I was looking through the Augsberg Confession today abd two passages seem rather surprising. Any explanation of the context and teching here would be very welcome.

Article XII

They condemn the Anabaptists, who deny that those once justified can lose the Holy Ghost

What is this teaching? is it disagreeing with perseverance of the saints?


Article XVII


They condemn also others who are now spreading certain Jewish opinions, that before the resurrection of the dead the godly shall take possession of the kingdom of the world, the ungodly being everywhere suppressed.


Is this opposing postmillennialism?

__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."

I don't have much in detail to offer (others might) but two hallmarks of Lutheran theology are denials of perseverance of the saints and of postmillenialism...

__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://semperubi.rtrc.net

"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Is anyone able to explain to me how Luther could reconcile a rejection of perserverance with an acceptance of unconditional election?

__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."

I read earlier today that Lutherans are historically, historical Amil. That's the official "confessional" stance taken by the LMCS.

__________________
J. M. - Baptist - Ontario, Canada -

Feileadh Mor
The Orthodox Catechism

I can't comment without giving stereotypes, or at least engaging in simplistic reduction of Luthero theology.

__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College

You err in assuming that Luther and the Lutheran confessions are the same thing. How can you reconcile free will (the official "Lutheran" position) with Luther's The Bondage of the Will?

Luther's theology morphed a bit at the hands of Melancthon who outlived him by almost 15 years (1546 vs. 1560). Also, you can detect strains between the two reformers in that the Augsburg Confession was Melancthon's authorship and his apology for it shows some of his differences from Luther.

Luther, who normally could become intractable over small disagreements (cf. his shouting "hoc est corpus meum" at Zwingli over and over) had a real soft spot for the little guy. Once he explained the difference between them this way: He saw himself as the plow that roughly turns over the hardscrap ground; Melancthon is the patient farmer who plants, tends, and harvests the crop.

__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

I recall reading on a lutheran forum a few quotes where Luther acutally agrees with Melancthon near the end of his life.

I'll try to dig them up again...it may take me a while as I forget exactly where they were posted.

j

__________________
J. M. - Baptist - Ontario, Canada -

Feileadh Mor
The Orthodox Catechism