Results 1 to 20 of 20

The Pilgrims Progress discuss Christian polygamy movement in the The Christian Walk forums; There seems to be a growing "Christian" polygamy movement. Even spreading to mainstream denominations. The logic being, "God said King David was blameless before him ...

  1. #1
    CDM's Avatar
    CDM
    CDM is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,952

    Christian polygamy movement

    There seems to be a growing "Christian" polygamy movement. Even spreading to mainstream denominations. The logic being, "God said King David was blameless before him and he had hundreds of wives." Or, "Scripture had laws about polygamy but didn't condemn it." Most say the "leave and cleave" passages don't neccessarily exclude this happening several times. On and on it goes. Some of the more sensible ones will acknowledge the qualifications for Elders and Deacons of having one wife. But they see all others as fair game.

    Here is a recent argument I heard:

    Numbers 3:40-43 provides us with a census of the firstborn in Israel. The number given is 22,273 firstborn sons. We may safely conclude there were at least 22,273 families in Israel, since a family cannot have more than one firstborn son. There were, no doubt, families which had no sons.

    That has no bearing upon this remarkable fact:

    22,273 families are responsible for a total count of over 600,000 fighting men (Numbers 1:46). If you take 600,000 and divide it by 22,000, you get 27. The average Israelite household with sons had 28 of them!

    The patriarch Jacob required four wives to get twelve sons. Is it too much to suppose that the typical Israelite needed twice as many wives to get 28 Sons? What about the daughters? If there was a daughter for every son, then there was 56 children per Israelite household, on the average scale. There is no way to know how many wives the average Israelite may have had, but it is impossible that the average woman could have had 56 children. Israelite society was a polygamous society.


    The host of this website, Vox Day, is a professed "Southern Baptist Christian Libertarian." He claims that the ideal for Christians is NOT TO BE married as the Apostle said (according to him).

    Some of this is so elementary and foolish, I've found myself at a loss for just where to begin on this thinking.

    Dumbfounded.
    Chris Mangum
    Mount Croghan, SC
    Christ Bible Church
    Pageland, SC

  2. #2
    fivepointcalvinist is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    546
    this is stupid, dont waste your time with it...
    [b]Matthew Cook[/b]
    [url=http://www.webspawner.com/users/graceprayerministry/][b][color=Blue]King's Chapel Reformed Baptist Church[/color][/b][/url]
    [b]West Chester, OH[/b]

    [b]"But a witless man can no more become wise than a wild donkey's colt can be born a man." - Job 11:12[/b]

    [IMG]http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/387/800pxflagofitalysvgod9.jpg[/IMG]

  3. #3
    Contra_Mundum's Avatar
    Contra_Mundum is offline. Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,691
    Its just $#X obsession, with a biblical veneer. If a man is bound and determined to have multiple wives, he's bound to move to Provo, too, eventually.
    Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
    ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

    Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
    Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

    When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

    Oh, that God the gift would give us
    To see ourselves as others see us.
    --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- Sermons

  4. #4
    MeanieCalvinist's Avatar
    MeanieCalvinist is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    373
    This position is unbiblical:

    The Gospel of Matthew clearly refutes this; "No man can serve two masters..." Matt 6:24

    I believe all of the married men on this post can back me on this one

    In Christ,

    MeanieCalvinist
    Brian K. Karger
    Faith Baptist Church
    1689 LBC
    www.founders.org

  5. #5
    ReformedReidian's Avatar
    ReformedReidian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    11,067
    Originally posted by MeanieCalvinist
    This position is unbiblical:

    The Gospel of Matthew clearly refutes this; "No man can serve two masters..." Matt 6:24
    Wow, how do you argue with this logic?!?!
    Jacob
    M.A., Louisiana College
    Studied at RTS Jackson
    ARP, Louisiana

    2Kingdomz4Life

    My blog: Extra Nos

  6. #6
    Cuirassier is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    151
    Originally posted by mangum
    There seems to be a growing "Christian" polygamy movement. Even spreading to mainstream denominations. The logic being, "God said King David was blameless before him and he had hundreds of wives." Or, "Scripture had laws about polygamy but didn't condemn it." Most say the "leave and cleave" passages don't neccessarily exclude this happening several times. On and on it goes. Some of the more sensible ones will acknowledge the qualifications for Elders and Deacons of having one wife. But they see all others as fair game.

    Here is a recent argument I heard:

    Numbers 3:40-43 provides us with a census of the firstborn in Israel. The number given is 22,273 firstborn sons. We may safely conclude there were at least 22,273 families in Israel, since a family cannot have more than one firstborn son. There were, no doubt, families which had no sons.

    That has no bearing upon this remarkable fact:

    22,273 families are responsible for a total count of over 600,000 fighting men (Numbers 1:46). If you take 600,000 and divide it by 22,000, you get 27. The average Israelite household with sons had 28 of them!

    The patriarch Jacob required four wives to get twelve sons. Is it too much to suppose that the typical Israelite needed twice as many wives to get 28 Sons? What about the daughters? If there was a daughter for every son, then there was 56 children per Israelite household, on the average scale. There is no way to know how many wives the average Israelite may have had, but it is impossible that the average woman could have had 56 children. Israelite society was a polygamous society.


    The host of this website, Vox Day, is a professed "Southern Baptist Christian Libertarian." He claims that the ideal for Christians is NOT TO BE married as the Apostle said (according to him).

    Some of this is so elementary and foolish, I've found myself at a loss for just where to begin on this thinking.

    Dumbfounded.
    Let's assume these statistics are right (and had I the time, I'm pretty sure I'd conclude otherwise). To base a moral position on something that the OT children of Israel did (and not, insofar as I can tell, with neither God's blessing or nor expressed instruction) is a leap of titanic proportions.

    God, in his infinite sovereignty and grace may have allowed this to happen - but God's instruction universally on this is quite clear. Genesis 1 states that a man and woman will leave their parents and "these TWO shall become one flesh". Not these three or four ...

    This argument strikes me as a pathetic attempt to twist the Rock of Scripture into a conveniently-shaped moral pretzel in order to feed a sinful appetite.

    dl



    [Edited on 3-21-2006 by Cuirassier]

    [Edited on 3-21-2006 by Cuirassier]
    D Lopez


    "Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" - Romans 5.1

    Sola Scriptura - Sola Gratia - Sola Fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo Gloria

  7. #7
    ReformedReidian's Avatar
    ReformedReidian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    11,067
    I was wondering:
    If we are a religiously neutral and pluralistic government, can the state still discriminate against religious polygamy?
    Jacob
    M.A., Louisiana College
    Studied at RTS Jackson
    ARP, Louisiana

    2Kingdomz4Life

    My blog: Extra Nos

  8. #8
    MeanieCalvinist's Avatar
    MeanieCalvinist is offline. Puritanboard Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    373
    Originally posted by Draught Horse
    Originally posted by MeanieCalvinist
    This position is unbiblical:

    The Gospel of Matthew clearly refutes this; "No man can serve two masters..." Matt 6:24
    Wow, how do you argue with this logic?!?!
    That is a good question......
    Brian K. Karger
    Faith Baptist Church
    1689 LBC
    www.founders.org

  9. #9
    ReformedReidian's Avatar
    ReformedReidian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    11,067
    Originally posted by trevorjohnson
    Just to throw a wrench in here....

    In many parts of the world tribal peoples still have multiple wives.

    Which is worse, polygamy or divorce?

    I argue that many polygamists around the world are better families than the multiple divorcees that abound in America.
    Divorce. Polygamy is a very real problem in many mission contexts. Say a tribal leader gets converted but has many wives. Does he divorce all but one of them? No. Polygamy isn't normative, but it isn't the end of the world either.

    [Edited on 3--21-06 by Draught Horse]
    Jacob
    M.A., Louisiana College
    Studied at RTS Jackson
    ARP, Louisiana

    2Kingdomz4Life

    My blog: Extra Nos

  10. #10
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    22,631
    Blog Entries
    1
    It's always hard to compare sin with sin. I agree that a polygamist is not called to put away his wives if he converts to Christianity. He needs to provide for them. I do, however, believe it disqualifies him from Church leadership so the missionary needs to stick around long enough to allow, perhaps, a new generation that does not practice polygamy before elders might be raised up.

    I didn't really respond to the article because there are too many kooks with crazy ideas. What a dope.
    Rich
    Ruling Elder, Licentiate, Under Care, Hope of Christ Church (PCA), Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

  11. #11
    Cuirassier is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    151
    Interesting question,

    Since I think we agree that God despises both, it's a question that'll go 'round and 'round.

    If the real question is what happens in a missionary/conversion situation - I believe God allows his grace to triumph where sin previously abounded. I don't believe know that God would want the commission of one sin (divorce of the not-because-of-adultery kind) to follow another (polygamy).

    Much like a couple who divorced and then remarried other partners, and then are converted. Was their divorce wrong? Yes. Was their subsequent remarriage wrong? Yes. Is the answer then to "undo" that wrong by making another (another divorce)? I don't believe so.

    God in his mercy and grace, can work within a flawed relationship to bring about His divine will. As Jacob says, though, this does not make it normative.

    dl
    D Lopez


    "Therefore, having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ" - Romans 5.1

    Sola Scriptura - Sola Gratia - Sola Fide - Solus Christus - Soli Deo Gloria

  12. #12
    Pilgrim's Avatar
    Pilgrim is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    8,727
    Originally posted by Draught Horse
    Originally posted by MeanieCalvinist
    This position is unbiblical:

    The Gospel of Matthew clearly refutes this; "No man can serve two masters..." Matt 6:24
    Wow, how do you argue with this logic?!?!
    Chris
    Currently seeking a church--in transition
    One Pilgrims Progress |Twitter

    And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come. Luke 19:13

  13. #13
    yeutter's Avatar
    yeutter is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    1,518
    Blog Entries
    1

    Walter Trobisch

    Originally posted by
    Just to throw a wrench in here....

    In many parts of the world tribal peoples still have multiple wives.

    Which is worse, polygamy or divorce?

    I argue that many polygamists around the world are better families than the multiple divorcees that abound in America.
    Walter Trobisch, a Lutheran, dealt with these issues in a manner I found helpful. InterVarcity Press used to publish him. I do not know if he is still in print.
    Last edited by VictorBravo; 04-21-2008 at 11:26 PM.
    Thomas Yeutter,
    Layman
    Chiang Mai, Kingdom of Thailand
    Anglican, attending Trinity Baptist Church Chiang Mai

    Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to seek the law of the Lord, and to do it and to, teach in Israel its statues and ordinances.

  14. #14
    VirginiaHuguenot is offline. Puritanboard Librarian
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    23,794
    Blog Entries
    7
    It's surprising the circles in which this kind of issue pops up.

    Luther, Bucer and Melanchthon all endorsed the bigamous marriage of Philip of Hesse. And polygamy is promoted as Biblical in Michael Brown's introduction to the Geneva Bible, citing Luther and Milton.
    Andrew

  15. #15
    CDM's Avatar
    CDM
    CDM is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    The "Christian polygamists" main point, according to them, IS scripture. Many many of the godly men had multiple wives the polygamist argues. There were rules and regulations on polygamy. Never a condemnation of it they say.

    I was also most concerned with the point "the ideal for Christians is NOT to be married" according to Paul.

    What would you say to that? You're right, Rich, adn others, most, if not all, of this is so ludicrous it is not worth rebuking. But this movement is seriously growing. Especially in light of the secular culture in America condoning and authorizing same-sex marriage.

    Sadly, if our past is any indication, the American "church" follows the culture not transforms it.
    Chris Mangum
    Mount Croghan, SC
    Christ Bible Church
    Pageland, SC

  16. #16
    Contra_Mundum's Avatar
    Contra_Mundum is offline. Pilgrim, Alien, Stranger
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    7,691
    They can selectively reference Scripture all day long. What do they do with the words and logic of Christ himself? Should that be "And the three (four, five, twelve?) will become one flesh"?

    How do they handle Paul's limitation on elders--to men with ONE wife? Doesn't that imply that one marriage is normative?

    As for Paul's "I wish all men were as I am," i.e. single, that has to be harmonized with "the marriage bed is honorable." The two thoughts can't be prejudicial to each other. To make Paul's statement (one NT reference) "normative", or even to combine it with Jesus' teaching about "eunuchs" (Mt. 19:12)--which in essence is a rebuke to his disciples--and overthrow the norm of marriage, is preposterous.

    As another has pointed out, two wrongs don't make a right. So if someone has violated God's pattern it does not follow that the solution is to boot out "illegitimate" wives (or husbands, I suppose). But obviously wrong behavior carries consequences--hence a bigamist may not exercise leadership in the church. That is a stiff penalty, if it is properly appreciated.

    Like I said earlier, and has been echoed--this is all about LUST. The deal with the Mormons is the same--a religion without grace, that "sanctifies" and even "normalizes" bad behavior by external, legal regulations.
    Rev. Bruce G. Buchanan
    ChainOLakes Presbyterian Church, CentralLake, MI

    Made both Lord and Christ--Jesus, the Destroyer
    Acts 2:36 - 1 Cor. 10:9-10 & 15:22-26 - Hebrews 2:9-15 - 1 John 3:8 - James 4:12

    When posting friends, kindly bear those words of earthly wisdom in mind:

    Oh, that God the gift would give us
    To see ourselves as others see us.
    --Robert Burns, 1786 (modernized) ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? -- Sermons

  17. #17
    CDM's Avatar
    CDM
    CDM is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,952
    Originally posted by Contra_Mundum
    They can selectively reference Scripture all day long. What do they do with the words and logic of Christ himself? Should that be "And the three (four, five, twelve?) will become one flesh"?

    How do they handle Paul's limitation on elders--to men with ONE wife? Doesn't that imply that one marriage is normative?

    As for Paul's "I wish all men were as I am," i.e. single, that has to be harmonized with "the marriage bed is honorable." The two thoughts can't be prejudicial to each other. To make Paul's statement (one NT reference) "normative", or even to combine it with Jesus' teaching about "eunuchs" (Mt. 19:12)--which in essence is a rebuke to his disciples--and overthrow the norm of marriage, is preposterous.

    As another has pointed out, two wrongs don't make a right. So if someone has violated God's pattern it does not follow that the solution is to boot out "illegitimate" wives (or husbands, I suppose). But obviously wrong behavior carries consequences--hence a bigamist may not exercise leadership in the church. That is a stiff penalty, if it is properly appreciated.

    Like I said earlier, and has been echoed--this is all about LUST. The deal with the Mormons is the same--a religion without grace, that "sanctifies" and even "normalizes" bad behavior by external, legal regulations.
    Well said. Thank you for your comments, Bruce.
    Chris Mangum
    Mount Croghan, SC
    Christ Bible Church
    Pageland, SC

  18. #18
    smhbbag is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,317
    Just to throw a wrench in here....
    In a Freudian reading slip, I read this as "Just to throw a wench in here....." and I died laughing.

    Then, even realizing I was wrong, it was still funny.
    Jeremy
    SBC
    NC

    "No heart can conceive that treasury of mercies which lies in this one privilege, in having liberty and ability to approach unto God at all times, according to his mind and will." - John Owen

  19. #19
    ReformedReidian's Avatar
    ReformedReidian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    11,067
    Seven wives might be one thing, but who could handle seven mother-in-laws!!!
    Jacob
    M.A., Louisiana College
    Studied at RTS Jackson
    ARP, Louisiana

    2Kingdomz4Life

    My blog: Extra Nos

  20. #20
    Semper Fidelis's Avatar
    Semper Fidelis is offline. 2 Timothy 2:24-25
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    22,631
    Blog Entries
    1
    Originally posted by Draught Horse
    Seven wives might be one thing, but who could handle seven mother-in-laws!!!
    You mean mothers-in-law. Yes Mom, I corrected his grammar...
    Rich
    Ruling Elder, Licentiate, Under Care, Hope of Christ Church (PCA), Northern VA
    Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

    WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
    SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72