The PuritanBoard  

Go Back   The PuritanBoard > The Church > Church History

Church History Discuss the History of the Christian Church

» Online Users: 81
23 members and 58 guests
calgal, CatherineL, David, EricP, Jack K, Karnes, Kilted_Rob, Montanablue, PactumServa72, Raj, Re4mdant, refbaptdude, Rogerant, satz, tabrooks, the Internet, TimV, WAWICRUZ, William Price
Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 02:58 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Christian Establishmentarianism Throughout the Ages

Oh, Be careful little eyes what you see!

Interesting resource with historical quotations, etc.

Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA

"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:02 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
Who runs the site?
__________________
Chris Coldwell, Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Dallas, Texas.
Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books
Westminster Letter Press
The Confessional Presbyterian Journal
The Blue Banner Archive

The Regulative Principle: The Scriptures are the “only infallible rule of faith and practice, no rite or ceremony ought to have a place in the public worship of God, which is not warranted in Scripture, either by direct precept or example, or by good and sufficient inference” (Samuel Miller).

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? Joining PB's Politics & Government Forum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:02 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?
__________________
Rich
PCA, Northern VA
Student, New Geneva Theological Seminary

WebsiteMaven - Web Hosting Reviews, Guides, and Advice to build and promote your web site.
SoliDeoGloria.com - A Community for Reformed Thought and Discussion

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:
Berean (09-20-2009), Christusregnat (06-30-2009), Joshua (06-30-2009), Josiah (06-30-2009), Theoretical (06-30-2009), toddpedlar (06-30-2009)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:05 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?


-----Added 6/30/2009 at 03:05:37 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
Who runs the site?
Not sure. That's why I said "Oh, Be careful little eyes!"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:05 PM
Whitefield's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Oh, Be careful little eyes what you see!

Interesting resource with historical quotations, etc.

Cheers,
You owe me two aspirins for the headache those graphics gave me.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post:
Berean (09-20-2009)
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:08 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
It is pretty ugly.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:09 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
It is pretty ugly.
It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:14 PM
Confessor's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...

So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?
__________________
Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook
In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH

When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH


“Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards-
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:15 PM
NaphtaliPress's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Blog Entries: 20
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
It is pretty ugly.
It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post:
Joshua (06-30-2009)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:17 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:17 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress View Post
It is pretty ugly.
It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!
Glad you got my joke.

Cheers,

-----Added 6/30/2009 at 03:17:45 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?


In the English dictionary.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:21 PM
toddpedlar's Avatar
Iron Dramatist
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 6,251
Thanks: 247
Thanked 2,367 Times in 1,238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
I think so...

but here's what was once regarded as the longest place name in the word... would love to hear Derek Thomas pronounce it


__________________
Todd K. Pedlar
member, First Congregational Church, (CCCC) Cresco, IA
http://inprincipiodeus.solideogloria.com
http://puritanwisdom.blogspot.com

"As God did not at first choose you because you were high, He will not now forsake you because you are low."
John Flavel in Keeping the Heart



Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post:
Berean (09-20-2009), Christusregnat (06-30-2009)
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:22 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...

So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?

This might be a good starting point:

Quote:
Civil magistrates may not assume to themselves the administration of the Word and sacraments; or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven; yet he has authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed, and all the ordainances of God duly settled, administrated, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he has power to call synods, to be present at them and to provide that whatsoever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God.
Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Christusregnat For This Useful Post:
Confessor (06-30-2009)
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:24 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:31 PM
Confessor's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
Thanks, Adam and Rich. Turns out I already knew what it was (and affirmed it) without linking the concept to its specific name.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 03:32 PM
Josiah's Avatar
Puritanboard Senior
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 1,533
Thanked 154 Times in 95 Posts
Who owns this website?
__________________
Josiah Lovett
Member of
Trinity OPC
Bothell WA
Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Westminster Standards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 04:09 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.
It could be argued, however, that the revision merely represents a non-denominational establishment. I agree that it does preclude the original version of the establishment, and that the trajectory was toward what we see in the modern world. But, for a magistrate to be called a "nursing father" to the church, and still be required (in the catechetical explanations) to support and maintain the church is a mild form of establishmentarianism which every office bearer in revised WCF churches agrees to (barring, of course, exceptions).

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:10 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:26 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
I believe Rev. Winzer is right.

However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.

It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:30 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
__________________
Pergamum


"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:32 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
I believe Rev. Winzer is right.

However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.

It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.

Cheers,


True enough. Historically there are some questions about Constantine's motivations in calling the Council but I believe the Lord used the Providence, whatever his personal motivations, for the good of the Church. Not all was good out of that involvement as he introduced the idea of vestments into the Church as well but I don't want to get off track.

I think the interesting discussion is how a government such as ours could deal with heresy or if it requires a radical Reformation. Part of me wouldn't mind seeing the government protecting people from heresy but they don't really have the tools necessary to detect it given our culture's captivity to non-Christian philosophies.

I'm not against the notion of Establishmentarianism in principle but am weary of certain types.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post:
Josiah (06-30-2009), Theoretical (06-30-2009)
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:34 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:37 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:52 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
Pergamum,

The prophet's description is concerning the Messianic age being a time when the kings will be like nursing fathers to God's children. To see what a nursing father is like would not require much more than reading 1 & 2 Samuel, and 1 & 2 Kings, concerning the "good things" that were done by kings.

What role would I want the senator to play in my congregation? I suppose that would depend on what my congregation was doing, teaching, promoting, etc.

A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:53 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
So you would favor a 3rd revision on this point? Maybe something in between the original and the 1788 revisions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:54 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
I think the same could be stated concerning Romans 13. The principal that the magistrate is God's servant, and to administer His vengence is universally applicable, regardless of the personal or official status of a given magistrate. Just as the rules don't change for faithless husbands; the rules are the same. The church's task is to warn the adulterer, as well as the adulterous magistrate.

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:55 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?


A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways

Cheers,
What methods would he employ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 05:56 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands.

-----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post

What methods would he employ?
Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.

Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you?

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:07 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands.

-----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST-----

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post

What methods would he employ?
Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.

Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you?

Cheers,
"a good start"? GULP.

If you start there, where will you end?





By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:11 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum View Post
By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?
I spell God with a capital "g"

Did you read the cite I sent? I introduced a thread on establishmentarianism throughout the centuries. I don't care if Theonomy is an unpopular term.

Cheers,
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:16 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
For those looking for a good description of the Reformed establishmentarian conception, see Turretin's Institutes, Topic 18, Question 34. Be sure to read the whole chapter. It will sum it up nicely.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI

They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post:
Pergamum (06-30-2009)
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:20 PM
Semper Fidelis's Avatar
Dux Tyrranus
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock View Post
For those looking for a good description of the Reformed establishmentarian conception, see Turretin's Institutes, Topic 18, Question 34. Be sure to read the whole chapter. It will sum it up nicely.
Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:24 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post

Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online.
I don't. As far as I know, there are no electronic editions of Turretin in English; only Latin. But, check your PM box.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:42 PM
Pergamum's Avatar
The MacDaddy
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post

Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online.
I don't. As far as I know, there are no electronic editions of Turretin in English; only Latin. But, check your PM box.
Can I check my PM box too, I would love to read this. ME TOO ME TOO!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:52 PM
Prufrock's Avatar
Arbitrary Moderation
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
Some main points:

1. Although princes may not compel any to faith or religion, nevertheless they have the duty to establish, nourish and protect the true faith. While he may not compel any, he is, however, as a caring father to admonish and encourage his subjects to the faith, and to admonish those ministers delinquent in their duty, and also through external means to ensure good order in the church.

2. Even as bishops may not legislate nor plead in court, so the magistrate may not take upon himself the ministry of the word or sacrament; nor is he concerned with religion as it is internal and pertains to the conscience, but only externally, as to good order in the kingdom.

3. Private belief and conviction may not be punished; only public and outward teaching and subversion. Therefore, while the true faith and church is to be established (and no other religion), nevertheless not only are none to be compelled thereunto, but private belief and scruple (and practice) are outside his sphere.

4. Even as the magistrate is not to punish all sins, neither is he to punish all heresies, nor to punish all equally, remembering that his duties are to nurture his subjects, and to maintain good order, whereby only the most notorious and subversive, irreconcilable heretics are to be punished with extreme measures.

Last edited by Prufrock; 06-30-2009 at 07:43 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post:
Semper Fidelis (06-30-2009)
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:54 PM
Hippo's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 179
Thanked 613 Times in 355 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism

Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
The mighty Wikipedia states that:

Longest_word_in_English Longest_word_in_English

antidisestablishmentarianism is the longest non-coined and nontechnical word in the English dictionary.

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis is the longest word in a major dictionary, which according to the Oxford English Dictionary is, "a factitious word alleged to mean 'a lung disease caused by the inhalation of very fine silica dust, causing inflammation in the lungs.'

While the longest word in a Shakespear play is "Honorificabilitudinitatibus"
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England

"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
The Following User Says Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post:
Semper Fidelis (06-30-2009)
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 06:59 PM
Confessor's Avatar
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
189819 letters for the longest ever word?! That has to be a typo.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009, 11:39 PM
Christusregnat's Avatar
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor View Post
189819 letters for the longest ever word?! That has to be a typo.
No..... that has to be ............... WIKIPEDIA!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009, 01:07 AM
Romans 8 Verse 28's Avatar
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Loganville, Georgia
Posts: 256
Thanks: 207
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis View Post
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?
__________________
Soli Deo Gloria,
Jeff - FCC - Georgia



"Every word of God is pure" — Proverbs 30:5

"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it." — Patrick Henry, A.D. 1775
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 PuritanBoard.com
Hosted by WebsiteMaven - helping ministries with web hosting advice, reviews, and design.
67 Westminster Abbey © Confessional Presbyterian Presses - used with permission.
Add Our Custom Button to your Google Toolbar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69