The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Preaching

Preaching Discussions regarding preaching of the Word

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:11 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 362
Thanks: 32
Thanked 65 Times in 45 Posts
Does the PCA allow ruling elders to preach?

I am relatively new to the PCA. Does the PCA allow for a ruling elder to preach? I guess it must because it is going to happen i my church this week, but is this something that occurs with any regularity? I assumed to preach in worship, one must be ordained.
__________________
Sean Caouette
Independent Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Memphis, Tennessee
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:19 PM
Kevin's Avatar
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Moncton NB Canada
Posts: 4,564
Thanks: 1,572
Thanked 927 Times in 483 Posts
Yes.

Who may preach is under the oversight of the session. And having an RE preach is very common.
__________________
Kevin Rogers
Sovereign Community Church, PCA
Moncton NB
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Kevin For This Useful Post:
caoclan (07-07-2009)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:20 PM
brianeschen's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
__________________
Brian Eschen
Ruling Elder, PCA
Pleasanton, California
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to brianeschen For This Useful Post:
Grillsy (07-07-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:22 PM
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 362
Thanks: 32
Thanked 65 Times in 45 Posts
I have been in my church for 1.5 years and have never seen it happen. What is strange to me is that we have 4 TEs, not sure why they aren't preaching, but they probably have their reasons.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:23 PM
P. F. Pugh's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 368
Thanks: 17
Thanked 120 Times in 76 Posts
Actually, it is a requirement (in many presbyteries) that REs be willing and able to preach if called upon. It is regular preaching that is restricted to teaching elders.
__________________
Philip
Potomac Hills Presbyterian Church (PCA) Leesburg, VA
Attending Reformed Presbyterian Church, Lookout Mountain, GA
Student Covenant College

The Importance of Being Orthodox
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:11 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,061
Thanks: 452
Thanked 869 Times in 397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
This statement is untrue, and is a distinction only pushed with regularity in our circles by high church ministers who would like to promote their particular view of the offices.

The BCO makes no separation between teaching elders, ruling elders, or even licentiates when it comes to the authority of preaching. Furthermore, in every case the BCO rightly employs the term "exhort/exhortation" in accordance with its biblical use, namely, in describing a particular function of preaching, and not as an attempt to make a distinction in levels of authority regarding the message given.

Our authority in preaching comes not from our formal ordination (which is Romanism), but from our accuracy and faithfulness in expounding the Scriptures, and from the power of the Holy Spirit applying the truth of the given message to the heart and to the mind. I have yet to receive a satisfying answer from those who promote this "class distinction" when they are asked whose sermon has more authority - the chump who is ordained, but through laziness and/or theological error puts out a poor sermon, or the formally unordained man who through prayer, diligence in study, and the grace of the Holy Spirit gives an outstanding sermon? I seem to remember that Christ himself was not ordained by the authorities in Jerusalem, and yet the people were amazed, because he "taught them as one having authority, not as the Scribes".

Btw, John Owen makes the same argument in a sermon on the pastoral ministry, so this is nothing original.
__________________
Adam J. Myer
Slated for the Jan. 10th Chaplains Basic Officer Leadership Course
Estacada Christian Church
Sandy, Oregon

Soli Deo Gloria
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Archlute For This Useful Post:
coramdeo (07-08-2009), Josiah (07-08-2009), Kevin (07-07-2009), KMK (07-07-2009), raekwon (07-07-2009)
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:25 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
This is a distinction typically employed in OPC circles. It is incorrect in the PCA, since the entire premise of being licensed to preach is that such licensure applies to those who preach "regularly." Others who preach may do so on an irregular basis.

(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
__________________
Fred Greco
Senior Pastor, Christ Church PCA (Katy, TX)
Christ Church Blog

"The heart is the main thing in true religion...It is the hinge and turning-point in the condition of man's soul. If the heart is alive to God and quickened by the Spirit, the man is a living Christian. If the heart is dead and has not the Spirit, the man is dead before God." (J.C. Ryle)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Berean (07-07-2009), brianeschen (07-07-2009), J. David Kear (07-07-2009), Josiah (07-08-2009), Kevin (07-07-2009), Montanablue (07-07-2009), SRoper (07-08-2009), TimV (07-07-2009)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:35 PM
brianeschen's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pleasanton, California
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 724
Thanked 188 Times in 108 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
This is a distinction typically employed in OPC circles. It is incorrect in the PCA, since the entire premise of being licensed to preach is that such licensure applies to those who preach "regularly." Others who preach may do so on an irregular basis.

(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
Thanks for the info. I had heard this distinction not only from friends, but also at last year's GA in the outgoing moderator's sermon. It seems then that the PCA holds less distinction between teaching and ruling elders than the OPC. Is that accurate?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:38 PM
KMK's Avatar
KMK KMK is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 8,600
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 3,593
Thanked 1,317 Times in 758 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archlute View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
This statement is untrue, and is a distinction only pushed with regularity in our circles by high church ministers who would like to promote their particular view of the offices.

The BCO makes no separation between teaching elders, ruling elders, or even licentiates when it comes to the authority of preaching. Furthermore, in every case the BCO rightly employs the term "exhort/exhortation" in accordance with its biblical use, namely, in describing a particular function of preaching, and not as an attempt to make a distinction in levels of authority regarding the message given.

Our authority in preaching comes not from our formal ordination (which is Romanism), but from our accuracy and faithfulness in expounding the Scriptures, and from the power of the Holy Spirit applying the truth of the given message to the heart and to the mind. I have yet to receive a satisfying answer from those who promote this "class distinction" when they are asked whose sermon has more authority - the chump who is ordained, but through laziness and/or theological error puts out a poor sermon, or the formally unordained man who through prayer, diligence in study, and the grace of the Holy Spirit gives an outstanding sermon? I seem to remember that Christ himself was not ordained by the authorities in Jerusalem, and yet the people were amazed, because he "taught them as one having authority, not as the Scribes".

Btw, John Owen makes the same argument in a sermon on the pastoral ministry, so this is nothing original.
Do you have a citation for this sermon, Mr. Myer? I would love to read it.
__________________


http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/


"Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas


Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:39 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
I believe the PCA refers to it as "exhortation," limiting "preaching" to ordained ministers of the Gospel (Teaching Elders).
This is a distinction typically employed in OPC circles. It is incorrect in the PCA, since the entire premise of being licensed to preach is that such licensure applies to those who preach "regularly." Others who preach may do so on an irregular basis.

(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
Thanks for the info. I had heard this distinction not only from friends, but also at last year's GA in the outgoing moderator's sermon. It seems then that the PCA holds less distinction between teaching and ruling elders than the OPC. Is that accurate?
Yes, that would be accurate. The OPC tends very strongly to a three office view (TE, RE, Deacon), whereas the PCA's BCO is explicitly two-office (elder, deacon). In practice it sometimes works itself out with a greater or lesser distinction, hence the term "two and one half office" view.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
brianeschen (07-07-2009), he beholds (07-07-2009), Montanablue (07-07-2009)
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 06:57 PM
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bordentown, NJ, 08505
Posts: 938
Thanks: 226
Thanked 607 Times in 295 Posts
In my PCA we have always had one or two interns (WTS, PTS, online at Reformed). This year we have three interns. They do various things in the church. We have an evening service with a shorter (20 minutes) sermon and the various interns and REs preach. My husband has an MDiv from WTS but is not an elder (being Baptist excludes him) and preached twice this winter (but not on Baptism ) Thinking back, we had an intern who was in his last year at WTS a couple years ago and he preached on a Sunday AM when the pastor went on vacation, as has another WTS intern. One intern did a Good Friday service that draws some vistors.

My pastor is very into obeying the BCO so I have to assume there must be some provision for letting unordained seminary students have a chance to preach now and then. One of them in particular was excellent. Is this not common in the PCA? I would hope seminary students are offered a pulpit now and then at churches, at least for an evening.
__________________
Lynnie

PCA

Central NJ
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 07:15 PM
Archlute's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sandy, Oregon
Posts: 2,061
Thanks: 452
Thanked 869 Times in 397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK View Post
Do you have a citation for this sermon, Mr. Myer? I would love to read it.
Ken (and, by all means, please feel free to call me Adam!),

You will find it in Owen's sermon The Duty of a Pastor in vol. 9 of his Complete Works. He writes something similar as part of an essay entitled The Duties of Pastor and People Distinguished in vol. 13 of the same, yet addressing a somewhat different issue.

Although I do not have a direct citation for you here, I did notice that I had footnoted p. 454 of vol. 9 in a summary review I had written of several of his works regarding the pastoral ministry, and in particular the issue of preaching authority and ordination, so you may want to begin there.

-----Added 7/7/2009 at 07:15:49 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianeschen View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post

This is a distinction typically employed in OPC circles. It is incorrect in the PCA, since the entire premise of being licensed to preach is that such licensure applies to those who preach "regularly." Others who preach may do so on an irregular basis.

(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
Thanks for the info. I had heard this distinction not only from friends, but also at last year's GA in the outgoing moderator's sermon. It seems then that the PCA holds less distinction between teaching and ruling elders than the OPC. Is that accurate?
Yes, that would be accurate. The OPC tends very strongly to a three office view (TE, RE, Deacon), whereas the PCA's BCO is explicitly two-office (elder, deacon). In practice it sometimes works itself out with a greater or lesser distinction, hence the term "two and one half office" view.
As I am sure Fred is aware, much of that comes from the Dutch Reformed influence found in the OPC. Most of the students arguing for that position during my seminary years were URCNA students, and following upon their heels some of the OPC students. The Belgic confession divides the offices into "minister, elder, and deacon", and it has been a tradition in Dutch churches, from what I understand, to make this distinction that attaches the authority of preaching to formal ordination.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Archlute For This Useful Post:
KMK (07-07-2009), Montanablue (07-07-2009)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 07:16 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Yes, hence the Dutch "domine" title for the minister.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 07:58 PM
TimV's Avatar
Puritanboard Botanist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,461
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,406 Times in 1,137 Posts
Quote:
(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
How does one understand th following?

Quote:
Recommendation No. 4:
That the General Assembly reaffirm the historic Presbyterian position expressed in LC 158, that none should preach the Gospel but those who are called and gifted of God; and therefore only those men who are properly ordained or licensed may preach in the pulpits of the PCA; and that Ruling Elders be allowed and encouraged to renew the historic practice of exhorting the people of God (See Rec. No. 5, paragraph D.). Adopted
__________________
Tim Vaughan
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian, OPC,
Santa Maria
California
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:15 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Tim,

that would be an "in thesi" non binding statment of a GA. It does not have the force of the BCO.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:20 PM
TimV's Avatar
Puritanboard Botanist
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oceano, CA, USA
Posts: 5,461
Thanks: 1,886
Thanked 2,406 Times in 1,137 Posts
Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:32 PM
Edward's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,018
Thanks: 621
Thanked 670 Times in 436 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Tim,

that would be an "in thesi" non binding statment of a GA. It does not have the force of the BCO.
Is that preacher for 'dicta'?
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:34 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Sort of. But it is actually less binding than dicta.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:36 PM
Webservant's Avatar
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Parkville, MD
Posts: 627
Thanks: 167
Thanked 274 Times in 143 Posts
We did it in a former PCA church I attended, sometimes with painful results.
__________________
Rich Brown
Deacon/Webmaster
Aisquith PCA
Parkville, MD
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 08:39 PM
JBaldwin's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pickens, SC
Posts: 3,301
Thanks: 921
Thanked 1,260 Times in 674 Posts
The only time I've seen ruling elders preach in the PCA is when there was no one to fill the pulpit on a given Sunday in absence of the pastor and another ordained man to fill his place. In our church, it is the practice of the elders to teach and exhort, and the TE (pastor) to preach. When our pastor is going to be out, he finds an ordained man from the presbytery to replace him.
__________________
J Baldwin
Keowee Presbyterian Church, PCA
Pickens, SC
“You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself.” Luke 10:27

Check Out My Blog: http://reflectjoy.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 09:37 PM
raekwon's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 198
Thanked 637 Times in 278 Posts
I sure hope so, because I'm expected to stand behind the pulpit and talk for 30-45 minutes 4 out of the next 8 Sundays!

(Our pastor's going on sabbatical, so our intern and I are splitting the preaching duties during that time.)

-----Added 7/7/2009 at 09:37:27 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by caoclan View Post
I assumed to preach in worship, one must be ordained.
It's already been pointed out here that the BCO allows for unordained men to preach, but please keep in mind -- ruling elders are ordained to that office.
__________________
Rae W. | Elder @ Grace Central Presbyterian Church | Columbus, OH
Online presence: blog | twitter | facebook


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raekwon For This Useful Post:
ColdSilverMoon (07-07-2009), Curt (07-07-2009)
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 09:46 PM
ColdSilverMoon's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,020
Thanks: 670
Thanked 836 Times in 392 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by caoclan View Post
I am relatively new to the PCA. Does the PCA allow for a ruling elder to preach? I guess it must because it is going to happen i my church this week, but is this something that occurs with any regularity? I assumed to preach in worship, one must be ordained.
Yes, though I've only seen an RE preach once in 3 decades in the PCA - the rest of the sermons were presented by TEs. Interesting that it's common in some churches, presumably smaller congregations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post

(This is also, by the way, why the dictum that "a woman may do anything an unordained man may do" is wrong on its face. Unordained men may preach in accordance with the BCO.)
I agree with you, Pastor Greco. However, in all the hundreds of PCA services I've attended across the country, I've never heard an unordained man preach. So while technically correct, in practice I doubt unordained men preach in Sunday services very often. In a large church with multiple TEs, I suspect it never happens.
__________________
Mason
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
New York, NY

"Come now, and let us reason together," says the Lord, "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be as wool." - Isaiah 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-07-2009, 10:08 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdSilverMoon View Post

I agree with you, Pastor Greco. However, in all the hundreds of PCA services I've attended across the country, I've never heard an unordained man preach. So while technically correct, in practice I doubt unordained men preach in Sunday services very often. In a large church with multiple TEs, I suspect it never happens.
My guess is that is exactly the case. If I recall correctly, before you were at Redeemer you were are Briarwood, right? It would be unusual for a large church with multiple TEs to use an unordained man (or even an RE for that matter). I don't think there is a subtext there, but rather the Lord has gifted those congregations with the means to call multiple men devoted to preaching the Word.

But in smaller congregations (especially those near seminaries), and in churches without a pastor, it is actually relatively common. That is in fact the reason for the Licensing provision in BCO 19. It is up to Presbyteries to determine what constitutes "regular" - in Great Lakes we decided 12 times in a year, regardless of which church. In Mississippi Valley, I believe it was more than once per month in the same church; the difference being MS Valley has many small churches without pastors, and has a seminary in it (RTS Jackson).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
ColdSilverMoon (07-07-2009)
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:06 PM
SRoper's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 2,031
Thanks: 626
Thanked 146 Times in 69 Posts
Since we've established that the PCA allows both TEs and REs to preach, may I ask why it is that only TEs can administer the sacraments? I can understand the reason from a three-office view (TEs are charged with preaching and the sacraments accompany preaching), but I feel like I'm missing something about the PCA two-office view.
__________________
Scott Roper
Member, Redeemer Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Winston-Salem, NC
scottandjenny.ws
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:18 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRoper View Post
Since we've established that the PCA allows both TEs and REs to preach, may I ask why it is that only TEs can administer the sacraments? I can understand the reason from a three-office view (TEs are charged with preaching and the sacraments accompany preaching), but I feel like I'm missing something about the PCA two-office view.
It is more than just the act of preaching. The sacraments are tied to the ministry of the Word, which is not the primary ministry of the Ruling Elder (hence the difference in terms, "Ruling" vs. "Teaching"). This connection is more systematic (or perhaps, intrinsic) than an individual act of preaching a sermon.

The PCA recognizes that distinction not only in the administration of the sacraments, but in the act of Licensure itself.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
SRoper (07-09-2009)
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:33 PM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
This is why in our OPC church before we called a Pastor the RE's would read sermons from the pulpit rather than preach a sermon however our RE's are very involved in teaching in Bible Studies and other forums. We also have several elder (notice I didn't say "elders" ) women in the Church who have taken on the responsibity of teaching the younger women through weekly Bible studies.
__________________
Wayne Whitmer
Member, Rio Rancho OPC
Albuquerque, NM
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 01:44 PM
fredtgreco's Avatar
Vanilla Westminsterian
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 10,515
Thanks: 333
Thanked 3,493 Times in 1,410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitway View Post
This is why in our OPC church before we called a Pastor the RE's would read sermons from the pulpit rather than preach a sermon however our RE's are very involved in teaching in Bible Studies and other forums. We also have several elder (notice I didn't say "elders" ) women in the Church who have taken on the responsibity of teaching the younger women through weekly Bible studies.
I have to say that here is one reason that I disagree with the three office view. I have been both an RE and a TE. The idea that you must read a sermon because you are not permitted (note I did not say unable) to preach God's Word is ridiculous to me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fredtgreco For This Useful Post:
Archlute (07-08-2009), whitway (07-08-2009)
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2009, 02:11 PM
whitway's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 2,058
Thanks: 913
Thanked 535 Times in 330 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredtgreco View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitway View Post
This is why in our OPC church before we called a Pastor the RE's would read sermons from the pulpit rather than preach a sermon however our RE's are very involved in teaching in Bible Studies and other forums. We also have several elder (notice I didn't say "elders" ) women in the Church who have taken on the responsibity of teaching the younger women through weekly Bible studies.
I have to say that here is one reason that I disagree with the three office view. I have been both an RE and a TE. The idea that you must read a sermon because you are not permitted (note I did not say unable) to preach God's Word is ridiculous to me.
Well when we first started attending it was kinda weird to us as well. Some folks even admitted to skipping out on services because they didn't appreciate the read sermons. I personally haven't really ever studied the 2 office vs 3 office view myself.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69