The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > The Pilgrims Progress

The Pilgrims Progress Discussions regarding the Christian Life
as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him (Col. 2:6)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 09:55 AM
alwaysreforming's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Should My Business Be Open on Sundays?

I am opening up a gym, its a franchise called "LA Boxing". Its a smaller facility, only about 5000 sq. ft. It is "class driven", meaning 90% of the members will come to participate in the "heavy bag training classes" provided by my instructors. You also have the strength training and other machines found in most gyms. It should be up and running in 2-3 months.

My dilemma comes in knowing whether or not I should be open on Sundays. Its not that I want to "make money," I just think that my main calling in this business is to serve people, and some people are so busy during the week that they might need to exercise on Sunday in order to get their 3 sessions per week in.

I don't like the thought of depriving members of what could amount to an essential service in their fitness routines; but I also don't like having to make any employees work on Sundays. I passed by a competitor's gym last Sunday and noticed the place was very full, meaning people definitely like to work out on that day.

Any input from my wiser brethren and sisters?
__________________
Christopher Hinton
Northland, A Church Distributed;
Altamonte Springs, FL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 10:01 AM
Scott Bushey's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Margate, Florida
Posts: 8,550
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
From the directory of Public Worship:

Of the Sanctification of the Lord's Day

THE Lord's day ought to be so remembered before-hand, as that all worldly business of our ordinary callings may be so ordered, and so timely and seasonably laid aside, as they may not be impediments to the due sanctifying of the day when it comes.

The whole day is to be celebrated as holy to the Lord, both in publick and private, as being the Christian sabbath. To which end, it is requisite, that there be a holy cessation or resting all that day from all unnecessary labours; and an abstaining, not only from all sports and pastimes, but also from all worldly words and thoughts.

That the diet on that day be so ordered, as that neither servants be unnecessarily detained from the publick worship of God, nor any other person hindered from the sanctifying that day. That there be private preparations of every person and family, by prayer for themselves, and for God's assistance of the minister, and for a blessing upon his ministry; and by such other holy exercises, as may further dispose them to a more comfortable communion with God in his public ordinances.

That all the people meet so timely for publick worship, that the whole congregation may be present at the beginning, and with one heart solemnly join together in all parts of the publick worship, and not depart till after the blessing.

That what time is vacant, between or after the solemn meetings of the congregation in publick, be spent in reading, meditation, repetition of sermons; especially by calling their families to an account of what they have heard, and catechising of them, holy conferences, prayer for a blessing upon the publick ordinances, singing of psalms, visiting the sick, relieving the poor, and such like duties of piety, charity, and mercy, accounting the sabbath a delight.
__________________
Scott Bushey
Husband to Tina, father to Nicole, Danielle and Zoe
Member First Presbyterian Church of Margate PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 10:29 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 798
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
From Exodus.

Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. For in six days the Lord God created the heavens and the earth, and the seventh day he rested. Therefore you shall not do any labor, you or your manservant or your maidservant....

---------------------------------------

The real question is "What brings glory to God?" If people's lives are so busy that they don't have time to get to the gym except for one day that's meant for rest and worship, that's their choice, but should you equip them in that decision?

[Edited on 7-18-2005 by ChristianasJourney]
__________________
Janice
AKA Professor Plum

Following in the footsteps of Christiana and heading toward the Celestial City!

"I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. " ~ Anon.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 10:56 AM
alwaysreforming's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I appreciate the wise counsel. I'm just not sure, however, if it can really be made applicable to the reprobate, since they 1) Will not give any thought to God that day; 2) have no intention of public assembly; 3) will in no other way sanctify or even give thought to sanctifying that day; 4) will use their time in no way that honors God

Am I still held accountable for not interfering with these people's Sabbaths even though they have no intention of honoring it?
Should they not be served on this day in a way that will benefit them?

I really just want to do the right thing....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 11:05 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 234
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by alwaysreforming
I passed by a competitor's gym last Sunday and noticed the place was very full, meaning people definitely like to work out on that day.
I like eating at Chik-fil-A and would love to on Sunday. All the other restaurants are full on Sunday, but Chik-fil-a still maintains a huge profit when compared to competitors despite being closed on Sunday.

I know it comes down to an economic decision, but I firmly beleive God will bless your business if your honor Him.
__________________
David Kicklighter
East Lanier Community Church (PCA)
Buford, GA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:14 PM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 102
Thanked 340 Times in 152 Posts
Chris - I appreciate your desire to obey God's word.

If you decide to be open on Sunday, then I would encourage you to make working Sunday an option... don't force it upon your employees. I understand that some people work 6 days a week and have little time to exercise... If someone wants to enjoy the Lord's Day by (in part) exercising, then fine. You won't be condemned by me.

That said, please think about this: in an age of moral relativity and self-absorbtion, is closing your business on the Lord's Day not a marvelous VISIBLE and CONCRETE testimony to the world that you trust in God as Lord of creation to meet the needs of you and your family?
Of course, just closing on Sunday won't necessarily convey that message... but perhaps (if you choose to go that route) you could hand out a flyer - or have a sign posted on the wall inside - informing members of why the gym is closed on Sunday. Just a thought or two.

[Edited on 7-18-2005 by SolaScriptura]
__________________
Ben
Sanford, NC
TE Ohio Valley Presbytery, PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 12:52 PM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,528
Blog Entries: 12
Thanks: 2,444
Thanked 3,204 Times in 1,886 Posts
If I may offer a few thoughts...

1. The Fourth Commandment, like all of the Decalogue, is binding upon all men at all times and in all places, both the unregenerate as well as believers.

Westminster Confession, Chap. 19:

Quote:
V. The moral law doth for ever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof;(h) and that, not only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave it: (i) neither doth Christ, in the Gospel, any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.(k)

(h) Rom. 13:8, 9, 10; Eph. 6:2; I John 2:3, 4, 7, 8.
(i) James 2:10, 11.
(k) Matt. 5:17, 18, 19; James 2:8; Rom. 3:31.
2. In fact, there is a particular use of the moral law for the unregenerate, according to the Catechism:

Westminster Larger Catechism:

Quote:
Q95: Of what use is the moral law to all men?
A95: The moral law is of use to all men, to inform them of the holy nature and will of God,[1] and of their duty, binding them to walk accordingly;[2] to convince them of their disability to keep it, and of the sinful pollution of their nature, hearts, and lives;[3] to humble them in the sense of their sin and misery,[4] and thereby help them to a clearer sight of the need they have of Christ,[5] and of the perfection of his obedience.[6]

1. Lev. 11:44-45; 20:7-8; Rom. 7:12
2. Micah 6:8; James 2:10-11
3. Psa. 19:11-12; Rom. 3:20; 7:7
4. Rom. 3:9, 23
5. Gal. 3:21-22
6. Rom. 10:4

Q96: What particular use is there of the moral law to unregenerate men?

A96: The moral law is of use to unregenerate men, to awaken their consciences to flee from wrath to come,[1] and to drive them to Christ;[2] or, upon their continuance in the estate and way of sin, to leave them inexcusable,[3] and under the curse thereof.[4]

1. I Tim. 1:9-10
2. Gal. 3:24
3. Rom. 1:20; 2:15
4. Gal. 3:10
3. The Fourth Commandments prohibits work on God's holy day except for works of piety, necessity and mercy.

Westminster Confession, Chap. 20:

Quote:
VIII. This Sabbath is then kept holy unto the Lord, when men, after a due preparing of their hearts, and ordering of their common affairs beforehand, do not only observe an holy rest, all the day, from their own works, words, and thoughts about their worldly employments and recreations,(o) but also are taken up the whole time in the public and private exercises of His worship, and in the duties of necessity and mercy.(p)

(o) Exod. 20:8; Exod. 16:23, 25, 26, 29, 30; Exod. 31:15, 16, 17; Isa. 58:13; Neh. 13:15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22.
(p) Isa. 58:13; Matt. 12:1 to 13.
4. There is a particular responsibility laid upon employers in the Fourth Commandment:

Westminster Larger Catechism:

Quote:
Q118: Why is the charge of keeping the sabbath more specially directed to governors of families, and other superiors?
A118: The charge of keeping the sabbath is more specially directed to governors of families, and other superiors, because they are bound not only to keep it themselves, but to see that it be observed by all those that are under their charge; and because they are prone ofttimes to hinder them by employments of their own.[1]

1. Exod. 20:10; 23:12; Josh. 24:15; Neh. 13:15, 17; Jer. 17:20-22
There is a great testimony is not only keeping the Sabbath holy ourselves but refraining from employing others on this day as well.

"Wherefore the LORD God of Israel saith, I said indeed that thy house, and the house of thy father, should walk before me for ever: but now the LORD saith, Be it far from me; for them that honor me I will honor, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed." (1 Sam. 2.30) [Inscription on a note given to Eric Liddell in regards to his Sabbath-keeping stance at the 1924 Paris Olympics]
__________________
Andrew Myers
Husband of Jessica, Father of Jackson, Katie and Samuel
Member, Presbyterian Reformed Church of Northern Virginia
Warrenton, VA USA
Editor, The Matthew Poole Project

"Let your Morning Thoughts, and your last Evening Thoughts, be what shall become of you to all Eternity." -- Matthew Poole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 02:55 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MI
Posts: 798
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by alwaysreforming
I appreciate the wise counsel. I'm just not sure, however, if it can really be made applicable to the reprobate, since they 1) Will not give any thought to God that day; 2) have no intention of public assembly; 3) will in no other way sanctify or even give thought to sanctifying that day; 4) will use their time in no way that honors God

Am I still held accountable for not interfering with these people's Sabbaths even though they have no intention of honoring it?
Should they not be served on this day in a way that will benefit them?

I really just want to do the right thing....
...then why are you letting them interfere with your Sabbath? And should you really choose this day "to serve people, who are so busy during the week that they might need to exercise on Sunday in order to get their 3 sessions per week in?"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 03:08 PM
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,758
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Chick-Fil-A is one of the highest-profit restaurants in the fast-food business, and they are closed an entire month and a half during the year (for Sundays).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 03:42 PM
RAS's Avatar
RAS RAS is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saint Charles, MO
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by alwaysreforming
Am I still held accountable for not interfering with these people's Sabbaths even though they have no intention of honoring it?
Intention does not determine ethic. Whether people intend to follow or deny God's commands does not determine if God's commands should be followed. They should be followed because God commands it. That is the only reason that really matters. God's truth is eternal and objectively true, regardless of our intentions, opinions, failures, obedience, desire, etc.

To repeat what Andrew already quoted:

Westminster Larger Catechism
Q118: Why is the charge of keeping the sabbath more specially directed to governors of families, and other superiors?
A118: The charge of keeping the sabbath is more specially directed to governors of families, and other superiors, because they are bound not only to keep it themselves, but to see that it be observed by all those that are under their charge; and because they are prone ofttimes to hinder them by employments of their own.[1]

1. Exod. 20:10; 23:12; Josh. 24:15; Neh. 13:15, 17; Jer. 17:20-22

[Edited on 7-18-2005 by RAS]
__________________
Allan
attending CPC (PCA)
St. Louis, MO
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 04:24 PM
alwaysreforming's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 924
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hmmm....

When I started this thread I was almost convinced that I SHOULD be open on Sundays so my customers could be served by it (not that I'd need to be there, but I'd just need to make sure it was open). Now after reading thru some of the reasoning, I'm beginning to think that being closed might be the best bet.

One of my hesitations is: lets just say I'm closed on Sunday and now the same person that would have worked there is either working somewhere else, or in some other way dishonoring the Sabbath; .... and my customers who would have greatly appreciated having the option to work out, no longer have that option and therefore are not served by my business.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2005, 05:45 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,595
Blog Entries: 19
Thanks: 992
Thanked 918 Times in 588 Posts
A lengthy Puritanisque exposition of the fourth commandment by James Durham is posted at the link below. The full set of lectures by Durham on the Ten Commandments in a single hard bound volume are on sale at http://www.naphtali.com

Durham on the Fourth Commandment
http://www.naphtali.com/4intro.htm
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: Samuel Miller gives a succinct statement of this principle when he writes that since the Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference.”

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:21 AM
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 3,758
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
One of my hesitations is: lets just say I'm closed on Sunday and now the same person that would have worked there is either working somewhere else, or in some other way dishonoring the Sabbath; .... and my customers who would have greatly appreciated having the option to work out, no longer have that option and therefore are not served by my business.
Needless speculation. You know in your heart what is right, and what honors God best. Follow His Word and He will bless you, even if that blessing isn't how you envision it should be.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:53 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A lot of this depends upon your view of the Lord's Day. Personally, I think you could open after lunch on Sundays with a clear conscience given some positions on the question. Other positions such as the Puritan ones on this board would set apart an entire day, and in those views it wouldn't be licit for you to exericse on Sunday, much less require your employees to enable the exercise of others.

Another wrinkle, though, is that if you're a franchisee, the parent company may not allow you to be closed on Sundays. Definitely check on that issue before you assume you'll have liberty to make a decision on this issue in the first place.

I think this is a hard issue, and that you're getting some good Puritan advice above. But you've got to sort out the arguments though and decide whether you think the Puritans are right on this issue. If you had a hotel or a restaurant, historically the questions would be much different. You've got to apply the normative standards to the situation at hand and further you have to ask how behaving one way or the other will affect your character (normative, situational, existential perspectives).

I think, at the very least, that unless you need to serve people breakfast, that having a later opening time on Sundays would be in order for most business. Even the most minimalist approaches to the Lord's Day don't exempt the believer from attending corporate worship and, in the case of employers, you are answerable to God for forcing someone to work rather than attend church.
__________________
Jonathan Barlow
Under Care, Missouri Presbytery, PCA
Grad Student, St. Louis University
From Picayune, MS, now a St. Louisan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 10:47 AM
Michael Butterfield's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pickens, MS
Posts: 267
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by smallbeans
A lot of this depends upon your view of the Lord's Day. Personally, I think you could open after lunch on Sundays with a clear conscience given some positions on the question. Other positions such as the Puritan ones on this board would set apart an entire day, and in those views it wouldn't be licit for you to exericse on Sunday, much less require your employees to enable the exercise of others.. . .

Jonathan Barlow
Under Care, Missouri Presbytery, PCA
Grad Student, St. Louis University
From Picayune, MS, now a St. Louisan
This type of thinking is one of the very problems with the PCA! This is such a non-confessional view that if it were not a view held by some in the PCA it would be funny. It passes neither the Confessional or Biblical smell test for service much less the view of the Sabbath. It does not depend on your view of the Lord´s Day your view is already regulated you are not allowed to have your own view. It is no more optional than adultery and could you please tell me when I have the right to commit adultery? The right to commit adultery is certainly a ludicrous position and untenable so why such a difficulty with the rest of the 10 commandments? We have so convoluted our view of subscription that we can just re-interpret what the Confession says and means and the sad fact is that there is no logical reason to resist the same thing being done to the scriptures themselves. It is not a hard issue except in as much as we do not want to submit to the biblical injunction and examples.

__________________
Michael J. Butterfield, I
Completed my M.Div. 12/07, RTS Jackson, MS
Presently living in Pickens, MS looking for a call to a P.C.A. church

Live as those that are going to the grave…spend every day in preparation for death; and in all your business remember, whither you are going and where you must dwell forever. (Richard Baxter)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:49 AM
SolaScriptura's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sanford, NC
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 102
Thanked 340 Times in 152 Posts
Christopher - I'd point you to Turretin as an excellent proponent of the Continental position. Not all Christians - not all Reformed Christians - not all thoroughly God-centered, Bible loving, Christ exalting, Spirit led Believers - hold to the strict Sabbatarianism presented as the majority opinion here.
I simply refuse to be so dogmatic regarding something about which even folks within the Reformed camp disagree - and yes, there are GOOD reasons for not being a strict sabbatarian. Just read Turretin - arguably the best Reformed theologian ever.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 11:57 AM
VirginiaHuguenot's Avatar
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Warrenton, VA, USA
Posts: 23,528
Blog Entries: 12
Thanks: 2,444
Thanked 3,204 Times in 1,886 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Michael Butterfield
This type of thinking is one of the very problems with the PCA! This is such a non-confessional view that if it were not a view held by some in the PCA it would be funny. It passes neither the Confessional or Biblical smell test for service much less the view of the Sabbath. It does not depend on your view of the Lord´s Day your view is already regulated you are not allowed to have your own view. It is no more optional than adultery and could you please tell me when I have the right to commit adultery? The right to commit adultery is certainly a ludicrous position and untenable so why such a difficulty with the rest of the 10 commandments? We have so convoluted our view of subscription that we can just re-interpret what the Confession says and means and the sad fact is that there is no logical reason to resist the same thing being done to the scriptures themselves. It is not a hard issue except in as much as we do not want to submit to the biblical injunction and examples.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:37 PM
RAS's Avatar
RAS RAS is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Saint Charles, MO
Posts: 392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
Quote:
Originally posted by Michael Butterfield
This type of thinking is one of the very problems with the PCA! This is such a non-confessional view that if it were not a view held by some in the PCA it would be funny. It passes neither the Confessional or Biblical smell test for service much less the view of the Sabbath. It does not depend on your view of the Lord´s Day your view is already regulated you are not allowed to have your own view. It is no more optional than adultery and could you please tell me when I have the right to commit adultery? The right to commit adultery is certainly a ludicrous position and untenable so why such a difficulty with the rest of the 10 commandments? We have so convoluted our view of subscription that we can just re-interpret what the Confession says and means and the sad fact is that there is no logical reason to resist the same thing being done to the scriptures themselves. It is not a hard issue except in as much as we do not want to submit to the biblical injunction and examples.


I'd also like to add that this is not just "Puritan"(a stream of the historically reformed) advice as smallbeans suggested. It is consistent with the Continental reformers also. The continental and Puritan view differ over recreation and works of mercy, but they do not differ on employing people for business. I have yet to see where even in the continental view that employment is allowed on Sunday, unless of course it is necessary (hospitals, hotels, etc). Please correct me if I am wrong. This thread from the past may be helpful, alwaysreforming- http://www.puritanboard.com/forum/vi....php?tid=10472

It should help clarify what historically the reformed postion is and where the differences lie within the reformed position. And also check out the Law of God forum where this has been discussed more thoroughly.

Michael-
How prevalent would you say this problem is in the PCA, specifically among it's elders? I know it is a problem among the laity, but as the saying goes..."water runs downhill".

[Edited on 7-19-2005 by RAS]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 12:59 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, allow me to simply respond that I think Michael's approach is what is wrong with the PCA - namely, people lashing out before reading carefully and thinking about what someone else has written. Such rhetoric is reaching epidemic proportions, and hopefully through the course of seminary he'll learn to moderate his reactions to people and read them more carefully. Nowhere in my post did I advocate a particular position on the Sabbath. Thus Michael's sentence "This is such a non-confessional view" really can't apply to anything because I didn't promote a view. I simply said that some positions on the Sabbath would allow this in good conscience, some wouldn't. The point may be trivial, but that was my point. Further, the man asking this question is not a pastor, he is not required to subscribe to the Westminster Confession.

So here was my post:

paragraph one: various positions exist, some allow this, some don't

paragraph two: research your responsibilities as a franchisee

paragraph three: giving him some helpful perspectives on moral decisionmaking

paragraph four: giving him the bad news that he's not going to find anybody supporting his opening before lunchtime, and finally that his calculation here is as an employer which puts him under a heavier obligation than if he were a wage slave somewhere.

I miss where I advocate a non-confessional position. I do advocate his thinking through all the positions, even those that differ from the WCF, however. And nowhere did I make a distinction between continental and Puritan positions - I just simply said that there are other positions besides the Puritan one.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:11 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 666
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Michael Butterfield
This type of thinking is one of the very problems with the PCA! This is such a non-confessional view that if it were not a view held by some in the PCA it would be funny. It passes neither the Confessional or Biblical smell test for service much less the view of the Sabbath. It does not depend on your view of the Lord´s Day your view is already regulated you are not allowed to have your own view. It is no more optional than adultery and could you please tell me when I have the right to commit adultery? The right to commit adultery is certainly a ludicrous position and untenable so why such a difficulty with the rest of the 10 commandments? We have so convoluted our view of subscription that we can just re-interpret what the Confession says and means and the sad fact is that there is no logical reason to resist the same thing being done to the scriptures themselves. It is not a hard issue except in as much as we do not want to submit to the biblical injunction and examples.



The sermon Sunday morning was on Matt 22:34-40. Jesus' response not only turned aside the attack of the Pharisees, but also emphasized the unity of the moral law.

BTW: Didn't the continental view approve of private recreation, but would still disapprove of organize or formal recreation. For example an informal pick-up game of basketball among neighbors vs league play.
__________________
Soli Deo Gloria

John Schultz
Member, Riveroaks Reformed Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Germantown, TN

"The reason why we worship God in a slight way is because we do not see God in His glory"
Jeremiah Burroughs
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:17 PM
Jeff_Bartel's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 3,862
Thanks: 122
Thanked 73 Times in 54 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by Michael Butterfield
Quote:
Originally posted by smallbeans
A lot of this depends upon your view of the Lord's Day. Personally, I think you could open after lunch on Sundays with a clear conscience given some positions on the question. Other positions such as the Puritan ones on this board would set apart an entire day, and in those views it wouldn't be licit for you to exericse on Sunday, much less require your employees to enable the exercise of others.. . .

Jonathan Barlow
Under Care, Missouri Presbytery, PCA
Grad Student, St. Louis University
From Picayune, MS, now a St. Louisan
This type of thinking is one of the very problems with the PCA! This is such a non-confessional view that if it were not a view held by some in the PCA it would be funny. It passes neither the Confessional or Biblical smell test for service much less the view of the Sabbath. It does not depend on your view of the Lord´s Day your view is already regulated you are not allowed to have your own view. It is no more optional than adultery and could you please tell me when I have the right to commit adultery? The right to commit adultery is certainly a ludicrous position and untenable so why such a difficulty with the rest of the 10 commandments? We have so convoluted our view of subscription that we can just re-interpret what the Confession says and means and the sad fact is that there is no logical reason to resist the same thing being done to the scriptures themselves. It is not a hard issue except in as much as we do not want to submit to the biblical injunction and examples.

__________________
Jeff Bartel
Mechanical Engineer
Member - Trinity Reformed Church - RPCNA

"To believe in the power of man in the work of regeneration is the great heresy of Rome, and from that error has come the ruin of the Church. Conversion proceeds from the grace of God alone, and the system which ascribes it partly to man and partly to God is worse than Pelagianism" (The Reformation in England (London, 1962), Vol. 1, p. 98)

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2005, 01:19 PM