The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > Educational Forums > The Literary Forum

The Literary Forum A Forum for the Discussion of good and bad reading material.

» Online Users: 42
8 members and 34 guests
Ex Nihilo, govols, J. David Kear, JM, Philippians39, satz, Tim
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 03:58 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 21,469
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,774
Thanked 2,166 Times in 1,325 Posts
The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology -- John Macpherson

The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology (1903) by John Macpherson has been reprinted (November 2007) and is available at AmazonAmazon .
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 04:24 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot View Post
The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology (1903) by John Macpherson has been reprinted (November 2007) and is available at Amazon.
Was that man orthodox?
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 04:40 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 21,469
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,774
Thanked 2,166 Times in 1,325 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot View Post
The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology (1903) by John Macpherson has been reprinted (November 2007) and is available at Amazon.
Was that man orthodox?
I'll proffer an opinion by Rev. Winzer from a previous thread: "Macpherson tried to rewrite reformed orthodoxy to a certain extent." And it is edited by C.G. M'Crie, grandson of Thomas M'Crie the Elder, who was more liberal than his father and grandfather.

From the Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology, p. 536:

Quote:
MacPherson was thoroughly familiar with the German theology of his century, and translated many volumes into English...His own theology, set out in his Christian Dogmatics (E, 1898), was an Amyraldian...type of Reformed theology, defending the doctrines of total depravity, unconditional election and substitutionary atonement. He propounded a realist view of the relation between Adam and mankind, and held that the sources of Christian doctrine were (in descending order) Scripture, the ecumenical creeds and the Christian consciousness.
Macpherson wrote a commentary on the Westminster Confession that I added to the links manager, and edited James Fraster's famous treatise on sanctification.

Nevertheless, this is an important work worth reading. It was one of the "Chalmers Lectures." To quote from the Dictionary of Scottish Church History and Theology again (ibid):

Quote:
His Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology (Chalmers Lectures,* E, 1903) is still the standard work on the subject and his edition of the Westminster Confession (Handbooks for Bible Classes, E, 1881) was frequently reprinted well into the twentieth century.
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to VirginiaHuguenot For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (01-19-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 05:11 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Macpherson wrote a commentary on the Westminster Confession that I added to the links manager, and edited James Fraster's famous treatise on sanctification.
Oh yes, I have his commentary on the WCF. Its not the best.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 05:16 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 21,469
Blog Entries: 11
Thanks: 1,774
Thanked 2,166 Times in 1,325 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Macpherson wrote a commentary on the Westminster Confession that I added to the links manager, and edited James Fraster's famous treatise on sanctification.
Oh yes, I have his commentary on the WCF. Its not the best.
No, not the best; but actually, I like what he says on WCF 19.4 in particular.
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 05:17 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by VirginiaHuguenot View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie View Post
Quote:
Macpherson wrote a commentary on the Westminster Confession that I added to the links manager, and edited James Fraster's famous treatise on sanctification.
Oh yes, I have his commentary on the WCF. Its not the best.
No, not the best; but actually, I like what he says on WCF 19.4 in particular.
I see.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 05:56 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,584
Blog Entries: 18
Thanks: 820
Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts
This is my note from the list I purchased M from back in the dark ages.
Purchased from "A List of Theological Books for Sale" David C. Lachman, Winter 1986.
Description:
"130. Macpherson, John. The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology. Edinburgh: Macniven & Wallace, 1903. ix, 227pp. A first-rate introduction, dealing with Samuel Rutherford, George Gillespie, etc. $25.00"
He "has problems" as noted.
In his Divine Right of Church Government and Excommunication, Rutherfurd lays down the position that “there is nothing so small in either Doctrinals or Polocie, so as men may alter, omit, and leave off these smallest Positive things that God hath commanded.” 3 But surely he commits himself to a quite needlessly extreme position when he says “I am obliged to
receive this as Scripture, that Paul left his cloak at Troas; no
lesse than this, Christ came into the world to save sinners, in
regard of Canonicall authority stamped upon both.”4
But supposing it were discovered that Paul had made
some mistake about the fortunes of that cloak.5
------------------
4. Ibid, Sect iv. p. 64.
5. Editor: Macpherson in critizing Rutherfurd on this point has departed from the historic orthodox understanding of verbal plenary inspiration.
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (01-19-2008)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 06:01 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
This is my note from the list I purchased M from back in the dark ages.
Purchased from "A List of Theological Books for Sale" David C. Lachman, Winter 1986.
Description:
"130. Macpherson, John. The Doctrine of the Church in Scottish Theology. Edinburgh: Macniven & Wallace, 1903. ix, 227pp. A first-rate introduction, dealing with Samuel Rutherford, George Gillespie, etc. $25.00"
He "has problems" as noted.
In his Divine Right of Church Government and Excommunication, Rutherfurd lays down the position that “there is nothing so small in either Doctrinals or Polocie, so as men may alter, omit, and leave off these smallest Positive things that God hath commanded.” 3 But surely he commits himself to a quite needlessly extreme position when he says “I am obliged to
receive this as Scripture, that Paul left his cloak at Troas; no
lesse than this, Christ came into the world to save sinners, in
regard of Canonicall authority stamped upon both.”4
But supposing it were discovered that Paul had made
some mistake about the fortunes of that cloak.5
------------------
4. Ibid, Sect iv. p. 64.
5. Editor: Macpherson in critizing Rutherfurd on this point has departed from the historic orthodox understanding of verbal plenary inspiration.
Someone told me that he denied Biblical Inerrancy; those comments would appear to indicate that he did.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 06:06 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,584
Blog Entries: 18
Thanks: 820
Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts
I think so; the editorial note is from my edition of MacPherson published in the Naphtali Anthology v5 (1992).
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice
The Blue Banner Archive

When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-19-2008, 06:08 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saintfield, Co. Down, Northern Ireland
Posts: 6,568
Thanks: 2,062
Thanked 1,124 Times in 740 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
I think so; the editorial note is from my edition of MacPherson published in the Naphtali Anthology v5 (1992).
The person who told me that, said that he read it in Rowland Ward's commentary on the WCF.
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64