The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > The Pilgrims Progress

The Pilgrims Progress Discussions regarding the Christian Life
as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him (Col. 2:6)

» Site Navigation
   • Forum Rules
    • Infraction System
   • Blog Rules
   • Admins & Mods
° PBay
   • F.A.Q.
» Online Users: 87
12 members and 75 guests
A5pointer, Abd_Yesua_alMasih, AV1611, Backwoods Presbyterian, blhowes, Cotton Mather, danmpem, kvanlaan, NaphtaliPress, satz, Staphlobob
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:13 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 186
Thanks: 55
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
WHAT'S WITH ALL THESE IMMODEST PICS!!!??? I can see their eye-lashes!

Cheers,

Adam


Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
Daniel,


Here is a Christian woman from England around the year 800 A.D.



Here is a Modern Day Christian woman from the Middle East, I believe from Israel.



__________________
Adam Brink, Grace Church of Pleasanton, PCA, Pleasanton, California
"Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth?" Romans 8:33
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:15 PM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 635
Thanks: 176
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
How about this one

__________________
Nikki Edmond
New Beginnings Believers Bible Fellowship (Family's Church), Non-Denom
Los Angeles, CA
www.haveatulip.com - Chat Room for Reformed Believers
Proverbs 1:7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:18 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
You can read Early Church Father Tertullian on that one......


"Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face."

Tertullian on the Veiling of Virgins A.D. 198



Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
How about this one

__________________
Michael Daniels
Reformed, RPCNA
Denton, Maryland

As For Me And My House, We Will Serve The Lord

Unum Deum in Trinitate: Pater, Filius, et Spiritus Sanctus
Sola scriptura - Sola gratia - Sola fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo gloria - Solum psalterium - Lex talionis
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:25 PM
Simply_Nikki's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 635
Thanks: 176
Thanked 53 Times in 44 Posts
Good thing Tertullian wasn't divinely inspired =D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
You can read Early Church Father Tertullian on that one......


"Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face."

Tertullian on the Veiling of Virgins A.D. 198



Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
How about this one

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Simply_Nikki For This Useful Post:
christianyouth (03-25-2008), Dena (03-28-2008)
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:28 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Nikki

Here is another Early Church Fathers quotes regarding that picture....



1. "Canon Seventeenth. Of woman, that they should cover their faces and their heads."

Hippolytus (170-236 a.d.)



2. "And she will never fall, who puts before her eyes modesty, and her shawl; nor will she invite another to fall into sin by uncovering her face. For this is the wish of the Word, since it is becoming for her to pray veiled.”
"It has also been commanded that the head should be veiled and the face covered. For it is a wicked thing for beauty to be a snare to men.

Clement of Alexandria (153-217 a.d.)





Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
Good thing Tertullian wasn't divinely inspired =D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
You can read Early Church Father Tertullian on that one......


"Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face."

Tertullian on the Veiling of Virgins A.D. 198
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:47 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,136
Thanks: 272
Thanked 415 Times in 216 Posts
Interesting brother. Times have changed. For the better or for the worse?
__________________
Pergamum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:12 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,136
Thanks: 272
Thanked 415 Times in 216 Posts
Coram Deo: I don't know, these are quite attractive still - better go with the burlap sack over the face. Or the full ninja suit.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:15 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Pergy:


Way to Funny......

Though I will admit there is a some attractiveness to face veils that is not lustful... More of a beauty of modesty and of admiration for the one covered.......


Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Coram Deo: I don't know, these are quite attractive still - better go with the burlap sack over the face. Or the full ninja suit.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:46 PM
calgal's Avatar
Most ladies dress for comfort, not to be hoochie mamas!
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 543
Thanks: 121
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Oh Noes! Their HANDS are showing! So let me see if I understand this thought process correctly: women are tempting and men are unable to withstand the temptation of a woman's hair or eyelashes or hands or any part of her body. How nice to have that power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
Good thing Tertullian wasn't divinely inspired =D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
You can read Early Church Father Tertullian on that one......


"Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face."

Tertullian on the Veiling of Virgins A.D. 198



Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
How about this one

__________________
Quote:
Gail
Grand Rapids, MI
Affiliation: PCA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:52 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Calgal,

We have gotten alittle funny in this thread with extremes like the burkas.. No one is saying that hands must be hidden.. They are not listed anywhere in the scriptures along with other parts...

Those of us who support more fuller coverings are using descriptions from scripture of what should be covered... Body, Legs, head, etc....

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal View Post
Oh Noes! Their HANDS are showing! So let me see if I understand this thought process correctly: women are tempting and men are unable to withstand the temptation of a woman's hair or eyelashes or hands or any part of her body. How nice to have that power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
Good thing Tertullian wasn't divinely inspired =D

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
You can read Early Church Father Tertullian on that one......


"Let them know that the whole head constitutes "the woman." Its limits and boundaries reach as far as the place where the robe begins. The region of the veil is co-extensive with the space covered by the hair when unbound; in order that the necks too may be encircled. For it is they which must be subjected, for the sake of which "power" ought to be "had on the head:" the veil is their yoke.

…. who cover not only the head, but the face also, so entirely, that they are content, with one eye free, to enjoy rather half the light than to prostitute the entire face."

Tertullian on the Veiling of Virgins A.D. 198


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:02 PM
calgal's Avatar
Most ladies dress for comfort, not to be hoochie mamas!
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 543
Thanks: 121
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Michael,

this is not funny really. The amazing thing is that the coverings do NOT take all responsibility from the man and frankly you guys have just as much responsibility for YOUR reactions as we women do to dress appropriately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
Calgal,

We have gotten alittle funny in this thread with extremes like the burkas.. No one is saying that hands must be hidden.. They are not listed anywhere in the scriptures along with other parts...

Those of us who support more fuller coverings are using descriptions from scripture of what should be covered... Body, Legs, head, etc....

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal View Post
Oh Noes! Their HANDS are showing! So let me see if I understand this thought process correctly: women are tempting and men are unable to withstand the temptation of a woman's hair or eyelashes or hands or any part of her body. How nice to have that power.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simply_Nikki View Post
Good thing Tertullian wasn't divinely inspired =D
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:06 PM
Gesetveemet's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: I live in Lake Katrine, NY which is about 90 miles north of NYC
Posts: 106
Thanks: 31
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts



Those hands look like a hairy boxers hands and are not at all tempting to me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gesetveemet For This Useful Post:
Backwoods Presbyterian (03-21-2008)
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:12 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,271
Thanks: 404
Thanked 207 Times in 131 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gesetveemet View Post



Those hands look like a hairy boxers hands and are not at all tempting to me.

__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser
Pittsburgh, PA
Fairmount ARP Church

Student of Theology

Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
My Blog
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:15 PM
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 34
Thanked 119 Times in 82 Posts
Could you please provide a link for men's modest swimwear as well?? I'd like to see what it looks like..

The only things I could find are with lycra wetsuits which is pretty much skin tight on men, or jeans and a t-shirt and well, men with wet t-shirts clinging to their muscle bound bodies can cause women to lust as well...
__________________
Bobbi Clark
Covenant Member
Pinewood Pres. (PCA) Middleburg

When I kept Silent, My bones wasted away through my groaning all day long. Psalm 32:3
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 05:43 PM
calgal's Avatar
Most ladies dress for comfort, not to be hoochie mamas!
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 543
Thanks: 121
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJClark View Post
Could you please provide a link for men's modest swimwear as well?? I'd like to see what it looks like..

The only things I could find are with lycra wetsuits which is pretty much skin tight on men, or jeans and a t-shirt and well, men with wet t-shirts clinging to their muscle bound bodies can cause women to lust as well...
Board shorts + wet T-shirt = Men's modest swimwear? I guess we get to lust after the muscle bound bodies from the protection of our burkhas......
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:08 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Calgal,

I did not say it was all funny... I said the burka aspect was being funny... I was quite serious in my views on modesty... If you had read me early on in the thread I already stated that we guys have as much responsibility as you woman do for modesty....

Both are responsible.. One to dress modestly which is commanded and not cause their brothers to stumble and the other to not commit adultery by lusting with their eyes after woman...

I will also state that man have just has much responsibility to dress modesty for woman and not cause them to stumble.... which is why I am fully clad in the summer when it is a balmy 100 degree day and Maryland is humid so it feels hotter... No shirt is removed, my legs are covered down past my ankles and all my clothing is loose and not form fitting....

Michael



Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal View Post
Michael,

this is not funny really. The amazing thing is that the coverings do NOT take all responsibility from the man and frankly you guys have just as much responsibility for YOUR reactions as we women do to dress appropriately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
Calgal,

We have gotten alittle funny in this thread with extremes like the burkas.. No one is saying that hands must be hidden.. They are not listed anywhere in the scriptures along with other parts...

Those of us who support more fuller coverings are using descriptions from scripture of what should be covered... Body, Legs, head, etc....

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgal View Post
Oh Noes! Their HANDS are showing! So let me see if I understand this thought process correctly: women are tempting and men are unable to withstand the temptation of a woman's hair or eyelashes or hands or any part of her body. How nice to have that power.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:25 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Here is what I would wear... It is lightweight and does not hold water.

Beta ARs are made from new Gore-Tex® Pro Shell fabric and offer improved protection, breathability, durability and suppleness






Quote:
Originally Posted by BJClark View Post
Could you please provide a link for men's modest swimwear as well?? I'd like to see what it looks like..

The only things I could find are with lycra wetsuits which is pretty much skin tight on men, or jeans and a t-shirt and well, men with wet t-shirts clinging to their muscle bound bodies can cause women to lust as well...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 08:00 PM
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,433
Thanks: 770
Thanked 625 Times in 380 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
Coram Deo: I don't know, these are quite attractive still - better go with the burlap sack over the face. Or the full ninja suit.
In seminary one of my roomates had a Catholic friend who gave him a statue of the Virgin Mary. Of course, that was problematic for us Reformed folk. But we didn't want to be jerks and tell the Catholic friend to go buzz off. So we got a whole bunch of electrical tape, wrapped it around the statue of Mary, and it looked like the perfect ninja!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 08:04 PM
Neopatriarch's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portage, MI
Posts: 40
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
Do these work for ya..... *Chuckling* I would prefer these above all else... *Grinning from ear to ear*


Not bad. It looks Muslimish though.

I'm curious, does anyone know of a good website that sells headcoverings for Christian women? A site with photos.
__________________
Chris
Independent Baptist
Michigan
Layman
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 08:08 PM
Coram Deo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denton, Maryland America
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 315
Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts
Well there is Headcoverings by She Maketh Herself Coverings

it has alot of anabaptistic headcoverings from mennonite to brethren, to amish to hutterite, to german baptist, etc....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neopatriarch View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coram Deo View Post
Do these work for ya..... *Chuckling* I would prefer these above all else... *Grinning from ear to ear*


Not bad. It looks Muslimish though.

I'm curious, does anyone know of a good website that sells headcoverings for Christian women? A site with photos.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 03-21-2008, 08:09 PM
Michael Butterfield's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pickens, MS
Posts: 267
Thanks: 1