The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Apologetics Forum > Cults & World Religions

Cults & World Religions Discuss false religions and cultic practices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:35 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,375
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 631 Times in 451 Posts
FLDS Case

Is it just me or does the FLDS child custody case look to be in danger of unraveling? The sheer numbers involved are unprecedented. A similar case in the 1950's in Arizona against the FLDS fell apart.

It doesn't take too active of an imagination to forsee public opinion swinging against the Texas Child Protective Services and in favor of the cultists. "After all, who are we to impose our morality?" is what we are likely to hear if we haven't already. The kids and women will likely say they were happy since they don't have any alternative to compare to unless they will have been exposed to it after the raid.
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA

"There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:37 PM
Blue Tick's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 226
Thanked 220 Times in 150 Posts
I haven't been following the case, what's the argument while the kids were taken from their parents?
__________________
John J.
Member Christ Prebyterian Church (OPC)
Salt Lake City, Utah
www.christpres.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:53 PM
Augusta's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Washington
Posts: 3,296
Thanks: 513
Thanked 208 Times in 140 Posts
A purported call to CPS by a sixteen year old girl who said she was forcible married to a 50 yr old man and had his child. The call may have been a hoax because they cannot find the girl.
__________________
Traci
Lynnwood OPC

Psalm 52:8-9
8 But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in the mercy of God for ever and ever.
9 I will praise thee for ever, because thou hast done it: and I will wait on thy name; for it is good before thy saints.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:27 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 106
Thanked 210 Times in 137 Posts
It's a royal mess.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Is it just me or does the FLDS child custody case look to be in danger of unraveling? The sheer numbers involved are unprecedented. A similar case in the 1950's in Arizona against the FLDS fell apart.

It doesn't take too active of an imagination to forsee public opinion swinging against the Texas Child Protective Services and in favor of the cultists. "After all, who are we to impose our morality?" is what we are likely to hear if we haven't already. The kids and women will likely say they were happy since they don't have any alternative to compare to unless they will have been exposed to it after the raid.
And truth be told, it was poorly planned and executed.

I'm thinking the most important thing to do is identify the pregnant underage girls, or those who were underage when they got pregnant.

There's no legal way for a girl 15 years old or younger to be pregnant. So first locate them, as clearly their situation is lamentable, and their parents have been of no use, and since the absolute earliest one can be married in Texas is 16 (and that only with court approval), she cannot have a legal husband.

It's the girls that should be the primary focus. Families with only sons can be shoved to the back of the process.

Of course, that's a problem right there, as that means the children most likely to have not been abused are the children who'll be separated from their parents the longest. That doesn't seem right, does it?

Thing is, on the one hand I'm uncomfortable with the state stomping in and doing a wholesale kid-grab.

Not a good precedent.

OTOH, polygamy is illegal in Texas. If this was a compound where families were teaching their children to steal, we'd be horrified and all in favor of the children being separated from such a deplorable environment. Why is it okay for people to raise their children to be polygamists, since polygamy is just as illegal as theft? Anyone raising their children to break the law should expect to lose custody of those children.
__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:34 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,375
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 631 Times in 451 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gryphonette View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Is it just me or does the FLDS child custody case look to be in danger of unraveling? The sheer numbers involved are unprecedented. A similar case in the 1950's in Arizona against the FLDS fell apart.

It doesn't take too active of an imagination to forsee public opinion swinging against the Texas Child Protective Services and in favor of the cultists. "After all, who are we to impose our morality?" is what we are likely to hear if we haven't already. The kids and women will likely say they were happy since they don't have any alternative to compare to unless they will have been exposed to it after the raid.
And truth be told, it was poorly planned and executed.

I'm thinking the most important thing to do is identify the pregnant underage girls, or those who were underage when they got pregnant.

There's no legal way for a girl 15 years old or younger to be pregnant. So first locate them, as clearly their situation is lamentable, and their parents have been of no use, and since the absolute earliest one can be married in Texas is 16 (and that only with court approval), she cannot have a legal husband.

It's the girls that should be the primary focus. Families with only sons can be shoved to the back of the process.

Of course, that's a problem right there, as that means the children most likely to have not been abused are the children who'll be separated from their parents the longest. That doesn't seem right, does it?

Thing is, on the one hand I'm uncomfortable with the state stomping in and doing a wholesale kid-grab.

Not a good precedent.

OTOH, polygamy is illegal in Texas. If this was a compound where families were teaching their children to steal, we'd be horrified and all in favor of the children being separated from such a deplorable environment. Why is it okay for people to raise their children to be polygamists, since polygamy is just as illegal as theft? Anyone raising their children to break the law should expect to lose custody of those children.
Of course many of the polygamists now are smart enough not to actually commit bigamy i.e. have the marriage legitimized by the state. They call it a spiritual marriage. In that case it would seem that it is no different than shacking up as far as the state is concerned.

Considering the move to overturn sodomy laws and the ongoing attempt to legalize "gay marriage" how much longer will it be before there is a push to legalize polygamy?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 08:46 PM
North Jersey Baptist's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 6,440
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 693
Thanked 742 Times in 432 Posts
I can think of one reason why the government will never legalize polygamy: less tax revenue.
__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 09:03 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 106
Thanked 210 Times in 137 Posts
Ah, but Texas is a common-law marriage state.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Of course many of the polygamists now are smart enough not to actually commit bigamy i.e. have the marriage legitimized by the state. They call it a spiritual marriage. In that case it would seem that it is no different than shacking up as far as the state is concerned.

Considering the move to overturn sodomy laws and the ongoing attempt to legalize "gay marriage" how much longer will it be before there is a push to legalize polygamy?
One needn't do the license+vows thing to be legally married here. All that's necessary is to present yourselves as married.

Now, THAT they've done.

So I can think of no legal reason these people - especially the men who've impregnated multiple women - shouldn't be charged with bigamy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:34 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
So you make a call claiming the neighbors kids, who you think run wild, are abused and this is what is standard due process in Texas.

Also, How unbiased is this? The courtroom judge is the same judge that ordered the raids in the first place....

Plus they have not found the girl who made the call and it looks like to everyone that it was a hoax.

This is a constitutional mess and I feel that this might have far reaching ramifications for us Christians who will be culturally different then those around society whether it is about anything else that CPS, Social Services, etc deems abusive whether it is Homeschooling, Vaccination issues, Discipline of our Youth, Modesty Differences or anything else that the media and government has demonized this group for.

I happen to know that John Knox married at 50 years of age to a 16 year old girl and John Calvin put marriageable age and flower of Youth between 12 and 20 years of age... Most Theologians agree that Mary had our beloved Savior at or around 14 years of age...

I will leave the particularities of this case alone but I do believe this is a constitutional mess and has far reaching implications..
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:51 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 106
Thanked 210 Times in 137 Posts
Did Knox really? Well, ick. I'll never understand the appeal of cradle robbing, and don't ever think it's really okay with the teenage girl.

And no, it's not really what standard due process is in Texas. The authorities were aware of the goings-on in the compound but without a complaint, they felt they couldn't do anything.

Which I disagree with, personally. Polygamy is illegal in Texas, for pity's sake, and that's an openly polygamous group. What's the point of outlawing polygamy if it's ignored like that?

However, if the FLDS would be welcome in Maryland, I'll recommend they ship the lot of 'em up to y'all. Problem solved. ;^)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:55 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 20,405
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,676 Times in 1,048 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
So you make a call claiming the neighbors kids, who you think run wild, are abused and this is what is standard due process in Texas.

Also, How unbiased is this? The courtroom judge is the same judge that ordered the raids in the first place....

Plus they have not found the girl who made the call and it looks like to everyone that it was a hoax.

This is a constitutional mess and I feel that this might have far reaching ramifications for us Christians who will be culturally different then those around society whether it is about anything else that CPS, Social Services, etc deems abusive whether it is Homeschooling, Vaccination issues, Discipline of our Youth, Modesty Differences or anything else that the media and government has demonized this group for.

I happen to know that John Knox married at 50 years of age to a 16 year old girl and John Calvin put marriageable age and flower of Youth between 12 and 20 years of age... Most Theologians agree that Mary had our beloved Savior at or around 14 years of age...

I will leave the particularities of this case alone but I do believe this is a constitutional mess and has far reaching implications..
Minor correction, John Knox's second wife was 17 years old when they married.

Marriages of Reformers
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"On land, at sea, at home, abroad, / I smoke my pipe and worship God." -- J.S. Bach
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 11:16 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 468
Thanks: 54
Thanked 276 Times in 149 Posts
Anybody who lives in a "compound," is obviously up to no good - unless of course their name is Kennedy, then it's ok because their "compound" is actually Camelot. But we know these people are up to no good because they were living in a "compound." I'm not exactly sure what a "compound" is, but I do know that anytime the government seems to feel compelled to raid someplace with national news coverage that is what these people live in.
__________________
Thomas Weddle
Member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church
Evansville, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 11:21 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 106
Thanked 210 Times in 137 Posts
A dictionary clears that right up. ;^)

A compound is " a cluster of buildings having a shared purpose, usually inside a fence or wall."

That's an accurate description of the FLDS whatchamacallit around San Angelo.


Couldn't say about the Kennedys' place, though.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2007 View Post
Anybody who lives in a "compound," is obviously up to no good - unless of course their name is Kennedy, then it's ok because their "compound" is actually Camelot. But we know these people are up to no good because they were living in a "compound." I'm not exactly sure what a "compound" is, but I do know that anytime the government seems to feel compelled to raid someplace with national news coverage that is what these people live in.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:20 PM
Richard King's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 1,524
Thanks: 40
Thanked 96 Times in 74 Posts
CONSIDER THE IRONY

Texas is the state where the governor Rick Perry
(a middle aged man) did not suggest but MANDATED without even going through the legislative process what a little girl should have done to her body to prepare for inevitable promiscuity.
AND he chose nine years old as the prep year for shooting up Gardasil in anticipation of sexual activities.

Maybe the FLDS leaders could just say they were taking their lead from the Texas governor’s ideas.
__________________
Richard H. King
Providence PCA
Lubbock, Texas
"No matter how far a man goes, he eventually finds out God's already there." John Wayne - the last line in "Chisum"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Richard King For This Useful Post:
kvanlaan (07-03-2008)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:27 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 20,405
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,676 Times in 1,048 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
So you make a call claiming the neighbors kids, who you think run wild, are abused and this is what is standard due process in Texas.

Also, How unbiased is this? The courtroom judge is the same judge that ordered the raids in the first place....

Plus they have not found the girl who made the call and it looks like to everyone that it was a hoax.

This is a constitutional mess and I feel that this might have far reaching ramifications for us Christians who will be culturally different then those around society whether it is about anything else that CPS, Social Services, etc deems abusive whether it is Homeschooling, Vaccination issues, Discipline of our Youth, Modesty Differences or anything else that the media and government has demonized this group for.

I happen to know that John Knox married at 50 years of age to a 16 year old girl and John Calvin put marriageable age and flower of Youth between 12 and 20 years of age... Most Theologians agree that Mary had our beloved Savior at or around 14 years of age...

I will leave the particularities of this case alone but I do believe this is a constitutional mess and has far reaching implications..
Minor correction, John Knox's second wife was 17 years old when they married.

Marriages of Reformers
Correction to the correction: Some sources do say 16 and others say 17; I'm not sure which is correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2007 View Post
Anybody who lives in a "compound," is obviously up to no good - unless of course their name is Kennedy, then it's ok because their "compound" is actually Camelot. But we know these people are up to no good because they were living in a "compound." I'm not exactly sure what a "compound" is, but I do know that anytime the government seems to feel compelled to raid someplace with national news coverage that is what these people live in.
This is very true. Mount Carmel, anyone?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:42 PM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,182
Thanks: 106
Thanked 210 Times in 137 Posts
That's a fact. Still, didn't it get reversed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard King View Post
CONSIDER THE IRONY

Texas is the state where the governor Rick Perry
(a middle aged man) did not suggest but MANDATED without even going through the legislative process what a little girl should have done to her body to prepare for inevitable promiscuity.
AND he chose nine years old as the prep year for shooting up Gardasil in anticipation of sexual activities.

Maybe the FLDS leaders could just say they were taking their lead from the Texas governor’s ideas.
I thought it had.

That was really infuriating on multiple levels.

Well, I've never been a fan of Perry, and hope someone runs against him in the primary.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 09:39 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 20,405
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,676 Times in 1,048 Posts
A couple of interesting articles concerning the FLDS case:

Colorado woman may be caller who sparked CPS sweep, officials say | Dallas Morning News | News for Dallas, Texas | Texas Regional News
Polygamist clothing has roots in 19th century and 1950s - Yahoo! News
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:04 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 20,405
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,676 Times in 1,048 Posts
Court: Texas had no right to take polygamists' kids - Yahoo! News (May 22, 2008)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:35 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 146
Thanked 164 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2007 View Post
Anybody who lives in a "compound," is obviously up to no good - unless of course their name is Kennedy, then it's ok because their "compound" is actually Camelot. But we know these people are up to no good because they were living in a "compound." I'm not exactly sure what a "compound" is, but I do know that anytime the government seems to feel compelled to raid someplace with national news coverage that is what these people live in.
When I served as a Ranger I lived in a compound, and lots of foreign governments thought that we were up to no good
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Back to looking for a call...
Evergreen PCA
Salem, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Archlute For This Useful Post:
LadyFlynt (05-22-2008)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:37 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 146
Thanked 164 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot View Post
I was glad to see this, and I hope that the state agencies involved get more than a slap on the wrist for it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Archlute For This Useful Post:
LadyFlynt (05-22-2008)
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 02:44 PM
LadyFlynt's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 6,109
Thanks: 246
Thanked 176 Times in 96 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2007 View Post
Anybody who lives in a "compound," is obviously up to no good - unless of course their name is Kennedy, then it's ok because their "compound" is actually Camelot. But we know these people are up to no good because they were living in a "compound." I'm not exactly sure what a "compound" is, but I do know that anytime the government seems to feel compelled to raid someplace with national news coverage that is what these people live in.
When I served as a Ranger I lived in a compound, and lots of foreign governments thought that we were up to no good
Half my childhood was on military "compounds" Talk about kids and rules...we had more of them than the norm and you can bet we learned to follow them!
__________________
JC
URCNA
PA

"Forgiveness is primarily for our own sake, so that we no longer carry the burden of resentment. But to forgive does not mean we will allow injustice again." --Jack Kornfield
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2008, 07:40 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 20,405
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,435
Thanked 1,676 Times in 1,048 Posts
Authorities appeal court ruling in polygamist case - Yahoo! News (May 23, 2008)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!