The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > The Confession of Faith

The Confession of Faith Discuss Westminster Standards, 1689 Confession and 3 Forms of Unity
Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful (Heb. 10:23)

» Online Users: 92
10 members and 82 guests
Andres, AThornquist, Bookmeister, David, DMcFadden, KaphLamedh, Pergamum, satz, wookie, Zenas
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:05 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,705 Times in 746 Posts
Wcf 10.4

Quote:
WCF 10.4
Others, not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit, yet they never truly come to Christ, and therefore can not be saved: much less can men, not professing the Christian religion, be saved in any other way whatsoever, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature, and the law of that religion they do profess; and to assert and maintain that they may is without warrant of the Word of God.
I'm curious about the inclusion of the following clause at the end of this section:

"And to assert and maintain that they may is without warrant of the Word of God."

Does anyone have historical information as to why they felt it necessary to assert such a thing here and nowhere else in the confession? It seems wholly superfluous and unnecessary to add this, as though the contraries of the other things stated in the confession could be asserted and maintained with warrant from the Word of God.

Was there some particular controversy in the assembly that sheds light on this? Or is this question pure speculation? I realize there was a lot of controversy regarding "common grace" and the light of nature at the time, but that doesn't explain the clause to me.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI

They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:07 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,525
Thanks: 335
Thanked 3,503 Times in 1,413 Posts
Paul,

My guess is that they are combating a Roman Catholic concept. Remember that Dante "saved" both Cato the Elder and the Emperor Trajan.
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
TimV (12-14-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:17 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,705 Times in 746 Posts
Thank you, Mr. Greco. I'm more asking about the emphasizing clause, however. It seems obvious that if the confession states a doctrine, then it is a matter of course that to assert the opposite is without warrant in the Word (lest why do we confess it?) I don't understand why, suddenly, at this point in the confession they said of this particular doctrine that "to assert otherwise is without warrant."

-----Added 12/14/2008 at 10:17:41 EST-----

I realize there may be no answer to this, and that it may be a pointless question; it just seems like a literary oddity in the Confession, which is normally incredibly concise and precise. I'm wondering if there's a reason.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:20 PM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,194
Thanks: 75
Thanked 3,371 Times in 1,193 Posts
Isn't the phrase "...is very pernicious"?
I've read the Confession many times and never read that "without warrant" bit.
Sounded wrong to me, so I checked:

10:4 Others, not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit, yet they never truly come unto Christ, and therefore cannot be saved: much less can men, not professing the Christian religion, be saved in any other way whatsoever, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature, and the law of that religion they do profess; and to assert and maintain that they may, is very pernicious, and to be detested.

I don't know which version you're looking at.
__________________
Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us.
--Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? --
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post:
Prufrock (12-14-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:27 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,519
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 2,019 Times in 1,118 Posts
Yes; that is an American change by the southern church. My note says: PCUS (1939): last clause replaced with “is without warrant of the Word of God.” Also in Book of Confessions and UPCUSA of 1958.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum View Post
Isn't the phrase "...is very pernicious"?
I've read the Confession many times and never read that "without warrant" bit.
Sounded wrong to me, so I checked:

10:4 Others, not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit, yet they never truly come unto Christ, and therefore cannot be saved: much less can men, not professing the Christian religion, be saved in any other way whatsoever, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature, and the law of that religion they do profess; and to assert and maintain that they may, is very pernicious, and to be detested.

I don't know which version you're looking at.
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
Westminster Letter Press
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post:
Prufrock (12-14-2008)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:40 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,705 Times in 746 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum View Post
Isn't the phrase "...is very pernicious"?
I've read the Confession many times and never read that "without warrant" bit.
Sounded wrong to me, so I checked:

10:4 Others, not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit, yet they never truly come unto Christ, and therefore cannot be saved: much less can men, not professing the Christian religion, be saved in any other way whatsoever, be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature, and the law of that religion they do profess; and to assert and maintain that they may, is very pernicious, and to be detested.

I don't know which version you're looking at.
Ironically, the one provided on the Puritan Board as the "main one". I was just reading that section on this website, and that jumped out at me: now I know why -- it's not how mine words it. Thanks.

Chris -- thanks for the information. Do you know why they changed it?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-14-2008, 10:50 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,519
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 2,019 Times in 1,118 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock View Post
Chris -- thanks for the information. Do you know why they changed it?
Dunno; I only have a digest of the minutes and it doesn't cover that change except to note there were eleven changes to various paragraphs in 1939. Other changes are given more coverage in the digest.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post:
Prufrock (12-14-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2008, 04:49 AM
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 24,004
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 2,636
Thanked 3,523 Times in 2,014 Posts
There are other inaccuracies that I have found in the links provided under Puritan Board Reformed Confessions. IMHO, it's usually best to go to the source rather than rely upon the texts found there.
__________________
Andrew
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2008, 02:29 PM
Contra_Mundum's Avatar
Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 5,194
Thanks: 75
Thanked 3,371 Times in 1,193 Posts
Richie! Gotta fix that!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2008, 07:23 PM
armourbearer's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 7,357
Thanks: 916
Thanked 5,355 Times in 1,961 Posts
David Dickson, Truth's Victory Over Error, ascribes the contrary position to the Socianians, when he comments on chap. 1, sect. 1, the insufficiency of the light of nature: "Well then, do not the Socinians err, who maintain, That men living according to the law and light of nature may be saved."
__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:
Prufrock (12-15-2008)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-15-2008, 07:30 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 825
Thanked 1,705 Times in 746 Posts
IMHO, the finest discussion of that topic I ever read was in Owen's Theologoumena Pantodapa, where his conclusion was that no man was ever saved by hope in a God reconcilable, but faith in a God reconciled in the person of Christ -- which knowledge, of course, could only come from special revelation, not being a part of natural theology.

(Sorry that was off topic, but, hey, it's my thread!)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69