» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 75 | | 16 members and 59 guests | | austinww, christabella_warren, ChristianTrader, dudley, dyarashus, glorifyinggodinwv, jpfrench81, kevin.carroll, Knight, Laudante, smhbbag, SolaGratia, The Author of my Faith, The Calvin Knight, Timothy William | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
10-20-2009, 10:44 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| | | Church of Rome reaches out to disaffected Anglicans
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI
Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
Last edited by yeutter; 10-20-2009 at 10:45 AM.
Reason: fix link
| 
10-20-2009, 11:13 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Perth, Scotland UK
Posts: 1,313
Thanks: 256
Thanked 432 Times in 287 Posts
| |
Is Benedict the last pope? Is he the "Gorbachev Pope" in line with this Medieval prophecy? Does he really know what he's doing?
__________________
Richard
communicant member, FCoS
Perth, Scotland UK
His Name forever shall endure;
last like the sun it shall:
Men shall be blessed in Him,
and blessed all nations shall Him call (Ps. 72:17)
| 
10-20-2009, 03:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Monticello, IA
Posts: 6,133
Thanks: 3,619
Thanked 828 Times in 696 Posts
| |
One line in the AP version caught my eye. Quote: |
By welcoming them in with their own special provision, Benedict has confirmed the increasingly conservative bent of his church.
| It's not Christ's church, it's the pope's church.
__________________
Norm
IA PCA In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will. Ephesians 1:4-5 | 
10-20-2009, 06:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Grayson, Kentucky
Posts: 950
Thanks: 497
Thanked 185 Times in 108 Posts
| | |
It will be interesting to see how this story develops.
__________________ Willie Grills
Trinity Presbyterian Church
OPC
Huntington, WV | 
10-20-2009, 08:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 17
Thanked 120 Times in 76 Posts
| | |
Personally, I think the Archbishop should have seen this coming. Benedict has been hinting at it for a while.
If the prophecy is right, Benedict would be the second to last pope.
| 
10-20-2009, 08:46 PM
| | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 145 Times in 89 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Berean One line in the AP version caught my eye. Quote: |
By welcoming them in with their own special provision, Benedict has confirmed the increasingly conservative bent of his church.
| It's not Christ's church, it's the pope's church. | By the way, do you accept baptism outside the Christ's church, as many reformers do ?
__________________
* Ralph Wilms (7-10-1974)
* Church : Christengemeente Roermond (The Netherlands)
* 1729 Goat Yard Declaration of Faith & 1646 Baptist Confession of faith
"To our mind, either everything or nothing must be held in subjection to the will and providence of God. Even the wickedness of ungodly men is restricted by predestination, so that the wrath of man shall praise God, and the remainder of wrath He will restrain." - GILBERT BEEBE (1800-1881)
| 
10-20-2009, 09:13 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 574
Thanks: 223
Thanked 209 Times in 118 Posts
| | |
The last pope? My money's on Francis Arinze.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | 
10-21-2009, 04:59 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 619
Thanks: 142
Thanked 260 Times in 151 Posts
| | | | 
10-21-2009, 08:02 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Johnstown, CO
Posts: 312
Thanks: 141
Thanked 86 Times in 50 Posts
| | |
This story made me very mad and sad. It seems hypocritical to allow some priests to marry and some to not. It is sad that more will be added to the fold of the Roman Catholic church and be taught that they are justified by faith and works.
__________________
Joshua F
Layman
Mountain View Community Church (Missionary Church Denomination)
Johnstown, CO
| 
10-21-2009, 08:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 175
Thanks: 31
Thanked 83 Times in 53 Posts
| | |
I guess to me it's all relative. How can one remain in a church that teaches that there is no sin, that simply being baptized assures salvation, that the Bible is not authoritative, that all religions are equally valid, that the Church should conform itself to secular culture, and that the Gospel has been supplanted by the United Nations Millenium Development Goals?
__________________
Jim
Elder
First Presbyterian Church of Honolulu
at Ko'olau (PCUSA)
Honolulu, Hawaii http://www.fpchawaii.org/ "And He said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for My strength is made perfect in weakness." II Corinthians 12:9
| 
10-21-2009, 08:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,301
Thanks: 921
Thanked 1,260 Times in 674 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jpfrench81 This story made me very mad and sad. It seems hypocritical to allow some priests to marry and some to not. It is sad that more will be added to the fold of the Roman Catholic church and be taught that they are justified by faith and works. | As the article indicated this practice of allowing married Anglican priests to become catholic priests has been allowed for awhile. What angers me is how the RCC has handled this.
Up until now, only the married Anglican priests who could further the cause of the unification of all religions under the RCC have been allowed to become RC priests. Each one of them has had to seek special approval from the pope. An old friend of mine is a perfect example of this. He was a married Anglican priest who converted to catholicism when the COE was making moves to ordain gays and women. After his books and writings about converting to catholicism became popular among RCs, he was suddenly granted the right to become a RC priest and given a prestigiuos position in an RCC in the USA. His (my friend's) type have laid the groundwork for a move the pope and his predecessor have been planning to make for some time.
There are similar overtures from Rome to other denominations. I imagine we will see more and more of this in the future. (Did anyone say the pope is an anti-christ?)
__________________ J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27 Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/ | 
10-21-2009, 08:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: lakewood, nj 08701
Posts: 473
Thanks: 384
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jpfrench81 This story made me very mad and sad. It seems hypocritical to allow some priests to marry and some to not. It is sad that more will be added to the fold of the Roman Catholic church and be taught that they are justified by faith and works. | It makes me also sad. But does not surprise me. I voted hands down on the roman catholic church over 3 years ago. I left the roman catholic church in 2006 because of the moves Benedict was making to reverse the open dialogue that was the intent of Vatican II between Protestants and roman catholicism. I became an Episcopalian at first then as I studied Protestantism and the Protestant Reformation I became born again into the Reformed Branch of Protestantism in 2007. I am thankful that I am no longer a roman catholic. I am more thankful to God alone in my conversion to the Reformed Protestant faith.
In faith alone,
Dudley
__________________
In faith,
Dudley
May we all be Sons of the Reformation and continue to proclaim what it means to be Reformed Protestant Christians!
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dudley For This Useful Post: | | 
10-21-2009, 08:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,849
Thanks: 903
Thanked 827 Times in 470 Posts
| |
This isn't the first time. John Paul did a little reaching after the 1976 General Convention approved the ordination of women and a new prayerbook. http://anglicancatholic.ca/documents/Affirm.pdf
__________________ Conscience may lash us, but it cannot replenish a languishing life. Conscience may be God's word and minister to you, telling you of your faults and your follies and your destitution. It may point out, but it will never supply you. Christ must give you new life. Hart has well expressed it: "He to the feeble and the faint, His mighty aid makes known; and when their languid life is spent, supplies it with His own." - J. K. Popham
| | The Following User Says Thank You to JM For This Useful Post: | | 
10-21-2009, 09:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 17
Thanked 120 Times in 76 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawaiian Puritan I guess to me it's all relative. How can one remain in a church that teaches that there is no sin, that simply being baptized assures salvation, that the Bible is not authoritative, that all religions are equally valid, that the Church should conform itself to secular culture, and that the Gospel has been supplanted by the United Nations Millenium Development Goals? | What it is, is that there are still leaders in the Anglican Church who believe the Bible and preach the Gospel. In terms of the worldwide Anglican Communion, these far outnumber the liberals who have gained control in the American and British churches. The new ACNA is, in some ways, a plant of the rest of the Anglican Communion in protest of the direction that Anglicanism in Britain and North America has taken.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to P. F. Pugh For This Useful Post: | | 
10-22-2009, 05:06 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | |
I've been following this story in our newspaper, with utter outrage.
This is Great Britain, how dare the pope try to move in like that!!
But then with sorrow I have to acknowledge that the Church of England, the church of Ridley and Cranmer and Bloody mary's Martyrs, has brought it on herself.
I could weep.
__________________ JennyG
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Fife, Scotland | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JennyG For This Useful Post: | | 
10-22-2009, 07:26 AM
|  | Semper ubi sub ubi | | Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 7,401
Thanks: 403
Thanked 2,943 Times in 1,076 Posts
| | |
I think this is all about the celibacy debate. Benedict wants to accelerate the debate in order to finally get rid of the celibacy requirement and get some young priests into the church again. Benedict is a conservative but I think he sees that celibacy is driving potential priests away and the conservative wing is willing to give it up.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BobVigneault For This Useful Post: | | 
10-22-2009, 07:44 AM
|  | Puritanboard Botanist | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,462
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,407 Times in 1,138 Posts
| | |
They've always allowed a married priesthood in their grandfather clauses.
You know, in a communion where Bishop NT Wright is considered a conservative, and demands women Bishops, no more burning of the rain forests and believes that Adam and Eve were late model apes, do we really want it to survive?
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TimV For This Useful Post: | | 
10-22-2009, 07:44 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,500
Thanks: 451
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault I think this is all about the celibacy debate. Benedict wants to accelerate the debate in order to finally get rid of the celibacy requirement and get some young priests into the church again. Benedict is a conservative but I think he sees that celibacy is driving potential priests away and the conservative wing is willing to give it up. | Interesting observation.
__________________
Ewen
1689 LBCF
Assemblies of God Bible College 
Singapore
| 
10-22-2009, 10:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| |
David Virtues online site is the best way I have found to follow this developing story. http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news
I wonder if the current Archbishop or Canterbury even understands Ridley and Cramner. Sadly those who are going over to Rome clearly have not come to grips with the Gospel or they would not go that direction. It appears that those holding to historic Anglican faith in and practice in Great Britain and North America will be largely marginalized in the mainstream Anglican Communion.
Last edited by yeutter; 10-22-2009 at 10:11 AM.
Reason: fixing link
| 
10-22-2009, 10:39 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter I wonder if the current Archbishop or Canterbury even understands Ridley and Cramner. Sadly those who are going over to Rome clearly have not come to grips with the Gospel or they would not go that direction. It appears that those holding to historic Anglican faith in and practice in Great Britain and North America will be largely marginalized in the mainstream Anglican Communion. | well, they already were pretty marginalised, but of course you are right - just as Scotland has forgotten the Covenanters, the CofE doesn't remember its martyrs, or what they died for.
If only a mass exodus to Rome would leave a purified and strengthened church, but I'm afraid it will only leave a more determinedly liberal one.
Brothers and sisters - please, pray for England and Scotland
| | The Following User Says Thank You to JennyG For This Useful Post: | | 
10-25-2009, 01:02 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,493
Thanks: 1,762
Thanked 3,530 Times in 1,712 Posts
| |
The Wall Street Journal's front-page story called it "one of Rome's most sweeping gestures to a Protestant church since the Reformation."
The part that confuses me is: "These Anglicans who want to enter in full communion with the Roman Catholic Church, want to bring with them one of their spiritual treasures, and that's completely understandable," Massa said. "It would exist alongside the Catholic Mass as an equally valid expression of Christian worship."
How can the Roman CATHOLIC church maintain that the Mass is essential and then allow the Anglican rites to exist "alongside the Catholic Mass as an equally valid expression of Christian worship"????????????
I have never claimed to understand the papacy or the church of King Henry's divorce snafu, but this is really confusing. But, given Rowan Williams' overtures to non-Christian religions such as Islam, how could the Anglicans of today make a principled rejection to this overture? Afterall, if they get to keep all the "best parts" of their Anglican faith and practice and can still call themselves part of the universal church, what possible objection could they make to it? Considering the omnipresent ecumania of liberal protestantism, this should be a dream come true. Oh, you mean that preservation of political power and the perks of office might keep religious leaders of no particular biblical/theological scruples from uniting the way they have been harping on all of us to do for decades?  Hmmmm.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following User Says Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
10-25-2009, 01:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
As I myself am in a state church that is largely liberal I can understand why traditional anglicans would have the desire to go to rome. The portrayed image of rome is one of stability and protection from liberalism creeping in and anglicans at the end of the day will be suffering in their denomination, like I and many other evangelicals suffer in the CofS. This will be extremely tempting for them.
__________________ Lee Johnston
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Paisley, Scotland Ephesians 1:4-5
"In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will."
| 
10-25-2009, 01:56 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk As I myself am in a state church that is largely liberal I can understand why traditional anglicans would have the desire to go to rome. The portrayed image of rome is one of stability and protection from liberalism creeping in and anglicans at the end of the day will be suffering in their denomination, like I and many other evangelicals suffer in the CofS. This will be extremely tempting for them. | well, except that the only ones who will consider going are catholics already, in all but the "roman" part. I never understood quite how the Forward in Faith bunch (and anglo-catholics in general) managed to tell themselves there was a serious point to being catholic but not roman. I agree, it's a hard road for evangelicals in the church, but if they go anywhere it won 't be to rome!
| 
10-25-2009, 02:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 17
Thanked 120 Times in 76 Posts
| | Quote: |
How can the Roman CATHOLIC church maintain that the Mass is essential and then allow the Anglican rites to exist "alongside the Catholic Mass as an equally valid expression of Christian worship"????????????
| Because the Anglo-Catholic liturgy is a form of the mass, just as the Eastern Orthodox rite is. This would just be a valid variant on the Latin Rite, like the Tridentine service. Quote: |
Oh, you mean that preservation of political power and the perks of office might keep religious leaders of no particular biblical/theological scruples from uniting the way they have been harping on all of us to do for decades? Hmmmm.
| That and the fact that the Church of Rome, for all its false doctrine, teaches truth when it comes to female clergy and sodomy. They can't submit to something that isn't politically correct. Quote: |
well, except that the only ones who will consider going are catholics already, in all but the "roman" part. I never understood quite how the Forward in Faith bunch (and anglo-catholics in general) managed to tell themselves there was a serious point to being catholic but not roman.
| It's similar to the way that Old Catholics in Germany and the Netherlands are able to be Catholic--they simply deny the authority of the Pope.
If only they understood that Reformed doctrine is more catholic than any of this popery.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to P. F. Pugh For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 12:12 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Hemet, Ca
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 339
Thanked 132 Times in 89 Posts
| | Quote: | Church of Rome reaches out to disaffected Anglicans | Sounds like a good idea
| 
10-27-2009, 06:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JennyG ....well, except that the only ones who will consider going are catholics already, in all but the "roman" part. I never understood quite how the Forward in Faith bunch (and anglo-catholics in general) managed to tell themselves there was a serious point to being catholic but not roman. I agree, it's a hard road for evangelicals in the church, but if they go anywhere it won 't be to rome! | Many of the Forward in Faith crowd and many other Anglo Catholics can not swim the Tiber because they are not in tune with Vatican 1 on the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary and Papal Infallibility. Some could go over to the Orthodox Church much more easily then they could the Roman Church
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |