The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > Family Forum

Family Forum A Place to discuss family issues (especially issues with children).

» Online Users: 56
5 members and 51 guests
David, Fly Caster, johnbugay, Kilted_Rob
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 11:44 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 102
Thanks: 31
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
What does Scripture teach about personal privacy?

The issue came up yesterday when my 11yodd received an inappropriate email forwarded from a "friend of a friend". It was one of those stupid "forward this email to 20 people and the person you have a crush on will make out with you at a party" kind of foolishness. I'm not sure how the girl got our email address - Dd does NOT have her own email account, but she is allowed to use the family email address with approval. I deleted it before anyone else saw it, and returned the email with a note that those emails were not welcome at our house. To her credit, the girl immediately sent an apology.

Anyway, it started a conversation about the need or lack thereof for personal privacy and off the top of my head, I could only come up with prayer, fasting, and good deeds as things that scripture specifically teaches can/should be done privately.

Can you give me more insight on this as it relates to raising children &/or adults?
__________________
Moselle
PCA
TN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 12:30 PM
jwithnell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,252
Thanks: 155
Thanked 555 Times in 339 Posts
What first jumps into my mind is the idea of headship within a household, backed up by the commandment to honor your mother and your father. The father has a heavy responsibility that can function only if he has a pretty good idea what's going on within his family. The modern "rights" of children, particularly to privacy, can in no way support the Biblical family structure.

Within scripture, you also see the exclusivity and intimacy of marriage which implies privacy there, not only from outsiders but also from the older generation and from the children of the household.

Under the Mosaic covenant, certain people and "situations" were taken outside the camp -- illnesses, menstruation, and so on. While this was part of the ceremonial law, perhaps it also suggests that not every human function needs to be publicly staged? Not so sure on this last one, but it seems like there's something intuitive there that applies to privacy.

Interesting question!
__________________
JWithnell
Member Bethel OPC
Virginia
http://learningyesican.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to jwithnell For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (10-19-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 01:23 PM
Andres's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Abilene,TX
Posts: 652
Thanks: 323
Thanked 217 Times in 113 Posts
I apologize up front if this is not answering your question, but I believe this original issue of the inappropriate email has nothign to do with a privacy issue, but rather simply an issue of what is appropriate for an 11 year old. If you don't want your child to read emails like that (and I agree you shouldn't) then I think it's just a matter of you exhorting your parental authority. In my opinion, you handled the situation correctly. As for what limits of privacy you should give your children, just use common sense as a parent. Obviously if you trust them, then they can have more leeway, yet at the same time, it is your house so you make the rules.
__________________
Andrew S.
Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Abilene,TX
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Andres For This Useful Post:
austinww (10-19-2009), Montanablue (10-19-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:04 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 102
Thanks: 31
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres View Post
I apologize up front if this is not answering your question, but I believe this original issue of the inappropriate email has nothign to do with a privacy issue, but rather simply an issue of what is appropriate for an 11 year old. If you don't want your child to read emails like that (and I agree you shouldn't) then I think it's just a matter of you exhorting your parental authority. In my opinion, you handled the situation correctly. As for what limits of privacy you should give your children, just use common sense as a parent. Obviously if you trust them, then they can have more leeway, yet at the same time, it is your house so you make the rules.
You're right - the privacy issue in my head that didn't quite make it out stemmed from my reading emails addressed to dd, and whether or not kids should have their own email accounts.

My thought was that there really wasn't any reason for our kids to have their "own" email accounts since they would be monitored anyway (with their knowledge), and might simply give them a false impression of having privacy and if this is an acceptable option. And that led to wondering where the Bible grants privacy, and where it is/is not necessary within families (particularly with children - there are obviously many things that parents keep private from their children.)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:24 PM
Jon Peters's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 625
Thanks: 67
Thanked 287 Times in 164 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwithnell View Post
The modern "rights" of children, particularly to privacy, can in no way support the Biblical family structure.
What modern rights are you talking about? In your view is it biblical for the civil magistrate to protect the child from sexual and physical abuse? I know that's a loaded question, but I'd like to know where the line is drawn in your thinking. In my (rather undeveloped) thinking, it is a matter of degrees, not an absolute prohibition.
__________________
Jon Peters
Member, Reformation Fellowship (OPC) (Roseville, CA)
Folsom, CA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:32 PM
Rich Koster's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,316
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 617
Thanked 702 Times in 404 Posts
Privacy can be given as trustworthiness is proven.
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA
Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rich Koster For This Useful Post:
austinww (10-19-2009), Berean (10-19-2009), Montanablue (10-19-2009), Pergamum (10-19-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 08:29 PM
jwithnell's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,252
Thanks: 155
Thanked 555 Times in 339 Posts
Quote:
In your view is it biblical for the civil magistrate to protect the child from sexual and physical abuse?
Of course I'd want to protect children from any kind of abuse! It's the idea of treating children like little adults that concerns me! Some believe that a child should be able to say and believe as he wants at any age. That parents have no "right" to search when they have a concern. As others have said, giving a greater degree of privacy as children gain your trust makes a lot of sense to me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 10:22 PM
Montanablue's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,739
Thanks: 2,594
Thanked 978 Times in 532 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Privacy can be given as trustworthiness is proven.
I agree. I think that especially as a child grows older, more and more privacy can be appropriate.

An example:

When I was about 15 or 16, I got my own email account. I was homeschooled and because of this, I communicated with many of my friends by email. My friends did not necessarily want my parents reading their emails - not because they were bad or inappropriate emails, but because they weren't friends with my parents and were uncomfortable sharing various emotions, experiences, situations with them- for instance, a friend's brother was in Iraq and she went through a lot of emotional trauma that she shared with me via email. My parents didn't need to read those. Likewise, I had anxiety over colleges that I shared with friends. You get the picture.

I certainly don't think that parents need to be privy to every single private emotion, feeling, or experience that a young person has. Of course, parents do need to know what is going on with their children, so a balance has to be struck. But if a child or teenage has shown that they can be trusted, I don't think that allowing some privacy is unbiblical.
__________________
Kathleen M
nondenominational
Montana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Montanablue For This Useful Post:
austinww (10-19-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 10:57 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 623
Thanked 673 Times in 438 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanablue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Privacy can be given as trustworthiness is proven.
I agree. I think that especially as a child grows older, more and more privacy can be appropriate.

An example:

When I was about 15 or 16, I got my own email account. I was homeschooled and because of this, I communicated with many of my friends by email. My friends did not necessarily want my parents reading their emails - not because they were bad or inappropriate emails, but because they weren't friends with my parents and were uncomfortable sharing various emotions, experiences, situations with them- for instance, a friend's brother was in Iraq and she went through a lot of emotional trauma that she shared with me via email. My parents didn't need to read those. Likewise, I had anxiety over colleges that I shared with friends. You get the picture.

I certainly don't think that parents need to be privy to every single private emotion, feeling, or experience that a young person has. Of course, parents do need to know what is going on with their children, so a balance has to be struck. But if a child or teenage has shown that they can be trusted, I don't think that allowing some privacy is unbiblical.
I'm planning to err on the side of being overprotective.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 11:16 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 102
Thanks: 31
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanablue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Privacy can be given as trustworthiness is proven.
I agree. I think that especially as a child grows older, more and more privacy can be appropriate.

An example:

When I was about 15 or 16, I got my own email account. I was homeschooled and because of this, I communicated with many of my friends by email. My friends did not necessarily want my parents reading their emails - not because they were bad or inappropriate emails, but because they weren't friends with my parents and were uncomfortable sharing various emotions, experiences, situations with them- for instance, a friend's brother was in Iraq and she went through a lot of emotional trauma that she shared with me via email. My parents didn't need to read those. Likewise, I had anxiety over colleges that I shared with friends. You get the picture.

I certainly don't think that parents need to be privy to every single private emotion, feeling, or experience that a young person has. Of course, parents do need to know what is going on with their children, so a balance has to be struck. But if a child or teenage has shown that they can be trusted, I don't think that allowing some privacy is unbiblical.
Thank you for those thoughts. I may be equating "privacy" with "hiding" at the moment. What really concerns me is that I know the families of most of the email recipients, as well as the sender. I'm pretty sure none of the parents would approve of this stuff and I would have considered the girls to be more level headed and responsible, yet their daughters are spreading it around (as it would seem from the lengthy chain of forwarding) quite freely.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to moselle For This Useful Post:
Montanablue (10-19-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2009, 11:28 PM
Montanablue's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Montana
Posts: 3,739
Thanks: 2,594
Thanked 978 Times in 532 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by moselle View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Montanablue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster View Post
Privacy can be given as trustworthiness is proven.
I agree. I think that especially as a child grows older, more and more privacy can be appropriate.

An example:

When I was about 15 or 16, I got my own email account. I was homeschooled and because of this, I communicated with many of my friends by email. My friends did not necessarily want my parents reading their emails - not because they were bad or inappropriate emails, but because they weren't friends with my parents and were uncomfortable sharing various emotions, experiences, situations with them- for instance, a friend's brother was in Iraq and she went through a lot of emotional trauma that she shared with me via email. My parents didn't need to read those. Likewise, I had anxiety over colleges that I shared with friends. You get the picture.

I certainly don't think that parents need to be privy to every single private emotion, feeling, or experience that a young person has. Of course, parents do need to know what is going on with their children, so a balance has to be struck. But if a child or teenage has shown that they can be trusted, I don't think that allowing some privacy is unbiblical.
Thank you for those thoughts. I may be equating "privacy" with "hiding" at the moment. What really concerns me is that I know the families of most of the email recipients, as well as the sender. I'm pretty sure none of the parents would approve of this stuff and I would have considered the girls to be more level headed and responsible, yet their daughters are spreading it around (as it would seem from the lengthy chain of forwarding) quite freely.
Right, and your daughter is also quite a bit younger - 11. An 11 year old is not as capable of discernment in certain areas, and so its probably more appropriate that they use a family email account. I'm not saying that children and teens have to have complete privacy - just that in a lot of situations a degree of privacy may be appropriate. Especially if you have a child that has shown themselves to be trustworthy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Montanablue For This Useful Post:
austinww (10-19-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69