The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > The Pilgrims Progress

The Pilgrims Progress Discussions regarding the Christian Life
as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him (Col. 2:6)

» Online Users: 54
8 members and 46 guests
Athaleyah, Beoga, DMcFadden, JDWiseman, Kenneth_Murphy, kvanlaan, Mayflower, TheocraticMonarchist
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-26-2007, 07:36 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Wink Woman and The Face Veil?!?!?

I know I will get alot of HuHs and your crazy on this one....

This is more about the modesty issue pertaining to the headcovering then over the worship issue.

So I have been wondering what exactly the veil is. What is a full veil? Does it consist of face veil? And what exactly is the head? When the woman’s head is to be covered does that mean also the face?

Some research results are as follows:

Katakalupto ”Strongs 2619” to cover wholly, i.e. Veil ; cover, hide.

But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with [her] head uncovered dishonoureth her head. (1 Corinthians 11:5)

Radiyd “Strongs 7289” Something spread, wide wrapper or large veil; a shawl.

"And Rebekah lifted up her eyes, and when she saw Isaac, she lighted off the camel. For she [had] said unto the servant, What man [is] this that walketh in the field to meet us? And the servant [had] said, It [is] my master: therefore she took a vail, and covered herself." (Genesis 24:64,65)

Concerning Tamar's duplicity.

"And she put her widow's garments off from her, and covered her with a vail, and wrapped herself, and sat in an open place, which [is] by the way to Timnath; for she saw that Shelah was grown, and she was not given unto him to wife…And she arose, and went away, and laid by her vail from her, and put on the garments of her widowhood." (Genesis 38:14,19)

“The watchmen that went about the city found me, they smote me, they wounded me; the keepers of the walls took away my veil from me.” (Song of Solomon 5:7)

Tsammah “Strongs 6777” A Veil

“Take the millstones, and grind meal: uncover thy veil, make bare the leg, uncover the thigh, pass over the rivers. Thy nakedness shall be uncovered, yea, thy shame shall be seen.” (Isaiah 47:2-3)

Definition of Head

Head: the upper or anterior division of the body that contains the brain, the chief sense organs, and the mouth



Why do some of the earliest writings on the Headcovering from the church fathers talk about the face being covered also?

Clement of Alexandria (153-217 a.d.)

"And she will never fall, who puts before her eyes modesty, and her shawl; nor will she invite another to fall into sin by uncovering her face. For this is the wish of the Word, since it is becoming for her to pray veiled.”

"It has also been commanded that the head should be veiled and the face covered. For it is a wicked thing for beauty to be a snare to men.

Tertullian (AD 198)

Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face.

Hippolytus (170-236 a.d.)

"Canon Seventeenth. Of woman, that they should cover their faces and their heads."




What are your thoughts?????? Especially from those who already believe in the HeadCovering?

__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 12:12 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,422
Thanks: 576
Thanked 831 Times in 433 Posts
Hey....millions of Muslims can't be wrong!
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 12:21 AM
No Longer A Libertine's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 1
Thanked 80 Times in 55 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Hey....millions of Muslims can't be wrong!
Or can they?
__________________

Travis Speegle
Redeemer Presbyterian, PCA (Waco, Tx)
Pacific Cross Roads, PCA (Los Angeles, CA)


"When it comes to trustworthy theologians one can usually honor the rule of thumb that the deader the better."-Dr. John Hannah, DTS (of all places)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 12:27 AM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,422
Thanks: 576
Thanked 831 Times in 433 Posts
Sorry...sarcasm never goes over well.... I am glad I do it poorly. Maybe I should just refrain.


Honestly though, if one believes in the headcovering, then they do well to look into just what that means.

So Thunaer is being faithful under his own convictions to find out the details of what obedience means and so I congratulate him and pray for him on that.


It does appear that there can be a case made for full veiling - a very strong case - if one buys into the need to veil in the first place.

When Jesus spoke of looking at a women in lust, this was during a day when women had their head covered, so the face seemed to be the part of the body that caused the lust.



Me...I do not beleive that a headcovering is needed. If I did, Thunaer's post is a very logical question and needs to be answered.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:34 AM
amishrockstar's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Michael,
To answer your question, A.T Robertson wrote:

11:14 Nature itself [hē phusis autē]. He reenforces the appeal to custom by the appeal to nature in a question that expects the affirmative answer [oude]. [Phusis], from old verb [phuō], to produce, like our word nature (Latin natura), is difficult to define. Here it means native sense of propriety (cf. Ro 2:14) in addition to mere custom, but one that rests on the objective difference in the constitution of things.

According to (one of the greatest Greek scholars), the word used in the phrase "does not nature itself..." has to do with the actual custom of the day; if that's the case, then you're going to have to look up how the Roman/Greek church did it (that's the only way that I can see how you're going to get a solid answer)...

on a personal note: if God or the Bible was so concerned about the headcovering being 'used' today, then wouldn't we have some sort of explaination as to what this 'thing' really is? Should it be white, black, or purple? Are 'designs' okay on the fabric? etc.; it seems to get very subjective and arbitrary when we read into a 1st century text what our own (21st century) preconceived ideas are about what a headcovering should look like or might be... these headcovering questions tend to forget the context that the Bible was written in and they assume that we can somehow come up with binding/Biblical rules while the Bible is actually pretty 'silent' on the issue.

... Robertson might be on to something

__________________
Matthew Scheffer
Christ The Redeemer (non-denominational)
http://www.christredeemer.com
Spokane, WA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 11:27 AM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Thanks for the encouragement and prayer brother..... I know in the past we have butted heads over cultural considerations but I have always respected you and the work you do..... And we agree on alot of issues. You continue to be in our prayers..



Michael

P.S. You know I was read a book on the Byzantium empire and they had a map of the empire in the book and I was surprise to see your screen name.... lol Pergamum is a town in Turkey.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Sorry...sarcasm never goes over well.... I am glad I do it poorly. Maybe I should just refrain.


Honestly though, if one believes in the headcovering, then they do well to look into just what that means.

So Thunaer is being faithful under his own convictions to find out the details of what obedience means and so I congratulate him and pray for him on that.


It does appear that there can be a case made for full veiling - a very strong case - if one buys into the need to veil in the first place.

When Jesus spoke of looking at a women in lust, this was during a day when women had their head covered, so the face seemed to be the part of the body that caused the lust.



Me...I do not beleive that a headcovering is needed. If I did, Thunaer's post is a very logical question and needs to be answered.
__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

[i][b]As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord[/i][/b]

[SIZE="1"][I][FONT="Century Gothic"]Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus [RIGHT]Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis[/RIGHT][/FONT][/I][/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 01:51 PM
SRoper's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 1,517
Thanks: 256
Thanked 54 Times in 35 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by amishrockstar View Post
on a personal note: if God or the Bible was so concerned about the headcovering being 'used' today, then wouldn't we have some sort of explaination as to what this 'thing' really is? Should it be white, black, or purple? Are 'designs' okay on the fabric? etc.; it seems to get very subjective and arbitrary when we read into a 1st century text what our own (21st century) preconceived ideas are about what a headcovering should look like or might be... these headcovering questions tend to forget the context that the Bible was written in and they assume that we can somehow come up with binding/Biblical rules while the Bible is actually pretty 'silent' on the issue.
I don't think the bible is silent on the issue of headcovering, but it is silent on the exact nature of the headcovering. If this is an argument against headcovering then we might as well abandon all modesty and decency since scripture does not give us details on how to dress.
__________________
Scott Roper
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA): "A bunch of hippie Calvinists"
Winston-Salem, NC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 02:03 PM
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,802
Thanks: 197
Thanked 394 Times in 256 Posts
The key from Scripture is that the hair is covered...IMO at any rate.
__________________
Richard
CofE
UK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2007, 03:00 PM
amishrockstar's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey Scott,
Can you biblically define "modesty and decency"?
__________________
Matthew Scheffer
Christ The Redeemer (non-denominational)
http://www.christredeemer.com
Spokane, WA

Last edited by amishrockstar; 10-27-2007 at 03:42 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64