I have 3 tattoos, all had before I was converted, two of them devoted to the idol I worshiped, i.e. my fraternity.

My question is, am I going to Hell for them?

No, I'm kidding, but seriously. Some would espouse that they are explicitly prohibited in Scripture, whereas others would say that it's a matter of Christian liberty. What is the general consensus here?

__________________
Andrew DeShazo, Deacon, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"All of us stumble in many ways, but if anyone is never at fault in what he says, then he is mature, able to control his whole body."(James 3:2)

Andrew,

Check out this THREAD.

__________________
Bill Brown
Elder
Grace Baptist Church
Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

I think it's a matter of Christian liberty.

__________________
Davidius
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics

This may explain the old adage about Baptists being Methodists with shoes, and Presbyterians being Baptists who can read. To round out the adage, Lutherans might qualify as Presbyterians who drink to excess, and Episcopalians as Lutherans who know when to say when. - D.G. Hart

In the thread I linked Bob made the point that tatoos call attention to self. I concur. I don't know anyone who gets a tatoo just so they can look at it in the mirror. They are making a statement. They want people to look at them. The same with odd piercings and dying your hair purple. IMHO those things are not about humility. When I encounter a person who exemplifies these things I treat them like I do anybody else. I don't call attention to their personal appearance.

You shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourselves: I am the Lord Leviticus 19:28

This is the only verse I know of in the Bible that speaks of tattooing. It's pretty clear that God does not want us to go out and damage our bodies with tattoos. You did this before you were converted, and it is costly to remove them. Also, I can't think of any reason from Scripture why you would go to hell for having them. If you belong to God, then you belong to God and what you did before you were converted is under the blood of Christ just as any other sin you have committed or will commit.

While I know many of my brothers and sisters in Christ find nothing wrong with tattooing, I personally have a problem with it. That is mainly because they are potentially harmful to the body, and we should take care of what God gave us.

All I can suggest that if your conscience is really bothering you about it, take the matter before the Lord and ask Him what He wants you to do about it. If the tattoos are not a hindrance to your ministering to other people, I really wouldn't get too uptight about it, but if they display things that would damage your testimony, you might want to prayerfully consider covering them up or having them removed.

__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/

For those who are interested: Tatoo removal system. This one does not require laser treatment or harsh chemicals.

That looks a lot like Matt's card trick webpage.

I don't have a problem with mine and they aren't bothering me.

Also, all of my tattoos are covered by clothing. No one sees them. Most people don't even know I have them and those who I tell are shocked that I do have them.

I know of people who want a tattoo in which no one else can see it, totally hidden unless they are completely disrobed. How would these instances work into teh Bawb's reasoning? On top of that, the tattoo they want is devoted to God's sustaining grace.

I am still thinking about a tattoo, but I am not sure. After I became a believer my whole lifestyle changed. I stopped going to dingy Punkrock clubs and many of my priorities changed (such as saving up for one wicked-cool tattoo). Its not that I thought they were wrong, its just that I felt so uncomfortable with certain things that I never would have questioned. For example; When I first started attending a OPC church where I live, I had a lip piercing. I remember I came one sunday with a plug in my pierced lip and I went to talk to my pastor (without telling him about the piercing) and the whole time he couldnt stop looking at it. I knew that he was being very gracious to me and so in time (with much nagging from my Grandma) I took it out and let the hole close.

In this instance I just felt convicted that it was wrong and that I felt like it made people have an impression of me that wasnt right, that I was some sort of rebellious, immature youth. I wanted to be able to fellowship with other believers without distraction and I think that tattoos (in visible places) and piercing can be just that . I hope I havnt .

__________________
Josiah Lovett
Member of
Trinity OPC Bothell Wa.
Orthodox Presbyterian Church
NAPARC
Westminster Confession (1788)

You can do all sorts of things and still not go to hell, including lots of the things in Lev 19, like having sex with animals, slandering, hating, lying, tricking a disabled person, etc..

The Bible says not to get tattoos, and it seems to me a pretty good argument, especially as that's the way both the Church and Jews have understood it for the past couple thousand years, but who am I to say for sure?

Of course there are other things in Lev. 19 that some say (and they may be right) are more ceremonial. I had a neighbor in South Africa who wouldn't mow the edges of his alfalfa field because of that chapter, and the poor people really were grateful. They went down and could get enough fodder for their milk goats.

I guess one could quibble about that, and say that in 10BC you HAD to leave some of your crops for the poor, but that after Christ rose from the dead it somehow became morally neutral to either leave something to the poor or take it all....in other words it became Christian liberty.

But to be on the safe side, I surely wouldn't tell anyone that getting a tattoo is Christian liberty. What if you're wrong, and you influence someone to get one?

__________________
Tim Vaughan, 48 years old, member PCA church but currently attending EV Free church. San Luis Obispo County, California.

Here is a livelier discussion on the topic from last October.

http://http://www.puritanboard.com/f...arettes-25333/

Here is where I started to break in.

__________________
R. Martin Snyder (Moderator)

1689er
Harmony Baptist Church (Member)
PuritanCovenanter MSN Blog
PuritanCovenanter's MySpace Page

"Our object should not be to have scripture on our side but to be on the side of scripture; and however dear any sentiment may have become by being long entertained, so soon as it is seen to be contrary to the Bible, we must be prepared to abandon it without hesitation."
William Symington

Click to get:Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Seems to be a Christian liberty issue to me. As for calling attention to oneself, I find this hard to believe if it's hidden. If it's not hidden, what if it's a Bible verse, or some other "worthy" tattoo? If not, the person may just like the way it looks. I would not automatically assume someone is trying to attract attention with a tattoo - there are too many other reasons to have one.

I personally have none, but I don't think it's by any means sinful.

__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18

ColdSilverMoon;

How are they not drawing attention to oneself?

Let's say they get it in a 'hidden place' what was the purpose of getting it at all? To satisfy one's flesh of knowing they HAVE a tatoo?

All the people I know who have tatoo's got them in order to show them to off, or put another way...to draw attention to themselves.

Let's say they get a tattoo of a Bible verse, if it's in a hidden place who is going to see it? So what would be the purpose?

Would that verse be more of a reminder for them of one passage of Scripture, as they would be the only one to see it? (depending where it is, they may not even be able to see it themselves--without looking in the mirror)

And in that it would be in a hidden place, where would that hidden place be?

if it's a women looking to get a tatoo, what hidden place would she get a tatoo, that she would have to expose that area of her body to the tatoo artist?

Same with a man, if it's a hidden place, wouldn't he too still have to expose that part of his body to the tatoo artist?


What would be some other reasons for getting a tatoo?

__________________
Bobbi Clark
Covenant Member
Pinewood Pres. (PCA) Middleburg

When I kept Silent, My bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Psalm 32:3

The bible DOES NOT say "Don't get a tatto" It says do not cut yourself "for the dead."

The purpose of tattoes is usually for beauty reasons...i.e. it is a cutting but not for the dead.

The reasons for cutting one's self for the dead is another reason...



If tattoes are opposed because they scar the body than circumcision must also be opposed and piercing the ears or nose.

The question is not about marking on the body but WHY we mark the body.

__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone

I have considerd getting a tatto of my wedding ring on my finger so that I can throw out this annoying metal one that I wear now.

Hi, Perg!

Actually if you look up the words (Strong's 5414 and 7085) they are "print" and "tattoo".

Modern practicing Jews have an interesting take, in that they say it was/is forbidden as your body is on loan.

BTW, when I was in PNG we were in an area where the old women all had missing joints in their fingers. I was in my young 20s, and it really freaked me out; if figured it was some sort of gender related disease or something. Then I found out that when a man died, his female relatives would bite off one of their finger joints so show sorrow. They didn't want his ghost to think that they didn't mourn his passing enough!
Best
Tim

I agree with your reasoning, but my reasoning against tattoos is a little different. I live in a place where it is quite normal to have tattoos, and all manner of piercings. In fact in some neighborhoods in Seattle you cant hardly pass someone by without seeing at least one tattoo or several on someone (especially on friday nights).



My first reason for resisting the urge to get a tattoo, is that if I did how would I then be any different from those who are around me? I love the artwork on tattoos. In fact I think we have some of the best artists here in seattle. But as a matter of liberty I cannot in good conscience (yet) bring myself to get one. I am still wrestling with it though.

My second reason is; Why does anyone get a tattoo? Tattoos can be beautiful, no doubt. Tattoos are most normally (from what I have seen) worn in noticable places and this is intentional on the part of the tattooee. This being said, I think that there is an inherent danger of vanity wrapped up in the motivation behind marking yourself. If its not vain then why not stop at just one? what is the motivation for more markings? I see that tattoos can be simply drawing attention to yourself just so people will know just how "hip" you can be. Also I have seen tattoos on the opposite sex that draw too much attention in places that should not be exhibited.

forgive my rant, I am a recovering hipster.

Yep, they do that here too.


It doesn't matter if it is print or tatto, it states the purpose of the print or tattoo in the text as "for the dead" - modern tattoes are not for the dead, only New Guinea digit removals. Therfore modern tattoes cannot be condemned on the basis of this OT passage.

I'm not one to get wildly bent out of shape about a Christian getting a tattoo, but OTOH, it definitely puzzles me a bit why he or she would want to.

As Pergy correctly noted, there is certainly some context to the prohibition against tattoos that can loosen what at first blush appears to be a fairly firm restriction.

But at the same time, we are to search the Scriptures to try to determine what pleases the LORD and behave thus. IOW, we aren't supposed to trying to figure out just how far we can go without really getting into trouble, but instead, figure out what best pleases Him and do that.

No one needs a tattoo, surely. There's a Biblical restriction on them, at least WRT particular situations. Since tattoos are mentioned just once in Scripture, and that negatively, I'd expect Christians to decide against them. Why run any risk of giving offense to the LORD at all? This has nothing to do with one's being saved, but goodness, just because I believe in perseverance of the saints doesn't mean I don't worry about offending the LORD.

I love Him. Why would I want to offend Him? Even if nothing "bad" is going to happen to me. I try to not offend or annoy or otherwise disappoint my husband, even though I know if I do he's not going to hit or divorce me or anything. He'll likely not mention it at all.

This reticence on his part ought not to be taken and used by me as an excuse to do what I want, never mind whether it bugs him or not.

It reminds me of an argument I had years ago (online) with an RC regarding that organization's dumping the title "Queen of Heaven" on Mary.

Considering the negative way the title "Queen of Heaven" is portrayed in Scripture (as an idol), it's simply weird that the RCC would think that's a suitable moniker for the mother of the Savior. The RC's defense was remarkably similar to the defense offered by those who defend tattoos on Christians (received post-regeneration), i.e. it's not the same situation; look at the context, etc.

My tuppence, and worth every dime. ;^)

__________________
Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas

Married to Don, mother of six, grandmother to an ever-increasing brood.

The Ivy Vine (my blog)

Pergamum;

It also says "Nor print any marks upon you:"

Hmmm, I would disagree with you...I have yet to see tatoo's done to bring about a person's beauty, or even to make them 'more' beautiful.

granted in some tribe in Africa it may be sign of beauty for a women to get a tatoo, but even then what is the motive behind why they are getting the tatoo? Is it not the same...to draw attention to themselves?

You may say, well, it's the same thing as a woman in the states wearing make-up to look more beautiful, and in some ways it may be, but in most cases make-up is not permanent (though it is becoming more popular) and can be washed off where a husband will see the full beauty of his wife without all the make-up and artistry done on her outward appearance..with tatoo's that is not the case..


To which I would agree...but again what is the purpose other than to draw attention to oneself?

Say a tribe in Africa it could be 1) a way to find a husband or wife; 2) a sign of wealth or affluence in a tribe...and even then aren't they still drawing attention to themselves after they get the tatoo as everyone comes to look at it? To see that new tatoo? Or the new piercing?

And as circumcision was commanded by God at one point as a sign of covenant, and is no longer used as a sign, that arguement would be moot..(Acts 15)

Hmmm? The Leviticus 19:28 text is pretty clear to me. Now whether the text is taken out of context, or poorly translated is another thing. That can be argued. I'm not equipped to argue that at this time.

Here's my personal opinion:
1. Don't get one if you don't have one.
2. If you have one, and it's offensive (ie. naked person, profanity, etc.) have it removed.
3. If you have one and it's not offensive, don't worry about it unless:
a. it violates your conscious to keep it.
b. it's a major distraction to others, and you are not able to conceal it.
c. you refuse to have it removed for ungodly reasons.

If agreee with Pergamum. The big question is "why?". The heart of the matter is what is most important. Even good works can be an abomination before God if they are done for selfish reasons.

Once again always keep in mind Romans 14...liberties with regard for others.

Well, not to beat a horse that's either alive or dead, but again for the sake of someone considering doing it,
I suppose that in some English translations the text could be ambiguous. In others, like the Septuagint it's "and in addition to not cutting yourself for the dead, don't get any tattoos"
Still, Jews for 3,500 years and Christians for 2000 years have thought that they were condemned. Which of course doesn't make them right, but it does give one pause.