

Then, following the flood in Genesis 9, we read:

1 Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the earth. 2 The fear and dread of you will fall upon all the beasts of the earth and all the birds of the air, upon every creature that moves along the ground, and upon all the fish of the sea; they are given into your hands. 3 Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything.
4 "But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it. 5 And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each man, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of his fellow man.

6 "Whoever sheds the blood of man,
by man shall his blood be shed;
for in the image of God
has God made man.

7 As for you, be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth and increase upon it."


Apart from the obvious parallels here, I'm trying to work through the differences as well, specifically:

1. Does God now give meat rather than just plant life for food (as He did in Gen 1) because sin is a reality and so death for the purpose of sustaining man is good?

2. Why does God require animals to give account for taking life as he does man? (see vs. 5 above).

Thanks for any help you can provide!
__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN

"Why wasn't God watching? Why wasn't God listening? Why wasn't God there for Georgia Lee?"
- Tom Waits
But you, O God, do see trouble and grief;you consider it to take it in hand. The victim commits himself to you; you are the helper of the fatherless. - Psalm 10:14
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 07:16 AM
Greg's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 480
Thanks: 60
Thanked 30 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotzo View Post

1. Does God now give meat rather than just plant life for food (as He did in Gen 1) because sin is a reality and so death for the purpose of sustaining man is good?

2. Why does God require animals to give account for taking life as he does man? (see vs. 5 above).

Thanks for any help you can provide!
1. I've wondered about that one too. The giving of meat for food doesn't happen until after the flood. So what you've mentioned sounds very possible.

2. In either case, whether an animal or another person, the taking of a human life is in reality the murdering of one who is an image bearer of God...a serious action deserving a serious consequence. Sadly the general consensus in today's society is that man is simply a more evolved species essentially no different than any other animal on the planet, when in fact man has been gifted a much more dignified place in the order of creation, particular as the only one of God's creatures made in His image.
__________________
~Greg Carpenter~
Deerfield Beach, FL

"It is a throne of grace that God in Christ is represented to us upon; but yet it is a throne still whereon majesty and glory do reside, and God is always to be considered by us as on a throne." –John Owen
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 08:47 AM
turmeric's Avatar
Megster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 6,955
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 472
Thanked 283 Times in 258 Posts
It provides for the killing of rogue animals that attack people. These creatures are usually found, upon examination, to have something radically wrong with them anyway.
__________________
The man who is disposed to think of his sin as a great calamity, rather than as a heinous crime, is not likely either to reverence God or to respect His law. - John Kennedy, 1873
Meg
Blog
Member, Intown Presbyterian Church,PCA, Portland, OR

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-13-2007, 10:36 AM
sotzo's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 570
Thanks: 37
Thanked 40 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by turmeric View Post
It provides for the killing of rogue animals that attack people. These creatures are usually found, upon examination, to have something radically wrong with them anyway.
This is interesting because it seems to indicate that it is the death of the image bearer that is the primary issue rather than the intent, motive or even culpability of the killer. (Obviously, an animal does not know the significance of killing a man as another man would.)

If this is a correct exegesis, would we then say the Bible teaches the death penalty for a murderer regardless of an insanity plea, mental status of the killer, etc? Whichever the answer, does one's position on theonomy govern the exegesis of this passage ultimately?
__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN

"Why wasn't God watching? Why wasn't God listening? Why wasn't God there for Georgia Lee?"
- Tom Waits
But you, O God, do see trouble and grief;you consider it to take it in hand. The victim commits himself to you; you are the helper of the fatherless. - Psalm 10:14
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64