» Site Navigation | | | | |
View Poll Results: Which One Should I Buy? | |
"Amos: A New Translation with Notes and Commentary" by Francis Andersen and David Noel Freedman
|    | 3 | 42.86% | |
"The Book of Amos: A Commentary" by Jorg Jeremies
|    | 0 | 0% | |
"Amos: A Commentary" by James L. Mays
|    | 1 | 14.29% | |
"Amos: A Commentary on the Book of Amos" by Shalom Paul
|    | 0 | 0% | |
"Joel and Amos" by Hans Walter Wolff
|    | 3 | 42.86% |  | 
12-01-2008, 11:52 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,797
Thanks: 5,023
Thanked 2,581 Times in 1,572 Posts
| | | I Have To Buy One of These 5 Books
For one of my classes at PTS. Looking for the one that will help me the most in the Future. None are what you would call "Reformed" or "Evangelical" but I have to buy one and need some wisdom in selecting.
Thanks in advance.
| 
12-01-2008, 12:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Hankamer, TX
Posts: 710
Thanks: 89
Thanked 125 Times in 87 Posts
| |
Let me first state that I do not know anything about these books, but I would buy "Joel and Amos" simply for the fact that you get a commentary on two books whereas all the others are only on Amos.
Just my
__________________
Boliver
Future Chaplain
EPC
Hankamer, TX
| 
12-01-2008, 01:03 PM
|  | Obi Wan Kenobi | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Escanaba, MI
Posts: 3,589
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 1,347 Times in 663 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaplainintraining Let me first state that I do not know anything about these books, but I would buy "Joel and Amos" simply for the fact that you get a commentary on two books whereas all the others are only on Amos.
Just my  |
__________________
For the Glory of our King,
Joe Johnson
Slave of Christ, husband, father, Preacherboy at Cornerstone Community Church, Escanaba, MI. and TMS graduate. Personal website - SoundLife.org I do not know, and I do not say, that a person cannot believe in Revelation and in evolution, too, for a man may believe that which is infinitely wise and also that which is only asinine. ~ CHS
| 
12-01-2008, 01:28 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,857
Thanks: 820
Thanked 1,642 Times in 722 Posts
| | |
I voted for the Mays commentary, put out by Westminster Press, mostly because this is the only one I can really remember anything about. I know I have consulted the two by Fortress press (Paul and Wolff), but sorry, I don't remember too much about them -- my knowledge of critical commentaries on the minor prophets is still all too sparse at this young age in my life. At the very least, even if you have radical differences of theological thought than the commentaries, I have always found all the commentaries and works put out in the Westminster Old Testament Library to be highly useful. And though I haven't had as much experience with the commentaries put out by Fortress, I have normally found them to be useful and worth the effort of consulting.
Bottom line: I'd go with Mays.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
12-01-2008, 01:35 PM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 963
Thanks: 147
Thanked 633 Times in 265 Posts
| |
I have used Freedman in other books. He is fairly textual (although with liberal presuppositions). His Hebrew work in the Psalms is helpful. I have used Wolff before too (not in Amos) and his liberal leanings controlled the work so much it had little redeeming value.  FWIW
| 
12-01-2008, 01:40 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,504
Thanks: 308
Thanked 921 Times in 350 Posts
| | |
I voted on the first one, where Andersen was one of the authors, as I have been using his Tyndale commentary on Job and found it excellent (save his take on Elihu, where I side with WH Green and Hywel Jones). I would buy another of his commentaries if I had to preach on that book.
__________________
Steve Rafalsky
Elder, International Evangelical Church (Reformed)
Limassol, Cyprus
" I am set for the defense of the gospel" (Philippians 1:17)
" Strengthened with all might, according to His glorious
power, unto all patience and longsuffering with joyfulness..." (Colossians 1:11)
Blog: A Great and Terrible Love | 
12-01-2008, 01:44 PM
|  | Vanilla Westminsterian | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,465
Thanks: 329
Thanked 3,420 Times in 1,385 Posts
| |
Let me first say that I think every preacher should have at least two books that help in the selection of modern commentaries. (For older, Puritan commentaries, you can use this:
Those two books are John Glynn's Commentary and Reference Survey and Derek Thomas' Essential Commentaries for a Preacher's Library:
Both of these books help greatly in determining if a modern commentaries is good, bad or horrible.
Having said that, Glynn rates the Anderson/Freedman volume as at least Critical/Moderate and the Paul volume as well. Jeremias, Wolffe and Mays all are rated "Liberal/Critical." So I would get Anderson/Freedman or Paul.
__________________ Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX) Christ Church Blog "The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle) | | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post: | | 
12-01-2008, 01:53 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,857
Thanks: 820
Thanked 1,642 Times in 722 Posts
| |
My  on the conservative/moderate/liberal/critical nature of commentaries:
Obviously, you're going to recommend different reading for different people. For a normal church member asking an elder about suggestions for reading material to help him understand the word of God, naturally it would be rather unthinkable to recommend something which has a low view of scripture, or teaches ridiculous things, etc. However, for a graduate student in an academic environment (especially for one who is thoroughly convinced of confessional truth), I think it is important to read, interact with and make use of the dominant theological and exegetical trends of the present age. As a pastor, John Owen would surely not recommend the works of Socinians to his congregation; but can you imagine the loss we would be at today if Owen himself had ignored these books because they contained bad theology?
I think that for the pastor-scholars of today, who have been taught in and our assured of our confessional, Christian truths, interaction with such commentaries is both useful and necessary. I think if we take seriously our belief in the perseverance of the saints, and thoroughly apply ourselves both to the administration and use of the ordinary means, we have nothing to fear from our pastors making use of them. -----Added 12/1/2008 at 01:53:26 EST-----
(Sorry if that was too off topic)
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
12-01-2008, 02:22 PM
|  | de-cool | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Garden City Ga
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 739
Thanked 438 Times in 196 Posts
| |
I would say any one except the one by Paul... it is a bit redundent in the name and thus would make a boring read.
__________________
Jessica Auner
Wife, Mother,
Garden City, Ga
Ephesus Church
(a Reformed Baptist church)
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.
| 
12-01-2008, 03:36 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,023
Thanks: 972
Thanked 2,394 Times in 827 Posts
| | |
The Andersen/Freedman and the Paul commentaries are the two best commentaries on that list (and are among the best on Amos period). Paul is Jewish, of course, which might influence your decision, but it is an excellent commentary, nevertheless.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post: | | 
12-01-2008, 05:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Rockville, CT
Posts: 3,642
Thanks: 609
Thanked 924 Times in 708 Posts
| | |
Go with: Amos: A New Translation with Notes and Commentary" by Francis Andersen and David Noel Freedman
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |