» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 96 | | 20 members and 76 guests | | Ask Mr. Religion, Chippy, Grillsy, gritsrus, Hamalas, Hebrew Student, Heidelberg1, JOwen, Knight, Nathan Riese, NRB, reformed trucker, rpeters, SolaSaint, TheDow, Turtle | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
10-12-2009, 08:37 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 7 Posts
| | | Baptist to Presbyterian?
I need some advice and wisdom on a situation for a person...
Apparently, this person is contemplating moving from being a Baptist (of the Southern Baptist variety) to the PCA. He feels he can no longer be a Baptist with his beliefs regarding the following: ecclesiology (he affirms eldership and the presbyterian form of gov't), hermeneutics (he affirms covenantal theology), the Lord's Supper (he affirms a real spiritual presence), and those who are invited to the Lord's Supper (he does NOT feel as though only those who have been baptized by immersion are the only ones allowed to the table).
Of course, his question centers around infant baptism. From what I understand, he is now at the point to of saying that infant baptism is ok, but that believing parents probably should (but it is not mandatory) baptize their infant children.
He is a MDIV student, but not an ordained SBC minister yet. He would probably pursue PCA ordination eventually.
I believe his question centers around this: due to his beliefs on infant baptism right now, is that enough to "not make him a Southern Baptist"? He realizes that most likely presbyteries would want him to affirm that believing parents MUST baptize their children. So, I believe he feels as though he is in limbo (not of the Catholic kind!) because he affirms more than Southern Baptists are comfortable with, but not all the way of what Presbyterians are comfortable with.
What advice can I give to this young man?
Thanks!
__________________
PMBrooks
Southern Baptist Pastor
New Orleans, LA
PhD Theology
| 
10-12-2009, 08:59 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,623
Thanks: 3,603
Thanked 1,320 Times in 759 Posts
| | |
He doesn't sound like your garden variety SB at all. It probably is best that he find something else so as not to unnecessarily strain relationships at his present church.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to KMK For This Useful Post: | | 
10-12-2009, 09:13 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 36 Posts
| | |
As one who's been down this journey (as well as many "discussions" with staunch SBCers) probably the best thing he needs to do is start attending a PCA church as well as talking with those who are presbyterian and who hold to paedo-baptism. In the PCA you can be a member of a congregation without holding to paedo-baptism however, he could not be an elder (ruling or teaching) or deacon without affirming paedo-baptism and/or not having his children baptized.
__________________
Chris Bryant
Attending Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA), McKinney, TX
Member of Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA), Tulsa, OK
M.A.R., WTS/Redeemer Seminary, Dallas, TX (in progress)
| | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cbryant For This Useful Post: | | 
10-12-2009, 09:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 226
Thanks: 23
Thanked 83 Times in 50 Posts
| |
Most Reformed Baptists believe this: Quote: |
the Lord's Supper (he affirms a real spiritual presence)
| Has he considered becoming a Reformed Baptist? Of course he could not confess the LBC 1689 if he embraces infant baptism.
| 
10-12-2009, 09:38 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Aledo, Illinois
Posts: 168
Thanks: 54
Thanked 71 Times in 44 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by cbryant As one who's been down this journey (as well as many "discussions" with staunch SBCers) probably the best thing he needs to do is start attending a PCA church as well as talking with those who are presbyterian and who hold to paedo-baptism. In the PCA you can be a member of a congregation without holding to paedo-baptism however, he could not be an elder (ruling or teaching) or deacon without affirming paedo-baptism and/or not having his children baptized. | I also have been down this journey and recommend for him the same. He is closer to PCA than to SBC from the sound of it, and i believe that just attending a PCA church and asking questions would be the most helpful. As far as ordination goes, as uncomfortable of an option this would be, patience and further study sound like the best option, because a pastor, who is a leader and teacher of doctrine, should not be in limbo, in my opinion.
__________________
Nathan Riese
Under Care, PCA
Trinity Presbyterian Church, Aledo, Illinois
Current student at MBBC
Future student of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary www.gpts.edu | | The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan Riese For This Useful Post: | | 
10-12-2009, 10:09 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Lake Zurich, Illinois
Posts: 438
Thanks: 93
Thanked 130 Times in 81 Posts
| | |
The young man seems to be having his eyes opened by God and should join the PCA.
__________________
Alan Hughes
PCA
Lake Zurich, Illinois
If you think I'm a Hyper-Calvinist, God planned that thought before the foundation of the Earth. If you try to tell me that God only planned some things and not all things, then your problem is with God not me.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Spinningplates2 For This Useful Post: | | 
10-12-2009, 10:21 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Bordentown, NJ, 08505
Posts: 948
Thanks: 229
Thanked 611 Times in 297 Posts
| | |
Why are you all assuming that a PCA church automatically equals sound doctrine? What if he ends up in one that is sliding into- or fully in- FV?
__________________
Lynnie
PCA
Central NJ
| 
10-12-2009, 10:52 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Posts: 262
Thanks: 73
Thanked 85 Times in 59 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks I need some advice and wisdom on a situation for a person...
Apparently, this person is contemplating moving from being a Baptist (of the Southern Baptist variety) to the PCA. He feels he can no longer be a Baptist with his beliefs regarding the following: ecclesiology (he affirms eldership and the presbyterian form of gov't), hermeneutics (he affirms covenantal theology), the Lord's Supper (he affirms a real spiritual presence), and those who are invited to the Lord's Supper (he does NOT feel as though only those who have been baptized by immersion are the only ones allowed to the table).
Of course, his question centers around infant baptism. From what I understand, he is now at the point to of saying that infant baptism is ok, but that believing parents probably should (but it is not mandatory) baptize their infant children.
He is a MDIV student, but not an ordained SBC minister yet. He would probably pursue PCA ordination eventually.
I believe his question centers around this: due to his beliefs on infant baptism right now, is that enough to "not make him a Southern Baptist"? He realizes that most likely presbyteries would want him to affirm that believing parents MUST baptize their children. So, I believe he feels as though he is in limbo (not of the Catholic kind!) because he affirms more than Southern Baptists are comfortable with, but not all the way of what Presbyterians are comfortable with.
What advice can I give to this young man?
Thanks! | He definitely sounds more Presbyterian that Baptist. Like others who have commented, I have made a similar journey from broadly evangelical to reformed. The PCA, as solid as it is in general, is not the only reformed confessing denomination out there. He definitely should consider attending a PCA, or other reformed, church. Have him check out the NAPARC (North American Presbyterian and Reformed Council) website to find a reformed church near him. The NAPARC is an association of reformed churches that enjoy a certain amount of comity and association based on holding to the Reformed confessions (Belgic, Heidelberg, Westminster). -----Added 10/12/2009 at 09:52:41 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnie Why are you all assuming that a PCA church automatically equals sound doctrine? What if he ends up in one that is sliding into- or fully in- FV? | He could always join the OPC...
__________________
Carl Gobelman
Long Grove Community Church (Evangelical)
Vernon Hills, IL
Blog: http://newcreationperson.wordpress.com
"Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come."
| 
10-12-2009, 11:42 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Kingsport, TN
Posts: 216
Thanks: 81
Thanked 59 Times in 23 Posts
| | |
The important thing is not so much where this man is, but the direction he is heading. My advice would be to worship with a Presbyterian body.
__________________
Timothy
Member, PCA
Kingsport, TN
| 
10-12-2009, 01:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Bordentown, NJ
Posts: 334
Thanks: 165
Thanked 140 Times in 65 Posts
| | |
I do not know what his future would be in the SBC. What I can say, speaking as a baptist who is a PCA member and who went through the training course for ruling eldership at my church, is that he will not be ordained to any kind of eldership in the PCA, ruling or teaching, unless he is definitively paedobaptist. Believing infant baptism is "OK" but believer baptism is preferable won't fly. So he needs to make study and consideration of this subject a priority in his life in order to determine where he belongs.
__________________
Mark Hettler
PCA
Central NJ
God answers prayers in one of two ways: "Yes," or "I have something better."
| 
10-12-2009, 01:50 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: wi
Posts: 6,242
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 1,813 Times in 1,147 Posts
| | |
I would suggest that he do some learning on infant baptism from reliable and knowledgeable resources. If he's just not convinced about it, I don't see how he can go down the Presby path.
| 
10-12-2009, 06:34 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 729
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by lynnie Why are you all assuming that a PCA church automatically equals sound doctrine? What if he ends up in one that is sliding into- or fully in- FV? | I don't think that assumption is being made. PCA is referenced because of the original post.
__________________
Brian Eschen
Ruling Elder, PCA
Pleasanton, California
| 
10-13-2009, 11:40 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 7 Posts
| | |
I appreciate evryone's feedback and prayers for this young man. He is genuinely searching.
Do any of you have any recommended books specifically for him to look with regards to infant baptism, on both sides of the issue? I have done some searches in threads, but would like personal recommendations from those who have posted here, knowing the situation.
Thanks!
| 
10-13-2009, 12:04 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 36 Posts
| |
There is a book that just came out that has contributions from Sinclair Ferguson and Bruce Ware. Dr. Ferguson taking the paedo side and Dr. Ware the credo side. | 
10-13-2009, 12:29 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,115
Thanks: 2,781
Thanked 2,445 Times in 1,225 Posts
| |
A list of resources on infant baptism was recently posted on the Heidelblog. See here: Online Resources on Infant-Baptism Heidelblog | | The Following User Says Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post: | | 
10-13-2009, 12:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vidalia, GA
Posts: 107
Thanks: 31
Thanked 56 Times in 26 Posts
| |
On a whole, your comments assume a narrow opposition within the SBC to everything mentioned below, like strict, anti-reformed confessionalism - that's simply isn't the case. Most of the issues here are no bar to fellowship within the SBC. Infant baptism is. But other than that the SBC is a large association of Baptist churches with a large variety of views on a whole host of issues. Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks He feels he can no longer be a Baptist with his beliefs regarding the following: ecclesiology (he affirms eldership and the presbyterian form of gov't), | Historically, Southern Baptists affirmed a plurality of elders in the local church. Single elder churches are a product of the 20th century. Today there are a number of elder-led and elder-ruled SB churches. Of course these churches are independent and autonomous answering to no higher ecclesiastical court, which is where we part with our Presbyterian brethren. Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks hermeneutics (he affirms covenantal theology), | Dispensationalism is not exclusively a Baptist issue. Nor is it representative of historic Baptist theology. And there is certainly no inconsistency in affirming CT and being a SB (many do) so long as this doesn't lead him to conclude that infant baptism is legitimate. Then he'd be clearly out of the Baptist camp. Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks the Lord's Supper (he affirms a real spiritual presence), | Again historically Baptists have affirmed the Reformed view of the Supper. The Baptist Confession affirms it. John Gill affirmed it. Many SB affirm it today. Myself included. This certainly isn't antithetical to being a Baptist. Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks and those who are invited to the Lord's Supper (he does NOT feel as though only those who have been baptized by immersion are the only ones allowed to the table). | Neither did John Bunyan! The Baptist Confession is silent on this issue of closed/open communion for this reason. It's up to the individual SB baptist churches. A majority of SB churches today only require that one be a regenerate believer in good standing with an evangelical church. This is another issue that is not inconsistent with Baptistic faith and order. Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks Of course, his question centers around infant baptism. From what I understand, he is now at the point to of saying that infant baptism is ok, but that believing parents probably should (but it is not mandatory) baptize their infant children. | This is THE issue. And it doesn't sound like he positively affirms it as much as he's just saying its not wrong. Here is where he needs to concentrate. The book recommended above is a great start. And if he comes to the conviction that infant baptism is not biblical, then there's no reason he'd have to leave the SBC. Though, as Baptists, our identity isn't so much tied up in being SOUTHERN Baptists as many might think. Our focus in on the local church. The SBC is simply an association of churches. It has no power over the member churches. All SBC churches are independent and autonomous. If the SBC disappeared tomorrow, it wouldn't affect our church in the least. We'd only need to determine where to sent 10% of our funds that go to missions.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to C. M. Sheffield For This Useful Post: | | 
10-13-2009, 02:48 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 7 Posts
| | |
Brother Sheffield,
Thanks for your thoughtful response. He and I have been over several of those points, and I think he would consider himself a stanch reformed baptist.
One clarification...and this is something myself and the young man have talked about before, but the BFM2000 does state that baptist is a prerequisite for the Lord's Supper (with the understanding that it is adult immersion baptism):
VII. Baptism and the Lord's Supper
Christian baptism is the immersion of a believer in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. It is an act of obedience symbolizing the believer's faith in a crucified, buried, and risen Saviour, the believer's death to sin, the burial of the old life, and the resurrection to walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus. It is a testimony to his faith in the final resurrection of the dead. Being a church ordinance, it is prerequisite to the privileges of church membership and to the Lord's Supper.
Admittedly, most local SBC churches do not adhere to this (almost none of the SBC churches I have served did). It is not binding on the local congregation, so each can choose their own path.
I just wanted to point that out, because I was not aware of it concerning the BFM2000 until a few years ago.
Thanks again for your input.
| 
10-21-2009, 03:56 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 44
Thanks: 1
Thanked 17 Times in 7 Posts
| | |
Thanks everyone for the help. This young man has started reading some of the books you all suggested.
He is now at the point of affirming believer's baptism (credobaptism), but still prefers presbyterian form of government.
Any denominational suggestions I can give him that you know of? I cannot think of a denomination with that mixture. Probably the closest thing for him would be a Reformed Baptist denomination (like ARBCA), but I do not think their polity would be classified anywhere near "presbyterian."
Suggestions?
| 
10-21-2009, 04:10 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 25
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| | |
It's my experience with PCA churches that generally, they require officers to hold to the WS, but that they don't require the members to do so. To the degree that a member is more Baptistic, they are encouraged to at least hear the church out on why they baptize infants, but they would never require it.
I don't see anything here that would disqualify this friend from serving as an officer in the PCA. (I might have missed something.)
__________________
Christopher Taylor
Ruling Elder: Village Seven (PCA)
Colorado Springs, CO
| 
10-21-2009, 04:12 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: May 2009 Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 241
Thanks: 77
Thanked 86 Times in 54 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks Thanks everyone for the help. This young man has started reading some of the books you all suggested.
He is now at the point of affirming believer's baptism (credobaptism), but still prefers presbyterian form of government.
Any denominational suggestions I can give him that you know of? I cannot think of a denomination with that mixture. Probably the closest thing for him would be a Reformed Baptist denomination (like ARBCA), but I do not think their polity would be classified anywhere near "presbyterian."
Suggestions? | Professor,
I wish I knew of some Reformed Baptist churches in the New Orleans area that he could check out. I don't think that there are any. Sorry I couldn't be of more assistance.
__________________ John Lanier Elder in Training
Reformed Baptist Church
Topeka, KS | 
10-21-2009, 04:15 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vidalia, GA
Posts: 107
Thanks: 31
Thanked 56 Times in 26 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks He is now at the point of affirming believer's baptism (credobaptism), but still prefers presbyterian form of government.
Any denominational suggestions I can give him that you know of? I cannot think of a denomination with that mixture. Probably the closest thing for him would be a Reformed Baptist denomination (like ARBCA), but I do not think their polity would be classified anywhere near "presbyterian."
Suggestions? | I would first recommend ARBCA of course.
However, I know that the Free Presbyterian Church of North America is neutral on the issue of baptism. Which isn't the same as being Baptistic but that's probably as close as you'll get.
The negative with them is that the're somewhat fundamentalist in their views and practices which might not be what your friend is looking for.
| 
10-21-2009, 04:22 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,597
Thanks: 1,681
Thanked 1,905 Times in 1,047 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PMBrooks I appreciate evryone's feedback and prayers for this young man. He is genuinely searching.
Do any of you have any recommended books specifically for him to look with regards to infant baptism, on both sides of the issue? I have done some searches in threads, but would like personal recommendations from those who have posted here, knowing the situation.
Thanks! | From the Credo only side I would encourage him to read a few books.
Fred Malone's The Baptism of Disciples Alone. The Baptism of Disciples Alone
Thomas Schrieiner's book Believer's Baptism
Alan Conner's book Covenant Children Today. Covenant Children Today - Reformed Baptist Academic Press
Concering Covenant Theology form a Credo Position I would recommend Nehemiah Coxe's book Covenant Theology From Adam to Christ. Covenant Theology - Reformed Baptist Academic Press | 
10-21-2009, 06:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,860
Thanks: 904
Thanked 834 Times in 476 Posts
| | |
Baptism in the Early Church by Stander and Louw
The Divine Covenants by A. W. Pink
__________________ Conscience may lash us, but it cannot replenish a languishing life. Conscience may be God's word and minister to you, telling you of your faults and your follies and your destitution. It may point out, but it will never supply you. Christ must give you new life. Hart has well expressed it: "He to the feeble and the faint, His mighty aid makes known; and when their languid life is spent, supplies it with His own." - J. K. Popham
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |