» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 135 | | 48 members and 87 guests | | ADKing, alb1, austinww, Backwoods Presbyterian, baron, Beoga, buggy, cbryant, Chaplainintraining, Chippy, Daniel Haley, David G, DD2009, earl40, Fly Caster, Glenn Ferrell, Jake, Jeff_Bartel, JM, jogri17, johnbugay, jollymommy4, KMK, louis_jp, markkoller, Marrow Man, mossy, Nathan Riese, Pilgrim's Progeny, PMBrooks, Puritan Scot, refbaptdude, Scottish Lass, Sgt Grit, shead, SRoper, steadfast7, tdowns, TimV, Tripel, VictorBravo, Wayne | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
05-22-2008, 12:17 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
| | | Jeremiah 31 and membership of the new covenant
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
| 
05-22-2008, 12:22 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,063
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,453 Times in 841 Posts
| | |
The problem with his arguments are several. One is that he does not acknowledge any kind of outer/inner distinction in the covenant. I believe that the covenant has an inner core which is unbreakable (the covenant promises salvation, and election, justification, adoption, etc. are *benefits* of the covenant). However, the covenant also has an outward administration (not all Israel is Israel, they went out from us but were not of us, and other passages), which is breakable. I fear that too many discussions of Jeremiah are marred by this failure to recognize the inner/outer distinction. From the least to the greatest is more likely to be a merism, which is inclusive of all members of the set, not exclusive of any. Therefore, I believe that Jeremiah is talking about the inner-core substance of the covenant.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post: | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |