» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
08-23-2007, 01:05 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 455
Thanked 289 Times in 187 Posts
| | | Bounds of consanguinity
I probably misspelled, but you know what I mean. The table that outlines who you may marry. How closely related.
It is my understanding that all American Presbyterians, except the ARP, have deleated it. Have any of the split-P's kept it. Or returned to it? Does anyone know? Does it matter?
BTW at ARP synod this is an issue brought up from time to time by former PCA guys as something that needed to be changed by us. Makes us to old-fashioned for modern Presbys I gather is the argument.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
| 
08-23-2007, 01:24 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,592
Thanks: 990
Thanked 918 Times in 588 Posts
| | |
Kevin,
I had a note that the ARP deleted the last clause of 24.4 in 2001; is that not correct? I have a paper by Dr. Cara, who concludes the original language is the correct biblical stance, and there is a paper by Barry Waugh who concludes the contrary.
| 
08-23-2007, 01:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Librarian | | Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,525
Thanks: 2,444
Thanked 3,204 Times in 1,886 Posts
| |
The Presbyterian Reformed Church adheres to the original 1646 WCF without exceptions, including 24.4.
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project
"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
| 
08-23-2007, 01:28 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 455
Thanked 289 Times in 187 Posts
| | |
My memory is that it had come up since 2001 as something that need to be "updated". I will check my FOG when I get home and comfirm if it has been changed.
I was relying on memory when I said we had not changed it.
| 
08-23-2007, 01:31 PM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: May 2006 Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 455
Thanked 289 Times in 187 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot | If memory serves (and it may not. See above.) The RPCUS holds to the Un-amended version as well.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |