» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 90 | | 33 members and 57 guests | | A5pointer, Answerman, Backwoods Presbyterian, Barnpreacher, Beth Ellen Nagle, Brad, CalvinandHodges, CovenantalBaptist, Curt, FrielWatcher, Grace Alone, Ivan, jaybird0827, JohnGill, jtate732, McPatrickClan, MICWARFIELD, NaphtaliPress, Pergamum, R. Scott Clark, raekwon, Rev. Todd Ruddell, sotzo, TimV, toddpedlar, turmeric, uberkermit | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
07-09-2008, 04:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 19
Thanked 60 Times in 34 Posts
| | | Creation Nakedness and Shame
Pre-Fall - Naked and unashamed
Post-Fall - Naked and shamed
Revelation 19:8 shows we are still clothed by Christ's righteousness
Is nakedness still shameful in eternity future? Do we wear clothes in eternity future or are we clothed?
Just asking, I'm trying to think through something for an article I want to write on modesty.
| 
07-09-2008, 04:41 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 544
Thanks: 66
Thanked 180 Times in 111 Posts
| | |
I would not think that it would be shameful as surely (as you point out) shame is a result of sin, we will have new heavenly bodies and no sin. I would have thought that all references to robes etc in eternity are figurative.
Think how marvelous it will be not to have to worry about lust or shame anymore.
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England
"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
| 
07-09-2008, 05:07 PM
|  | Puritanboard Postgraduate | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,370
Thanks: 556
Thanked 813 Times in 422 Posts
| | |
man, I need to work out more if that's the case!
If we are perfected in heaven, the more rotund saints....will they be at optimal weight in heaven?
I'm SERIOUS.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
07-10-2008, 02:11 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 564
Thanks: 79
Thanked 160 Times in 97 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hippo I would not think that it would be shameful as surely (as you point out) shame is a result of sin, we will have new heavenly bodies and no sin. I would have thought that all references to robes etc in eternity are figurative.
Think how marvelous it will be not to have to worry about lust or shame anymore. | Agree 100%, Hippo.
The real question is what should be our attitude to non-sexual or non-lascivious nudity here on Earth...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
07-10-2008, 06:55 AM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,912
Thanks: 11
Thanked 1,162 Times in 439 Posts
| | |
I don't think this follows. There is no consideration for the simple themes of propriety and dignity. And I do not think that such are only post-fall considerations.
Adam and Eve were alone. We do not know how they would have naturally treated a situation where children were present, a society. Shame, as we know it, would have been unknown. However, that doesn't mean that under ordinary circumstances, people wouldn't have done "right" by dressing appropriately, whatever that could have meant.
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Contra_Mundum For This Useful Post: | | 
07-10-2008, 08:39 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 564
Thanks: 79
Thanked 160 Times in 97 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum I don't think this follows. There is no consideration for the simple themes of propriety and dignity. And I do not think that such are only post-fall considerations.
Adam and Eve were alone. We do not know how they would have naturally treated a situation where children were present, a society. Shame, as we know it, would have been unknown. However, that doesn't mean that under ordinary circumstances, people wouldn't have done "right" by dressing appropriately, whatever that could have meant. | I agree with you Pastor Bruce, which is why modesty is utterly subjective. The definitions of "right" and "appropriate" dress are ultimately impossible to define when it comes to modesty...
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
07-10-2008, 09:49 AM
|  | "da wabbit" | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: CentralLakeMI
Posts: 3,912
Thanks: 11
Thanked 1,162 Times in 439 Posts
| | |
Mason,
I think that modesty is culturally sensitive. However, brazen lasciviousness comes in many forms, and our own culture is moving in a rebellious direction. Skimpy isn't always just about the climate.
__________________ Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12 When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:
Oh, that God the gift would give us
To see ourselves as others see us. --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- | 
07-10-2008, 11:27 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 19
Thanked 60 Times in 34 Posts
| | |
I don't know if it is as subjective as many think. Note: that in verse 7 of Genesis 3 that Adam and Eve cover with loin cloths. BUT this is not enough for the LORD, it says in verse 21, " And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them."
Loin cloths were not good for the Lord even when the context is the Lord, Adam, and Eve. The marriage bed is obviously different, but in regular life even in the home could not we discern from this that at least more clothing than undergarments and/or the bathing suits of today should be worn?
| 
07-10-2008, 03:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,026
Thanks: 933
Thanked 272 Times in 180 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 Pre-Fall - Naked and unashamed
Post-Fall - Naked and shamed
Revelation 19:8 shows we are still clothed by Christ's righteousness
Is nakedness still shameful in eternity future? Do we wear clothes in eternity future or are we clothed?
Just asking, I'm trying to think through something for an article I want to write on modesty. |
In John's Revelation it shows that the curse will be lifted and we will live in a restored garden paradise. John states we will not need the sun for the Lord will be the light. We will be like Adam and Eve, but we will be covered in the glory of Christ, so there will be no need for clothing as we know it. We are covered now because of the shame associated with sin. Dr. Ronald Sigenthaler, the executive minister at Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Ft. Lauderdale, FL wrote a great article on this very issue of clothing. You could contact him or I will try to see if I still have a copy of this article. He wrote it about four years ago.
__________________
Stephen Welch
PCA Teaching Elder
Nova Scotia :cheers:
| 
07-10-2008, 05:25 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 564
Thanks: 79
Thanked 160 Times in 97 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 I don't know if it is as subjective as many think. Note: that in verse 7 of Genesis 3 that Adam and Eve cover with loin cloths. BUT this is not enough for the LORD, it says in verse 21, " And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them."
Loin cloths were not good for the Lord even when the context is the Lord, Adam, and Eve. The marriage bed is obviously different, but in regular life even in the home could not we discern from this that at least more clothing than undergarments and/or the bathing suits of today should be worn? | To be honest, this argument really doesn't make sense to me. Adam and Eve were completely naked before the Fall, so obviously no clothing at all was "good enough for the Lord." In fact, in His perfect plan there would be no need for clothes at all. It is man's shame over sin, not the Lord's, that necessitates the use of clothing. In God's perfect plan, clothes are completely unnecessary.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY
"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
| 
07-10-2008, 05:48 PM
|  | PB Evil Scientist...Boo! | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 67
Thanked 524 Times in 306 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum Mason,
I think that modesty is culturally sensitive. However, brazen lasciviousness comes in many forms, and our own culture is moving in a rebellious direction. Skimpy isn't always just about the climate. | Moving? Seems we're well entrenched in such a direction...
__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA http://semperubi.rtrc.net
"Many men, after a long conversion, see more of the workings of sin in their hearts than ever they did before or at their first conversion. Now, such men have not an increase of sin, but an increase of illumination and light" (Christopher Love)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
07-10-2008, 05:56 PM
|  | McFadderator Minimizing | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 3,979
Thanks: 799
Thanked 1,253 Times in 750 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum If we are perfected in heaven, the more rotund saints....will they be at optimal weight in heaven? | My, my, I certainly HOPE so!!!
BTW - 60 lbs. weight loss and counting on my diet. So please, Lord, if we don't have optimal weights in heaven, can you at least wait another few months until I lose the other 60 lbs?
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | 
07-10-2008, 06:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 1,421
Thanks: 19
Thanked 60 Times in 34 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon Quote:
Originally Posted by Romans922 I don't know if it is as subjective as many think. Note: that in verse 7 of Genesis 3 that Adam and Eve cover with loin cloths. BUT this is not enough for the LORD, it says in verse 21, " And the LORD God made for Adam and for his wife garments of skins and clothed them."
Loin cloths were not good for the Lord even when the context is the Lord, Adam, and Eve. The marriage bed is obviously different, but in regular life even in the home could not we discern from this that at least more clothing than undergarments and/or the bathing suits of today should be worn? | To be honest, this argument really doesn't make sense to me. Adam and Eve were completely naked before the Fall, so obviously no clothing at all was "good enough for the Lord." In fact, in His perfect plan there would be no need for clothes at all. It is man's shame over sin, not the Lord's, that necessitates the use of clothing. In God's perfect plan, clothes are completely unnecessary. | I was meaning to see that it wasn't good enough for the Lord post-fall meaning a loincloth is not suitable for a curse. I don't know I'm just thinking in my head out loud.
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |