» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
05-04-2009, 11:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | | Ligon Duncan on Complimentarianism Quote: |
The denial of complementarianism undermines the church's practical embrace of the authority of Scripture (thus eventually and inevitably harming the church's witness to the Gospel).
| - Ligon Duncan
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
| | The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to whitway For This Useful Post: | | 
05-04-2009, 11:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 783
Thanks: 248
Thanked 393 Times in 179 Posts
| | |
Pardon my ignorance, but what does he mean by complementarianism? I can infer from the response, but I'd like to know more than my inference provides.
__________________ Clark Brooking
Pastor
Living Hope Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Clarksville, MD
| 
05-04-2009, 11:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by chbrooking Pardon my ignorance, but what does he mean by complementarianism? I can infer from the response, but I'd like to know more than my inference provides. | Complementarianism is a term used to describe a conservative theological view held by many in Christianity and other world religions that men and women have different roles and responsibilities, as manifested in marriage, religious leadership, and elsewhere...from Wikipedia.
| 
05-04-2009, 11:37 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Bourbonnias, IL
Posts: 67
Thanks: 12
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
| | |
My I ask where this was taken? Can I have proof he actually said this.
__________________
Robert Peters
Bethal Christian Church - PCA
LAMP Theolgical Semianry Student - M.Div
Kankakee, IL
| 
05-04-2009, 11:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 281
Thanks: 147
Thanked 75 Times in 40 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by rpeters My I ask where this was taken? Can I have proof he actually said this. | Google, FTW! Link.
__________________
Jennifer Petrik
Member, Grace Reformation Church
Associate Member, Escondido Reformed Baptist Church
Student, Westminster Seminary California (M.A.H.T.)
Woodland/Escondido, CA per caliginem | 
05-04-2009, 11:40 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,519
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 2,019 Times in 1,118 Posts
| |
Very quick you.  The article is: Why "Together for the Gospel" Embraces Complementarianism
And a PDF version is also at the link. Quote:
Originally Posted by Jen Quote:
Originally Posted by rpeters My I ask where this was taken? Can I have proof he actually said this. | Google, FTW! Link. | | 
05-04-2009, 11:42 PM
|  | whippersnapper | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Purcellville, Virginia
Posts: 2,758
Thanks: 1,476
Thanked 541 Times in 329 Posts
| |
I love Ligon Duncan.
__________________
Ben Franks
I attend: Ketoctin Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
in Purcellville, Virginia
I'm a member of: Heartland Community Church (PCA)
in Wichita, Kansas
I blog here (along with my Dad): http://rrfranks.blogspot.com/
And I'm a student here: www.phc.edu "Remember the speeches we have spoken so often over our mead, when we raised boast on the bench, heroes in the hall, about hard fighting. Now may the man who is bold prove that he is."-Aelfwine at the Battle of Maldon | 
05-04-2009, 11:44 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,523
Thanks: 1,771
Thanked 3,540 Times in 1,719 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by chbrooking Pardon my ignorance, but what does he mean by complementarianism? I can infer from the response, but I'd like to know more than my inference provides. | In this context, as the opposite of egalitarianism (cf. Piper and Grudem).
In a nutshell, here is the good Dr. Duncan: Quote: One, the denial of complementarianism undermines the church's practical embrace of the authority of Scripture (thus eventually and inevitably harming the church's witness to the Gospel). The gymnastics required to get from "I do not allow a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man," in the Bible, to "I do allow a woman to teach and to exercise authority over a man" in the actual practice of the local church, are devastating to the functional authority of the Scripture in the life of the people of God.
By the way, this is one reason why I think we just don't see many strongly inerrantist-egalitarians (meaning: those who hold unwaveringly to inerrancy and also to egalitarianism) in the younger generation of evangelicalism. Many if not most evangelical egalitarians today have significant qualms about inerrancy, and are embracing things like trajectory hermeneutics, etc., to justify their positions. Inerrancy or egalitarianism, one or the other, eventually wins out. Two, and following on the first point, the church's confidence in the clarity of Scripture is undermined, because if you can get egalitarianism from the Bible, you can get anything from the Bible. Three, because the very ideal of equality championed by egalitarianism (whether secular or Christian) is a permutation of a particular strand of Enlightenment thought, and because this particular ideal of equality is actually alien to the biblical anthropology and ethic, whenever and wherever it is read into the text of Scripture and its principles are worked out consistently, there is a competition with a biblical view of manhood and womanhood.
Four, when the biblical distinctions of maleness and femaleness are denied, Christian discipleship is seriously damaged because there can be no talk of cultivating distinctively masculine Christian virtue or feminine Christian virtue. | BTW, after more than a half century watching the decline of evangelicalism in the culture and in the conservative expressions of my former denomination, I heartily agree with Dr. Duncan. It will either be egalitarianism or inerrancy. One or the other, but not both.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
05-04-2009, 11:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
| | |
I'm sure Enlightenment has a lot to do with it but having attended a Fundamental Baptist Church growing up where the women outnumbered the men 4 to 1 due to the lack of strong male leadership I can't help to think that in many ways we are getting what we deserve.
| 
05-06-2009, 10:36 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Bourbonnias, IL
Posts: 67
Thanks: 12
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
| | |
Sorry I misread the thread. I thougt the post was saying duncan deniying complimentarism.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |