The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > The Pilgrims Progress

The Pilgrims Progress Discussions regarding the Christian Life
as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him (Col. 2:6)

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:27 PM
armourbearer's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,253
Thanks: 644
Thanked 2,491 Times in 1,005 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak View Post
Mr. Winzer, just to clarify my own take, I was not attributing the negative factors I identified to the doctrine of separatism, or taking issue with the principle. Rather I was looking at those who self-identify as fundamentalists, and commenting on certain issues that seem to be rather glaring. It was not an attempt to relate those problems to the doctrine of separatism (where I don't think the blame lies) but rather an attempt to pursue the root problem manifesting itself in the various objectionable phenomena.
Thanks, Ruben, for the clarification. I suppose evangelical Presbyterians don't identify themselves as fundamentalists -- even though they are obliged to acknowledge it to some degree. So in that case I concede your remarks are applicable to certain baptistic groups. Blessings!
__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 11:36 PM
py3ak's Avatar
El Tirano
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,948
Thanks: 130
Thanked 831 Times in 547 Posts
I think that in the U.S.A. only the Bible Presbyterian and Free Presbyterian groups would self-identify as fundamentalists, and I am not sure whether the Bible Presbyterians would continue to use the term.

Of course, even among the baptistic groups there is a sense that with the increased usage of "fundamentalism" as a label for consistent muslims, that perhaps a different term would be more appropriate. So Bob Jones III suggested "preservationists" a little while ago, but it does not seem to have caught on.

Oddly enough, a related conversation took place recently on the Bayly Blog.

Thanks again, Mr. Winzer, not only for the sharpening of the thinking but for the reminder of intellectual charity and fairness.
__________________
Ruben
Moderator
F.P.C.I.
Indiana

Men can only be happy when they do not assume that the object of life is happiness. -George Orwell

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Calvinistas Conversando - Reformed Discussion Board in Spanish.

Spanish Blog -Teologia en Mexico
English Blog -The Howling Wilderness

Last edited by py3ak; 02-19-2008 at 12:25 AM..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65