» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 129 | | 47 members and 82 guests | | alb1, Andres, austinww, Bern, CalvinandHodges, calvinich, cbryant, Chippy, Curt, David, DD2009, dgordonwood, gene_mingo, Gord, Grillsy, jlynn, johnbugay, KS_Presby, LeeJUk, markkoller, Matthias, Montanablue, NateLanning, PactumServa72, PuritanCovenanter, R. Scott Clark, Re4mdant, SolaSaint, Southern Presbyterian, SteppingHeavenward, Susanna, Timothy William, TimV, VictorBravo, Wayne, William Price | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
10-27-2009, 05:27 AM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,579
Thanks: 1,671
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,045 Posts
| | | Am I missing something or did the Pope really do this.
R. Martin Snyder You are not real churches, Pope tells Protestants - World - brisbanetimes.com.au You are not real churches says Pope....
Wow, I am dismayed how the media has deleted most of their articles on the Popes declaration that anything outside of the Catholic Church can be called an ecclesia. (the church of God). I just googled the story that took precedence a few months ago and they are mostly gone. Wow, That is weird since it was such a big story then. I am not usually a paranoid anti-anything person but this is weird. The Pope made a lot of people mad back then with this declaration and it is basically gone from the news. What happened?
| | The Following User Says Thank You to PuritanCovenanter For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 06:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 1,425
Thanks: 556
Thanked 317 Times in 205 Posts
| | |
Ya Randy, I remember this from 2007 and thinking, wow, what a things to say. However, as I have become more familiar with church history, as I am sure you are, I thought, well, thats of course the natural progression based upon the council of Trent and if they are consistent then that has to be their position.
It is kinda spooky that there is omissions of articles concerning this statement, as it is quite newsworthy I would think to the secular community.
| 
10-27-2009, 06:43 AM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,934
Thanks: 2,001
Thanked 3,291 Times in 1,651 Posts
| | |
I have no problem with Papa Ratzi saying this. As Michael indicated, the RCC is just being consistent with what they believe. It helps to further sharpen the lines of distinction between us. That is a good thing.
| | The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Herald For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 07:32 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Mason, MI
Posts: 980
Thanks: 136
Thanked 91 Times in 60 Posts
| |
I just checked it out on my current favorite browser, Bing , and found lots of references to the pope saying that protestant churches are not real churches. He believes that a bishop in apostolic succession is essential for an ecclesial community to be a real church.
That is also what is behind his current outreach to Anglo Catholics.
__________________
Thomas Yeutter,
Mason, MI
Member St. Patrick's Anglican Church, Comstock, MI
Ezra 7:10 For Ezra had set his heart to study the law of the Lord and to do it and to teach its statues in Isreal.
| 
10-27-2009, 09:31 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Hammondsville, Ohio
Posts: 341
Thanks: 38
Thanked 93 Times in 50 Posts
| | |
This sentiment isn't new with the current pope - it's been around forever. I remember as a child when my Catholic stepmother informed me that the Catholic church was the "true church" just before I was forced into years of unwilling attendence at said "church". I've seen her and other family members sit in Protestant services with sneers on their faces and have seen children from a Catholic homeschool group run wild in a Baptist church while their parents did nothing to rein them in. A Catholic friend of my dh is constantly making a certain disparaging remark about our pastor (it's just a matter of time before I explode in his face over it). This is a belief that is ingrained into the Catholic soul.
__________________
Sue Scott
First Evangelical Presbyterian Church - PCA
East Liverpool Ohio
| | The Following User Says Thank You to SueS For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 09:49 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,421
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 1,061 Times in 599 Posts
| | |
Sue's right. This slur has been around forever; I was taught it in Catholic school in the '50s.
Margaret
__________________
Margaret
Free Church of Scotland [Continuing]
Michigan "The LORD thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing." Zephaniah 3:17 | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Galatians220 For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 09:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,301
Thanks: 921
Thanked 1,261 Times in 675 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter R. Martin Snyder You are not real churches, Pope tells Protestants - World - brisbanetimes.com.au You are not real churches says Pope....
Wow, I am dismayed how the media has deleted most of their articles on the Popes declaration that anything outside of the Catholic Church can be called an ecclesia. (the church of God). I just googled the story that took precedence a few months ago and they are mostly gone. Wow, That is weird since it was such a big story then. I am not usually a paranoid anti-anything person but this is weird. The Pope made a lot of people mad back then with this declaration and it is basically gone from the news. What happened? |
This bothers me, too, in the sense that by deleting articles mentioning the Pope's true position of the RCC, the media is actually helping the RCC accomplish their agenda of reuniting all faiths under the control of the RCC.
I recently spent some time looking on the Vatican website and reading about the Pontifical Council for promoting Christian Unity. While it states its purpose is to promote unity among churches and dialogue with the WCC (World Council of Churches), the Pope is making comments such as the one referenced above that none of the other churches in the world are the true church. It's ultimate goal (if you talk to RCC priests) is to reunite all the churches under the RCCs control. What I find very interesting is that the RCC is not a member of the WCC. If they think they are the one true church, then why would they?
__________________ J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27 Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/ | 
10-27-2009, 10:27 AM
|  | Snow Miser | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 3,313
Thanks: 313
Thanked 1,413 Times in 741 Posts
| | |
That's ok, I don't mind him saying that.
__________________ Andrew DeShazo
Husband of Kathryn 
Father of Phillip-Giles B. DeShazo 
Deacon Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Memphis, TN
"From out of the depth of unbroken Infinfity arose the Question, "Who am I?" And to that Question there is the answer, "I am God!" -Meher Baba, died 1969.
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." Christ, died 33 AD, ressurected three days later.
| 
10-27-2009, 10:46 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: West Mifflin, PA
Posts: 121
Thanks: 32
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
| |
I don't know that anyone is deleting such articles. But I do agree that it's a good thing that the lines are being drawn more sharply.
Here is the "question and answer" from the original document: Quote:
FIFTH QUESTION
Why do the texts of the Council and those of the Magisterium since the Council not use the title of “Church” with regard to those Christian Communities born out of the Reformation of the sixteenth century?
RESPONSE
According to Catholic doctrine, these Communities do not enjoy apostolic succession in the sacrament of Orders, and are, therefore, deprived of a constitutive element of the Church. These ecclesial Communities which, specifically because of the absence of the sacramental priesthood, have not preserved the genuine and integral substance of the Eucharistic Mystery cannot, according to Catholic doctrine, be called “Churches” in the proper sense.
| Here is the original document: Responses to Some Questions Regarding Certain Aspects of the Doctrine on the Church
Here also is some official "commentary": Commentary on Responsa ad quaestiones
And of course, Ratzinger's own comment on this: Address to the members of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
__________________
John Bugay
City Reformed PCA, Pittsburgh, PA http://reformation500.wordpress.com
-- And the sphere of a creature's knowledge, be it that of an infant, or of a man, or of a philosopher, or of a prophet, or of saint or archangel in heaven, will float as a point of light athwart the bosom of that God who is the infinite Abyss for ever. From A.A. Hodge, "Evangelical Theology," pg 16.
| 
10-27-2009, 11:29 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Melbourne Beach, FL
Posts: 582
Thanks: 217
Thanked 134 Times in 97 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Herald I have no problem with Papa Ratzi saying this. As Michael indicated, the RCC is just being consistent with what they believe. It helps to further sharpen the lines of distinction between us. That is a good thing. |
Exactly. And the distinctions between the us and the RCC are real and important. For a lot of years these important distinctions were ignored and there was a zeitgeist of foggy ecunemicism and a vapid, shallow theology permeating Christianity.
Add an apparent resurgence of Calvinism with the Southern Baptists (with much thanks to Al Mohler's courage) and even in the popular press with Time magazine's recent article, we may be on the brink of a new reformation. I even hear complaints from my students about the lack of good biblical teaching in their churches and that they would prefer attending a more biblically and Christ centered church.
I hope that the "ecumenical movement" will meet its demise and go down as a failed social experiment (along with political correctness, diversity and multiculturalism) 3. The New Calvinism - 10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now - TIME
__________________
Michael Masztal
Ruling Elder, Chapel By The Sea, ARP
Melbourne Beach, FL
| | The Following User Says Thank You to MMasztal For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 12:51 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 881
Thanks: 387
Thanked 209 Times in 133 Posts
| | |
This was always the Catholic Church's view until Vatican II, when they changed their tune and decided that Protestants were partial churches with partial sacraments. Ever since Benny here became Pope, he's been doing everything in his power to convince Catholics that Vatican II never happened.
__________________
Austin
EE student at Texas State University
Member of Church of the Cross (PCA) in San Marcos, TX
Ps. 8:3-4 "When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which thou hast ordained; What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?"
| 
10-27-2009, 02:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Woodinville, WA
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | |
I don't think anyone should be surprised by this kind of thing. Talk to any Catholic who knows what his church believes, and he will claim that it was not until the sixteenth century that anyone denied the role of apostolic succession as a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for valid ordination.
Perhaps one of our resident experts on all things Roman could point us to some statements of the early church fathers to refute this claim? I'm not a patristics scholar (nor do I play one on TV), but I seem to remember coming across refutations before, and I'm sure someone like John Bugay could produce them practically from memory.
__________________
Rev. Jason J. Stellman, M.Div.
Minister of the Word and Sacraments
Exile Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Woodinville, WA
| 
10-27-2009, 02:33 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,501
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,535 Times in 1,715 Posts
| | |
I like things as sharply delineated as possible. With the squishy middle going for the Evangelicals and Catholics Together, it is kind of nice to remember that there ARE differences between us and Rome.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following User Says Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 02:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,421
Thanks: 1,961
Thanked 1,061 Times in 599 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by austinww Ever since Benny here became Pope, he's been doing everything in his power to convince Catholics that Vatican II never happened. | Cool. No Vatican II...  That would mean that guitar masses never happened (  ), we never ditched our chapel caps, nuns didn't suddenly become "Sister Bob" and "Sister Marie Frank," priests didn't *all* become "funny Father Ed," all of those ad nauseam arguments about whether a mass that happened to start at 3:59:20 p.m. on Saturday could "count" for Sunday were figments of sick imaginations, etc., etc. The "In Search Of..." segment about "the world's shortest mass that included a homily" that my brother and I tried to cook up never happened. The Saturday night Vegas nights, the writing-our-own-vows-at-our-weddings nonsense: all not true; the Nine First Fridays and the Ten First Saturdays and novenas: all still around for the "hocus pocus" crowd to enjoy.
I'd be fine with all that. And I'd still be so gone from the RCC!
Margaret
| | The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Galatians220 For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 04:21 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: West Mifflin, PA
Posts: 121
Thanks: 32
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason J. Stellman Talk to any Catholic who knows what his church believes, and he will claim that it was not until the sixteenth century that anyone denied the role of apostolic succession as a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for valid ordination.
Perhaps one of our resident experts on all things Roman could point us to some statements of the early church fathers to refute this claim? I'm not a patristics scholar (nor do I play one on TV), but I seem to remember coming across refutations before, and I'm sure someone like John Bugay could produce them practically from memory. | Jason, since my name came up, I'd say that you have allowed the Catholics to frame this issue in an improper way. Please keep in mind that the early Christian writers meant a particular thing when they talked about "apostolic succession," and that, as Calvin said, "Satan, in the papacy, has polluted everything God had appointed for our salvation." It is true in this case as well. Rome has polluted what was once a right doctrine of apostolic succession.
| 
10-27-2009, 04:57 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: West Mifflin, PA
Posts: 121
Thanks: 32
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason J. Stellman Perhaps one of our resident experts on all things Roman could point us to some statements of the early church fathers to refute this claim? | Here again is the Roman Catholic claim: Quote: |
According to Catholic doctrine, these Communities do not enjoy apostolic succession in the sacrament of Orders, and are, therefore, deprived of a constitutive element of the Church.
| Ii is interesting that neither Berkhof nor Reymond "refutes this (Roman) claim" with "statements of the early church fathers."
Berkhof simply says (580): Quote: |
This (Roman Catholic Episcopal System) pretends to comprrise, not only successors of the apostles, but also a successor to Peter, ... This system also conflicts with Scripture, which recognizes no such primacy of Peter as that on which the system is built, and distinctly recognizes the voice of the people in ecclesiastical affairs. Moreover, the claim of the Roman Catholic Church, that there has been an unbroken line of succession from the time of Peter down to the present day, is contradicted by history. The papal system is, both exegetically and historically, untenable (bold emphasis added).
| And Reymond (906): Quote: |
As for the claim of the Roman Catholic Church and other episcopal church bodies that their authority has come to them through an unbroken line of succession from the apostles themselves down to the present, it is enough to say, first, that such a claim is simply unsupported by history and not verifiable, and second, that even were such an unbroken succession true in some instance, such episcopal succession per se would convey no particular authority or guarantee apostolicity by one so graced. Mere unbroken apostolic succession is not the New Testament criterion for ministerial authority (bold emphasis added).
| | 
10-27-2009, 05:05 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | |
Ratzinger is an old school pope. The statement isn't surprising at all.
I don't consider the Roman church to be a "real church" either. If the gospel is not being preached and false sacraments being administered, I don't see how it can be anything but a synagogue of satan.
I am not saying that a person cannot come to Christ in a RCC (and I know of someone who did). This is the exception, not the rule. And there were Christians even in Sardis.
| | The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Marrow Man For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 06:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Montgomery Village, MD
Posts: 836
Thanks: 396
Thanked 319 Times in 154 Posts
| |
It might seem new because John Paul II didn't say it but ask any Catholic and they would tell you they are the one "true faith." Because after all Jesus told Peter.....I guess they miss the part about also being called the devil...
__________________ Frank Under Care
P.C.A.
Maryland | 
10-27-2009, 07:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 465
Thanked 185 Times in 116 Posts
| | |
__________________
Bert Mulder
Elder of the First Protestant Reformed Church of Edmonton
Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | The Following User Says Thank You to BertMulder For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 09:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,301
Thanks: 921
Thanked 1,261 Times in 675 Posts
| | |
For what it's worth, I googled articles on this topic and found messages such as "Article has been deleted".
| 
10-27-2009, 09:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,501
Thanks: 452
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaldwin For what it's worth, I googled articles on this topic and found messages such as "Article has been deleted". | Gasp! Conspiracy! Get ready for the next Dan Brown book.
__________________
Ewen
1689 LBCF
Assemblies of God Bible College 
Singapore
| 
10-27-2009, 09:43 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 279
Thanks: 85
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaldwin For what it's worth, I googled articles on this topic and found messages such as "Article has been deleted". | Might just because they were from services like the AP. Content syndicated often expires on the web after an alloted period.
__________________
Jake; Hold to Original WCF, member of SBC; Greater Atlanta, Georgia Area The cross does not give us a minor shift or two with regard to a few of our ethical and moral and religious values; the cross radically disrupts the very center and citadel of your life from self to Christ. —Albert N. Martin
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Jake For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 09:47 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Browns Mills NJ
Posts: 2,323
Thanks: 619
Thanked 703 Times in 405 Posts
| |
Maybe Ratzi is using Benny Hinn's publicist to clean up the loose ends  .
__________________
Rich Koster
1689'er
Browns Mills NJ USA Often Goofy Reformed Eccentric
Romans 7:14-25
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Rich Koster For This Useful Post: | | 
10-27-2009, 11:04 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Koster Maybe Ratzi is using Benny Hinn's publicist to clean up the loose ends  . | Rich, that may me fall over laughing! | 
10-27-2009, 11:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
| | |
I remember the pope saying this, just a few months ago.
The Roman Catholic Church has never changed its position on this. For them, Protestant churches are not true churches of Christ. It's no surprise that Ratzi has reiterated this position.
It's just another demonstration of just how truly awful and pointless the "Evangelicals and Catholics Together" document was, back in the '90s. Just become some RC official signed it, doesn't mean he actually meant it.
Makes me want to ask J. I. Packer and Charles Colson, "So, guys, how's that ECT thing workin' out for ya?"
The RC Church has always seen it's ultimate goal as bringing all Christians, of whatever denomination, under the thumb of Rome, which sees itself as the only true Christian church.
If I remember rightly, at about the same time that ECT was being signed by the RC guys, the RC church was also concluding a similar pact with Hindus, I think. I have no doubt that the RC church guy who signed that one didn't mean it, either...
| 
10-27-2009, 11:49 PM
|  | Norseman Moderator | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 10,579
Thanks: 1,671
Thanked 1,901 Times in 1,045 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover
If I remember rightly, at about the same time that ECT was being signed by the RC guys, the RC church was also concluding a similar pact with Hindus, I think. I have no doubt that the RC church guy who signed that one didn't mean it, either... |
I didn't know that. A similar pact with Hindus? I don't get it. At least the doctrine of the Trinity is kept in tact between Protestants and Roman Catholics. What does Hinduism have to do with the Trinity?
| 
10-28-2009, 12:00 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 881
Thanks: 387
Thanked 209 Times in 133 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover
If I remember rightly, at about the same time that ECT was being signed by the RC guys, the RC church was also concluding a similar pact with Hindus, I think. I have no doubt that the RC church guy who signed that one didn't mean it, either... |
I didn't know that. A similar pact with Hindus? I don't get it. At least the doctrine of the Trinity is kept in tact between Protestants and Roman Catholics. What does Hinduism have to do with the Trinity? | Well, they do have a triad that stems from one god-being of sorts, but I would hope Rome would have more sense than to equate a pagan triad with the Christian Trinity. Not going to put money on it, though.
| 
10-28-2009, 12:50 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 373
Thanked 707 Times in 345 Posts
| | |
I don't see why this surprises anyone. If the RCC has a different gospel, then they would look at the true gospel as being a different gospel, even as we look at the doctrines the RCC holds as being a different gospel (even if some do find faith in the real gospel through them inadequately teaching what they really believe).
__________________
Brian Withnell
Deacon, OPC
Leesburg, Virginia
You cannot train for war in the midst of a battle. Prepare before the battle starts; if the battle is long and hard, you will wish you had.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Brian Withnell For This Useful Post: | | 
10-28-2009, 05:01 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 579
Thanks: 226
Thanked 214 Times in 119 Posts
| | |
The 'ecumenical', Qu'ran-kissing, Baptist delegate-having papacy of John Paul II blurred the official position of the Roman Catholic Church on Protestant churches/communions for a lot of people -- including many Roman Catholics. Benedict is just restating that sobering position, which Vatican II did not negate, in-keeping with the 'neo-traditionalism' (allowing for the Latin Mass again, cracking down on the liberal/homosexual cultures dominating American seminaries and religious orders, etc.) of his papacy.
The Roman Catholic ECT'ers were/are definitely dyed-in-the-wool John Paul II people. The late Richard John Neuhaus consistently referred to the late pope as 'John Paul the Great' in the pages of his magazine.
__________________
Nathan Tyler
Reformed Baptist
University of Toronto (Student: Hons. B.A. in Philosophy)
Ontario, Canada 1689'er http://nathantyler.wordpress.com | | The Following User Says Thank You to Reformed Thomist For This Useful Post: | | 
10-28-2009, 08:29 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 603
Thanks: 312
Thanked 130 Times in 88 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by ewenlin Quote:
Originally Posted by JBaldwin For what it's worth, I googled articles on this topic and found messages such as "Article has been deleted". | Gasp! Conspiracy! Get ready for the next Dan Brown book. | It does sound pure conspiracy theorist.
However, a few years back I was in the habit of catching the crack-of-dawn BBC radio 4 news (I stopped because I grew to hate having my waking thoughts infiltrated)
Once or twice I heard items that cast a questionable light of some sort on the church of Rome. I expected to hear more on the later bulletins, but....nothing. The stories sank without trace.
This happened often enough that I began taking notice, even eventually noted one or two down in my diary, but of course I have no comprehensive record so it remains anecdotal! It did happen though.
The highly respected Daily Telegraph, also, has a largely RC senior editorial staff and that fact is strongly reflected in its reporting.
I hear there have been major scandals in the US over child abuse in Catholic dioceses....? If you read the Telegraph you would not really know it!
__________________ JennyG
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Fife, Scotland | | The Following User Says Thank You to JennyG For This Useful Post: | | 
10-28-2009, 12:03 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: West Mifflin, PA
Posts: 121
Thanks: 32
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover Makes me want to ask J. I. Packer and Charles Colson, "So, guys, how's that ECT thing workin' out for ya?" | | 
10-28-2009, 10:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 3,237
Thanks: 5
Thanked 579 Times in 328 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by johnbugay Quote:
Originally Posted by bookslover Makes me want to ask J. I. Packer and Charles Colson, "So, guys, how's that ECT thing workin' out for ya?" |  | Yeah. Frankly, Packer and Colson got rolled...
| 
10-28-2009, 11:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 569
Thanks: 344
Thanked 105 Times in 67 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter R. Martin Snyder You are not real churches, Pope tells Protestants - World - brisbanetimes.com.au You are not real churches says Pope....
Wow, I am dismayed how the media has deleted most of their articles on the Popes declaration that anything outside of the Catholic Church can be called an ecclesia. (the church of God). I just googled the story that took precedence a few months ago and they are mostly gone. Wow, That is weird since it was such a big story then. I am not usually a paranoid anti-anything person but this is weird. The Pope made a lot of people mad back then with this declaration and it is basically gone from the news. What happened? | The Pope's Canadian Apologist Michael Coren said something similiar on his show a few weeks ago. No Evangelical took him to task for that. This seems to be basic Catholic Teaching.
Of course when we Reformed say to Catholics that they are not Christians, we get accused of being judgemental and divisive.
__________________
Jacob Peters
Layman
URC
Toronto
Canada
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |