The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Christian Walk > The Pilgrims Progress

The Pilgrims Progress Discussions regarding the Christian Life
as you received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in him (Col. 2:6)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:32 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Biblical Separation

As was mentioned in the thread about fundamentalism, sometimes fundamentalists are too extreme in their view of biblical separation. They seem to separate from most everybody and everything (slight exaggeration). People who don't believe in biblical separation sometimes are at the other extreme and don't separate from anybody or anything.

As with many things, the correct understanding of the teaching is somewhere in the middle between the two extremes.

I've copied an exerpt below from a fundamentalist church website that believes in biblical separation. The first and last sentences most would agree with:
We believe that all the saved should live in such a manner as not to bring reproach upon their Savior and Lord...Our objective is to please the Thrice Holy God in all that we do.
Sandwiched between those two good statements are other statements that may not be as good, but are based on the scriptures sited.

1. Based on the scriptures sited, and your beliefs about separation, how would you rewrite this part of the statement of faith?

2. Or, would you leave it as is?

3. If a person came to you who got saved after living the "life of Riley", what advice would you give him/her regarding separation from the world and other churches?

Quote:
Biblical Separation
We believe that all the saved should live in such a manner as not to bring reproach upon their Savior and Lord; and, that separation from all religious apostasy, all worldly and sinful pleasures, practices and associations is commanded of God

Because our God is the Thrice Holy One we must take a separated stand regarding teaching that undermines the fundementals of the faith, including: Liberalism, Neo-orthodoxy, Neo-Evangelicalism, Eccumenicalism, Hyper-Calvinism, and the Charismatic Movement. We only use godly, conservative music and hymns in our church. Taking the music of the night club and the world and mixing it with the words of scripture is an abomination unto God and should be repented of. Our first objective in not to draw a crowd or entertain people. Our objective is to please the Thrice Holy God in all that we do.

(II Timothy 3:1-5; Romans 12:1, 2, 14:13; I John 2:15-17; II John 9-11; II Corinthians 6:14-7:1).

2Ti 3:1-5 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

Rom 12:1,2 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Rom 14:13 Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in his brother's way.

1Jo 2:15-17 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever.

2Jo 1:9-11 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Godspeed: For he that biddeth him Godspeed is partaker of his evil deeds.

2Co 6:14-7:1 Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty. Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
__________________
Bob Howes
Framingham, MA

A reoccurring thought:

Rev 22:20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:36 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to joshua For This Useful Post:
Blueridge Baptist (04-02-2008), Davidius (04-02-2008), KMK (04-02-2008), Simply_Nikki (04-02-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:44 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 394
Thanks: 45
Thanked 92 Times in 60 Posts
It looks pretty good overall, but I would delete "associations" from the first sentence and this entire sentence: "Taking the music of the night club and the world and mixing it with the words of scripture is an abomination unto God and should be repented of." I know music is a sensitive topic and I personally prefer a more traditional service, but I don't think they can make this statement based on Scripture.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:44 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
Your suggestion makes sense. Instead of the focus being "not like the world", the focus is that its scripture - much easier to defend and less open to subjective decisions about what is and isn't proper music for worship.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:52 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
Your suggestion makes sense. Instead of the focus being "not like the world", the focus is that its scripture - much easier to defend and less open to subjective decisions about what is and isn't proper music for worship.
I think. I mean, we should worship according to God's commands, and stop having our emphasis being on: "What is the world doing these days? We must do our dead-level best to de-emulate them!" If we just worship as God has commanded, we don't have to spend all the extra efforts avoiding the foolishness of the world.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:53 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Here's what we have so far. Any other changes needed to make this a good statement about Biblical separation?

Quote:
Biblical Separation
We believe that all the saved should live in such a manner as not to bring reproach upon their Savior and Lord; and, that separation from all religious apostasy, all worldly and sinful pleasures and practices is commanded of God

Because our God is the Thrice Holy One we must take a separated stand regarding teaching that undermines the fundementals of the faith, including: Liberalism, Neo-orthodoxy, Neo-Evangelicalism, Eccumenicalism, Hyper-Calvinism, and the Charismatic Movement. We only use the psalter in our church. Our first objective in not to draw a crowd or entertain people. Our objective is to please the Thrice Holy God in all that we do.

(II Timothy 3:1-5; Romans 12:1, 2, 14:13; I John 2:15-17; II John 9-11; II Corinthians 6:14-7:1).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:55 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
I think. I mean, we should worship according to God's commands, and stop having our emphasis being on: "What is the world doing these days? We must do our dead-level best to de-emulate them!" If we just worship as God has commanded, we don't have to spend all the extra efforts avoiding the foolishness of the world.
I think we're saying the same thing, your's was just a little more articulate and better stated.

Last edited by joshua; 04-02-2008 at 12:57 PM. Reason: fixing quotes
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:57 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
...your's was just a little more articulate and better stated.
Dunno 'bout that, Bob.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:01 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fort Branch, Indiana
Posts: 470
Thanks: 54
Thanked 276 Times in 149 Posts
"As was mentioned in the thread about fundamentalism, sometimes fundamentalists are too extreme in their view of biblical separation. They seem to separate from most everybody and everything (slight exaggeration). People who don't believe in biblical separation sometimes are at the other extreme and don't separate from anybody or anything."

I was raised as an independent baptist that thought like this - we only grouped with other people that didn't group.
__________________
Thomas Weddle
Member, Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church
Evansville, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:01 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Another question just came to mind. Do any of you folks have any statement(s) at all on your church website about separation?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:07 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas2007 View Post
I was raised as an independent baptist that thought like this - we only grouped with other people that didn't group.
Me too. At one time I probably would have separated from the majority of people on this board. Between the infant baptism and the drinking and the smoking and the listening to worldly music and ... would there be anybody left?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:16 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 394
Thanks: 45
Thanked 92 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by blhowes View Post
Another question just came to mind. Do any of you folks have any statement(s) at all on your church website about separation?
My current church has all their mission, values, philosophy, etc in MP3 format, but here's the worship philosphy of my old church (Briarwood Presby); I couldn't find anything on separation per se:

We desire true worship that:

Glorifies God
Edifies the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:19, Colossians 3:16)
Magnifies the message of salvation through Christ alone (1 Corinthians 14:24-25)

Reformed worship is God-centered and governed by the biblical guidelines given to us through scripture alone. In our worship, we seek to be connected to the best of the past without becoming idolatrous of the past (i.e., traditional, not traditionalism), contextualized in the present without allowing popular culture to dictate our approach to worship, and establishing worship that sets a standard for the future.

Drawing from all the bounty that God has given to His church, from the rich musical and liturgical traditions that have come down to us from our past to the exciting new movements of God today, enables us to set a worship “feast” or “banquet” before the people of God--a well-balanced “meal” to strengthen the body of Christ and keep her healthy spiritually.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:54 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post
My current church has all their mission, values, philosophy, etc in MP3 format, but here's the worship philosphy of my old church (Briarwood Presby); I couldn't find anything on separation per se:

We desire true worship that:

Glorifies God
Edifies the body of Christ (Ephesians 5:19, Colossians 3:16)
Magnifies the message of salvation through Christ alone (1 Corinthians 14:24-25)

Reformed worship is God-centered and governed by the biblical guidelines given to us through scripture alone. In our worship, we seek to be connected to the best of the past without becoming idolatrous of the past (i.e., traditional, not traditionalism), contextualized in the present without allowing popular culture to dictate our approach to worship, and establishing worship that sets a standard for the future.

Drawing from all the bounty that God has given to His church, from the rich musical and liturgical traditions that have come down to us from our past to the exciting new movements of God today, enables us to set a worship “feast” or “banquet” before the people of God--a well-balanced “meal” to strengthen the body of Christ and keep her healthy spiritually.
I like the wisdom of the bolded part of your quote.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:00 PM
Gage Browning's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 104
Thanks: 32
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
You make a good argument on guitars and drums etc...
My question is how do you only sing Psalms which never actually name the name of Christ? I know they point to him in type and shadow, I know the Psalms was God's songbook, but to disallow other songs, hymns or spiritual songs that actually name the name of Christ seems strange to me. Thoughts?
__________________
Gage Browning (Layman)
Grace Community Presbyterian Church
PCA Fort Worth, Texas
www.posttenebraslux.squarespace.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:02 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,913
Thanks: 463
Thanked 682 Times in 352 Posts
A statement about separation in a church's doctrinal statement is like saying, "Look at me, I'm a Fundy." and usually is evidence that "lifestyle" issues are added to the Gospel, such as drinking, smoking, movies, dress, often with a peculiar local interpretation of what Christians should be doing about all of these issues.

I, myself, am always suspicious when I hear churches that always talk about submission, rightly dividng the Word, or...the subject of this post, "separation".. it is code talk...
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:03 PM
Pilgrim's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mandeville, LA
Posts: 6,383
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 635 Times in 455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
I'm with you, brother. I don't know that a return to a cappella EP is the only way to avoid this. But the question is, once instruments and songs of human composition are allowed in, by what standard are we to judge what we are to sing? As Dr. Rowland Ward wrote:

Quote:
If we want to travel from songs that are Scripture to doctrinally accurate free songs, a significant yet at times fairly fine point, let us not only get our history straight but also understand the principles of Biblical worship. Otherwise the train may go express to Sound Hymns, then stop all stations to Mime, Dance and Clowns, and ultimately end at Ichabod.
__________________
Chris Poe--Attending Grace Community Baptist Church, Mandeville, LA

"There never was a man in the world without a creed. What is a creed? A creed is what you believe. What is a confession? It is a declaration of what you believe. That declaration may be oral or it may be committed to writing, but the creed is there either expressed or implied."—B.H. Carroll
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pilgrim For This Useful Post:
joshua (04-02-2008)
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:05 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
J.G. Vos on Biblical Separation:

The Bible Doctrine of the Separated Life by Johannes G. Vos
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:15 PM
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 4,988
Thanks: 186
Thanked 125 Times in 81 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
I'm with you, brother. I don't know that a return to a cappella EP is the only way to avoid this. But the question is, once instruments and songs of human composition are allowed in, by what standard are we to judge what we are to sing?
I hate to continue too far down a rabbit trail that may lead to an EP debate, but what the hey - its "MY" thread.

The same standard a pastor uses when deciding what to preach in a sermon. A good pastor typically (I'd imagine) spends a good number of hours searching the scriptures, preparing their sermon, making sure what he says is correct. What if a pastor spent a proportional amount of time selecting the music with the same care he spends preparing sermons?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:15 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gage Browning View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua View Post
(particularly concerning their quip about music)

In my opinion, a return to singing Psalms, with the exclusion of instruments is the only way to snuff out the idea of musical instrument, hymns or praise songs, preferences that pervade the Churches today.

I just don't see how one who embraces musical instruments and non-canonical hymns in the stated worship of the Church has the grounds upon which to reject the inclusion of "praise choruses," guitars, drums, ________ (fill in the blank) also.

But I am ooohhhh so teachable.
You make a good argument on guitars and drums etc...
My question is how do you only sing Psalms which never actually name the name of Christ? I know they point to him in type and shadow, I know the Psalms was God's songbook, but to disallow other songs, hymns or spiritual songs that actually name the name of Christ seems strange to me. Thoughts?
Howdy, Mr. Browning. I hate to be a copy and past kind of guy, but so as to not sidetrack this thread too much, and to not divulge my obscene ignorance abroad, allow me to refer you to this thread: Is the name of Jesus important in worship?

Blessings, Sir. And welcome again.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:28 PM
Gage Browning's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 104
Thanks: 32
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Thanks Joshua...I have seen that. My persuasion is probably different than many.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:34 PM
joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Texarkana (Border of Texas and Arkansas)
Posts: 14,927
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,298
Thanked 1,471 Times in 777 Posts
I think that Jesus' Hebrew name yeshuoah (spelling?) is used in the Psalms. It's translated Salvation (thanks to Rev. Winzer in that other thread).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 02:48 PM
ModernPuritan?'s Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Montgomery, ALabama
Posts: 371