» Site Navigation | | | |  | 
03-11-2009, 09:15 AM
|  | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 777
Thanks: 69
Thanked 111 Times in 68 Posts
| | | WTS Innerancy and Hermeneutic
Many of you may remember this book edited by Harvie Conn. I've just finished Sinclair Ferguson's chapter "How Does the Bible Look at Itself?".
To start the dialogue, here is a citation from him in his section on Authority:
"If Scripture made no claim to divine inspiration, it could still possess authority - as the unique (and to that extent, authoritative) witness of the people of God to the acts of God in history and as the source book of all original Christian tradition. It could even be regarded as possessing supreme authority for the faith and life of the church."
Ferguson seems to be indicating here that the Bible's authority is not dependent on it being inspired - that the basis for its authority resides elsewhere or, at least only partially resides on inspiration. Based on the context of the chapter, I take Ferguson to mean by authority the same thing as infallibility. I could be wrong on that count. If he does mean the same thing, then I don't see how one can give up inspiration and still retain the doctrine of infallibility. If the words are not to be taken as Paul says "the very words of God" then on what other basis is infallibility maintained? Ferguson says that such a basis could be found in the fact that it is "a unique witness of the people of God to the acts of God in history and as the source book of all original Christian tradition". But absent inspiration, it is only unique to the extent the church recognizes it as such which would turn sola scriptura on its head and render a more Roman
Catholic understanding of the Bible. I guess we could say by "unique" we mean "there are no other Bibles out there" and so in that sense it is alone. But the mere quality of being the lone book we call the Bible seems inadequate as a base for holding to infallibility.
I may have misunderstood Ferguson on this matter...any thoughts?
__________________
Joel Batts
Christ Presbyterian Church (PCA) - Memphis, TN
I believe that many would find that the heart sings unbidden while they are working their way through a tough bit of theology with a pipe in their teeth and a pencil in their hand. - CS Lewis
| 
03-11-2009, 09:26 AM
| | Puritanboard Sophomore | | Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Québec,Québec; Canada
Posts: 512
Thanks: 5
Thanked 118 Times in 79 Posts
| | |
I do think you are misunderstanding him. I take that quote to mean that assuming that God did not specifically say through the apostles and prophets in the Bible that it is directly from God the internal evidence (also by the testimony of the HOly Spirit) is so clear of its authority that it ought to be the authority. The fact that it claims divine authority explicately is just icing on the cake giving us no excuse to not not obey it.
__________________
J. P. Grigoletti II * Lay-man * Église Réformée du Québec
Québec, Québec Canada * Member: Église Reformée St. Marc http://Grigoletti.blogspot.com - blog
<<There are three things necessary for thee to know, that thou, enjoying this comfort, mayest live and die happily: the first, how great your sins and miseries are; the second, how thou may be delivered from all thy sins and miseries; the third, how thou shall express thy gratitude to God for such deliverance.>>
| 
03-11-2009, 09:31 AM
|  | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,434
Thanks: 493
Thanked 379 Times in 240 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by jogri17 I do think you are misunderstanding him. I take that quote to mean that assuming that God did not specifically say through the apostles and prophets in the Bible that it is directly from God the internal evidence (also by the testimony of the HOly Spirit) is so clear of its authority that it ought to be the authority. The fact that it claims divine authority explicately is just icing on the cake giving us no excuse to not not obey it. | I got that impression as well.
__________________
Chris Thomas | SBC-Founders | Fairbanks, AK "Whatever the cause, the Calvinists were the only fighting Protestants. It was they whose faith gave them courage to stand up for the Reformation. In England, Scotland, France, Holland, they,... did the work, and but for them the Reformation would have been crushed... If it had not been for Calvinists,... and whatever you like to call them, the Pope and Philip would have won, and we should either be Papists or Socialists." ~ Sir John Skelton | 
03-11-2009, 09:49 AM
|  | Puritanboard Senior | | Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: North Texas
Posts: 2,187
Thanks: 700
Thanked 818 Times in 448 Posts
| |
I don't think Ferguson would equate "authority" with "infallibility" as you seem to in the OP. I believe he is suggesting that the Bible is inherently authoritative (as an historical testimony and witness) by its nature, even if it did not internally claim divine inspiration. However, it does claim divine inspiration which makes it emphatically authoritative.
Not given the context of his statement, it is hard to speculate any further.
__________________
Jim
1689 LBCF
Independent Bible Church
North Texas, USA
|  | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |