» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
03-11-2008, 03:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 931
Thanks: 25
Thanked 120 Times in 51 Posts
| | | Basil and allegorical interpretation Basil of Caesarea (Ad 329-379): Shall I then prefer foolish wisdom to the oracles of the Holy Spirit? Shall I not rather exalt Him who, not wishing to fill our minds with these vanities, has regulated all the economy of Scripture in view of the edification and the making perfect of our souls? It is this which those seem to me not to have understood, who, giving themselves up to the distorted meaning of allegory, have undertaken to give a majesty of their own invention to Scripture. It is to believe themselves wiser than the Holy Spirit, and to bring forth their own ideas under a pretext of exegesis. Let us hear Scripture as it has been written. NPNF2: Vol. VIII, Hexaemeron, Homily 9, The Creation of Terrestrial Animals, §1.
DTK
__________________ Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
David T. King, pastor
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Elkton, Maryland Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, Β§1.
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DTK For This Useful Post: | | 
06-23-2008, 01:27 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 931
Thanks: 25
Thanked 120 Times in 51 Posts
| | | A fuller quote than the one above... Basil of Caesarea (Ad 329-379): I know the laws of allegory, though less by myself than from the works of others. There are those truly, who do not admit the common sense of the Scriptures, for whom water is not water, but some other nature, who see in a plant, in a fish, what their fancy wishes, who change the nature of reptiles and of wild beasts to suit their allegories, like the interpreters of dreams who explain visions in sleep to make them serve their own ends. For me grass is grass; plant, fish, wild beast, domestic animal, I take all in the literal sense. For I am not ashamed of the gospel. Those who have written about the nature of the universe have discussed at length the shape of the earth. If it be spherical or cylindrical, if it resemble a disc and is equally rounded in all parts, or if it has the forth of a winnowing basket and is hollow in the middle; all these conjectures have been suggested by cosmographers, each one upsetting that of his predecessor. It will not lead me to give less importance to the creation of the universe, that the servant of God, Moses, is silent as to shapes; he has not said that the earth is a hundred and eighty thousand furlongs in circumference; he has not measured into what extent of air its shadow projects itself whilst the sun revolves around it, nor stated how this shadow, casting itself upon the moon, produces eclipses. He has passed over in silence, as useless, all that is unimportant for us. Shall I then prefer foolish wisdom to the oracles of the Holy Spirit? Shall I not rather exalt Him who, not wishing to fill our minds with these vanities, has regulated all the economy of Scripture in view of the edification and the making perfect of our souls? It is this which those seem to me not to have understood, who, giving themselves up to the distorted meaning of allegory, have undertaken to give a majesty of their own invention to Scripture. It is to believe themselves wiser than the Holy Spirit, and to bring forth their own ideas under a pretext of exegesis. Let us hear Scripture as it has been written. NPNF2: Vol. VIII, Hexaemeron, Homily 9, The Creation of Terrestrial Animals, §1.
DTK
Last edited by DTK; 06-23-2008 at 01:42 PM.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DTK For This Useful Post: | | 
06-23-2008, 04:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 146
Thanked 165 Times in 102 Posts
| | | My NPNF set is still sitting in storage, but I would be interested to read up on these sections and see what Basil was actually addressing. I would think that at that point in the history of the Church he would more likely be directing those comments toward the Jewish allegorists and neo-Platonists than he would be toward men such as Origen and others. I may be wrong, but it would still be good to make that distinction if it is truly the case, since much of later Christian allegory still centered upon Christ and his kingdom or the virtues of the Christian life, while the Jews and neo-Platonic interpreters just made a complete mockery out of the practice.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Back to looking for a call...
Evergreen PCA
Salem, Oregon
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |