The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > Family Forum

Family Forum A Place to discuss family issues (especially issues with children).

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:35 PM
Kim G's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 581
Thanks: 217
Thanked 137 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Kim,

Here are some examples of the basic way of surnaming a married woman:

[snip]

Notice in each case, that the "second name" to describe who this woman is identifies the woman with her husband; this is the function of our surname, and reflects Eve's identity as Mrs. Adam, and the church's identity as the Mrs. The Lamb.
Thanks for correcting me. (That's why I added "right?" at the end of my sentence. I guess I should edit it to say "wrong!")
__________________
Kim G
Non-denom church (holds to the WCF)
Zion Community Church, Greenville, SC

Teach me Your way, O LORD;
I will walk in Your truth;
Unite my heart to fear Your name.

Psalm 86:11
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kim G For This Useful Post:
Christusregnat (07-16-2008)
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:37 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 204
Thanked 263 Times in 150 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
I always get a kick out of the false dichotomy brought about when people attempt to argue that something is either cultural and therefore of little consequence or biblical and therefore we should take it more seriously. Culture is never neutral, it is either more biblical or less biblical in how it has been influenced. Dismissing something as being unimportant to change/reclaim under the guise of it being "merely a part of Western culture, etc." shows more the negative impact of modern missiology than it does a Christian view of culture. That view would say, "It is both Western and correct, because the Western view is, in this instance, founded on a Christian view of life while the Asian culture is wrong at this point, because it is a cultural practice founded on principles that are devoid of Christian knowledge."
I understand what you're saying. However, you can only take it so far. What you are presenting I would consider a "false dichotomy"=everything is either Christian or non-Christian. In ancient Asia, women wore pants and men wore robes. In the West, men wear pants and women (traditionally) wear skirts. Neither is a Christian vs. non-Christian view of life. It's just . . . clothing styles. Same with types of food eaten, traditional music styles, etc. Unless maybe you wouldn't consider this neutral.

In the Bible, I would have been called Kim, daughter of Ken. Upon getting married, I STILL would have been Kim, daughter of Ken, not Kim, wife of Josh, right? So maybe the biblical precident is that the daughter retains the name of her father.
No, you would still have been called Kim, the wife of Josh; see Gen. 24:15, 36:10, etc.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Now waiting on the November accessions board, because I'm still waiting on the West Coast recruiting staff!
Evergreen PCA
Salem, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 02:39 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, OR
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 204
Thanked 263 Times in 150 Posts
Guess I got there a bit late.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Now waiting on the November accessions board, because I'm still waiting on the West Coast recruiting staff!
Evergreen PCA
Salem, Oregon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:01 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 717
Thanked 341 Times in 211 Posts
Kim,

I took it as a question, and my response more of an answer than correction, but thanks for confirming your intent

Cheers,

Adam


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim G View Post
Thanks for correcting me. (That's why I added "right?" at the end of my sentence. I guess I should edit it to say "wrong!")
__________________
Adam Brink, Livermore Wine Country, California
Grace Church of Pleasanton, PCA

Attorney: Chicolini, when were you born?
Chicolini: I don't remember. I was just a little baby.
~Chico Marx in Duck Soup
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:01 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 717
Thanked 341 Times in 211 Posts
Hate it when that happens!



It is nice when two responses are the same though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
Guess I got there a bit late.
__________________
Adam Brink, Livermore Wine Country, California
Grace Church of Pleasanton, PCA

Attorney: Chicolini, when were you born?
Chicolini: I don't remember. I was just a little baby.
~Chico Marx in Duck Soup
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 03:31 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,766
Thanks: 308
Thanked 117 Times in 89 Posts
Not that it realy mattered to me at the time, but when my wife and I married, she took my name and kept her middle name dropping her maiden name entirely.

She's quite comfortable with that discision and as we have grown more covenantal over the years she finds it to be appropriate as she is no longer under her father's headship but mine.

Just the way things have worked out in the Jacobs' household anyway.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMerlin777 For This Useful Post:
Christusregnat (07-16-2008)
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2008, 07:46 PM
Brad's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 1,350
Thanks: 229
Thanked 291 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Johnnie Cochranesque
Is that one in the lexicon yet?
__________________
Brad
PCA Member
Virginia

Pro 16:33 The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD.

Isa 8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64