» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
05-30-2009, 07:01 PM
|  | The Closer | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,495
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,071 Times in 694 Posts
| | | "Abigail the widow of Nabal the Carmelite"
Why is it that Abigail is listed this way throughout I and II Samuel? I'm sure that there is some point to it that I am completely missing.
Is it an equivalent of "Jackie Kennedy-Onasis"? or what? | 
05-30-2009, 07:03 PM
| | Moderator v. Madison | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 2,813
Thanks: 1,452
Thanked 727 Times in 361 Posts
| | |
I've been reading 1 and 2 Samuel and wondering the same thing, and even thought about starting a thread! I hope someone has an explanation.
__________________
Evie B.
New Members Class, RPCNA, Cambridge, Massachusetts Remember not the former things, nor consider the things of old. Behold, I am doing a new thing; now it springs forth, do you not perceive it? I will make a way in the wilderness and rivers in the desert. -- Isaiah 43:18-19 (ESV) | 
05-30-2009, 07:52 PM
|  | The Closer | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,495
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,071 Times in 694 Posts
| |
GMTA, Evie.  I just wish mine could think of the reason behind this appellation.....
| 
05-30-2009, 08:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| |
I'm wondering if it was because once again David has taken another wife that doesn't belong to him. In the NT, Bathsheba is not even called by her name but by "the wife of Uriah". God never gave David or anyone else permission to have multiple wives. I think it was done to show the disobedience that was done. | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OPC'n For This Useful Post: | | 
05-30-2009, 08:32 PM
|  | The Closer | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,495
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,071 Times in 694 Posts
| |
Good point, Sarah. I was wondering if it might not be a reprimand, thought I didn't quite connect all the dots, as you have.
But it still records her as David's wife.
Anyone else? | 
05-30-2009, 08:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
| |
Maybe to point her out.  Like someone calls a lady "The widow" so maybe it was to point out that this particular lady was the one being mentioned maybe?
| 
05-30-2009, 09:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | |
Why not praise her? Abigail, the virtuous woman married to a pig, who was loyal to the pig. More loyal to one of the biggest pigs in history except for when loyalty to God caused her to go behind her husbands back. And even then, in the presence of a handsome, charismatic rebel leader still remained loyal to her husband.
Who knows what sparks flied between Abigail and David when they met? No one. But we do know that she stayed with her husband until he died. Her hands weren't guilty, although there is no doubt at all that she was very unhappy in her marriage.
But when he died, and she was free, she went to David. Some sort of communication must have been sent between the two. Whether their thoughts were pure or not, their hands were clean, and they married legally, and loved each other. And God blessed them with children, and when she was kidnapped, and both their hearts were broken, God Himself brought them back into each other's arms again.
I see no need to point fingers. To me it's another love story, and her epithet a reminder of the story behind their marriage.
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| | The Following User Says Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
05-30-2009, 09:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV Why not praise her? Abigail, the virtuous woman married to a pig, who was loyal to the pig. More loyal to one of the biggest pigs in history except for when loyalty to God caused her to go behind her husbands back. And even then, in the presence of a handsome, charismatic rebel leader still remained loyal to her husband.
Who knows what sparks flied between Abigail and David when they met? No one. But we do know that she stayed with her husband until he died. Her hands weren't guilty, although there is no doubt at all that she was very unhappy in her marriage.
But when he died, and she was free, she went to David. Some sort of communication must have been sent between the two. Whether their thoughts were pure or not, their hands were clean, and they married legally, and loved each other. And God blessed them with children, and when she was kidnapped, and both their hearts were broken, God Himself brought them back into each other's arms again.
I see no need to point fingers. To me it's another love story, and her epithet a reminder of the story behind their marriage. | I wasn't saying Abigail was wrong on this matter as Bathsheba was in enticing David. I was saying David was wrong in taking yet another wife. God in the Garden set up how marriage was to be...between one man and one woman. David broke God's law by having multiple wives.
| 
05-30-2009, 09:21 PM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 191
Thanked 2,436 Times in 1,347 Posts
| |
There may be more to it than that, of course, but there is another Abigail whom you wouldn't want to confuse with the erstwhile wife of Nabal.
2 Samuel 17:25
1 Chronicles 2:16,17
| | The Following User Says Thank You to py3ak For This Useful Post: | | 
05-30-2009, 09:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | |
Sarah, you're naturally right in that David would have been better to have had only one wife, but he didn't break God's law. He married Abigail perfectly legally.
| 
05-30-2009, 09:24 PM
|  | The Closer | | Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 5,495
Thanks: 1,657
Thanked 1,071 Times in 694 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak There may be more to it than that, of course, but there is another Abigail whom you wouldn't want to confuse with the erstwhile wife of Nabal.
2 Samuel 17:25
1 Chronicles 2:16,17
| But then wouldn't the appellation "Abigail the second (third?) wife of David" fit the bill of distinguishing between the two?
| 
05-30-2009, 09:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | |
Did David rightfully get rid of Michal before he married Abigail?
1Sam 18
43David also took Ahinoam of Jezreel, and both of them became his wives. 44Saul had given Michal his daughter, David’s wife, to Palti the son of Laish, who was of Gallim.
Looks to me that David took Abigail and Ahinoam as wives at the same time. Doesn't really say if Saul gave Michel away before David took these two wives...maybe it does somewhere else. Even if Saul did give Michel away first, the fact that David took two wives at the same time doesn't make his marriage to Abigail legal.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |