The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > The Confession of Faith

The Confession of Faith Discuss Westminster Standards, 1689 Confession and 3 Forms of Unity
Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful (Heb. 10:23)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:01 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 6,537
Blog Entries: 18
Thanks: 642
Thanked 501 Times in 305 Posts
LC 109/Images of Christ bibliography

As noted on other threads I've posted on this topic, I'm constructing a bibliography on the subject of idolatrous images, specifically of Christ as covered in the Westminster Larger Catechism Q&A 109.

I would like to pull the best and most succinct statements upholding LC 109 from the Puritans forward. Specifically I'd like input on what time periods to demarcate and the best authors to cite from those periods. There's obviously James Durham, Watson and Vincent from the heart of the Puritan period. How about later? Any thoughts, quotations to add would be much appreciated.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
• Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
• The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
• The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:34 PM
Daniel Ritchie's Avatar
Puritanboard Professor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 5,183
Thanks: 1,604
Thanked 835 Times in 554 Posts
See Thomas Ridgeley on the Larger Catechism.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
http://reformedcovenanter.wordpress.com/
The Regulative Principle of Worship: Explained and Applied (Xulon Press)
A Conquered Kingdom: Biblical Civil Government (Reformed Worldview Books)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daniel Ritchie For This Useful Post:
NaphtaliPress (05-05-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 05:44 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lyndon, VT
Posts: 470
Thanks: 23
Thanked 136 Times in 64 Posts
Chris, I am sure you are already familiar with this book, but I will take the opportunity to put in another plug for a book by a friend of mine.

Why Christ Can't Be Pictured: God is not like art by J Virgil Dunbar
__________________
Rev. Adam King
Pastor, Westminster Presbyterian Church (WPCUS)
Lyndon, VT
www.vt.wpcus.org
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ADKing For This Useful Post:
NaphtaliPress (05-05-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 06:08 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 389
Thanked 205 Times in 129 Posts
A.A Hodge's commentary on the Confession would be a good place to look for 19th century thought... (cf. pg. 274 of the Banner of Truth edition, 2002). He unequivocally says the Confession forbids Religious imagery.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church

Student of Theology

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
NaphtaliPress (05-05-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:48 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 18,972
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 1,001
Thanked 1,145 Times in 723 Posts
Looking for books : error of using images of Jesus
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"On land, at sea, at home, abroad, / I smoke my pipe and worship God." -- J.S. Bach
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VirginiaHuguenot For This Useful Post:
Quickened (05-06-2008)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:56 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kirkland,WA U.S.A.
Posts: 6,863
Thanks: 229
Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts
I cant wait to see your list.
__________________
Nathan Olaf Brandal
First Baptist Church of Kirkland

"Man is nothing: he hath a free will to go to hell, but none to go to heaven, till God worketh in him to will and to do his good pleasure"
GEORGE WHITEFIELD TO JOHN WESLEY

My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:09 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 18,972
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 1,001
Thanked 1,145 Times in 723 Posts
Besides the names I already cited in the aforementioned thread, I can add a couple of more:

Wilhelmus a'Brakel, The Christian's Reasonable Service (1700), Vol. 3, pp. 108-110 re the second commandment.

George Estey, Certain Godly and Learned Expositions Upon Divers Parts of Scripture (1603), p. 42 re the second commandment.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:05 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 187
Thanked 276 Times in 214 Posts
This maybe slightly , but I bring it up anyway.

The reformed tradition (DUTCH) have their own R. C. Sproul type departures in this area.

J. Douma, The Ten Commandments: Manual for the Christian Life, (P & R Pubblishing), 1992. This is an excellent contemporary exposition of the 10 Commandments by a Dutch theologian. However, in this area of images and what the second commandment forbids, he is as mistaken as some Presbyterians we've discussed in another recent thread.

"Iconoclastic Campaigns" and "Images Today" (pages 58-71)

Douma advocates "religious art" as being a good a thing, but maintains it's place is "outside the walls of the church."

Quote:
Religious art must be able to develop, but it develops best outside the walls of the church. Rembrandt was in his own way an interpreter of Scripture, but you must not make the Rembrandt Bible the pulpit Bible. Religious art reflects the history of exegesis, but that is different from the living preaching of God's Word.
(page 66).

He does not hold that images of Christ are forbidden, but that they don't belong in the church:

Quote:
Since this kind of portrait of Christ is controversial, people should not put it in a church. Representations of Christ are numerous. You should compare the subdued portrayals of the sufferings of Christ with the tearful expressionsso often portrayed in religious art. Nevertheless, it would be good if both remained outside the church building.
(page 66).

So it is not the commandment that keeps such out of church, but the fact that it's controversial? A catering to the opinions of men rather than obedience to God?

But, he then enters into a discussion of "mental images" which is very interesting:

Quote:
If you are intersted in the relevance of the second commandment, you must not restrict it to the idol images mentioned in the commandment, but ask whether, apart from materials like wood, stone, or paint, you can construct wrong mental images of God. For then you are doing exactly what the image-making craftsmen were doing in the Old Testament world: fashioning God according to your own understanding.
(page 69-70).

__________________
Sterling Harmon
Coventry, CT
PCA
Deacon

________________

"Whatever is laudable in our works proceeds from the grace of God."
-- John Calvin, Institutes III:xv.3.

"Our Lord God must be a good man, to be fond of worthless fellows. I cannot like them, and yet I, myself, am one."
-- Martin Luther, Table Talk
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:13 PM
dannyhyde's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oceanside, California
Posts: 268
Thanks: 2
Thanked 74 Times in 33 Posts
Sterling,

Yes, there are some moderns in our Dutch Reformed circles that permit pics of Jesus, but some us are trying to get back to our original practice. I have a little book on this issue coming out sometime at the end of '08 entitled, In Living Color: Pastoral Counsel on Images of Christ.
__________________
Rev. Daniel R. Hyde
Pastor, Oceanside United Reformed Church
www.oceansideurc.org
Carlsbad/Oceanside, California
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dannyhyde For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (05-05-2008)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 10:17 PM
Presbyterian Deacon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 1,286
Thanks: 187
Thanked 276 Times in 214 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyhyde View Post
Sterling,

Yes, there are some moderns in our Dutch Reformed circles that permit pics of Jesus, but some us are trying to get back to our original practice. I have a little book on this issue coming out sometime at the end of '08 entitled, In Living Color: Pastoral Counsel on Images of Christ.

I look forward to reading that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61