Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed Thomist I have heard that the Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion which the Church of England and other Anglican/Episcopalian bodies worldwide (officially) subscribe to is a basically Reformed or Calvinistic confessional document, but that there has been a great deal of disagreement over the centuries as to the degree that it is Reformed or Calvinistic in several areas.
My concern is just with its soteriology. Would you say that the Thirty-Nine Articles teach each of the five points of Calvinism? If not, could one consistently be a five-pointer and hold to the Thirty-Nine Articles in its entirety? |
Hi, Reformed Thomist....
I'm glad you brought that up because I myself am a 5 point Calvinist and an Anglican. Unfortunately, the vast majority of Anglicans are apostate, including the "conservative" ones. Why do I say that? It is because since the 19th century Anglo-Catholicism has been the predominate theology of the communion worldwide.
There are exceptions to this, of course. Probably the most visible exception is the Sydney diocese in Sydney, Australia. The Sydney Anglicans are low church, 5 point Calvinists. A great many do not use the prayer book nor do they wear any vestments. Since the modern revisions are mostly either Anglo-Catholic and Tractarian or pelagian to one degree or another, this is probably a good thing. However, myself prefer the 1662 Book of Common Prayer which is reformed, evangelistic, and penitential. (See Samuel Leuenberger, Archbishop Cranmer’s Immortal Bequest, The Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England: An Evangelistic Liturgy; Grand Rapids 1990. Out of print).
The Sydney Anglicans have had a significant impact in Africa and Asian. David Broughton Knox, the former principal of Moore College in Sydney, started a reformed and Anglican seminary in South Africa called Whitefield College. Because of this faithful witness to the Protestant and Reformed side of the Anglican church there is a growing number of Evangelical and Reformed preachers in the Anglican churches in South Africa and Africa at large.
Other Anglicans like J.I. Packer and Gerald Bray, while solidly reformed in their own "private" theology, have compromised their witness by signing the Evangelicals and Catholics Together document. R.C. Sproul and others from the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals answered that document with the Cambridge Declaration. (See
Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, Inc).
I have searched far and wide on the internet and the most reformed organizations I can find in the Anglican communion are the Church Society and Sydney Anglicans.net. You might also be interested in the 1662 Prayer Book Society.
At any rate, my blog is the most visible and most vocal against Anglo-Catholicism, Armininianism and Pentecostalism. You can visit my blog at
Reasonable Christian.
BTW, I knew Matthew McMahon during my bible college days at what was then called Southeastern College of the Assemblies of God. It's now called Southeastern University, located in Lakeland, Florida. Obviously, I'm no longer charismatic or pentecostal. Rather I consider myself a Calvinistic/Reformed Anglican and therefore "post-pentecostal."
Please keep in touch? Hope you like what you see on my blog.
Sincerely in Christ,
Charlie