The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Theology > The Confession of Faith

The Confession of Faith Discuss Westminster Standards, 1689 Confession and 3 Forms of Unity
Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful (Heb. 10:23)

Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the LORD your God.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:51 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
The Families of Reformed Confessions

While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
discipulo (02-03-2009), Hippo (02-03-2009)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 02:59 PM
discipulo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
Actually the Westminster Divines in 1643 were working on the basis of the Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England
The Assembly spent the first part of its work in an attempt to revise the Thirty Nine Articles.
Only when the Scottish delegates joined they insisted on a new confession, that would be supra national, so to speak, and only then the Parliament instructed the Assembly to draw up a new confession.

So the WCF has the 39 articles as one of its roots.


and Toplady the same year (1774 ) he published the Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England
also published The Church of England Vindicated from the Charge of Arminianism.
__________________
César Proença

there is no will nor running by which we can prepare the way for our salvation, it is wholly of the Divine Mercy Jean Calvin Institutes II . V. 17

Reformed Churches in The Netherlands (liberated) http://www.gkv.nl/main.asp?intTreeviewID=954

Igreja Reformada em Massamá Portugal http://www.igrejareformada.pt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to discipulo For This Useful Post:
Classical Presbyterian (02-04-2009), Hamalas (02-03-2009), Whitefield (02-03-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 04:17 PM
Casey's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: La Grange Park, IL
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 281
Thanked 379 Times in 217 Posts
There's also the Second Helvetic Confession which, as I understand it, represents another Reformed "family."
__________________
Casey, Chicagoland, OPC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Casey For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (02-03-2009), Classical Presbyterian (02-04-2009), Whitefield (02-03-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:13 PM
yeutter's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
Compare the 39 Articles and the Augsberg Confession. It is clear that Archbishop Cramner was looking ar the Augsberg when he wrote the 42 Articles which were revised under Archbishop Parker to become todays 39 Articles.
Archbishop Ussher took these Articles and expanded them to create Irish Articles of Religion. Prof. B. B. Warfield has shown that the Westminster drew heavily on the Irish Articles of Religion.

-----Added 2/3/2009 at 05:04:20 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by discipulo View Post
Actually the Westminster Divines in 1643 were working on the basis of the Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England
The Assembly spent the first part of its work in an attempt to revise the Thirty Nine Articles.
Only when the Scottish delegates joined they insisted on a new confession, that would be supra national, so to speak, and only then the Parliament instructed the Assembly to draw up a new confession.
The Scots had a very fine confession of faith prior to the Westminster. The Scots Confession of 1560 was written by John Knox. It was adopted in 1567 and remained the confession of the Scottish Church until it was superceded by the Westminster in 1648.

-----Added 2/3/2009 at 05:13:16 EST-----

The Scots Confession of 1560 may be found at
Scottish Confession of Faith (1560)
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI

Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to yeutter For This Useful Post:
Whitefield (02-04-2009)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 05:44 PM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 179
Thanked 615 Times in 356 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
Your website is very impressive. I have run accross it in the past looking for Toplady texts and it is great to realise that you are a PB member.

How do you get the source files to mark up, do you scan documents or do you have an electronic format to start with?

I have tried to do this myself and have found it really difficult.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 06:06 PM
discipulo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Coimbra Portugal
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 387
Thanked 317 Times in 209 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
Your website is very impressive. I have run accross it in the past looking for Toplady texts and it is great to realise that you are a PB member.

How do you get the source files to mark up, do you scan documents or do you have an electronic format to start with?

I have tried to do this myself and have found it really difficult.
That’s right, I had not seen it was your own site Pastor Lance.

Indeed, great work, and so good you provided that important title online.

I am doing some gathering of Toplady’s hymns and poems for a thread here, and several works are just available as image facsimiles.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-03-2009, 09:43 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
Your website is very impressive. I have run accross it in the past looking for Toplady texts and it is great to realise that you are a PB member.

How do you get the source files to mark up, do you scan documents or do you have an electronic format to start with?

I have tried to do this myself and have found it really difficult.
Some are scanned, some are from PDF files ... and some are "hard typed". It started as a repository for things I had read and wanted quick access to, so I marked them up in HTML. When I realized what I had compiled, I decided to buy space on server and offer it all to whomever it would help. The D'Aubigne work was the longest I did (it took about 3 months of part-time work). Things got easier once I learned about .css files and macros in Notepad++. I do my proof reading using Compozer. That's probably more than you were asking.

-----Added 2/3/2009 at 09:43:15 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by discipulo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
While finishing marking up an addition to my webpage:

Historic Proof of the Doctrinal Calvinism of the Church of England by Augustus Toplady

I had a thought that I would like to run by others on this board. Most of the discussion I have seen here deals with three families of Reformed confessions 1) WCF, 2) 1689 Confession, and 3) 3 forms of Unity. But rereading Toplady got me to thinking that there is a fourth: 4) the Thirty-nine Articles. I'm curious as to why they don't get mentioned much. Are they not to be considered a valid confession for Reformed bona fides?
Your website is very impressive. I have run accross it in the past looking for Toplady texts and it is great to realise that you are a PB member.

How do you get the source files to mark up, do you scan documents or do you have an electronic format to start with?

I have tried to do this myself and have found it really difficult.
That’s right, I had not seen it was your own site Pastor Lance.

Indeed, great work, and so good you provided that important title online.

I am doing some gathering of Toplady’s hymns and poems for a thread here, and several works are just available as image facsimiles.
This link is my favorite Toplady material on my sight.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
Classical Presbyterian (02-04-2009), discipulo (02-04-2009)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 03:17 AM
JohnOwen007's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Perth, Australia.
Posts: 718
Thanks: 98
Thanked 251 Times in 122 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeutter View Post
Compare the 39 Articles and the Augsberg Confession. It is clear that Archbishop Cramner was looking ar the Augsberg when he wrote the 42 Articles [...]
Cranmer certainly had the Augsburg Confession as a resource for the 39 Articles. However, he also clearly moved in a direction away from the AC. Cranmer had gone through a Lutheran phase in his own life, but then ultimately became convinced of a reformed theology, particularly (at this stage in the reformation) of the sacraments (not to mention predestination). Hence, the 39 Articles are clearly reformed and not Lutheran.
__________________
Marty
Ordained Presbyter; Currently Lecturer in Theology
Anglican Church of Australia
(Now finally back! in) Perth, Australia.
"There is nothing so necessary to draw us to repentance as good thoughts of God." (Thomas Manton)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JohnOwen007 For This Useful Post:
Classical Presbyterian (02-04-2009), Whitefield (02-04-2009)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 03:23 AM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,248
Thanks: 179
Thanked 615 Times in 356 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Some are scanned, some are from PDF files ... and some are "hard typed". It started as a repository for things I had read and wanted quick access to, so I marked them up in HTML. When I realized what I had compiled, I decided to buy space on server and offer it all to whomever it would help. The D'Aubigne work was the longest I did (it took about 3 months of part-time work). Things got easier once I learned about .css files and macros in Notepad++. I do my proof reading using Compozer. That's probably more than you were asking.
Do you use just a regular flatbed scanner and what OCR programme are you using?

MY success in scanning and OCR'ing text to an acceptable standard has been very limited. I usually just scan to pdf and use pagemaker's OCR but the results are quite poor most of the time. Your results are much more impressive.

Mike
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:10 AM
Jimmy the Greek's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
. . .
This link is my favorite Toplady material on my sight.
Thanks, Lance. I too have enjoyed the use of the resources on your site for a couple of years now.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:36 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Do you use just a regular flatbed scanner and what OCR programme are you using?

MY success in scanning and OCR'ing text to an acceptable standard has been very limited. I usually just scan to pdf and use pagemaker's OCR but the results are quite poor most of the time. Your results are much more impressive.

Mike
I use an inexpensive Canon scanner (CanoScan LiDE) and the OCR software which came with it (OmniPage). I usually scan at 300dpi (sometimes 400dpi). It gives me about 3%-5% error rate. I load the .txt file into Notepad++ for some styling macros I wrote, and then I proofread it in Compozer with the spellchecking on. If you look at the Warfield index on my page, most of the longer works were scanned from books and submitted to the above process.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:53 AM
Classical Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 1,194
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 859
Thanked 311 Times in 153 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whitefield View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo View Post
Do you use just a regular flatbed scanner and what OCR programme are you using?

MY success in scanning and OCR'ing text to an acceptable standard has been very limited. I usually just scan to pdf and use pagemaker's OCR but the results are quite poor most of the time. Your results are much more impressive.

Mike
I use an inexpensive Canon scanner (CanoScan LiDE) and the OCR software which came with it (OmniPage). I usually scan at 300dpi (sometimes 400dpi). It gives me about 3%-5% error rate. I load the .txt file into Notepad++ for some styling macros I wrote, and then I proofread it in Compozer with the spellchecking on. If you look at the Warfield index on my page, most of the longer works were scanned from books and submitted to the above process.
Your time management skills are a wonder! When do you sleep?
__________________
Rev. Toby L. Brown, pastor
Jefferson Center Presbyterian Church--in, but not of, the PC(USA)
Saxonburg, PA
A Classical Presbyterian
Proud member of The Westminster Fellowship

"The happiness of the creature consists in rejoicing in God, by which God is also highly exalted." --Jonathan Edwards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 10:56 AM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classical Presbyterian View Post
Your time management skills are a wonder! When do you sleep?
Next year
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-2009, 04:11 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 195
Thanks: 60
Thanked 62 Times in 47 Posts
I would also mention that the London Baptist Confession (1689) and the Savoy Declaration are roughly in the same family as the Westminster (with the obvious differences on the ordinance of baptism and some aspects of polity).

The Baptists came out with a confession in 1644 that had as a primary purpose to place themselves in line with the Puritan/Separatist movement and in order to declare that they were not Anabaptists. Secondarily, they wanted to separate themselves from the excesses of the continental Anabaptists. Three signatories from that confession also signed the 1677 Second London Confession (which was only published after William and Mary came to England in 1689 and legalized religious freedom). The 1677/89 was designed to be an expression of ecumenical unity with our Presbyterian and Congregationalist brethren affirming many areas of agreement after the Presbyterians published the 1646 WCF. We would do well to remind ourselves of this essential unity on this board as I think we can all have a tendency towards an excessive sectarianism at times.

You can compare line for line the differences in four confessions (WCF, Savoy, LBCF and Philadelphia) with this handy chart
__________________
~Pastor Chris Powell~
Covenant Baptist Church, Toronto
Church Website: www.covenantbaptistchurch.com
Team Blog:www.ardentcries.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to CovenantalBaptist For This Useful Post:
Whitefield (02-04-2009)
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69