» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 90 | | 22 members and 68 guests | | austinww, calvinich, dannyhyde, Grillsy, Hamalas, Hippo, Iakobos_1071, Jack K, JoyFullMom, MMasztal, Montanablue, P. F. Pugh, Puritan Scot, PuritanCovenanter, shawnanderson, T.A.G., WAWICRUZ, westminken | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | | |
View Poll Results: What Version is Used in Your Pulpit? | |
KJV
|    | 16 | 17.39% | |
NKJV
|    | 18 | 19.57% | |
ESV
|    | 32 | 34.78% | |
NASB
|    | 12 | 13.04% | |
NIV
|    | 10 | 10.87% | |
NLT
|    | 0 | 0% | |
RSV
|    | 0 | 0% | |
NRSV
|    | 0 | 0% | |
Geneva Bible
|    | 1 | 1.09% | |
Other
|    | 3 | 3.26% |  | 
09-01-2009, 09:53 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | | What is Your Pulpit Bible?
What version does your Pastor (or you yourself) use in the pulpit to preach from and do the Scripture Readings from in Lord's Day Worship?
Also if you feel so inclined let us know why you use a particular translation.
| 
09-01-2009, 10:22 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Valera, Texas
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
| | |
When I first started preaching, I used the KJV. I found it difficult to read from smoothly.
Since I had always enjoyed the literalness of the NASB I started using it.
I then noticed the puzzled looks, people thumbing through their Bibles, looking to the person next to them and shrugging. They were having a hard time keeping up with where I was.
Since I switched to the NKJV, I have found most folks are able to follow along with me regardless of what translation they have.
__________________
Ralph
Pastor
Valera Baptist Church
Valera, Texas
| | The Following User Says Thank You to busdriver72 For This Useful Post: | | 
09-01-2009, 10:37 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Denver, NC
Posts: 94
Thanks: 35
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
| | |
Didn't God super-inspire the ESV 8 years ago? Were still using Tyndale, not a big deal.
| 
09-01-2009, 10:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Texas
Posts: 277
Thanks: 100
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
| | |
English Standard Version
| 
09-01-2009, 10:54 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 196
Thanks: 1
Thanked 54 Times in 37 Posts
| | |
I use the ESV when I am teaching and "exhorting". For me, it is just a personal preference. My mentor pastor uses the NIV in the pulpit and in the liturgy. I think at our church it was decided long ago to use the NIV and he didn't want to rock any boats.
__________________
Kenneth Kneip
Member @ New St. Peter's PC (PCA), Dallas TX
Pastoral Intern @ New Covenant PC (PCA), Dallas TX
M. Div. student @ Redeemer Seminary, Dallas TX
| 
09-01-2009, 10:54 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Ft Rucker Al
Posts: 586
Thanks: 58
Thanked 184 Times in 117 Posts
| | |
I prefer the Message and am rather upset it was not included!
__________________
Joseph F Scibbe
Chaplain Assistant
Chapel of Wings Ft Rucker Al
Ephesians 1:4-7, 1 Thessalonians 2:8, Romans 12:1-2
Titus 2:2 - But you, teach what accords with sound doctrine. http://twitter.com/just_joe_scibbe | | The Following User Says Thank You to Unashamed 116 For This Useful Post: | | 
09-01-2009, 11:25 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Monticello, IA
Posts: 6,139
Thanks: 3,622
Thanked 831 Times in 699 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 I prefer the Message and am rather upset it was not included! | You upgraded from the Living Bible you used to use?
__________________
Norm
IA PCA In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will. Ephesians 1:4-5 | 
09-01-2009, 11:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 298
Thanks: 28
Thanked 152 Times in 80 Posts
| | |
KJV. I just purchased the Allen Longprimer, which is very easy to read in the pulpit. I use the KJV because of manuscript preference. If I were to use a newer translation, it would be the NKJV. I prefer to preach from the same translation I usually study from. I do think the ESV is a good translation of the Critical Text.
__________________
Rev. Andy Eppard
Associate Minister
First Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Springfield, MO
| 
09-01-2009, 12:46 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 2,139
Thanks: 325
Thanked 530 Times in 296 Posts
| | |
NKJV. It was the Bible in situ before I arrived at the church. I am happy to retain it because of manuscript/textual preferences, and I find it easier to preach from and more accessible to newcomers than the KJV. No, don't start debating me on the point. That's my opinion, is all.
__________________ Jonathan Hunt
Elder holding forth the word of life at: Cheltenham Evangelical Free Church (Confessionally Based)
Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom Logic is a systematic method of coming to the wrong conclusion with confidence.
-- Thomas Elsworth
| 
09-01-2009, 12:52 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Valera, Texas
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
| |
I'm shocked that NIV was a choice in the list.
Everyone knows that stands for " Non- Inspired Version."  | 
09-01-2009, 12:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: SC
Posts: 3,218
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 576 Times in 430 Posts
| | |
My pastor uses ESV, but I use NKJV.
__________________ soli Deo gloria!
~Nicholas~ Ordained Pastor
Member, Fulton PCA; GPTS Student
Christians are like snow covered dung; it is the purity of the covering which the Father sees. -Luther-
There is nothing more ugly than a Christian orthodoxy without understanding or without compassion.
-Francis Schaeffer-
| 
09-01-2009, 01:02 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Paisley
Posts: 611
Thanks: 260
Thanked 174 Times in 100 Posts
| | |
good news bible :| in all churches of Scotland. Helpful for simple people and children and people whose first language isn't english.
Extremely annoying to read due to the dumbing down of the text. I'd prefer a NIV to it to be honest. ESV would be my first choice though if I could have it.
__________________ Lee Johnston
Church of Scotland (Presbyterian)
Paisley, Scotland Ephesians 1:4-5
"In love he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will."
| 
09-01-2009, 01:16 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
| | | | 
09-01-2009, 01:20 PM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
I use a Thompson-Chain Reference NKJV in the Pulpit that a kindly gentleman here on the PB gave me.
| 
09-01-2009, 01:28 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Conyers, GA
Posts: 88
Thanks: 16
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
| | |
ESV.
I bought myself, my wife, and my oldest son ESVs when we joined the church because of it. Personally, I prefer the NASB and use it for devotion and study. But, between watching my son's confusion trying to follow along in his NIV and listening to my wife begging for the same translation being used from the pulpit... I caved.
| 
09-01-2009, 01:55 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 492
Thanks: 201
Thanked 139 Times in 84 Posts
| | |
Our pastor uses the NIV, where I personally follow along with the ESV.
__________________
Eric
Woodgreen Presbyterian (PCA)
Calgary, Alberta CANADA
| 
09-01-2009, 08:19 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,028
Thanks: 625
Thanked 674 Times in 439 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeJUk good news bible :| in all churches of Scotland. Helpful for simple people and children and people whose first language isn't english.
| In the old days (and my copy is at least 3 decades old) it was considered a paraphrase, not a translation. They have better PR now. It does have the benefits that you've stated.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| 
09-01-2009, 08:35 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 279
Thanks: 85
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
| | |
Pastor uses NIV along with most of the church. Some ESV usage is beginning to arise those.
| 
09-01-2009, 08:37 PM
|  | Drunk with Powder | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 7,100
Thanks: 2,777
Thanked 2,441 Times in 1,223 Posts
| | |
Nasb
| 
09-01-2009, 08:48 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Vernon, CT
Posts: 96
Thanks: 16
Thanked 42 Times in 25 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by wmc1982 Didn't God super-inspire the ESV 8 years ago? Were still using Tyndale, not a big deal. | Naturally. I am an ESV-onlyist. Who needs other versions when you have the give-all, be-all, end-all version in front of your eyes?
My pastor called me a stodgy old man for wanting to discard the NIV's in a certain way.
In all seriousness, I appreciate the ESV very much, and it is what I use both at home and when I preach. I've started to warm up to the NKJV slightly, but not well immersed in it yet.
I became saved in high school reading the Gospels in the Good News version. I then got an ESV, and it was like I was saved all over again ("I never read this before!")
__________________
Mitch
Presbyterian Church of Coventry, CT (PCA)
| 
09-03-2009, 02:12 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Middlebury, VT
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| | |
I'm Complicated, but here's my list
Church I attend: NIV (I don't care for it) Home Church (Grew up there, still a member): NRSV (anything less from a New England UMC would be a shock) Church I attended this summer: NASB (NIV in the pews) Should I survive seminary:I'm an NASB guy through and through now, though the KJV and Geneva are unmatched in poetry.
__________________ Stephen J. Powell Middlebury, VT "Do not let your heart be troubled; believe in God, believe also in Me" John 14:1 (NASB) | 
09-03-2009, 07:26 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
I do find it interesting that the two most common translations are the NKJV and the ESV (not really surprising).
| 
09-03-2009, 07:35 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 1,083
Thanks: 349
Thanked 191 Times in 133 Posts
| |
It seems the older more traditional Southern Baptist preachers prefer the KJV, but the younger prefer the NKJV or the NIV. I personally have switched to the KJV because that is the way i talk.
__________________
Rangerus
Southern Baptist
Austin, TX
Teacher and Volunteer
1689 LBCF & BF&M 2000
| 
09-03-2009, 07:57 AM
|  | Iron Dramatist | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 6,251
Thanks: 247
Thanked 2,368 Times in 1,238 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 I prefer the Message and am rather upset it was not included! | It's not included because it's not a translation. (I take that back.... the NLT made the list, and it's not
really a translation, either. Still, there are very good reasons not to have included The Message, no offense intended)
| 
09-03-2009, 11:57 AM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Johnstown, CO
Posts: 312
Thanks: 141
Thanked 86 Times in 50 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Backwoods Presbyterian I do find it interesting that the two most common translations are the NKJV and the ESV (not really surprising). | I'm surprised in one sense that both are so popular and not in another. Obviously, the KJV has had a historic following and the NKJV builds off that base, but it really doesn't read that naturally when compared to other modern bible translations. I've never really understood why the ESV is so popular. Crossway has done great marketing, but I find it to be an awkwardly revised RSV, especially the OT. The NT is much better, but any translation that claims to be a modern translation and uses a phrase such as "would that" (as in "would that they were baptized . . ." or "at table" could use a little more work. I personally prefer the HCSB. It often gets labeled the baptist translation, but it is translated by committee including many non-baptists. And they have worked hard to translate the text accurately (e.g., John 3:16) instead of caving to tradition.
__________________
Joshua F
Layman
Mountain View Community Church (Missionary Church Denomination)
Johnstown, CO
| 
09-03-2009, 05:08 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Vidalia, GA
Posts: 107
Thanks: 31
Thanked 55 Times in 25 Posts
| |
Since my conversion (in the SBC), I've been in, preached in, and pastored churches that predominately use the King James Version (none KJVOnly). I cut my teeth on it at the age of twelve and have used it ever since. It isn't perfect but it is a great translation unsurpassed in idiomatic beauty. Which I might say, adds a great deal to a church's liturgy. And while many complain about the "thees" and "thous," truth be told, they provide greater gramatical clarity than does contemporary English (e.g. "ye" vs. "you").
My stand-by translation is the ESV. A great translation to be sure. But after 13 years of reading, memorizing and listening to the AV I just can't make the switch. Nor do I feel morally obliged to.
While a great deal of time and ink has been spent debunking the KJV Only argument (and rightfully so), another current has gained strength: one of antipathy towards the AV. The general lack of respect and deference toward a translation that formed the foundation of modern English and much of Western civilization is astounding. When I tell people that I preach from the AV, I get looks as though I'd grown a third eye! It is as though the KJV and KJV-Only have been confused. The KJV should be held among English-speaking Christians with the same respect that Germans revere Luther's Bible.
That's just my -----Added 9/3/2009 at 04:56:32 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ferrell | I Have this Bible! I love it! It's a BEAST! -----Added 9/3/2009 at 05:08:43 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 I prefer the Message and am rather upset it was not included! | I don't believe the Message is a translation in the truest sense of the word. And preaching from it could be harmful to your church. For a fair and objective review of The Message, I would encorage you to check out this Review of The Message by Michael Marlowe.
| 
09-03-2009, 05:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Ukiah, California
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 1,458
Thanked 1,107 Times in 694 Posts
| | |
Pastor uses the NASB but I use the ESV.
| 
09-03-2009, 05:18 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Ft Rucker Al
Posts: 586
Thanks: 58
Thanked 184 Times in 117 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by toddpedlar Quote:
Originally Posted by Unashamed 116 I prefer the Message and am rather upset it was not included! | It's not included because it's not a translation. (I take that back.... the NLT made the list, and it's not
really a translation, either. Still, there are very good reasons not to have included The Message, no offense intended) |
None taken as I was being totally sarcastic.
| 
09-03-2009, 05:36 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Fair Haven, Vermont, USA
Posts: 209
Thanks: 76
Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts
| | |
Before my pastor left he used the NKJV...I have no clue what bible the fill-in guy uses.
__________________
Joshua
Non-Denominational
Fair Haven, Vermont
Romans 1 = Smack to the face about the human condition! 24 O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? 25 I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!
So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin. - Romans 7:24-25 | 
09-03-2009, 05:39 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 22,419
Thanks: 2,913
Thanked 6,136 Times in 2,590 Posts
| | |
The Pastor preaches, teaches, and reads from the KJV. We like the KJV because we believe it's the best English translation.
__________________ Josh Hicks, Chloë's Dad Christ Covenant Reformed Presbyterian Church, RPCGA Facebook - The Calvinist Vent Board Rules - Signature Rules - Suggestion Box It is God that multiplies our sorrows.... God, as a righteous Judge, does it, which ought to silence us under all our sorrows; as many as they are, we have deserved them all, and more: nay, God, as a tender Father, does it for our necessary correction, that we may be humbled for sin, and weaned from the world by all our sorrows; and the good we get by them, with the comfort we have under them, will abundantly balance our sorrows, how greatly soever they are multiplied. - Matthew Henry | 
09-03-2009, 05:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Dayton, TX
Posts: 78
Thanks: 19
Thanked 22 Times in 12 Posts
| |
I use ESV as well. I just bought my first Geneva (for study purposes), and I would love to know which member checked the Geneva in the list above.
__________________
Lee Dodd | Twitter: @LeeDodd
Layperson - FBC Daisetta
Dayton, TX "We must work the works of Him who sent Me as long as it is day; night is coming when no one can work." - John 9:4  | 
09-03-2009, 06:38 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 450
Thanked 798 Times in 284 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by C. M. Sheffield -----Added 9/3/2009 at 04:56:32 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn Ferrell | I Have this Bible! I love it! It's a BEAST! | One of our families visited another church recently. Their teenage son, about 14, commented afterwards, “The preacher didn't read from the Bible.”
Knowing that other congregation, very likely the minister read from a printout of his text, which is certainly acceptable. But, I know their practice is usually not to have the reading of the word as a distinct element of worship. Rather, a single text is read in the course of preaching, with comments interspersed between each segment.
But, I was interested in this young man’s perception of the Bible not being read.
Our practice is to have two readings from the word. The first reading is consecutively taken from the same book each week, with no necessary connection to the other reading or sermon. The other reading from the other testament is from the book being expounded consecutively in the sermon. The congregation hears both testaments regularly and consecutively read.
Use of this large lectern Bible dramatically conveys the fact these readings come from the Word of God, not man’s words. Of course, such is a circumstance of worship, certainly not required. Nevertheless, it lends dignity to the Word read, as a pulpit or raised platform lends dignity to the Word preached.
This is the Cambridge AV lectern Bible. If I a supplying somewhere away from my congregation, where there is no letern Bible, I use my Oxford Longprimer AV.
| 
09-03-2009, 06:51 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,501
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,532 Times in 1,714 Posts
| | |
Our pastor uses the NIV.
I use both the NKJV and ESV. Typically, I carry a NKJV and Greek text to church with me.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Last edited by DMcFadden; 09-03-2009 at 08:48 PM.
| 
09-07-2009, 06:50 AM
|  | Uncommon Denominator | | Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Gambrills, MD
Posts: 11,931
Thanks: 2,000
Thanked 3,289 Times in 1,651 Posts
| | |
The NASB.
| 
09-07-2009, 11:40 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Texas
Posts: 277
Thanks: 100
Thanked 41 Times in 33 Posts
| | |
While I admit that our church currently uses the ESV, I love the KJV.
| 
09-07-2009, 12:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Shelton, WA
Posts: 270
Thanks: 72
Thanked 113 Times in 49 Posts
| |
We're pretty much an ESV-only congregation now. My pastor and I are the true Bible snobs with matching Allan ESV-1's.
__________________ Jacob Mearse
Reformation Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Olympia, WA Student, Reformed Theological Seminary (Virtual)
Lieutenant, U.S. Navy
Husband to April; Daddy to Wesley, Cyrus, FaithMarie and SarahAnn. | 
09-13-2009, 05:35 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Grizzly Flats California
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
| | |
My Pastor used the NASB for years, while I used the NKJV. I used the NASB as one of my references and I liked to study from it now and again but I was a NKJV guy and preached from the NKJV.
Then a while back he started using the ESV. He did not announce it, does not promote it, nor did I discuss it with him. I kept seeing good recommendations for the ESV and I picked up a copy. I am now an ESV guy and preached from it today.
__________________
Eric Paulsen
Preaching Deacon, GFCC - Non-Denominational/Independent
Grizzly Flats, California He must hold firm to the trustworthy word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to rebuke those who contradict it. - Titus 1:9
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |