View Poll Results: Did Noah live long enough to know Abraham?

Voters
22. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    4 18.18%
  • No

    7 31.82%
  • I have no opinion one way or the other

    9 40.91%
  • Who cares, it a silly debate

    4 18.18%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 23 of 23

OT Historical Books discuss Did Noah live long enough to know Abraham? in the The Scriptures forums; Here a question that may generate some debate and one that may reflect our views of genealogies as it compares to the 6000 year age ...

  1. #1
    Grimmson's Avatar
    Grimmson is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    537

    Did Noah live long enough to know Abraham?

    Here a question that may generate some debate and one that may reflect our views of genealogies as it compares to the 6000 year age date of the Earth. It is not a question we should divide over, call each other liberals/fundamentalists, or worse heretics. Now for the question:

    Did Noah live long enough to have possibly known Abraham? Explain your position.

    And for added fun, I included a poll that we can all see each other's results. Yeah!!! Now that what I call fun.
    Last edited by Grimmson; 06-02-2010 at 07:54 PM. Reason: correct grammar
    David Jolley
    Broadway Baptist Church of Escondido, CA
    Confessions: 1689-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
    Yuma, AZ (attending the OPC church plant/bible study in Yuma)

  2. #2
    Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline. Ordinary Guy (TM)
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    14,997
    The question, right, is not whether he knew Abraham, but whether he could have known him?
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone

  3. #3
    AThornquist's Avatar
    AThornquist is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    6,731
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmson View Post
    It is not a question we should divide over, call each other liberals/fundamentalists, or worse heretics.
    Ohh so are you a post-modern sissy, is that it?


  4. #4
    Grimmson's Avatar
    Grimmson is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
    The question, right, is not whether he knew Abraham, but whether he could have known him?
    At the heart that is the question. Thanks for correcting my grammar.

    ---------- Post added 06-02-2010 at 12:02 AM ---------- Previous post was 06-01-2010 at 11:57 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by AThornquist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmson View Post
    It is not a question we should divide over, call each other liberals/fundamentalists, or worse heretics.
    Ohh so are you a post-modern sissy, is that it?

    Sissy me? You obiviously didn’t see my work against partial preterism or my defense for non-Solomon authorship of Ecclesiastes . Or did you? LOL.
    But really all, explain your position on the main question of this thread.

    ---------- Post added at 12:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 AM ----------

    Maybe one of the moderators could fix the grammatical mistake of the poll.
    David Jolley
    Broadway Baptist Church of Escondido, CA
    Confessions: 1689-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
    Yuma, AZ (attending the OPC church plant/bible study in Yuma)

  5. #5
    AThornquist's Avatar
    AThornquist is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    6,731
    Personally, I've never even considered this question before. I suppose it just never occurred to me before you brought it up.

  6. #6
    Tim's Avatar
    Tim
    Tim is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    3,196
    What would Usher's timeline say?
    Tim Lindsay
    member, Southfield RPCNA, Southfield, MI

    "in the center of the continent, on a river flowing toward the inland sea, not far from a great northern forest"

    For listings of EP churches everywhere, visit: exclusivepsalmodychurches.wordpress.com

  7. #7
    Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
    Jimmy the Greek is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,386
    Ussher's chronology has Noah's birth in 2948 BC, his death in 1998 BC, followed by Abraham's call in 1920 BC. In this scenario, Abraham was called 78 years after Noah died. I can't find what Abraham's supposed age was when he was called.
    Jim
    1689 LBCF
    Independent Bible Church
    North Texas, USA

  8. #8
    goodnews's Avatar
    goodnews is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy the Greek View Post
    Ussher's chronology has Noah's birth in 2948 BC, his death in 1998 BC, followed by Abraham's call in 1920 BC. In this scenario, Abraham was called 78 years after Noah died. I can't find what Abraham's supposed age was when he was called.
    I seem to remember Abram being 75 when God called him from Haran. If all our chronology is correct then it's amazing how quickly the human race forgot the true God, even while Noah was alive.
    Jeff Jacobs
    Pastor, Covenant ARP Church, Statesville, NC
    Hubby of Madeline the Teacher
    Father of Grace and Sarah (both of whom have daddy wrapped around their finger)
    Longsuffering Gamecock fan

    "If you abide in my Word, you are truly my disciples; and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free" -John 8:31,32

  9. #9
    Jerusalem Blade's Avatar
    Jerusalem Blade is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,168
    Blog Entries
    8
    Ussher holds that Abraham was born 2008 years after Adam’s birth, 4004 – 1997 BC, or year 1 AM (Anno Mundi – year of the world) – 2008 AM.

    We know that Noah was 600 years old when the flood came upon the earth (Gen 7:6); this was the year 1656 AM (2348 BC). We know that Noah lived to age 950, living 350 years after the flood (Gen 9:28, 29), which brings him to the year 2006 AM when he died.

    The differing schools of chronological reckoning agree in the 2008 years from Adam to Abraham (save the Rabbinic school, which is patently off), though some differ slightly on the creation start date; they likewise agree that the flood was 1656 years after the creation.

    Trouble comes in to some reckonings as regards the age of Abraham’s father, Terah, when Abraham was born, whether it was when he was 130 years old or 70. D.A. Waite holds that Abraham was 88 years old when Noah died, though I don’t have access to his proofs, having only the chart of his results, copied out of his book, Gems from Genesis, p. viii. He is in disagreement with the other chronologists.

    As far as Ussher is concerned, Abraham was born two years after Noah died. I think this is probably sound.

    Now Noah’s son, Shem, was still alive in the days of Abraham, though we have no indication they ever met.

    I’ve been collecting the writings of the differing schools, though have not had the time to devote myself to studying them in depth. Obviously I am of the young earth camp.
    Steve Rafalsky
    Member, Queens Presbyterian Church, Astoria (PCA)
    Queens, New York
    USA

    "I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)

    "Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
    power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness...
    " (Colossians 1:11)

    Jerusalem Blade's PB Blog; Collected Textual Posts, Eschatology, and Misc.
    Lightning Sword: Journal of the Apokalypse

  10. #10
    Pilgrim Standard's Avatar
    Pilgrim Standard is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    717
    [QUOTE=goodnews;789104]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy the Greek View Post
    I seem to remember Abram being 75 when God called him from Haran. If all our chronology is correct then it's amazing how quickly the human race forgot the true God, even while Noah was alive.
    Now THIS is one of many reasons why questions such as the one proposed are important. Far too often I overlook questions such as these as if no benificial knowledge will be gained by proposing or answering them.
    Benjamin
    Member - Presbyterian Reformed Church, Columbus, Indiana

    “In death it will be your joy that ye have ventured all ye have for Christ; and there is not a promise of heaven made but to such as are willing to suffer for it. It is a castle taken by force.”. — Samuel Rutherford

  11. #11
    VictorBravo's Avatar
    VictorBravo is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    8,438
    Blog Entries
    1
    Another amazing thing is that Noah's dad, Lamech, could have met Adam. He was around 56 when Adam died if you follow the numbers in Gen. 5.
    R. Victor Bottomly
    Port Cities Reformed Baptist Church, Lewiston ID

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- How to access Politics and Government forum

  12. #12
    py3ak's Avatar
    py3ak is offline. They're stalling and plotting against me
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    12,819
    Quote Originally Posted by VictorBravo View Post
    Another amazing thing is that Noah's dad, Lamech, could have met Adam. He was around 56 when Adam died if you follow the numbers in Gen. 5.
    And that kind of thing (if Hodge, Schaeffer, et al are incorrect about there being gaps in the Genesis genealogy) is why written revelation was not so necessary then.
    Ruben: Administrator
    NCCC-OP
    Steger, IL

    ...analogy does not mean identity. When we make a comparison we do not make an equation. -John Murray

    Board Rules - Signature Requirements - Suggestions?

    Teología en Mexico
    The Howling Wilderness

  13. #13
    Augusta's Avatar
    Augusta is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,924
    According to the book of Jasher they lived at the same time. Book of Jasher 9
    Traci
    Lynnwood OPC

    "I have taken all my good deeds, and all my bad deeds, and cast them through each other in a heap before the Lord, and fled from both, and betaken myself to the Lord Jesus Christ, and in him I have sweet peace."--David Dickson

  14. #14
    Jerusalem Blade's Avatar
    Jerusalem Blade is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,168
    Blog Entries
    8
    Hello Traci,

    I don't give the book of Jasher (what we have in its name today) any credence, but rather as adding to the word of God. That there was such a book back then the Scripture affirms, though it was not accorded the status of Scripture and included in the canon. What we have of it today (in 3 versions) is like a Hollywood movie treating the Bible, full of fanciful additions.
    Steve Rafalsky
    Member, Queens Presbyterian Church, Astoria (PCA)
    Queens, New York
    USA

    "I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)

    "Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
    power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness...
    " (Colossians 1:11)

    Jerusalem Blade's PB Blog; Collected Textual Posts, Eschatology, and Misc.
    Lightning Sword: Journal of the Apokalypse

  15. #15
    Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline. Ordinary Guy (TM)
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    14,997
    Wow, fascinating thread!
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone

  16. #16
    Augusta's Avatar
    Augusta is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,924
    Steve, would you give it the same credence as say Josephus? He said some fanciful things as well but people still give much credence to his historical record.
    Traci
    Lynnwood OPC

    "I have taken all my good deeds, and all my bad deeds, and cast them through each other in a heap before the Lord, and fled from both, and betaken myself to the Lord Jesus Christ, and in him I have sweet peace."--David Dickson

  17. #17
    Skyler's Avatar
    Skyler is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,792
    I voted "Yes", "No", and "Who cares, it [sic] a silly debate". I didn't feel like looking it up and doing the math right now.
    Jonathan
    Reformed Baptist
    Ohio

    My blog: Middle of the Narrow Way

  18. #18
    Grimmson's Avatar
    Grimmson is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by Augusta View Post
    Steve, would you give it the same credence as say Josephus? He said some fanciful things as well but people still give much credence to his historical record.
    I know am not Steve, but maybe this may help.

    There one major issue with the use of Jasher compared to Josephus. Josephus was written at the end of the first century. Jasher was written, or the version that was linked, about the 12 to 13th century. Creating such documents was not uncommon in the medieval world. In fact we have a ton of them, neither one of them we would want to necessarily use for the teaching of scripture. It can be a good reflection to the traditions held to by a people at a given time. I have not done the detail analysis of the text to see if there are any clear contradictions between Jasher and the scriptures, but one thing should be clear, it was not written as history, but a forgery towards that history. Josephus was written as history, not as a forgery to another book and you can figure out what some of those sources are that he used. His work stands alone. If you want in the medieval times to get your book circulated then you subscribe to its title a familiar character in scripture that has little or no back ground material on it for that time.

    So I would not use it with the same credence as Josephus, which I can point to some of his sources that he used. Jasher linked to should not be confused with the text of 2 Samuel 1:8 or with Joshua 10:13, based on the dating subscribed to the text.

    ---------- Post added at 01:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    I voted "Yes", "No", and "Who cares, it [sic] a silly debate". I didn't feel like looking it up and doing the math right now.
    Come on do the math. I have always said math good for the soul.

    I use to be a math teacher.
    David Jolley
    Broadway Baptist Church of Escondido, CA
    Confessions: 1689-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
    Yuma, AZ (attending the OPC church plant/bible study in Yuma)

  19. #19
    Curt's Avatar
    Curt is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Tim View Post
    What would Usher's timeline say?
    Did you mean Usher? Or Seal?
    Curt Lovelace
    Director, Lifework Forum
    Somewhere in New England, USA

    Attending New Boston Baptist Church, New Boston NH

    webpage at JCurtisLovelace.com
    Author: Children in Church: Nurturing Hearts of Worship
    http://www.childreninchurch.com

  20. #20
    Skyler's Avatar
    Skyler is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    3,792
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmson View Post
    [/COLOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    I voted "Yes", "No", and "Who cares, it [sic] a silly debate". I didn't feel like looking it up and doing the math right now.
    Come on do the math. I have always said math good for the soul.

    I use to be a math teacher.
    Meh. I'm an engineering teacher, so I guess I should set a good example.

    Abram was born 2+35+30+37+30+32+30+29+70=295 years after the flood, according to Genesis 11. That puts him at 1951 AC. Noah would have died 2006 AC, if he lived 350 years after the flood, so Abram would have been about 55 when he died.

    So yes.
    Jonathan
    Reformed Baptist
    Ohio

    My blog: Middle of the Narrow Way

  21. #21
    Grimmson's Avatar
    Grimmson is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    537
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Grimmson View Post
    [/COLOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by Skyler View Post
    I voted "Yes", "No", and "Who cares, it [sic] a silly debate". I didn't feel like looking it up and doing the math right now.
    Come on do the math. I have always said math good for the soul.

    I use to be a math teacher.
    Meh. I'm an engineering teacher, so I guess I should set a good example.

    Abram was born 2+35+30+37+30+32+30+29+70=295 years after the flood, according to Genesis 11. That puts him at 1951 AC. Noah would have died 2006 AC, if he lived 350 years after the flood, so Abram would have been about 55 when he died.

    So yes.

    Jonathan, just like an engineer I see one number off. So you are setting a good example as an engineer. (I can explain this later.) Of course all kidding aside, going back to chapter 11:16:
    “Eber lived thirty-four years, and begot Peleg.”
    Notice it is 34 and not 37 in accordance to ESV and NKJV. I figure it is a mistake based on the 7 being on top of the 4 with the number pad on the right hand of the key board. So subtract 3 and you will get 292 which is what I got.

    Now for the rest of you:
    I am surprised I do not see more under the yes column keeping in mind how me literal 6000 year new earthers we have in here. If your answer is no, then why. Explain the justification for the gap theory in the genealogies. Or if year does not mean 365-day year in a person’s age. By the way if you wanted to know my answer to the poll it was no. I’ll let you all have some fun and respond before I do.
    David Jolley
    Broadway Baptist Church of Escondido, CA
    Confessions: 1689-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
    Yuma, AZ (attending the OPC church plant/bible study in Yuma)

  22. #22
    Grimmson's Avatar
    Grimmson is offline. Puritanboard Sophomore
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    537
    Before am called a sissy again for not giving a detailed answer, I will give two hints to my position.
    Hint 1: Luke 3:36
    Hint 2: Generation count being 10 for Gen. 5 and 11.
    David Jolley
    Broadway Baptist Church of Escondido, CA
    Confessions: 1689-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
    Yuma, AZ (attending the OPC church plant/bible study in Yuma)

  23. #23
    Jerusalem Blade's Avatar
    Jerusalem Blade is offline. Puritanboard Graduate
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,168
    Blog Entries
    8
    Some milestone dates, and a Biblical timeline


    Flood . . . . . 1656 Anno Mundi

    Noah . . . . . 600 yrs old at Flood . . . Died 350 years later in 2006 . . . Gen 7:6; 9:28, 29

    Shem . . . . 100 yrs old at Flood . . . Gen 11:10

    Arphaxad born of Shem 2 years after flood 1658 . . . Gen 11:10

    Salah born of Arphaxad in 1693, when Arphaxad was 35 . . . Gen 11:12

    Eber born of Salah in 1723, when Selah was 30 . . . Gen 11:

    Peleg born of Eber in 1757, when Eber was 34 . . . Gen 11:16

    Reu born of Peleg in 1787, when Peleg was 30 . . . Gen 11:18

    Serug born of Reu in 1819, when Reu was 32 . . . Gen 11:20

    Nahor born of Serug in 1849, when Serug was 30 . . . Gen 11:22

    Terah born of Serug in 1878, when Serug was 29 . . . Gen 11:24

    Abram born of Terah in 2008, when Terah was 130 . . . Gen 11:27, 32; 12:4; Acts 7:4

    ----------

    I realize some posit the age of Terah when Abraham was born at 70, due to Genesis 11:26,

    And Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran.

    That Moses mentioned Abram first does not mean that Abram was born first (and in Terah’s 70th year), but that he was the blessed of God and a progenitor of the Messiah. The very same thing happens with the sons of Noah. Shem is listed first (cf. Gen 5:32; 6:10; 10:1; 1 Chron 1:4) even though Japheth is the elder (Gen 10:21), and this because the line of the “seed of the woman” went through Shem, as it did through Abraham. When Jacob and Esau are mentioned together, Jacob has the priority even though he is the younger (Josh 24:4; Heb 11:20). There are many other instances of this.

    Gen 12:4 says that “Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.” Acts 7:4 says this of Abraham,

    Then came he out of the land of the Chaldæans, and dwelt in Charran: and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell.

    Now if Abraham was 75 when he left Harran, and he left “when his father was dead” – and we know Terah died at the age of 205 in Harran (Gen 11:32), then 205 - 75 = 130, as the age Terah begat Abraham.

    As for Luke 3:36, which places Cainan in the lineage between Arphaxad and Salah (Sala), where the Genesis genealogy omits mention of Cainan, some remarks:

    First, the absence of a person in the lineage does not annul the tightly interlocking numeric values between the patriarchs and their offspring. As Floyd Nolan Jones, in his Chronology of the Old Testament puts it,

    For regardless of the number of names or descendants that might be missing between Arphaxad and Salah (or any other two patriarchs) their lives are mathematically interlocked and a fixed relationship exists; when Salah was born, Arphaxad was thirty-five years old and so on across the entire span in question. Consequently, no time can possibly be missing even though names may so be. Strange as it may seem at first, in this instance the two concepts are mutually exclusive. (p. 34)

    Dr. Jones is firm that both the Genesis genealogy and the one in Luke 3 are correct and both the infallible word of God. While admitting there is no explanation for the omission given in Scripture, Jones gives a number of scenarios to show how it may have come to be. Here is one of them:

    In this scenario both Arphaxad and Cainan (Arphaxad’s son) married young. Cainan dies after conceiving Salah but before his birth. At age 35, Arphaxad then adopts his grandson, Salah (like Jacob adopted his grandsons, Ephraim and Manasseh). (Mat. 1:1; Heb. 7:9-10) [Footnote: Compare Ruth 4:17 which declares that “there is a son born to Naomi”, whereas technically she is his step mother-in-law. . .] (Ibid., p. 35)

    At any rate, the Cainan spoken of in Luke 3:36 poses no threat to the timeline of Genesis 11, only a mystery. The LXX versions of Genesis 11 which posit a Cainan in them are spurious, patently contriving to construct an order which fails.

    I had noted in post #9 of this thread, difficulty enters the genealogical comparison between Noah and Abraham regarding Terah’s age at Abraham’s birth; I hope what I have written above satisfactorily addresses that (though surely not everyone will be convinced – as my commentaries show!). I do think it sound to say that Noah died two years before Abraham saw the light of day.

    As for there being 10 generations both before the Flood and after it to Abraham, with both Noah and Terah having three sons, and what some say about these two lineages being but formulaic compilations with gaps between people and generations, this theory can be disproven (in the first lineage) by attestation of Scripture, and in the second, as I have shown above.

    All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

    That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. (2 Tim 3:16, 17)
    Our wonderful Saviour has kept His promise to give us an intact, infallible, preserved word of God, that we may have comfort and strength in the holy Scriptures. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but His words shall not pass away (Cf. Matt 24:35).
    Last edited by Jerusalem Blade; 06-17-2010 at 01:38 PM.
    Steve Rafalsky
    Member, Queens Presbyterian Church, Astoria (PCA)
    Queens, New York
    USA

    "I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)

    "Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
    power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness...
    " (Colossians 1:11)

    Jerusalem Blade's PB Blog; Collected Textual Posts, Eschatology, and Misc.
    Lightning Sword: Journal of the Apokalypse

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72