The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > General Forums > General discussions

General discussions If it's not theological, then it's considered, "general".

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 03:01 PM
brianeschen's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
Presbyterian Split in 1741-45

I have been reading through Foote's Sketches of Virginia and read in there about a split that came into the Presbyterian church. Foote referred to it as the "new" and "old" and also, "new light" and "old light."

What was this all about? What are your opinions?
__________________
Brian Eschen
Ruling Elder, PCA
Pleasanton, California
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 04:48 PM
nleshelman's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 262
Thanked 602 Times in 318 Posts
There have been a couple of old vs. new light splits in Presbyterianism. This old-new light split was over the biblical validity of revivals. The old lights were opposed to the Great Awakening and believed that it was fanatical. The new lights were open to it and saw it as good and from the Lord. Edwards jumped into the argument, even though he was a Congregationalist by this time and wrote a defense of the revivals in New England. He catalogs some of the conversions and shows their validity.

Many of the old light Presbyterians went Unitarian within a generation or two.
__________________
Pastor Nathan Eshelman, Los Angeles, CA
Reformed Presbyterian Church

PRESBYTERIAN THOUGHTS
Los Angeles Reformed Presbyterian Church
RPCLA Sermons Online
Puritan Reformed Seminary
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post:
brianeschen (09-20-2008), ManleyBeasley (09-19-2008), Pergamum (09-19-2008)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 07:20 PM
R. Scott Clark's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,003
Thanks: 12
Thanked 748 Times in 265 Posts
Technically, I think the split among the Presbyterians was known as the "Old Side-New Side" division. The "old lights" and "new lights" refer to a roughly analogous split among congregationalists.

There is not a lot of literature on the Old Side/New Side split and what exists is not very favorable to the Old Siders.

I deal with this in one of the chapters of Recovering the Reformed Confession which is scheduled to be released next month, Dv.

As I see things, the Old Siders were, more or less, "the good guys," or at least they were the fellows most concerned about confessional theology, piety, and practice. The New Siders were the fellows who were anxious to support the "revival" (contemporary scholarship has cast real doubt on the 1st Great Awakening) and they weren't above condemning the Old Side as "unregenerate" (or worse) for daring the question them.

Until recently the standard history of the split essentially sided with the New Side. There is more contemporary work which I describe in the book. Stay tuned.....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to R. Scott Clark For This Useful Post:
brianeschen (09-20-2008), Pergamum (09-19-2008), Rev. Todd Ruddell (09-19-2008)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 07:24 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
Actually there were both "Old Side/New Side" and "Old School/New School) splits in the Presbyterian world, but at different times.

Old Side/New Side was in 1741-58 (as Nathan pointed out).

Old School/New School was in 1837-1970.
__________________
Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Member Fairmount ARP Church
Pittsburgh, PA


Deo Vindice

Last edited by Backwoods Presbyterian; 09-19-2008 at 07:34 PM. Reason: forgot to add
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (09-19-2008)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:27 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 970
Thanks: 148
Thanked 634 Times in 266 Posts
And "Old Light/New Light" was also used with regard to a split among Reformed Presbyterians in the 1830s over different issues (such as the relationship of the church and her covenants to the magistrate in America etc).

From Wikipedia...

In 1833, the church split down the middle, forming the New Light and Old Light RP Synods. The New Lights, who exercised political rights, grew for some years but suffered splits and went into decline, eventually merging in the 20th century with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church to form the Reformed Presbyterian Church (Evangelical Synod), which in 1982 merged with the Presbyterian Church in America. The Old Lights, who continued to teach the old doctrines, suffered a similar split, the "East End Split", in 1891. Statistics reveal that denominational membership suffered a net loss of 11% in 1891, most of whom joined the United Presbyterian Church. The fourth split, in 1840, resulted in two ministers and a few elders leaving to form the Reformed Presbytery (nicknamed the Steelites, after Dr David Steele, their most prominent leader), which continues today. Unlike with the other splits, this was occasioned by the departed ministers and members considering the denomination to be too liberal, especially by allowing membership in "voluntary associations", which today might include both political groups and groups such as the Boy Scouts.
__________________
Rev. Adam King
Minister in the RPCNA
Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church
Wichita, KS
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to ADKing For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (09-19-2008)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:33 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,829 Times in 1,466 Posts
Interesting.
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:33 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,829 Times in 1,466 Posts
SO...should we see the Great Awakening as a God-sent blessing or a fanatical wildfire?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:37 PM
Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
Both, IMHO
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 09:37 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,495
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
SO...should we see the Great Awakening as a God-sent blessing or a fanatical wildfire?
Yes?
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
Westminster Letter Press
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 11:42 PM
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,299
Thanks: 655
Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
Well, I'm not too versed with Presbyterian history but I will say I side with the Great Awakening.
__________________
[B]Manley Beasley[/B]
Southern Baptist Convention
Fayetteville, Arkansas

[B]Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum (We are beggars. This is true.).--Luther's dying words[/B]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-20-2008, 01:42 AM
brianeschen's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nleshelman View Post
There have been a couple of old vs. new light splits in Presbyterianism. This old-new light split was over the biblical validity of revivals. The old lights were opposed to the Great Awakening and believed that it was fanatical. The new lights were open to it and saw it as good and from the Lord. Edwards jumped into the argument, even though he was a Congregationalist by this time and wrote a defense of the revivals in New England. He catalogs some of the conversions and shows their validity.

Many of the old light Presbyterians went Unitarian within a generation or two.
Interesting about Edwards. I did not know that (the congregationalist part). In this book I am reading, Foote describes how Davies was desirous to get the services of Edwards in the Presbytery of Hanover.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69