The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > Family Forum

Family Forum A Place to discuss family issues (especially issues with children).

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:10 AM
Kaalvenist's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Currently deployed to Iraq
Posts: 452
Thanks: 2
Thanked 24 Times in 8 Posts
Courtship/Marriage between Paedos and Credos

Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
__________________
Sean P.M. McDonald
Communicant Member of Springs Reformed Church (RPCNA), Colorado Springs, CO
Infantryman, 10th Mountain Division, Fort Drum, NY (Deployed to Iraq)
Engaged to Laura A. Doman of Grand Rapids, MI
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Lex praescribit, evangelium inscribit." (The law prescribes, the gospel inscribes.)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:11 AM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Haha



Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:16 AM
Joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,196
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,647
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,000 Posts
Just my :

Ultimately, the woman -whatever she may be- must submit to her husband's beliefs in such a matter, and follow him accordingly. If she cannot do that/work through that in educating and counsel, there should be no courtship.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC, Attending CCRPC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (04-02-2008), Beoga (04-02-2008), BlackCalvinist (04-05-2008), Blueridge Believer (04-02-2008), Bygracealone (08-02-2008), christianyouth (08-02-2008), Coram Deo (04-02-2008), Daniel Ritchie (04-02-2008), etexas (04-02-2008), Gloria (08-11-2008), JonathanHunt (05-24-2008), MrMerlin777 (08-08-2008), North Jersey Baptist (04-02-2008), Peter H (08-11-2008), Pilgrim (04-02-2008), rescuedbyLove (08-01-2008), smhbbag (04-02-2008), Southern Presbyterian (04-02-2008), TheocraticMonarchist (08-02-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:17 AM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,234
Thanks: 1,836
Thanked 788 Times in 543 Posts
I would not think this would fall under the heading of "unequally yolked". I certainly, when I get to the place where I can wed and give pre-marital counseling, would marry a couple with one credo and one paedo member as long as we talked through the issue and made sure that it was not a factor that would cause division later.

(I of course would try and counsel the credo member of the union as to his/her position)
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church, Sewickley, PA
Candidate Under Care Pittsburgh Theological Seminary & Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary

“If the Church could be aroused to a deeper sense of the glory that awaits her, she would enter with a warmer spirit into the struggles that are before her.”-- J.H. Thornwell
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
Hippo (04-03-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:20 AM
servantofmosthigh's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 224
Thanks: 17
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Well, you'll have to discuss with her whether whichever one of you is the pedobaptist wants to baptize your children after marriage or whichever one of you is the credobaptist views that as heresy. =p
__________________
Will Shin
Rockville, MD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:27 AM
Gryphonette's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,279
Thanks: 125
Thanked 246 Times in 164 Posts
It largely would depend on the type of paedo involved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
One thing I've definitely noticed over the years by interacting with Presbyterianish folk is that there are quite a few variations on a paedobaptist theme, so to speak.

If the paedobaptist in question is one of the "baptism does so save, it says so right there in 1 Peter 3:21", then trying to pair off with a credobaptist is a serious mistake.

If, however, the paedobaptist thinks of baptism more as placing someone within the parameters of the visible church, then there's more hope that the two can either peacefully coexist, or - playing the odds of the way this tends to go - the credobaptist will move over to the paedobaptist's POV.
__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:39 AM
JBaldwin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 1,677
Thanks: 315
Thanked 440 Times in 275 Posts
I agree with Michael

Here's why: If God should bless a marriage with children, there has to be a "united front" when it comes to raising the children. The issue of paedo vs. credo is an argument waiting to happen, especially if one of the two is firmly planted in their beliefs. It's a possible source of division that can cause trouble down the road.

What I have found in marriage is that when it comes to differences in raising children, the most ridiculous things can become a source of irriation. If you start off with a division as big as paedo-credo, you're asking for trouble. My
__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JBaldwin For This Useful Post:
Beoga (04-02-2008), jaybird0827 (04-03-2008), Pilgrim (04-02-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 10:08 AM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 659
Thanks: 99
Thanked 181 Times in 113 Posts
Interesting. I agree with Backwoods Pres that it doesn't fall under unequally yoked, but I also agree with JBaldwin that it is a conflict waiting to happen, unless the wife understands the issue and agree beforehand that she will submit to her husband on the issue. I guess if it's something both are very passionate about and the the wife isn't willing to submit, then I don't see a reason to continue courtship, knowing that it will inevitably lead to major, potentially unresolvable contention.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:26 AM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 385
Thanked 109 Times in 78 Posts
As a credo, I have no problem courting or marrying a paedo....

The children will probably just have to be baptized twice
__________________
Nikki Edmond
Berean Christian Assembly (Reformed Baptist)
Tucson, AZ
HaveATulip Chat Room for Reformed Believers
Principle and Practice Blog
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:37 AM
Joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,196
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,647
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,000 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
As a credo, I have no problem courting or marrying a paedo....

The children will probably just have to be baptized twice
But to the paedo husband, and the Reformed Paedos everywhere, that would be considered as blasphemous and a denial of their children's baptism (i.e. the original).
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC, Attending CCRPC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post:
ColdSilverMoon (04-02-2008), Ivanhoe (04-02-2008), jaybird0827 (04-03-2008), Southern Presbyterian (04-02-2008)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:52 AM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,032
Thanks: 385
Thanked 109 Times in 78 Posts
I was kidding hence the smirk.

On a serious note, I'm not sure, though I think I could probably submit to a paedo husband's stance on that issue. However, what if the children once adults wanted to be baptized again because they did not come to accept the position of paedo baptism? I've seen many adults do this, especially those who left the church and came back. Oh and why would it be blasphemy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
As a credo, I have no problem courting or marrying a paedo....

The children will probably just have to be baptized twice
But to the paedo husband, and the Reformed Paedos everywhere, that would be considered as blasphemous and a denial of their children's baptism (i.e. the original).
__________________
Nikki Edmond
Berean Christian Assembly (Reformed Baptist)
Tucson, AZ
HaveATulip Chat Room for Reformed Believers
Principle and Practice Blog
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 11:56 AM
Joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,196
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,647
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,000 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
I was kidding hence the smirk.
Ahh...my bad.
Quote:
On a serious note, I'm not sure, though I think I could probably submit to a paedo husband's stance on that issue. However, what if the children once adults wanted to be baptized again because they did not come to accept the position of paedo baptism?
As long as they are under the headship of their Father, and according to the Father's paedo position, and the family's Paedo Church membership, it ought not be allowed.
Quote:
I've seen many adults do this, especially those who left the church and came back. Oh and why would it be blasphemy?
I'll let the seasoned Paedos chime in on this, but, basically it boils down to the denial of what the infant's baptism objectively symbolizes. However, I don't want to misrepresent what either side may respectively hold, so at this time I will defer to those much smarter and greater than myself.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC, Attending CCRPC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:10 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
The only absolute qualification in courtship and marriage is that the other person is a Christian. Other things are a matter of prudence. However, if a woman is strongly paedo-baptist, then it is unwise of her to marry a man who is definitely Baptist, as she will have to submit to her husband's decision as to whether or not the children are to be baptised. But even in this case, we cannot forbid her from marrying the man if her father permits her.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:13 PM
Joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,196
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,647
Thanked 1,977 Times in 1,000 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
The only absolute qualification in courtship and marriage is that the other person is a Christian. Other things are a matter of prudence. However, if a woman is strongly paedo-baptist, then it is unwise of her to marry a man who is definitely Baptist, as she will have to submit to her husband's decision as to whether or not the children are to be baptised. But even in this case, we cannot forbid her from marrying the man if her father permits her.
But if we can't biblically object to their marriage, how could her father? In other words, if we all know the facts, and there is nothing biblically prohibiting the two from marrying, neither we nor the father can ultimately (and legitimately) forbid the marriage, right? Sorry for this question.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC, Attending CCRPC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:14 PM
JBaldwin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 1,677
Thanks: 315
Thanked 440 Times in 275 Posts
Just for the record, before I met my husband, I dated a wonderful Christian man, and we had such a disagreement. We met in a reformed Baptist church, but I was studying paedo baptism at the time. It wasn't too long before I made the switch, and he couldn't agree. I knew I wasn't going to change my mind, so we broke it off.

Though I highly respect the views of my credo baptist brothers and sisters, if I had married (and we were discussing it seroiusly) I would have always felt like I was denying my convictions, and I'm sure it would have caused trouble later on.
__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:17 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaalvenist View Post
Any thoughts on the question of whether Reformed paedobaptists should court or marry Reformed credobaptists? (I view this as more of a question regarding courtship or marriage, rather than concerning baptism; that's why I put it in this forum.)
The only absolute qualification in courtship and marriage is that the other person is a Christian. Other things are a matter of prudence. However, if a woman is strongly paedo-baptist, then it is unwise of her to marry a man who is definitely Baptist, as she will have to submit to her husband's decision as to whether or not the children are to be baptised. But even in this case, we cannot forbid her from marrying the man if her father permits her.
But if we can't biblically object to their marriage, how could her father? In other words, if we all know the facts, and there is nothing biblically prohibiting the two from marrying, neither we nor the father can ultimately (and legitimately) forbid the marriage, right? Sorry for this question.
I suppose what I mean is that her church's elders could not discipline her for marrying a Baptist, as it is the father's responsibility to decide whether or not such an marriage is wise and prudent. IMHO, it is a sphere sovereignty issue, which the church has got no business to get involved in. Hope that helps.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:25 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Joshua, it may interest you to know that Mark Chanksi has a couple of good chapters on the father's role in courtship and giving in marriage in his book Manly Dominion. It wont be that long before boys are wanting to court your own daughter, so be prepared.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:25 PM
Southern Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wytheville, Virginia
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 882
Thanked 371 Times in 288 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
But if we can't biblically object to their marriage, how could her father? In other words, if we all know the facts, and there is nothing biblically prohibiting the two from marrying, neither we nor the father can ultimately (and legitimately) forbid the marriage, right? Sorry for this question.
Biblically, the father is the head of the daughter until she is given in marriage, and if he sees this issue leading to future irreconcilable trouble in the marriage (after due consideration) I believe he can biblically deny his blessing.

This would be a tough issue to weigh, as would be many others, and wise would be the couple who didn't weighing issues just because they would not be "unequally yoked".
__________________
~James Helbert~, Wytheville, VA
Providence Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCUS

TheBibleAlone.com / The Edinburgh Inn
"Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?” - Zechariah 3:2

Last edited by Southern Presbyterian; 04-02-2008 at 12:28 PM. Reason: spelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:28 PM
Pergamum's Avatar