 » Site Navigation | | | | » Online Users: 120 | | 33 members and 87 guests | | Backwoods Presbyterian, Brad, CalvinandHodges, cbryant, christabella_warren, ChristianHedonist, ColdSilverMoon, Dearly Bought, J. David Kear, jambo, JDWiseman, JM, kalawine, Karnes, KSon, LeeJUk, markkoller, Michael Doyle, mvdm, Piano Hero, Simply_Nikki, smhbbag, T.A.G., TaylorOtwell, ThomasH., TimV, WAWICRUZ | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
03-30-2009, 10:04 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
| |  Question for my Presbyterian Friends???
I did not wish to derail a running thread and poll with a silly Anglican question so I am going to let you educate me on the sideline.  What IS the difference between being 100% WCF and being 100% under? (I think this is how the ? was presented in the Poll). Again forgive me if this is a dumb question but what is the semantic difference between Holding 100% and being Under the WCF 100% or am I TOTALLY misreading???  
__________________
et
|
03-30-2009, 10:08 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
| | |
He was asking about supporting the WCF 100% or supporting it less than 100% (i.e. subscribing fully or only partially).
__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emily
Member of All Saints Anglican Church - Chapel Hill (AMiA / Anglican Church of North America)
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German and Classics
|
03-30-2009, 10:11 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius  He was asking about supporting the WCF 100% or supporting it WCF less than 100% (i.e. subscribing fully or only partially). | OH! Makes sense! Sorry I must have misread! (BLUSH) I thought it read being 100% UNDER, in my mind interpreting a submission.  OK, I did a reread on the poll! I did not read it correctly! Someone please do DUMBEST PB Member thread now! I nominate myself! DOH!
Last edited by et; 03-30-2009 at 10:47 AM.
|
03-30-2009, 10:18 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,956
Thanks: 906
Thanked 820 Times in 504 Posts
| | | |
03-30-2009, 10:28 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidius | Nothing to see here folks...keep moving,! David! We are fellow Anglicans! "Fer Shame" quit laughing! In FAIRNESS it is allergy season and the ONLY thing I can take is Benadryl so I was a tad blurred in reading that! Etexas has yet another fantasy about a Life Rewind and Delete button! 
Last edited by et; 03-30-2009 at 10:47 AM.
|
03-30-2009, 10:46 AM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| |
We're not laughing at you Max. We're laughing with you.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Roanoke VA.
Covenant Reformed Episcopal Church.
Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum. |
03-30-2009, 10:48 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777
We're not laughing at you Max. We're laughing with you. | Thank you Don! That makes me feel SO much better! |
03-30-2009, 10:52 AM
| | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 4,220
Thanks: 779
Thanked 389 Times in 277 Posts
| |
Glad to be of help Max.  |
03-30-2009, 10:56 AM
| | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: US
Posts: 6,033
Thanks: 1,147
Thanked 346 Times in 254 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMerlin777 Glad to be of help Max. | | |
| Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
| | |
|
