Closed Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Presbyterian Split in 1741-45

  1. brianeschen's Avatar
    brianeschen is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Leandro, California
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks
    749
    Thanked 201 Times in 113 Posts

    Presbyterian Split in 1741-45

    I have been reading through Foote's Sketches of Virginia and read in there about a split that came into the Presbyterian church. Foote referred to it as the "new" and "old" and also, "new light" and "old light."

    What was this all about? What are your opinions?
    Brian Eschen
    Ruling Elder, PCA
    Pleasanton, California

    "When the Lion roars, all the beasts of the forest tremble: when King Jesus speaks, the Kings of the earth should keep silent."
    -Samuel Davies to King George II (1755)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  2. nleshelman's Avatar
    nleshelman is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,571
    Thanks
    299
    Thanked 729 Times in 387 Posts
    There have been a couple of old vs. new light splits in Presbyterianism. This old-new light split was over the biblical validity of revivals. The old lights were opposed to the Great Awakening and believed that it was fanatical. The new lights were open to it and saw it as good and from the Lord. Edwards jumped into the argument, even though he was a Congregationalist by this time and wrote a defense of the revivals in New England. He catalogs some of the conversions and shows their validity.

    Many of the old light Presbyterians went Unitarian within a generation or two.
    Pastor Nathan Eshelman, Los Angeles, CA
    Reformed Presbyterian Church

    PRESBYTERIAN THOUGHTS
    Los Angeles Reformed Presbyterian Church
    RPCLA Sermons Online
    Puritan Reformed Seminary
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nleshelman For This Useful Post:

    brianeschen (09-20-2008), ManleyBeasley (09-19-2008), Pergamum (09-19-2008)

  4. R. Scott Clark's Avatar
    R. Scott Clark is offline. Puritanboard Senior
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    2,136
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 890 Times in 323 Posts
    Technically, I think the split among the Presbyterians was known as the "Old Side-New Side" division. The "old lights" and "new lights" refer to a roughly analogous split among congregationalists.

    There is not a lot of literature on the Old Side/New Side split and what exists is not very favorable to the Old Siders.

    I deal with this in one of the chapters of Recovering the Reformed Confession which is scheduled to be released next month, Dv.

    As I see things, the Old Siders were, more or less, "the good guys," or at least they were the fellows most concerned about confessional theology, piety, and practice. The New Siders were the fellows who were anxious to support the "revival" (contemporary scholarship has cast real doubt on the 1st Great Awakening) and they weren't above condemning the Old Side as "unregenerate" (or worse) for daring the question them.

    Until recently the standard history of the split essentially sided with the New Side. There is more contemporary work which I describe in the book. Stay tuned.....
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to R. Scott Clark For This Useful Post:

    brianeschen (09-20-2008), Pergamum (09-19-2008), Rev. Todd Ruddell (09-19-2008)

  6. Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
    Backwoods Presbyterian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sarver, PA
    Posts
    12,706
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    5,397
    Thanked 2,931 Times in 1,753 Posts
    Actually there were both "Old Side/New Side" and "Old School/New School) splits in the Presbyterian world, but at different times.

    Old Side/New Side was in 1741-58 (as Nathan pointed out).

    Old School/New School was in 1837-1970.
    Last edited by Backwoods Presbyterian; 09-19-2008 at 07:34 PM. Reason: forgot to add
    Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
    Ruling Elder-Elect Fairmount ARP Church
    Pittsburgh, PA


    "I am as happy as perhaps creation can make me. I enjoy all the necessaries and most of the conveniences of life. I have a peaceful study as a refuge from the hurries and noise of the world around me, the venerable dead are waiting in my library to entertain me..." --Samuel Davies

    Deo Vindice
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post:

    Pergamum (09-19-2008)

  8. ADKing is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    1,002
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 704 Times in 281 Posts
    And "Old Light/New Light" was also used with regard to a split among Reformed Presbyterians in the 1830s over different issues (such as the relationship of the church and her covenants to the magistrate in America etc).

    From Wikipedia...

    In 1833, the church split down the middle, forming the New Light and Old Light RP Synods. The New Lights, who exercised political rights, grew for some years but suffered splits and went into decline, eventually merging in the 20th century with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church to form the Reformed Presbyterian Church (Evangelical Synod), which in 1982 merged with the Presbyterian Church in America. The Old Lights, who continued to teach the old doctrines, suffered a similar split, the "East End Split", in 1891. Statistics reveal that denominational membership suffered a net loss of 11% in 1891, most of whom joined the United Presbyterian Church. The fourth split, in 1840, resulted in two ministers and a few elders leaving to form the Reformed Presbytery (nicknamed the Steelites, after Dr David Steele, their most prominent leader), which continues today. Unlike with the other splits, this was occasioned by the departed ministers and members considering the denomination to be too liberal, especially by allowing membership in "voluntary associations", which today might include both political groups and groups such as the Boy Scouts.
    Rev. Adam King
    Pastor,Trinity Reformed Church (RPCNA)
    Wichita, KS
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to ADKing For This Useful Post:

    Pergamum (09-19-2008)

  10. Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline now. The MacDaddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    10,883
    Thanks
    2,824
    Thanked 3,103 Times in 1,592 Posts
    Interesting.
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  11. Pergamum's Avatar
    Pergamum is offline now. The MacDaddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    10,883
    Thanks
    2,824
    Thanked 3,103 Times in 1,592 Posts
    SO...should we see the Great Awakening as a God-sent blessing or a fanatical wildfire?
    Pergamum


    "If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
    -- David Livingstone
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  12. Backwoods Presbyterian's Avatar
    Backwoods Presbyterian is offline. Puritanboard Doctor
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sarver, PA
    Posts
    12,706
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    5,397
    Thanked 2,931 Times in 1,753 Posts
    Both, IMHO
    Benjamin P. Glaser, M. Div, Licentiate, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
    Ruling Elder-Elect Fairmount ARP Church
    Pittsburgh, PA


    "I am as happy as perhaps creation can make me. I enjoy all the necessaries and most of the conveniences of life. I have a peaceful study as a refuge from the hurries and noise of the world around me, the venerable dead are waiting in my library to entertain me..." --Samuel Davies

    Deo Vindice
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  13. NaphtaliPress's Avatar
    NaphtaliPress is offline. Administrator
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13,228
    Blog Entries
    20
    Thanks
    1,692
    Thanked 2,259 Times in 1,235 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
    SO...should we see the Great Awakening as a God-sent blessing or a fanatical wildfire?
    Yes?
    Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
    Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
    Westminster Letter Press
    The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
    The Blue Banner Archive

    The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

    Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  14. ManleyBeasley is offline. Inactive User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Fayetteville, Arkansas
    Posts
    1,286
    Thanks
    642
    Thanked 375 Times in 208 Posts
    Well, I'm not too versed with Presbyterian history but I will say I side with the Great Awakening.
    [B]Manley Beasley[/B]
    Southern Baptist Convention
    Fayetteville, Arkansas

    [B]Wir sein pettler. Hoc est verum (We are beggars. This is true.).--Luther's dying words[/B]
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

  15. brianeschen's Avatar
    brianeschen is offline. Puritanboard Junior
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    San Leandro, California
    Posts
    1,142
    Thanks
    749
    Thanked 201 Times in 113 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nleshelman View Post
    There have been a couple of old vs. new light splits in Presbyterianism. This old-new light split was over the biblical validity of revivals. The old lights were opposed to the Great Awakening and believed that it was fanatical. The new lights were open to it and saw it as good and from the Lord. Edwards jumped into the argument, even though he was a Congregationalist by this time and wrote a defense of the revivals in New England. He catalogs some of the conversions and shows their validity.

    Many of the old light Presbyterians went Unitarian within a generation or two.
    Interesting about Edwards. I did not know that (the congregationalist part). In this book I am reading, Foote describes how Davies was desirous to get the services of Edwards in the Presbytery of Hanover.
    Brian Eschen
    Ruling Elder, PCA
    Pleasanton, California

    "When the Lion roars, all the beasts of the forest tremble: when King Jesus speaks, the Kings of the earth should keep silent."
    -Samuel Davies to King George II (1755)
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!

Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69