The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Scriptures > OT Historical Books

OT Historical Books Discussion of texts from Genesis - Esther
Hear O Israel, the Lord our God is One! (Deut. 6:4)

» Online Users: 61
6 members and 55 guests
Jake, johnbugay, KaphLamedh, TimV, wookie
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:07 AM
Nathan Riese's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 162
Thanks: 51
Thanked 68 Times in 42 Posts
Relation of Yahweh to the 3 men in Genesis 18

I am confused as to who the three men are and what the relation Yahweh is to them. Yahweh is used in verses 1 and 13, but it's almost like one of the three men is speaking. Can someone help me out? I've been trying a couple commentaries, but no relief. If someone can either explain it well to me or point me to a resource that explains it well, I would be greatly appreciative!
__________________
Nathan Riese
Under Care, PCA
Trinity Presbyterian Church, Aledo, Illinois
Current student at MBBC
Future student of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary
www.gpts.edu
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:15 AM
JTB's Avatar
JTB JTB is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 138
Thanks: 8
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Riese View Post
I am confused as to who the three men are and what the relation Yahweh is to them. Yahweh is used in verses 1 and 13, but it's almost like one of the three men is speaking. Can someone help me out? I've been trying a couple commentaries, but no relief. If someone can either explain it well to me or point me to a resource that explains it well, I would be greatly appreciative!
Gordon Clark doesn't answer the question directly, but does discuss the passage in his book on the Trinity. I don't have the book with me at present to reproduce the quotes, but perhaps someone else may oblige, if you don't already possess the volume.

~Joshua
__________________
Joshua Butcher
PCA
College Station, TX
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 11:19 AM
youthevang's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 178
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
By taking into consideration the whole counsel, I think these are three angels that come to represent the trinity, since no man can see God's face and live. Some scriptures that come to mind are:

Ex. 33:18-23
Gal 3:19
Acts 7:53
__________________
Joshua Parker
Christ the King (PCA)
Foedus Theologus - My Blog
MDiv. Student at Whitefield
Cambridge, MA
"Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection! The second death has no power over these, but they will be priests of God and the Messiah, and they will reign with Him for 1,000 years." - Revelation 20:6
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:26 PM
austinww's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 868
Thanks: 379
Thanked 207 Times in 133 Posts
I think the one that speaks, at least, is the angel of the LORD (i.e. the Son pre-incarnate) and therefore is Yahweh. Not sure who the other two are. Angels? Perhaps important angels?
__________________
Austin
EE student at Texas State University
Member of Church of the Cross (PCA) in San Marcos, TX
Ps. 8:3-4 "When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?"

Last edited by austinww; 09-29-2009 at 12:47 PM. Reason: Basic math error! I meant "other two" not "other three"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 12:44 PM
discipulo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
I agree, chapter 18, vs 1 tells us it is a Teophany, and Abraham talks in the singular vs 3 to the Angel of the Covenant, Who bears the Name of God, the Pre Incarnate God the Son.

and we notice that the other 2 characters, are the Angels who go to Sodom on chapter 19
__________________
César Proença

there is no will nor running by which we can prepare the way for our salvation, it is wholly of the Divine Mercy Jean Calvin Institutes II . V. 17

Reformed Churches in The Netherlands (liberated) http://www.gkv.nl/main.asp?intTreeviewID=954

Igreja Reformada em Massamá Portugal http://www.igrejareformada.pt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:00 PM
BobVigneault's Avatar
Semper ubi sub ubi
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 7,401
Thanks: 403
Thanked 2,943 Times in 1,076 Posts
I think the safest interpretation (and without too much speculation) is to stick to exactly what the text says. These were three messengers in the form of men. The emphasis should not be so much on the messengers and who they were, but rather on the message and judgment that they were bringing. It might help to think of the three as inter dimensional transmitters.

Just as God spoke from a pillar of fire, from a glowing cloud, from a burning bush, through a donkey, in dreams, in the pre-canon history, He is not challenged in His choices for modes of revelation.

One of these messenger was the transmitter for God himself. He spoke as an omniscient sovereign yet Abraham was not seeing God but only the transmitter. These didn't even need to be angels with a past but rather the Lord could simply form these three for this specific purpose. The other two were sent on as agents of God's wrath.

I believe the reason they appeared in the form of man was the same reason Jesus was incarnated, the Lord was showing that he must condescend in order to deal with mankind. "I will go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me. And if not, I will know.” His language in both condescending and accommodating.
__________________
Bob Vigneault C.O.L, L.E., G.E, Dr.O.P., O.U.T.
The Heartbeat of Heaven (blog)
Deacon/Christ Presbyterian Church, Janesville, WI OPC www.christ-opc.org

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:17 PM
discipulo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault View Post
I think the safest interpretation (and without too much speculation) is to stick to exactly what the text says. These were three messengers in the form of men. The emphasis should not be so much on the messengers and who they were, but rather on the message and judgment that they were bringing. It might help to think of the three as inter dimensional transmitters.

Just as God spoke from a pillar of fire, from a glowing cloud, from a burning bush, through a donkey, in dreams, in the pre-canon history, He is not challenged in His choices for modes of revelation.

One of these messenger was the transmitter for God himself. He spoke as an omniscient sovereign yet Abraham was not seeing God but only the transmitter. These didn't even need to be angels with a past but rather the Lord could simply form these three for this specific purpose. The other two were sent on as agents of God's wrath.

I believe the reason they appeared in the form of man was the same reason Jesus was incarnated, the Lord was showing that he must condescend in order to deal with mankind. "I will go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me. And if not, I will know.” His language in both condescending and accommodating.
Bob, I am just reading my bible with no commentary aid, so I hope I am not

drawing wrong conclusions here, but wouldn't you say that verse 3, my Lord

with Abraham prostrated on the ground and all the following offerings confers

the context of a clear Divine visitation ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:18 PM
Romans922's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
I would definitely be careful of saying that it was all three persons of the Trinity. I don't think I could be convinced of that fact. There are no other places in Scripture where anyone SEES all three persons of the Trinity.

I however do find it appropriate to say that one of the messengers was the Son of God (Preincarnate).
__________________
Rev. Andrew J. Barnes
Husband of Dena
Father of Oliver
Master of Bruce
Pastor of Tchula Presbyterian Church

What can I say, I like blogs!


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Romans922 For This Useful Post:
discipulo (09-29-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:23 PM
discipulo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 View Post
I would definitely be careful of saying that it was all three persons of the Trinity. I don't think I could be convinced of that fact. There are no other places in Scripture where anyone SEES all three persons of the Trinity.

I however do find it appropriate to say that one of the messengers was the Son of God (Preincarnate).
That's the way I see it Rev Barnes,

but I do remember that often in evangelical circles because of being 3 persons, this is quoted as a trinitarian passage, clearly out of scriptural warrant as you say.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2009, 01:25 PM
BobVigneault's Avatar
Semper ubi sub ubi
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 7,401
Thanks: 403
Thanked 2,943 Times in 1,076 Posts
Of course it was a divine visit, and just as Moses removed his sandals and fell down before the burning bush so Abraham realizes that this is of the Lord. As it's been pointed out, no one sees God and lives so whatever this messenger was in essence, it was acting as a transmitter of God's message and a filter for God's glory.
Remember, Abraham's grandson is going to wrestle with one of these beings all night. It is most definitely an encounter with the Lord but it's a condescending and creature friendly encounter.


Quote:
Originally Posted by discipulo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault View Post
I think the safest interpretation (and without too much speculation) is to stick to exactly what the text says. These were three messengers in the form of men. The emphasis should not be so much on the messengers and who they were, but rather on the message and judgment that they were bringing. It might help to think of the three as inter dimensional transmitters.

Just as God spoke from a pillar of fire, from a glowing cloud, from a burning bush, through a donkey, in dreams, in the pre-canon history, He is not challenged in His choices for modes of revelation.

One of these messenger was the transmitter for God himself. He spoke as an omniscient sovereign yet Abraham was not seeing God but only the transmitter. These didn't even need to be angels with a past but rather the Lord could simply form these three for this specific purpose. The other two were sent on as agents of God's wrath.

I believe the reason they appeared in the form of man was the same reason Jesus was incarnated, the Lord was showing that he must condescend in order to deal with mankind. "I will go down to see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry that has come to me. And if not, I will know.” His language in both condescending and accommodating.
Bob, I am just reading my bible with no commentary aid, so I hope I am not

drawing wrong conclusions here, but wouldn't you say that verse 3, my Lord

with Abraham prostrated on the ground and all the following offerings confers

the context of a clear Divine visitation ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to BobVigneault For This Useful Post:
discipulo (09-29-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69