» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 119 | | 46 members and 73 guests | | A.Hudson, austinww, Backwoods Presbyterian, Beoga, bisonrancher, buggy, Casey, Chippy, Confessor, Curt, DD2009, E Nomine, gene_mingo, glorifyinggodinwv, Grafted In, Grillsy, Knight, KSon, markkoller, Mindaboo, Montanablue, mvdm, NateLanning, PointyHaired Calvinist, PuritanCovenanter, raekwon, Reformed Thomist, Rich Koster, Richard Tallach, sastark, satz, smhbbag, SolaScriptura, TaylorOtwell, TimV, Von Stroh, Wayne | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
08-25-2008, 04:13 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 991
Thanks: 339
Thanked 221 Times in 140 Posts
| | | Hezekiah's Illness
What is supposed to be the take-home message on this? Was Hezekiah's request for an extension on his life morally right, neutral, or wrong?
Right because it gave Israel more years of godly rule?
Neutral because the text neither lauds nor condemns his request?
Wrong because the extension produced Manassah who was a disaster?
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
| 
08-25-2008, 05:17 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 131
Thanked 303 Times in 167 Posts
| | | Rather a mixture, don't you think?
As is so often the case. ISTM it shows that there's nothing inherently dishonoring to the LORD to prefer to not die just now, but instead remain on Earth. Which, naturally, Christ Himself tacitly pointed out by asking this cup be taken from Him.
But it also shows that monkeying with the LORD's timing is tricky business, as the Manassah incident demonstrates.
Interesting question! Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie What is supposed to be the take-home message on this? Was Hezekiah's request for an extension on his life morally right, neutral, or wrong?
Right because it gave Israel more years of godly rule?
Neutral because the text neither lauds nor condemns his request?
Wrong because the extension produced Manassah who was a disaster? |
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Widowed mother of six, grandmother of eight. The Ivy Vine (my blog) | 
08-25-2008, 06:23 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Lisburn, Northern Ireland, UK
Posts: 765
Thanks: 179
Thanked 404 Times in 227 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie Wrong because the extension produced Manassah who was a disaster? | I don't think it is fair to "blame" Hezekiah's request for healing for Manasseh's disastrous reign. It is true that had Hezekiah not received those 15 extra years, Manasseh would not have been born. But then no Manasseh would mean no grandson, Josiah either.
Secondly in the providence of God, Manasseh, wicked as he was, was an ancestor of Christ and part of the "seed of the woman".
Thirdly although Manasseh was wicked and corrupt, there was that element of repentance which has proved to be a source of encouragement for many in the church today.
The Lord was gracious in giving Hezekiah extra years and he was gracious in humbling Manasseh (2 Chro 33.12) Truly the Lord does not treat us as our sins deserve.
According to both 2 Kgs 20 and 2 Chro 32, Hezekiah just prayed when he was told his life was about to end. It does not say he asked for extra years. The Lord just gave him it. "Shall not the Judge of al the Earth do right."
__________________
Stuart
Elder, Lambeg Baptist, Northern Ireland, UK
In Him the fulness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form and in Him you are complete (Col 2.9-10)
The Christian is a person who makes it easy for others to believe in God. (RM M'Cheyne)
| | The Following User Says Thank You to jambo For This Useful Post: | | 
08-26-2008, 12:43 AM
|  | Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,194
Thanks: 75
Thanked 3,370 Times in 1,193 Posts
| | |
Looking at this from the biblical-theological perspective,
I would see Hezekiah's great concern as having to do with succession to the throne and the promises to David and to the People Israel.
Both 2Ki.20:1 and Is.38:1 read: "In those days, Hezekiah was sick and near death..." In both passages the case of his illness is put after the episode of the Assyrian siege of Jerusalem; but according to scholars, the congratulatory note sent by Babylonian envoys (2Ki.20:12; Is 39:1) from their king must have been sent while he was alive, and he died some two years or so before the siege.
This puts us back some time before the siege (701BC) and closer to Manasseh's birthdate, which was most likely in 709 BC, and maybe even before it. (The supposition that because Manasseh was given status as king at 12 yrs, that must have been Hezekiah's death-date, is based on a faulty understanding of the succession mechanism in Judah, which ordinarily included a period of co-regency.) So, I think there was some concern he had for the time he thought necessary to participate in God's promises.
Whether the child was Hezekiah's only son, or if he was even born, for some reason Hezekiah was distraught either over the possibility that he would not remain in the direct line of God's promises (which I think is LESS likely), or that he would not have the opportunity to raise up his son in the way he ought to go. He praises the Lord, Is 38:19 "The living, the living man, he shall praise you, As I do this day; The father shall make known Your truth to the children."
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | 
08-27-2008, 10:27 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 991
Thanks: 339
Thanked 221 Times in 140 Posts
| | |
Thanks for your replies as they help my understanding of the passage. At least it was not morally wrong for him. The next question then is does this passage permit or encourage a person with a terminal diagnosis to plead for some extra years?
| 
08-27-2008, 04:05 PM
|  | Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,194
Thanks: 75
Thanked 3,370 Times in 1,193 Posts
| | |
Nothing wrong with asking God for any lawful boon. Paul asked the Lord three time to take away his "thorn in the flesh," whatever that was. God said "no" but never stopped loving him.
| 
08-27-2008, 04:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,484
Thanks: 1,894
Thanked 2,423 Times in 1,146 Posts
| | |
Great thread.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| 
08-29-2008, 01:26 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 991
Thanks: 339
Thanked 221 Times in 140 Posts
| | |
Does anyone know of a Hezekiah event? I'm personally familiar with only one. 15 years ago a guy who was at missionary candidate school with us was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, a kind that responds to neither chemotherapy nor radiation. He had surgery and was sent home to die. As of about 2 years ago when we lost contact, he was very alive and well. There was no "faith healer" or alternative medicine at all. It was obviously a sovereign act of God with no other explanation.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |