The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > General Forums > General discussions

General discussions If it's not theological, then it's considered, "general".

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 01:13 AM
Reformingstudent's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,577
Thanks: 425
Thanked 141 Times in 110 Posts
Ultra-Reformed?

I have a question concerning an individual who although claiming to be in the Faith refuses to fellowship with other believers simply because in her opinion, there is no one close enough who is "reformed" enough to worship with. In other words this person does not attend church anywhere simply because she believes she is too Reformed to associate with other believers.
What I would like to know then is this, is this person sinning against the Lord by not accepting other believers because she considers her self superior to them simply because she may have more knowledge of the ways of the Lord and a deeper understanding of the Reformed faith. This same person also believes that true Christian don't sin even though she has sinned many a time against others and has refused to acknowledge any wrong on her part. Is it wrong for a true Christian to refuse to worship with other Christians simply because they are not as reformed as we may be? Is this not sin also?
__________________
Tom Mitchell
Opp, AL
Member of First Presbyterian Church PCA Florala, AL

Open profaneness is the broad dirty way which leads to hell
--but trusting in religious duties is a sure way, though a cleaner way to hell. ~ Thomas Brooks
www.myspace.com/tom_mitchell1960
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=607055102
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 01:24 AM
Philip A's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 538
Thanks: 6
Thanked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformingstudent View Post
This same person also believes that true Christian don't sin...
The entirety of the Reformed confessions are unequivocal in asserting that all believers are to unite themselves to true churches, despite the fact that the churches have many failings. They are also unequivocal in stating that all Christians still sin.

Of course, if this person were to join a confessional Reformed church, she would shortly come under discipline for her false doctrine, i.e., perfectionism. If sinless perfectionism is Reformed, then I'm a helicopter.
__________________
Philip A - Member, High Desert United Reformed Church, Apple Valley, CA.

"Reason also is choice" - Milton, Paradise Lost
"And then shall every word also seem consistent to him, if he for his part diligently read the Scriptures in company with those who are presbyters in the Church, among whom is the apostolic doctrine, as I have pointed out." - Irenaeus, Against Heresies, IV:XXXII.
"where there is text, there is hope" - Richard A. Muller
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 01:37 AM
Theoretical's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,916
Thanks: 617
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Nothing ultra-Reformed about her - just Wesleyan Perfectionist, with a predestinarian and exceptionally sectarian flair.
__________________
Scott - Dallas, Texas - PCA

"It is not what a lawyer tells me I may do; but what humanity, reason, and justice tell me I ought to do." - Edmund Burke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Theoretical For This Useful Post:
Josiah (05-18-2008), Stephen (05-20-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 02:12 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ethiopia
Posts: 538
Thanks: 143
Thanked 88 Times in 62 Posts
Does the obligation to affiliate with a local church include the obligation to sit through 2-hour services in a language one does not understand? In that case, would it not be better to listen to Christian music and sermon tapes with a few others who have a common language?
__________________
Mary Vanderkooi
Kale Heywott Church (KHC)
Soddo, Ethiopia
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 05:57 PM
jambo's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lisburn, Northern Ireland, UK
Posts: 245
Thanks: 52
Thanked 95 Times in 62 Posts
I think of Pauls comment about the Colossian believers who had a love for all the saints (Col 1.4) Loving all the saints can be difficult. There is no doubt that some of the saints are a pain in the neck but we are under obligation to love our brothers and sisters. At the last supper Jesus instructed the disciples to love another as he had loved them. Earlier on in the night the discples had been arguing about who was the gretest. I often wonder how a zealot like Simon got on with a tax colletor like Matthew. How did the ten other disciples cope with the Sons of Thunder?

I often wonder that if the Corinthian church was up the road, would I be able to have fellowship with it considering some of the things going on there? Would I be able to love all the saints in Galatia who were trying to mix the Law with grace? What about the other NT churches? Would we go to a church like Ephesus that was losing its first love? Do we just love and have fellowship with those who just think like us?

We need to be narrow enough to include the essentials but broad enough to accept the diversity within that band. By essentials, I mean that which is biblically essential, not what we arbitrarily deem to be essential
__________________
Stuart
Elder, Lambeg Baptist, Northern Ireland, UK

In Him the fulness of the Godhead dwells in bodily form and in Him you are complete (Col 2.9-10)

The sacrifice of a broken heart doth please Him but the sacrifice of a broken Christ alone doth satisfy Him (Richard Steele)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-18-2008, 06:22 PM
MrMerlin777's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 2,769
Thanks: 308
Thanked 119 Times in 90 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformingstudent View Post
................. she believes she is too Reformed to associate with other believers. ............... Is this not sin also?
Yes.
__________________
Donald Jacobs
Marysville. WA
Cascade Church (CRCNA)

Cum vero infirmor tunc potens sum.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 12:06 PM
sastark's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 147
Thanked 77 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip A View Post
If sinless perfectionism is Reformed, then I'm a helicopter.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 12:10 PM
Joshua's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 16,249
Blog Entries: 15
Thanks: 1,669
Thanked 1,992 Times in 1,011 Posts
It is incumbent upon a Christian -Reformed or otherwise- unless providentially hindered, to join themselves to God's people in fellowship for mutual edification, and place themselves in accountability under the oversight of God's ministers. No man is an island. Paul didn't command any of the Corinthians to leave the church, despite the gross errors in which they engaged.
__________________
Josh Hicks, Chloë's Daddy
Member of TRBC, Attending CCRPC. My Blog
The Puritan Pub (Team Blog)

Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Joshua For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (05-19-2008), Reformingstudent (05-20-2008), Rev. Todd Ruddell (05-20-2008), Stephen (05-20-2008), Theoretical (05-20-2008)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2008, 12:27 PM
JBaldwin's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 1,679
Thanks: 315
Thanked 443 Times in 278 Posts
The longer I have been a believer, the more I am convinced that we are to be patient with our brothers and sisters who do not completely agree with us on the secondary issues of our faith. I am also convinced that when I see the Lord, I will find out on what points I was completely wrong and on what points I was more accurate, and God will judge me based on how much I responded in obedience to His revealed Word.

We are to fellowship with believers who love the Lord and strive to follow Him with all their hearts. We are all at different places in our pilgrimage. That does not mean that we have to become full fledged members of those churches that are full of problems, but if that is all that is available, we should worship with those believers.
__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JBaldwin For This Useful Post:
Augusta (05-19-2008), Reformingstudent (05-20-2008), Stephen (05-20-2008)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 12:09 AM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 573
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Not to mention that while we as Reformed believers may believe we have "the most consistent expression of the Christian religion," we cannot forget that there are true believers in other, true Christian churches and, if we find ourselves in the sad state where there are no Reformed churches nearby, still we should endeavor to find a suitable church for fellowship and edification.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 06:16 AM
jwithnell's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 271
Thanks: 31
Thanked 99 Times in 67 Posts
What troubles me about the original question here is a deep doubt that someone could claim to love the bridegroom (Christ) but reject his bride (the church). The most loving thing you could do for this woman is to go over the passages from scripture that most succinctly present the gospel.

As to whether or not one should attend somewhere when language is a barrier, that is largely different. On one hand, I would do everything I could to gather with those of like language and mind. At the same time, I would not totally reject attending even when language is a difficulty -- Christ himself promises to be present.
__________________
JWithnell
Member Bethel OPC
Virginia
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:53 AM
kceaster's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 976
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 30 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leslie View Post
Does the obligation to affiliate with a local church include the obligation to sit through 2-hour services in a language one does not understand? In that case, would it not be better to listen to Christian music and sermon tapes with a few others who have a common language?
Mary,

I understand how hard it is to worship in another language. A similar thing happened to my family when we were in Italy. We only did this for two weeks in a row, but we got a lot out of it, even though we didn't understand most of it. We thought it was a beautiful thing to worship with them. It was a very simple service, praying, reading, singing, and preaching, along with the administration of the sacraments. We knew that the people loved the Lord in the manner of what Paul is saying in 1 Cor. 14. and we could report that God was truly among them.

I would encourage you not to choose between these two things, but do them both. You will be edified twice if the Spirit is in it.

In Christ,

KC
__________________
Heb 13:20-21

Kevin C. Easterday
Attending Covenant OPC, St. Augustine, FL
Husband to Tina (August 13, 1988), Father and Teacher to Kamden (16) and Kolton (14)
Federal Theology Website
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 08:08 AM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Québec,Québec; Canada
Posts: 234
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 21 Posts
I've encountered people like that. They are the kind who call RC Sproul arminian, VanTil a heretic, and all infralasparians are reprobate. They have no discernment between primary issues and secondary issues and matters of technical theology. Also usually they are people with no formal theological education but read a few hundred books and think they are experts on something.
__________________
Joseph P. Grigoletti II
Lay-person
Église Réformée du Québec
Québec, Québec Canada

''Nothing is so sacred that Satan will not invade it. In fact, the more sacred something is, the more he desires to profane it.''
John MacArthur
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 08:22 AM
Reformingstudent's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,577
Thanks: 425
Thanked 141 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwithnell View Post
What troubles me about the original question here is a deep doubt that someone could claim to love the bridegroom (Christ) but reject his bride (the church). The most loving thing you could do for this woman is to go over the passages from scripture that most succinctly present the gospel.

As to whether or not one should attend somewhere when language is a barrier, that is largely different. On one hand, I would do everything I could to gather with those of like language and mind. At the same time, I would not totally reject attending even when language is a difficulty -- Christ himself promises to be present.
Someone has already tried that and they were booted out of her group. She does not take correction very well and when confronted she becomes very hostel. This person thinks herself as an Internet theologian and as long as she has her Internet friends (some of which are into hyper-Presbyterianism) to encourage her in her error she will just keep on going her way. I could feel sorry for her if not for the fact that she is a hateful person and just uses her religion as a veil for her wickedness.
__________________
Tom Mitchell
Opp, AL
Member of First Presbyterian Church PCA Florala, AL

Open profaneness is the broad dirty way which leads to hell
--but trusting in religious duties is a sure way, though a cleaner way to hell. ~ Thomas Brooks
www.myspace.com/tom_mitchell1960
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=607055102
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 08:41 AM
ericfromcowtown's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 191
Thanks: 54
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
I play a 'game' whenever I am driving through a small town. I check out what churches this town of 500 or 1000 has to offer. "Catholic, United (ultra-liberal), and Lutheran. Well I guess if we lived in Greenview, we'd be worshipping in a Lutheran church." "Catholic, United, and Baptist. Well, I guess if we lived in Brownville, we'd be worshipping in a Baptist church." Perhaps in Greenview and Brownville you'd start to think seriously about connecting with other families who would like to plant a reformed church, but in the meantime you should be occupying a pew in one of the above.

I suppose that there might be rare occasions when worshipping at home could be justified, but I agree with the other posters that Christians have an obligation to worship together. We often draw our swords on the PB, and there is nothing wrong with heated debates on important doctrinal points, but we should remember that more often than not these are in-family arguments.
__________________
Eric
Woodgreen Presbyterian (PCA)
Calgary, Alberta CANADA
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 08:54 AM
Zenas's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cordova, TN
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 94
Thanked 348 Times in 234 Posts
She sounds like she's in the same group as Fred Phelps.

Both of them are under the impression that their conception of a Christian is the correct conception, that they themselves fit it, and that only who they deem worthy can ever meet it. From that, they reduce the number of worthy, "true" Christians to themselves and whoever is in their living room that they don't think are going to Hell.

She is hardly Reformed. If she were Reformed she would be confessional. If she were confessional she'd attend worship. She does not, ergo, she's not Reformed. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news for her, but the Canons of Dort do NOT make one Reformed.

Edit: She sounds like she's in the "cage stage" actually. She may be a Calvinist, but nothing much else.
__________________
Andrew DeShazo, Deacon, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"All of us stumble in many ways, but if anyone is never at fault in what he says, then he is mature, able to control his whole body."(James 3:2)

Last edited by Zenas; 05-20-2008 at 09:15 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2008, 01:14 PM
Reformingstudent's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,577
Thanks: 425
Thanked 141 Times in 110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zenas View Post
She sounds like she's in the same group as Fred Phelps.

Both of them are under the impression that their conception of a Christian is the correct conception, that they themselves fit it, and that only who they deem worthy can ever meet it. From that, they reduce the number of worthy, "true" Christians to themselves and whoever is in their living room that they don't think are going to Hell.

She is hardly Reformed. If she were Reformed she would be confessional. If she were confessional she'd attend worship. She does not, ergo, she's not Reformed. I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news for her, but the Canons of Dort do NOT make one Reformed.

Edit: She sounds like she's in the "cage stage" actually. She may be a Calvinist, but nothing much else.
I'm not sure about Fred Phelps but I know she considers herself to be a Covenanter. One of the reasons she gave someone for not attending church was the fact that most churches sing hymns and not Psalms and in her view singing hymns in church is sinning against God. I don't know of any Covenanters, especially here on this board who would hold to such a view, but that is what she has been led to believe. In other words, she has no need of those of us she considers enemies of the Lord because she has obtained a higher quality of worship and is more "reformed" then us mere mortals.
__________________
Tom Mitchell
Opp, AL
Member of First Presbyterian Church PCA Florala, AL

Open profaneness is the broad dirty way which leads to hell
--but trusting in religious duties is a sure way, though a cleaner way to hell. ~ Thomas Brooks
www.myspace.com/tom_mitchell1960
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=607055102
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64