» Site Navigation | | | » Online Users: 81 | | 23 members and 58 guests | | calgal, CatherineL, David, EricP, Jack K, Karnes, Kilted_Rob, Montanablue, PactumServa72, Raj, Re4mdant, refbaptdude, Rogerant, satz, tabrooks, the Internet, TimV, WAWICRUZ, William Price | | Most users ever online was 856, 07-06-2007 at 12:19 AM. | |  | 
06-30-2009, 02:58 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | | Christian Establishmentarianism Throughout the Ages
Oh, Be careful little eyes what you see!
Interesting resource with historical quotations, etc.
Cheers,
__________________
Adam B., Wine Country, California, PCA
"I fear not to hold with Junius, de Politia Mosis cap. 6, that he who was punishable by death under that Judicial law, is punishable by death still; and he who was not punished by death then, is not to be punished by death now."
| 
06-30-2009, 03:02 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
| | |
Who runs the site?
| 
06-30-2009, 03:02 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | |
Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site?
| | The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site? |  -----Added 6/30/2009 at 03:05:37 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress Who runs the site? | Not sure. That's why I said "Oh, Be careful little eyes!"
| 
06-30-2009, 03:05 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Georgetown, IN
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 158
Thanked 645 Times in 378 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Oh, Be careful little eyes what you see!
Interesting resource with historical quotations, etc.
Cheers, | You owe me two aspirins for the headache those graphics gave me.
__________________
Lance G. Marshall
Pastor
Georgetown, Indiana
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Whitefield For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:08 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
| | |
It is pretty ugly.
| 
06-30-2009, 03:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress It is pretty ugly. | It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities! | 
06-30-2009, 03:14 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| |
I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...
So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism?
__________________ Ben Maas. . . . .Facebook In college, attending First Presbyterian Church (PCUSA), Ada, OH, and
Belle Center Reformed Presbyterian Church (RPCNA), Belle Center, OH When at home, attending Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC), Mansfield, OH “Prayer is as natural an expression of faith as breathing is of life.”
-Jonathan Edwards- | 
06-30-2009, 03:15 PM
|  | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 12,501
Thanks: 1,589
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,112 Posts
| |
That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that. Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress It is pretty ugly. | It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!  | | | The Following User Says Thank You to NaphtaliPress For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:17 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | |
On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary?
| 
06-30-2009, 03:17 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress That's right; all establishment needs is another ugly site promoting it. And anonymously on top of that. Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress It is pretty ugly. | It's reassuring to know that we all have such important priorities!  | | Glad you got my joke.
Cheers, -----Added 6/30/2009 at 03:17:45 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary? |
In the English dictionary.
| 
06-30-2009, 03:21 PM
|  | Iron Dramatist | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 6,251
Thanks: 247
Thanked 2,367 Times in 1,238 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary? | I think so...
but here's what was once regarded as the longest place name in the word... would love to hear Derek Thomas pronounce it | | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to toddpedlar For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:22 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor I was hoping to see some comments that didn't have to do with the graphics of the site...
So what is a good working definition of establishmentarianism? |
This might be a good starting point: Quote: |
Civil magistrates may not assume to themselves the administration of the Word and sacraments; or the power of the keys of the kingdom of heaven; yet he has authority, and it is his duty, to take order that unity and peace be preserved in the Church, that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed, and all the ordainances of God duly settled, administrated, and observed. For the better effecting whereof, he has power to call synods, to be present at them and to provide that whatsoever is transacted in them be according to the mind of God.
| Cheers,
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Christusregnat For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 03:24 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | |
The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB.
| 
06-30-2009, 03:31 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| |
Thanks, Adam and Rich. Turns out I already knew what it was (and affirmed it) without linking the concept to its specific name. | 
06-30-2009, 03:32 PM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Redmond WA
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 1,533
Thanked 154 Times in 95 Posts
| | |
Who owns this website?
| 
06-30-2009, 04:09 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis The original WCF is establishmentarian while the American revisions strip out those portions. I know Rev. Winzer faithfully represents the establishmentarian view on the PB. | It could be argued, however, that the revision merely represents a non-denominational establishment. I agree that it does preclude the original version of the establishment, and that the trajectory was toward what we see in the modern world. But, for a magistrate to be called a "nursing father" to the church, and still be required (in the catechetical explanations) to support and maintain the church is a mild form of establishmentarianism which every office bearer in revised WCF churches agrees to (barring, of course, exceptions).
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 05:10 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | |
I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy.
| 
06-30-2009, 05:26 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy. | I believe Rev. Winzer is right.
However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.
It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 05:30 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | |
How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists?
__________________
Pergamum
"If a commission by an earthly king is considered a honor, how can a commission by a Heavenly King be considered a sacrifice?"
-- David Livingstone
| 
06-30-2009, 05:32 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis I really haven't studied the issue in great depth but I know that Rev. Winzer has repeatedly noted that it really requires a Christian magistrate to work itself out in the way that the WCF intended and it would be difficult under our current form of government to have the current administration calling a Synod to resolve a theological controversy. | I believe Rev. Winzer is right.
However, the same agument about the difficulty of such an arrangement would have seemed very real to the Christians in the late 200s, early 300s, and yet they were emancipated not long thereafter, with Nicea being called within a quarter of a century.
It reminds me of something I read recently about many of the presbyters at Nicea having mutilated faces, ears, etc. from the persecution throughout their lifetime, to then command kings and empires.
Cheers, |
True enough. Historically there are some questions about Constantine's motivations in calling the Council but I believe the Lord used the Providence, whatever his personal motivations, for the good of the Church. Not all was good out of that involvement as he introduced the idea of vestments into the Church as well but I don't want to get off track.
I think the interesting discussion is how a government such as ours could deal with heresy or if it requires a radical Reformation. Part of me wouldn't mind seeing the government protecting people from heresy but they don't really have the tools necessary to detect it given our culture's captivity to non-Christian philosophies.
I'm not against the notion of Establishmentarianism in principle but am weary of certain types.
| | The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Semper Fidelis For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 05:34 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | |
So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward?
| 
06-30-2009, 05:37 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward? | I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original.
| 
06-30-2009, 05:52 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists? | Pergamum,
The prophet's description is concerning the Messianic age being a time when the kings will be like nursing fathers to God's children. To see what a nursing father is like would not require much more than reading 1 & 2 Samuel, and 1 & 2 Kings, concerning the "good things" that were done by kings.
What role would I want the senator to play in my congregation? I suppose that would depend on what my congregation was doing, teaching, promoting, etc.
A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 05:53 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward? | I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original. | So you would favor a 3rd revision on this point? Maybe something in between the original and the 1788 revisions?
| 
06-30-2009, 05:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward? | I'm skating on thin ice here but I think the particular clauses with respect to the Magistrate could be modified a bit to talk about how the principle would operate when the Magistrate is completely hostile to the Christian religion. It doesn't seem like that's the pre-supposition in the original. | I think the same could be stated concerning Romans 13. The principal that the magistrate is God's servant, and to administer His vengence is universally applicable, regardless of the personal or official status of a given magistrate. Just as the rules don't change for faithless husbands; the rules are the same. The church's task is to warn the adulterer, as well as the adulterous magistrate.
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 05:55 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum How could a civil magistrate be a nursing father in a church? What role would you want your senator to play in your congregation? How would you safeguard poor dissenting baptists? |
A magistrate may safeguard poor dissenting baptists by helping them see the error of their ways
Cheers, | What methods would he employ?
| 
06-30-2009, 05:56 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward? | It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands. -----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum
What methods would he employ? | Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.
Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you?
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 06:07 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Christusregnat Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum So, this would mean that the 1788 revision of the WCF was NOT a step forward? | It depends in what point of the spectrum one stands. -----Added 6/30/2009 at 05:56:14 EST----- Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum
What methods would he employ? | Synods, councils, instruction, warning, rebuke; that would be a good start.
Were you hoping I'd go Zwinglian on you?
Cheers, | "a good start"? GULP.  
If you start there, where will you end?
By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform?
| 
06-30-2009, 06:11 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Pergamum By the way, sensing the unpopularity and steam of that other word "theonomy," is your use of the term establishmentarianism a new trend for the same platform? | I spell God with a capital "g"
Did you read the cite I sent? I introduced a thread on establishmentarianism throughout the centuries. I don't care if Theonomy is an unpopular term.
Cheers,
| 
06-30-2009, 06:16 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
For those looking for a good description of the Reformed establishmentarian conception, see Turretin's Institutes, Topic 18, Question 34. Be sure to read the whole chapter. It will sum it up nicely.
__________________
Paul Korte
OPC
Flint, MI They who perceive in themselves discoveries of the divine goodness, so full and absolutely perfect, and who make them the subject of earnest meditation, will never embrace new doctrines, by which the very grace they feel so powerfully in themselves is thrown into the shade. --John Calvin
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? | | The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 06:20 PM
|  | Dux Tyrranus | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Northern Virgnia
Posts: 17,812
Thanks: 2,442
Thanked 6,028 Times in 2,447 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock For those looking for a good description of the Reformed establishmentarian conception, see Turretin's Institutes, Topic 18, Question 34. Be sure to read the whole chapter. It will sum it up nicely. | Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online.
| 
06-30-2009, 06:24 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online. | I don't. As far as I know, there are no electronic editions of Turretin in English; only Latin. But, check your PM box.
| 
06-30-2009, 06:42 PM
|  | The MacDaddy | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,394
Thanks: 2,680
Thanked 2,830 Times in 1,466 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Prufrock Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis
Do you have an electronic version? I can't find Turretin online. | I don't. As far as I know, there are no electronic editions of Turretin in English; only Latin. But, check your PM box. | Can I check my PM box too, I would love to read this. ME TOO ME TOO!
| 
06-30-2009, 06:52 PM
|  | Arbitrary Moderation | | Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Flint, MI
Posts: 2,907
Thanks: 824
Thanked 1,699 Times in 743 Posts
| | |
Some main points:
1. Although princes may not compel any to faith or religion, nevertheless they have the duty to establish, nourish and protect the true faith. While he may not compel any, he is, however, as a caring father to admonish and encourage his subjects to the faith, and to admonish those ministers delinquent in their duty, and also through external means to ensure good order in the church.
2. Even as bishops may not legislate nor plead in court, so the magistrate may not take upon himself the ministry of the word or sacrament; nor is he concerned with religion as it is internal and pertains to the conscience, but only externally, as to good order in the kingdom.
3. Private belief and conviction may not be punished; only public and outward teaching and subversion. Therefore, while the true faith and church is to be established (and no other religion), nevertheless not only are none to be compelled thereunto, but private belief and scruple (and practice) are outside his sphere.
4. Even as the magistrate is not to punish all sins, neither is he to punish all heresies, nor to punish all equally, remembering that his duties are to nurture his subjects, and to maintain good order, whereby only the most notorious and subversive, irreconcilable heretics are to be punished with extreme measures.
Last edited by Prufrock; 06-30-2009 at 07:43 PM.
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Prufrock For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 06:54 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 179
Thanked 613 Times in 355 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis On the topic of discussing establishmentarianism, I think it's cool that there's this word in the dictionary: antidisestablishmentarianism
Is it still the longest word in the dictionary? | The mighty Wikipedia states that:
antidisestablishmentarianism is the longest non-coined and nontechnical word in the English dictionary.
Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis is the longest word in a major dictionary, which according to the Oxford English Dictionary is, "a factitious word alleged to mean 'a lung disease caused by the inhalation of very fine silica dust, causing inflammation in the lungs.'
While the longest word in a Shakespear play is "Honorificabilitudinitatibus"
__________________
Mike
London City Presbyterian Church
London
England
"Surely, we wish to be orthodox, but we must first learn what real orthodoxy is. Surely, we wish to be progressive, but we must first have a basis to progress from."
| | The Following User Says Thank You to Hippo For This Useful Post: | | 
06-30-2009, 06:59 PM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Ada, OH
Posts: 1,991
Thanks: 488
Thanked 492 Times in 326 Posts
| | |
189819 letters for the longest ever word?! That has to be a typo.
| 
06-30-2009, 11:39 PM
|  | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Cali.
Posts: 3,891
Thanks: 1,996
Thanked 998 Times in 572 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Confessor 189819 letters for the longest ever word?! That has to be a typo. | No..... that has to be ............... WIKIPEDIA!!
| 
07-01-2009, 01:07 AM
|  | Puritanboard Freshman | | Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Loganville, Georgia
Posts: 256
Thanks: 207
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Semper Fidelis Are you sure this thread doesn't belong under Computers and Technology forum as an example of how not to design a web site? | |  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |