» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
06-30-2009, 08:11 AM
|  | Reformed Dane | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Breum, Denmark
Posts: 6,340
Thanks: 2,713
Thanked 1,013 Times in 735 Posts
| | | Top 3 Church historians ?
I would Luke a list og Tour top 3 historians and the name og their work and maybe some reasons for the 3 you have chosen, thanks | 
06-30-2009, 08:35 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,500
Thanks: 451
Thanked 307 Times in 194 Posts
| | |
Schaff!
As for a contemp, I like Mark Noll for the easy reading but he is in no way comprehensive.
__________________
Ewen
1689 LBCF
Assemblies of God Bible College 
Singapore
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ewenlin For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 08:40 AM
|  | Puritanboard Doctor | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Clarksburg, WV
Posts: 11,973
Thanks: 5,103
Thanked 2,644 Times in 1,604 Posts
| | |
I do not know if he would consider himself one but Iain Murray has done an excellent job recording the history of the Church in the 20th century.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Backwoods Presbyterian For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 09:08 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Alvord, TX
Posts: 89
Thanks: 12
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
| | |
I would add Wm Cunningham to the list
Hard to name just 3, so many these days specialize in a specific area.
John Hannah definitely be a very good modern day historian.
__________________
"Be killing sin or it will be killing you."--John Owen
Tim Goerz
Weatherford Presbyterian(PCA)
Alvord, Texas
| | The Following User Says Thank You to tgoerz For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 09:36 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: shelbyville, ky
Posts: 1,127
Thanks: 424
Thanked 447 Times in 294 Posts
| | |
Merle d'Aubigné - several volumes on the Reformation
__________________
Bob, elder, RBC Louisville. 1689 LBCF "... Of such also, or of those who make a credible profession of being such, all those particular churches consist, which constitute our Lord's visible kingdom. ... Consequently, all the subjects of His government must have spiritual dispositions, , and yield spiritual obedience- obedience proceeding from an enlightened understanding, an awakened conscience, and a renewed heart."- Abraham Booth 1788 | | The Following User Says Thank You to rbcbob For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 09:58 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
Eusebius has to be one, i would think, with all his work on Ecclesiastical History in the Early Church.
So in order, I would put him first because he came first. William Cunningham WOW, praise God for working through him. I'd have to put him on there and then probably Schaff.
1. Eusebius
2. Cunningham
3. Schaff
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Romans922 For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 11:12 AM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | |
Mark Knoll,
Kenneth Scott Latourette
Schaff -----Added 6/30/2009 at 11:12:52 EST-----
Don't forget Kenneth Scott Latourette; his is the best history of missions ever written.
Stephen Neill is also good for missions history.
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Pergamum For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 02:43 PM
|  | Meum cerebrum nocet | | Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: San Gabriel, CA
Posts: 7,493
Thanks: 1,762
Thanked 3,530 Times in 1,712 Posts
| | |
Merle d'Aubigné - I love his non-contemporary attitude that God is an actor in history's drama
P. Schaff
Wm. Cunningham
J. Gonzalez, G. Marsden, M. Noll, I. Murray, and D. Bebbington are also very good, but probably too recent to know the enduring value of their scholarship.
__________________
Dennis E. McFadden, Ex Mainline Baptist (in Remission)
Atherton Baptist Homes, CEO
First Baptist Church of Alhambra, Member, Transformation Ministries (CA)
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DMcFadden For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 02:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| |
D'Aubigne
Eusebius
Neander
For Schaff lovers, you may find this paper I did on Volume 1 of his history here.
Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA
"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Christusregnat For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Acton, Maine
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 366
Thanked 381 Times in 243 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by tgoerz
John Hannah definitely be a very good modern day historian. | He wasn't a bad offensive lineman, either.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Curt For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 07:42 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Plano TX
Posts: 2,023
Thanks: 623
Thanked 673 Times in 438 Posts
| | |
Dr. Hannah is an excellent teacher on the subject. He also has some reformed leanings, although he is at DTS.
__________________
Edward
Deacon
PCA
Texas
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Edward For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 09:37 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Temple, Georgia
Posts: 316
Thanks: 242
Thanked 30 Times in 20 Posts
| | |
In addition to Eusebius and Schaff I would Add J.N.D. Kelly.
__________________
J. David Kear
Sunday School Teacher
First Presbyterian Church
Villa Rica, Georgia
| | The Following User Says Thank You to J. David Kear For This Useful Post: | | 
07-01-2009, 09:18 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Tchula, MS
Posts: 2,567
Thanks: 135
Thanked 560 Times in 259 Posts
| | |
OOOOO, good one Mr. Kear.
| 
07-01-2009, 09:36 AM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,055
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,416 Times in 835 Posts
| | |
Schaff is definitely one of the three best. I think that Pelikan is a good contender. I'm not sure anyone has done history of doctrine better than he has (not even Harnack). Eusebius, d'Aubigne, Cunningham, Everett Ferguson are also all excellent.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post: | | 
07-01-2009, 09:55 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 677
Thanks: 189
Thanked 334 Times in 179 Posts
| | |
Philip Schaff: History of the Christian Church; Creeds of Christendom
Reinhold Seeberg: Textbook of the History of Doctrines (Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte)
William Cunningham: Historical Theology; The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation
Jaroslav Pelikan: The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, 5 vols.
Richard A. Muller: Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics
J. N. D. Kelly: Early Christian Doctrines -----Added 7/1/2009 at 09:55:14 EST-----
Etienne Gilson: The Spirit of Medieval Philosophy; Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages; The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas
__________________ Steven J. Carr (Sven) http://beholdingthebeauty.blogspot.com/ Eagan, MN PCA
"Weak is the effort of my heart / And cold my warmest thought / But when I see thee as thou art / I'll praise thee as I ought."--John Newton
Trophy Wife/Arm Candy: Crystal Ann  Children: Steven Jr. and Hannah Grace
| 
07-01-2009, 09:57 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Lacombe Alberta
Posts: 876
Thanks: 66
Thanked 246 Times in 72 Posts
| | |
1. Eusebius
2. A.J Whylie
3. Schaff
__________________ Pastor Jerrold H. Lewis. (Dipl. IT; Assc. A; B.Th; M.Th Candidate, PRTS)
Lacombe Free Reformed Church
"A hot iron, though blunt, will pierce sooner than a cold one, though sharper."
JOHN FLAVEL My Blog - Click HERE Our Church site - Click HERE | 
07-01-2009, 10:23 AM
| | Inactive User | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,636
Thanks: 717
Thanked 653 Times in 342 Posts
| |
We used Earle E. Cairns for our Church History class.
__________________
Nancy L./ www.foundersbaptist.org
Spring, TX
Your will, Lord Jesus Christ! Nothing more... nothing less... nothing else.
| 
07-01-2009, 01:45 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 64
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
| | |
Most Church Historians are either generalists or specialists. It is hard to break it down from there; but my list reflects men still living.
In terms of generalists: Noll (Turning Points is the best summary of Christian history), Nichols of Lancaster, very easy to read and well researched, and Justo Gonzalez (The Story of Christianity: excellent and thorough as he seeks to look at the theological, political, and sociological reasons Christians did things.)
In terms of specialists: Carl Trueman on the reformation ( I put him ahead of Schaefer, Scott Clark, Godfrey, Beeke, and Hoffecker) Michael Hayken on Patristics (we need a lot more men who know this time period. In terms of a sociological method I enjoy Rodney Stark's Cities of God and the Rise of Christianity.) And Nick Needham (4 volume set of 2000 Years of Christ's power). In terms of American history- George Marsden and DG Hart are both excellent. [I know that is 4; go ahead and sue me].
I do not like Eusebius, even though he is "the father of church history" because of his over all bias and favor of Constantine. He is helpful in the sense that when one reads him you understand how Christians thought and lived in that time.
| 
07-01-2009, 01:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 116
Thanks: 15
Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts
| | |
1. Eusebius
2. Schaff
3. The third and final one here a bit hard. John Fox would probably been one of the most influential. But personally, I like Everett Ferguson/ Tom Nettles.
__________________
David Jolley 
Currently SBC, may change 
Confessions: 1680-SLBCF/ 2000-BFAM
Escondido, CA
| 
07-01-2009, 08:24 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Portbalintrae, Antrim, Northern Ireland
Posts: 87
Thanks: 9
Thanked 59 Times in 33 Posts
| | |
1. Richard Muller
2. J.N.D Kelly
3. Henry/Owen Chadwick
__________________
Keith
Pastoral Worker and MDiv Student, PCI
Ballymoney, Northern Ireland
| 
07-01-2009, 08:30 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Fairview, NC
Posts: 478
Thanks: 295
Thanked 94 Times in 35 Posts
| | |
1) Philip Schaff
2) Eusebius
3) John Gerstner
__________________ Johnathan Tate Cornerstone Presbyterian Church (OPC), Arden, NC Husband of one, father of 3 (1 in-utero); Time's "Man of the Year" 2006 | 
07-01-2009, 08:44 PM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
| | |
I am no expert, but three that I have benefited from:
1. Michael Haykin
2. C. Gregg Singer (Theological Interpretation of American History)
3. Hughes Oliphant Old (Reading and preaching of the scriptures series.)
__________________ Rob VanDoodewaard Free Reformed Church
PRTS Student
Grand Rapids, MI | 
07-01-2009, 08:57 PM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 191
Thanked 2,436 Times in 1,347 Posts
| | |
I'm surprised at all the commendations of Schaff. I soldiered through two volumes and found him turgid, tendentious, pompous and really surprisingly uninformative given the sheer quantity of words.
| 
07-01-2009, 09:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 677
Thanks: 189
Thanked 334 Times in 179 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak I'm surprised at all the commendations of Schaff. I soldiered through two volumes and found him turgid, tendentious, pompous and really surprisingly uninformative given the sheer quantity of words. | The reason that there are so many commendations of Schaff is because he is brilliant. I might grant you that he is turgid, but then again, who wasn't back then? He was an academic and it seems to me that the academic style back then was to be excessive and complex. As far as being tendentious and pompous he says things we might disagree with, but that hardly qualifies as tendentious or pompous. As to being uninformative, how on earth can you say that? Whoever reads Schaff and comes away uninformed either is really really smart or hasn't taken care in reading him. Every time I pick up Schaff, I am amazed at the vastness of his learning, and the range of his abilities. I really hope that one day I can have a quarter of the knowledge and ability that he had.
| 
07-01-2009, 10:26 PM
| | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Hilton Head, SC
Posts: 303
Thanks: 238
Thanked 55 Times in 23 Posts
| | |
On a related note, is there any such thing as an "Adult Sunday School" curriculum that could give a rough outline of church history in a year's time - maybe something of a mix between lecture and video. Something to inform the lay person who is not going to pickup Schaff, etc. but who is interested enough to attend a weekly SS class for a year to become informed? Or am I dreaming?
__________________
Warren
Member, PCA
South Carolina
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek"
Romans 1:16
| 
07-01-2009, 11:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: May 2007 Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 743
Thanks: 91
Thanked 262 Times in 169 Posts
| | |
As far as Reformation history, I'm surprised no one has mentioned Heiko Oberman. I never knew the man, but one of my undergrad history profs was a student of his and he has been hugely influential in modern historical studies. Steven Ozment (another student of Oberman) is also worth reading and Richard Muller has also been mentioned a couple of times. On North American church history, Nathan Hatch (The Democratization of American Christianity), D.G. Hart, and George Marsden are excellent.
| 
07-02-2009, 07:30 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 201
Thanks: 64
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenInSC On a related note, is there any such thing as an "Adult Sunday School" curriculum that could give a rough outline of church history in a year's time - maybe something of a mix between lecture and video. Something to inform the lay person who is not going to pickup Schaff, etc. but who is interested enough to attend a weekly SS class for a year to become informed? Or am I dreaming? | In terms of Sunday School education curriculum I have no idea. Your best bet is to read Turning Points by Noll; Crossway sells another overview but I forget the author. I teach church history at a local Christian school and have lots of notes on the subject, perhaps I can turn it into a SS. curriculum. Most pastors study our history in great detail and are a tremendous resource.
| 
07-02-2009, 07:33 AM
|  | Use Bat Lip Balm | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 191
Thanked 2,436 Times in 1,347 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Sven Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak I'm surprised at all the commendations of Schaff. I soldiered through two volumes and found him turgid, tendentious, pompous and really surprisingly uninformative given the sheer quantity of words. | The reason that there are so many commendations of Schaff is because he is brilliant. I might grant you that he is turgid, but then again, who wasn't back then? He was an academic and it seems to me that the academic style back then was to be excessive and complex. As far as being tendentious and pompous he says things we might disagree with, but that hardly qualifies as tendentious or pompous. As to being uninformative, how on earth can you say that? Whoever reads Schaff and comes away uninformed either is really really smart or hasn't taken care in reading him. Every time I pick up Schaff, I am amazed at the vastness of his learning, and the range of his abilities. I really hope that one day I can have a quarter of the knowledge and ability that he had. | In my view his generalizations and summarizations alone probably disqualify him from brilliance. Certainly he had the ability to read a lot of material. But I don't think his bad style can be wholly blamed on the times.
| 
07-02-2009, 09:05 AM
| | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,210
Thanks: 1,764
Thanked 138 Times in 83 Posts
| | |
Alister McGrath- His books are very well written and easy to read, even when they deal with a technical subject, like Iustitia Dei.
Mark Noll- I put him in here just for his work done on American Christianity. His book America's God helped me greatly in understanding the religious atmosphere of 21st century American Christianity.
I haven't read much too many church historians, so I don't know if either of them qualify as the best, but they both write in an accessible style and seem to be non-partisan in their interpretations of history(i.e. Mark Noll disapproving of evangelicalism, yet writing The Age of Evangelicalism which convicted me more than ever that evangelicalism is an accurate representation of biblical Christianity).
What about historians dealing with the 1st and 2nd centuries of Christianity? Does anyone have any suggestion for a historian that specializes in that time?
__________________
Andrew C.
IFB
LBCF 1689
| 
07-02-2009, 11:51 AM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by py3ak I'm surprised at all the commendations of Schaff. I soldiered through two volumes and found him turgid, tendentious, pompous and really surprisingly uninformative given the sheer quantity of words. | Plus, he was a liberal, and his liberalism is the most dangerous kind: the kind that pretends to be orthodox. I did a book review you may want to read.
Cheers,
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |